33438 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.
111 / Friday, June 9, 2006 / Notices
NPA: Winston-Salem Industries for the
Blind, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Contracting Activity: Defense Commissary
Agency (DeCA), Fort Lee, Virginia.
Services
Service Type/Location: Custodial Services,
Denver Federal Center, Buildings 41, 44,
and 48, Denver, Colorado.
NPA: Aspen Diversified Industries, Inc.,
Colorado Springs, Colorado.
Contracting Activity: GSA, PBS Region 8,
Denver, Colorado.
Service Type/Location: Custodial Services,
GSA, Federal Courthouse, 1101 Court
Street, Lynchburg, Virginia.
NPA: Goodwill Industries of the Valleys, Inc.,
Roanoke, Virginia.
Contracting Activity: GSA, PBS, Region 3
(3PMT), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Service Type/Location: Grounds/Custodial/
Security Services, Lake Okeechobee and
Outlying Areas, Army Corps of
Engineers, Lake Okeechobee, Florida.
NPA: Gulfstream Goodwill Industries, Inc.,
West Palm Beach, Florida.
Contracting Activity: U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Jacksonville, Florida.
Service Type/Location: Laundry Service
At the following locations: DiLorenzo
Army Health Clinic, Pentagon,
Arlington, Virginia, Kimbrough
Ambulatory Care Center, Fort Meade,
Maryland, Malcolm Grow Medical
Center, Andrews AFB, Maryland.
National Naval Medical Center, Naval
Surface Warfare Center, Bethesda,
Maryland.
Naval Health Clinic, Patuxent River Naval
Station, Patuxent River, Maryland.
Walter Reed Army Medical Center, 6900
Georgia Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
NPA: Rappahannock Goodwill Industries,
Inc., Fredericksburg, Virginia.
Contracting Activity: North Atlantic
Contracting Office, Washington, DC.
Service Type/Location: Warehousing,
National Institute of Environmental
Health Science, Research Triangle Park,
Durham, North Carolina.
NPA: Employment Source, Inc., Fayetteville,
North Carolina.
Contracting Activity: National Institute of
Environmental Health Science, Durham,
North Carolina.
Deletions
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
I certify that the following action will
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The major factors considered for this
certification were:
1. If approved, the action may result
in additional reporting, recordkeeping
or other compliance requirements for
small entities.
2. If approved, the action may result
in authorizing small entities to furnish
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
the products to the Government.
3. There are no known regulatory
alternatives which would accomplish
the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-
O’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48c) in
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:01 Jun 08, 2006 Jkt 208001
connection with the products proposed
for deletion from the Procurement List.
End of Certification
The following products are proposed
for deletion from the Procurement List:
Products
Product/NSNs: Shampoo, Coal Tar, 6505–
00–997–8531—Shampoo, Coal Tar,
Shampoo, Medicated, 6505–01–326–
0175—Shampoo, Medicated, 6505–00–
116–1362—Shampoo, Medicated.
NPA: NYSARC, Inc., Seneca-Cayuga Counties
Chapter, Waterloo, New York.
Contracting Activity: Veterans Affairs
National Acquisition Center, Hines,
Illinois.
Contracting Activity: Defense Supply Center
Philadelphia, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania.
Patrick Rowe,
Deputy Executive Director.
[FR Doc. E6–8978 Filed 6–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353–01–P
BROADCASTING BOARD OF
GOVERNORS
Notice of Meeting; Sunshine Act
DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, June 12, 2006,
2–3 p.m.
PLACE: RFE/RL Broadcast Center, Room
546, Prague, Czech Republic.
CLOSED MEETING: The members of the
Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG)
will meet in closed session to review
and discuss a number of issues relating
to U.S. Government-funded non-
military international broadcasting.
They will address internal procedural,
budgetary, and personnel issues, as well
as sensitive foreign policy issues
relating to potential options in the U.S.
international broadcasting field. This
meeting is closed because if open it
likely would either disclose matters that
would be properly classified to be kept
secret in the interest of foreign policy
under the appropriate executive order (5
U.S.C. 552b.(c)(1)) or would disclose
information the premature disclosure of
which would be likely to significantly
frustrate implementation of a proposed
agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B))
In addition, part of the discussion will
relate solely to the internal personnel
and organizational issues of the BBG or
the International Broadcasting Bureau.
(5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) and (6)).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Persons interested in obtaining more
information should contact Carol
Booker at (202) 203–4545.
PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
Dated: June 6, 2006.
Carol Booker,
Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 06–5299 Filed 6–7–06; 12:37 pm]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–803]
Heavy Forged Hand Tools, Finished or
Unfinished, With or Without Handles,
from the People’s Republic of China:
Extension of Time Limit for the Final
Results of the 14th Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 9, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicole Bankhead, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 9, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–9068.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 8, 2006, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on Heavy
Forged Hand Tools, Finished or
Unfinished, With or Without Handles,
from the People’s Republic of China,
covering the period February 1, 2004,
through January 31, 2005. See Heavy
Forged Hand Tools, Finished or
Unfinished, With or Without Handles,
From the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Administrative
Reviews and Preliminary Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews, 71 FR 11580
(March 8, 2006).
