Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
266
solution GOR results in values that are low by 10% or more. The
stock-tank GOR can be estimated with3
log RST=A +A2 log -y0+A3 log "Ygsp+A4 log PsP
+As log Tsp,
(1)
(2)
(3)
+ 1.25T
(4)
(5)
The equations can be used for any pressure equal to or below the
bubblepoint by inserting the corresponding value of solution GOR
estimated as discussed above. The resulting FVF value will be within
5 % of laboratory-measured values if accurate values of solution
GOR are used. If solution GOR's are obtained with Eqs. 2 and 3,
the accuracy of the resulting FVF values will be sorne unlrnown
combination ofthe 15% accuracy ofEqs. 2 and 3 and the 5% accuracy of Eqs. 4 and 5. Do not use at temperatures above 325F.
SPE Reservoir Engineering, May 1991
exp[c0(p,,-p)],
(6)
where FVF at the bubblepoint is estimated as discussed above. Estimation of the coefficient of isothennal compressibility of oil, eO,
is discussed later.
Oil Density at Reservoir Conditions, PoR Eq. 7 may be used to
calculare> the density of the oil in the reservoir at bubblepoint pressure (and below) from estimated values of B0 and Rs.
PoR =(psTO +0.01351R/y g)IB0,
(7)
(8)
Coefflcient of lsothermal Compressibility of Oil, c0 The coefficient of isothennal compressibility of ol, often called oil compressibility, is defined for pressures above the bubblepoint as
Co = -(llV)(iW/op)r,
(9a)
c0= -(l!B0)(0B0)/op)r,
(9b)
(9c)
Or C0 =(1fp0)(op0/op)r
c0
=-;J(~ ) -B/;s )J
7
(10)
(11)
+0.184 ln(Rs1,)
(12)
The results are accurate to within 10% at pressures above 500 psia.
Below 500 psia, the accuracy is within 20%. Ifthe bubblepoint pressure is known, the accuracy of estimates of oil compressibility at
pressures below bubblepoint can be improved by using?
ln(c0)= -7.573-1.450 ln(p)-0.383 ln(p1,)+ 1.402 ln(T)
+0.256 ln('YAP1)+0.449ln(Rs1,)
(13)
(14)
(15)
P.o =A.oDB,
where A=l0.715(Rs+lOO)-O.S!S
(16)
(17)
B=C
P.o =p.01,(plp1,)8,
where
1pC2
exp(C3 +C4p),
(18)
(19)
(20)
+(A6 +A7/Tpr+Ag/Tpr2)Ppr2
-A9(A7/Tpr+Ag/Tp/)Ppr5
+A1o(l +A 11Ppr2)(ppr2/Tpr3)exp(-A
and Ppr=0.21[pprl(ZTpr)J,
11Ppr2)
(21)
(22)
(23a)
and Ppr=PIPpc
(23b)
(24)
g2
(25)
(26)
(27)
This will improve accuracy over direct calculation of the pseudocritical properties with composton.P
When H2S and C02 are present, the pseudocritical properties
are adjusted by 16
r;c=Tpc-E
(28)
267
and Ppc =
PpcT/,c
Tpc +YH2s0-YH2s)E
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
Toe equations are exact, and the calculated values of gas FVF are
directly related to the accuracy of the values of z factor used.
Coefficienl o/ lsothermal Compressibilily o/ Gas. Toe coefficient of isothermal compressibility of gas is defined as
c8 = -(llV)(iW/Jp)7
or Cg=(llBg)(JBglJp)r
(33a)
(33b)
-~e-~)
(34)
Jpp, Tpr
Eq. 34 can be combinedt'' with the definition of pseudoreduced
gas density,
Z
Pp,=0.21[pp,l(zTp,)J,
(35)
J
(36)
Tp,3
II
where the values of the constants are given with Eq. 21.
lsothenns ofthe z factor plotted vs. pseudoreduced pressure have
rather sharp minima at low temperatures. Eq. 21 follows the shape
ofthese isothenns rather well. However, the slopes ofthe isothenns
calculated with Eq. 37 are not particularly accurate near these mni
ma, where the slope changes sharply from negative to positive.
Thus, Eqs. 36 and 37 should not be used at Tp, < 1.4 for
0.4<p ,<3.0. Toe accuracy ofthese equations is unknown; however, ~ results should be suitable for engineering calculations.
268
.8=A
exp(Bp8C)(l0-4),
where A =
(38)
(9.379+0.01607Ma)Tl.5
209.2+ 19.26Ma+T
B=3.448+(986.4/T)+0.01009Ma,
and C=2.447-0.2224B
(39)
(40)
(41)
Toe results of Eqs. 38 through 41 agree with the limited published data of gas viscosity to within 2 % at low pressure and to
within 4 % at high pressure when the specific gravity of the gas
is < 1.0. Toe equations are less accurate for gases of higher specific gravities, usually giving low estimates by up to 20% for retrograde gases with specific gravities over 1.5.
Wet Gases. Toe key to the estimation of the properties of a wet
gas is that the composition of the reservoir gas is not the same as
the composition of the surface gas. Hydrocarbon liquid condenses
from the reservoir gas as it moves from reservoir conditions to surface conditions. Toe surface gas and surface liquid must be recombined by calculation to detennine the specc gravity of the reservoir
gas. Correlations given above can be used once the specific gravity. of the reservoir gas is known.
Specific Gravily o/ Wet Gas. Wet gases are processed through
two or more stages of separation at the surface. Unfortunately, the
quantity and specific gravity ofthe stock-tank gas are rarely known.
The specific gravity of a reservoir wet gas can be estimated when
only the properties of the gas from the primary separator are
known.20
'Y gR =
RspJ'YSPI+4,600-yo+Gpa
Rsp +Veq
. . .. , . , . , . . . . . . . . .. . (42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
-5pp, 4A9(A7/Tp,+A8/Tp,2)
+ 2A JOPpr (1 + A 11Ppr 2 -A
(46)
Equations
Symbol Definition
g mol solid
Cm
1,000 g pure water
molarity
g mol solid
CM
1,000 ml brine
eq wt solid
normality
CN
1,000 ml brine
meq solid
milliequivalents per litar Cmeq/l
1,000 ml brine
weight percent solids
g solid
Cw
100 g brine
parts per million
g solid
CppmCwx104
Cppm
106 g brine
milligrams per liter
g solid
Cmg11.
106 ml brine
grains per gallon
grains solid
Cgr/gal = 17.1 X Cmg/l 17.1 XPw X Cppm,
Cgr1ga1
where p w is in g/cm 3 at standard
gal brine
conditions.
molality
'Adapted from Jordan. J.R. and Campball, F.L.: We// Logg/ng /-Rock Proparties, Borehole Envlronmant, Mud, and
Temperatura Lor,g/ng, Monograph Serias, SPE, Richardson, TX (1985) 9, 38.
(47)
5
resulting in
Bwg=0.00502(Rsp + Veq)7/p,
(48)
Values from this correlation agree with the lirnited published experimental data to within 2 % . The correlation is valid throughout
the full range of solids contents, temperatures to 260F, and pressures to 5,000 psia. An increase in solids content causes a slight
increase in '1VwT and a slight decrease in '1Vwp that are offsetting
to within l % .
l.60074x 10-3S2.
(52)
The results are as accurate as laboratory measurement throughout the full range of solids contents. Density at reservoir conditions is calculated by dividing density at standard conditions by FVF
for the pressure and temperature of interest.
Solution Gas/Water Ratio ofFonnation Water, Rsw The solution gas/water ratio of pure water may be calculated with 5
1.91663(10-4)72
-2.1654(10-7)73,
(54)
B= 1.01021(10-2)-7.44241(10-5)7+3.05553(10-7)72
-2.94883(10-10)73,
(55)
and C= -(l0-7)[9.02505-0.1302377+8.53425(10-4)72
-2.34122(10-6)73 +2.37049(10-9)74].
(56)
(Rsw)brine
(Rsw)pure water
J = -0.0840655S7-0.285854.