Extension of Time Limit for Final
Results
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’), and section 351.213(h)(1) of the
Department’s regulations, the
Department shall issue the preliminary
results of an administrative review
within 245 days after the last day of the
anniversary month of the date of
publication of the antidumping duty
order. The Act further provides that the
Department shall issue the final results
of a review within 120 days after the
date on which the notice of the
09JNN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 111 / Friday, June 9, 2006 / Notices
preliminary results was published in the
Federal Register. However, if the
Department determines that it is not
practicable to complete the review
within this time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and section
351.213(h)(2) of the Department’s
regulations allow the Department to
extend the 245-day period to 365 days
and the 120-day period to 180 days.
The Department determines that the
completion of the final results of this
review within the statutory time period
is not practicable. The Department
requires additional time to analyze
comments regarding the four companies
involved in the instant review, each of
which exported subject merchandise in
at least one of the four classes or kinds
of merchandise covered by this order,
along with complex affiliation and agent
sale issues. Therefore, in accordance
with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the
Department is extending the time period
for issuing the final results of this
review by 25 days until July 31, 2006.
Dated: June 2, 3006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–9006 Filed 6–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–489–806]
Certain Pasta from Turkey: Preliminary
Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
is conducting an administrative review
of the countervailing duty order on
certain pasta from Turkey for the period
January 1, 2004, through December 31,
2004. We have preliminarily determined
that Gidasa Sabanci Gida Sanayi ve
Ticaret A.S. did not receive
countervailable subsidies during the
period of review. If the final results
remain the same as these preliminary
results, we will instruct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection to liquidate
without regard to countervailing duties,
as detailed in the ‘‘Preliminary Results
of Review’’ section of this notice.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results
(see the ‘‘Public Comment’’ section of
this notice).
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 9, 2006.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:01 Jun 08, 2006 Jkt 208001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brandon Farlander or Audrey Twyman,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–0182 and (202)
482–3534, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 24, 1996, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published in the Federal Register the
countervailing duty order on certain
pasta from Turkey. See Notice of
Countervailing Duty Order: Certain
Pasta from Turkey, 61 FR 38546 (July
24, 1996). On July 1, 2005, the
Department published in the Federal
Register, a notice of ‘‘Opportunity to
Request Administrative Review’’ of this
countervailing duty order. See
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review, 70 FR 38099
(July 1, 2005). We received one request
for review on July 29, 2005, and
initiated the review for calendar year
2004, on August 29, 2005. See Initiation
of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Administrative Reviews and
Requests for Revocation in Part, 70 FR
51009 (August 29, 2005). In accordance
with 19 CFR 351.213(b), this review of
the order covers Gidasa Sabanci Gida
Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (‘‘Gidasa’’).
On September 8, 2005, we issued
countervailing duty questionnaires to
the Government of Turkey and Gidasa.
We received responses to our
questionnaires on November 14 and 17,
2005, and issued supplemental
questionnaires on January 31, 2006.
Responses to the supplemental
questionnaires were received on
February 23, and March 17, 2006.
On March 14, 2006, the Department
postponed the preliminary results of
review until June 5, 2006. See Certain
Pasta from Turkey: Extension of Time
Limit for Preliminary Results of the
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review, 71 FR 13966 (March 20, 2006).
On April 5, 2006, we provided Gidasa
an opportunity to place information on
the record concerning the world market
price for durum wheat, and
international freight rates. We received
Gidasa’s submission on April 17, 2006.
Scope of Order
Covered by the order are shipments of
certain non–egg dry pasta in packages of
five pounds (2.27 kilograms) or less,
whether or not enriched or fortified or
containing milk or other optional
PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703
33439
ingredients such as chopped vegetables,
vegetable purees, milk, gluten, diastases,
vitamins, coloring and flavorings, and
up to two percent egg white. The pasta
covered by this order is typically sold in
the retail market, in fiberboard or
cardboard cartons or polyethylene or
polypropylene bags, of varying
dimensions.
Excluded from the order are
refrigerated, frozen, or canned pastas, as
well as all forms of egg pasta, with the
exception of non–egg dry pasta
containing up to two percent egg white.
The merchandise under review is
currently classifiable under subheading
1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience
and customs purposes, our written
description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
Scope Ruling
To date, the Department has issued
the following scope ruling:
On October 26, 1998, the Department
self–initiated a scope inquiry to
determine whether a package weighing
over five pounds as a result of allowable
industry tolerances may be within the
scope of the countervailing duty order.
On May 24, 1999, we issued a final
scope ruling finding that, effective
October 26, 1998, pasta in packages
weighing or labeled up to (and
including) five pounds four ounces is
within the scope of the countervailing
duty order. See Memorandum from John
Brinkman to Richard Moreland, dated
May 24, 1999, which is on file in the
Central Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’) in Room
B–099 of the main Commerce building.
Period of Review
The period of review (‘‘POR’’) for
which we are measuring subsidies is
from January 1, 2004, through December
31, 2004.
Analysis of Programs
I. Programs Preliminarily Determined
To Not Provide a Countervailable
Benefit
1. Purchases of Domestic Wheat from
the Turkish Grain Board (‘‘TMO’’) under
Decree 2003/5468
There are three main ways for Turkish
pasta producers to obtain wheat for
semolina pasta: (1) from the TMO, (2)
from local growers and traders, or (3)
through imports. Prices for wheat in
Turkey are set above world market
prices as part of a price support scheme
benefitting domestic wheat growers.
However, companies holding an Inward
Processing License can obtain lower
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM 09JNN1