(57)
(50)
where A=8.15839-6.12265(10-2)T+
(53)
(49)
Rsw=A+Bp+cp2,
(51)
Cw
= (1/V w)(}Vwf}p)r,
(58a)
269
cw= -(llBw)(JBwlop)r,
(58b)
or Cw=(llpw)(Opwlop)r
(58c)
(59)
c;w)/ ::
Cw = :w
c:;w
(60)
Toe first term on the right side of Eq. 60 is related to water compressibility at pressures above the bubblepoint and can be estimated with Eq. 59. Toe derivative in the second term on the right side
of Eq. 60 can be estimated with5
(JRswlop)r=B+2Cp,
(61)
whereB and Care from Eqs. 55 and 56. Toe result ofEq. 61 should
be multiplied by the salinity adjustment factor of Eq. 57. Values
of FVF of formation water for use in the second term are estimated as described above, and FVF of gas is estimated with a gas specific gravity of 0.63.
Toe resulting estmate of water compressibility is of unknown
accuracy. It should be considered to be 'order of magnitude'' only.
(62)
(63)
(64)
Eq. 62 fits the existing graphical correlaton-? to within 5% at temperatures between 100 and 400F and salinities to 26%.
Water viscosity at 1 atm can be adjusted to reservoir pressure
wth>
wlwl =0.9994+4.0295X lQ-5p+3.1062X 1Q-9p2 .... (65)
Eq. 65 fits data28 at 86 to 167F and pressures below 10,000 psia
to within 4%. At pressures between 10,000 and 15,000 psia, the
fit is to within 7 % .
MoistureContent ofNatural Gas. Toe dewpoint water-vapor content of natural gas in equilibrium with liquid water may be calculated with 29
W=Alp+B,
(66)
18(I06)psc
where A =pv
'
8 20
l0.13(459.6+Tsc)Zsc
(67)
(68)
---=l-4.920(1Q-3)S-l.7672(10-4)S2, .....
wpure water
270
(69)
Hydrate Formation. Hydrocarbon gas and liquid water will combine to form solids called gas hydrates at temperatures above the
temperature at which water freezes. Eq. 70 can be used to estmate
the temperature at which hydrates will form32:
Th = 1/[2.77077(10-3)-2. 78224(10-3)(ln 'Y 8)-5.64929(10-4)
(In p)- l.29859(10-3)(ln 'Y 8)2 + I.40712(10-3)(ln 'Y 8)(ln p)
+ I.78574(10-4)(ln p)2 + 1.13028(10-3)(ln 'Y 8)3
+5.97282(1Q-4)(ln -y8)2(Jn p)-2.32792(10-4)(ln -y8)(ln p)2
-2.68408(lQ-5)(ln p)3 +4.66106(10-3)(ln 'Y 8)4
+5.55424(1Q-4)(In -y8)3(ln p)- l.47278(I0-5)(ln -y8)2(ln p)2
+ l.39381(10-5)(ln 'Y 8)(ln p)3 + I.48850(10-6)(ln p)4].
...................................
(70)
The estmate of hydrate-forming temperature could be in error by
5F or more. Do not use Eq. 70 at temperatures above 62F, pressures above 1,500 psia, or gas specific gravities above O. 9.
Toe presence of H2S and/or C02 in the gas will cause an increase in hydrate-forming temperatures, but data are too limited
to quantify this.
Toe presence of dissolved solids in the water will decrease the
temperature at which hydrates form. Toe decrease can be calculated with5
ATh=AS+BS2+CS3,
(71)
(72)
B= -0.106056+0.722692-y8-0.85093-y/,
(73)
and C=0.00347221-0.0165564-y
+0.019764-yg2
(74)
Eq. 71 agrees with the existing data30 exactly when the results are
rounded to the nearest whole degree Fahrenheit. Eqs. 71 through
74 are based on gas specific gravities < O. 68 and salinities < 20%.
Inhibitor is often added to the water in contact with gas to reduce
the hydrate-forming temperature. Toe temperature reduction can
be calculated wifu33,34
ATh =2,335w/100M-Mw.
(75)
Toe results ofEq. 75 are well within the scatter ofthe experimental data.
Toe presence of liquid hydrocarbons with the gas and liquid water
will decrease hydrate-forming temperature. 34 Data are limited, and
the temperature decrease has not been quantified.
Nomenclature
A,B,C = coefficients
B8 = FVF of dry gas, res ft3/scf or RB/scf
B0 = ol FVF, RB/STB
Bw = water FVF, RB/STB
Bwg = FVF of wet gas, RB/STB
c8 = coefficient of isothermal compressibility of gas,
psi-1
c0 = coefficient of isothermal compressibility of ol,
psi "!
cp, = pseudoreduced coefficient of isothermal
compressiblity
cw = coefficient of isothermal compressibility of
water, psi 1
SPE Reservoir Engineering, May 1991
facid
/c
Subscripts
acid
air
b
H2S
j
R
se
SP
SPl
SP2
ST
STO
+ H2S
= air
= at bubblepoint pressure at reservoir temperature
= hydrogen sulfide
= component j
= reservoir conditions
= standard conditions
= separator
= primary separator
= second-stage separator
= stock tank
= stock-tank ol
= C02
Acknowledgmenta
I am grateful to Core Laboratories Inc. and, in particular, to Phl
Moses for providing the data used to evaluate these correlations.
Also, 1 thank Cawley, Gillespie & Assocs. lnc. for permission to
publish this paper.
Reterencea
l. Moses, P.L.: "Enginccring Applications of Phase Behavior of Crude
Oil and Condensate Systems," JPT (July 1986) 715-23.
2. Schilthuis, R.J.: "Active Oil and Reservoir Energy," Trans., AIME
(1936) 118, 33-52.
3. Rollins, J.B., McCain, W.D. Jr., and Creeger, J.T.: "Estimation of
Solution GOR ofBlack Oils," JPT(Jan. 1990) 92-94; Trans., AIME,
289.
4. Standing, M.B.: Volumetricami Phase Behavior of Oil Fietd Hydrocarbon Systems, SPE, Richardson, TX (1977) 124.
5. McCain, W.D. Jr.: The Properties of Petroleum Fluids, second edition, PennWell Books, Tulsa (1989) 120, 175, 214, 318, 322, 513,
525-28.
6. Martin, J.C.: "Simplified Equations of Flow in Gas Orive Reservoirs
and the Theoretical Foundation of Multiphase Pressure Buildup Analyses," Trans., AIME (1959) 216, 309-11.
7. Vazquez, M. and Beggs, H.D.: "Correlations for Fluid Physical Property Prediction," JPT(June 1980) 968-70.
8. Vazquez, A.M.E.: "Correlation for Fluid Physical Prediction," MS
thesis, U. of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK (1976).
9. McCain, W.D. Jr., Rollins, J.a:, and Villena, A.J.: "The Coefficient
oflsothermal Compressibility ofBlack Oils at Pressures Below the Bubblepoint," SPEFE (Sept. 1988) 659-62; Trans., AIME, 285.
10. Ng, J.T.H. and Egbogah, E.O.: "On Improved Temperature-Viscosity
Correlation for Crode Oil Systems," paper CIM 83-34-32 presented
at the 1983 Petroleum Soc. of CIM Annual Technical Meeting, Banff,
May 10-13.
11. Beggs, H.D. and Robinson, J.R.: "Estimating the Viscosity of Crode
Oil Systems," JPT (Sept. 1975) 1140-41.
12. Standing, M.B. and Katz, D.L.: "Density of Natural Gases," Trans.,
AIME (1942) 146, 140-49.
13. Takas, G.: "Comparisons Made for Computer z-Factor Calculations,"
Oil &: Gas J. (Dec. 20, 1976) 64-66.
14. Dranchuk, P.M. and Abou-Kassem, J .H.: "Calculations of z-Factors
for Natural Gases Using Equations of State," J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. (JulySept. 1975) 34-36.
15. Sutton, R.P.: "Compressibility Factors for High-Molecular-Weight
Reservoir Gases," paper SPE 14265 presented at the 1985 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, Sept. 22-25.
16. Wichert, E. and Aziz, K.: "Calculate z's for Sour Gases," Hydrocarbon Processing (May 1972) 119-22.
17. Wichert, E. and Aziz, K.: "Compressibility Factor of Sour Natural
Gases," Cdn. J. Chem. Eng. (April 1971) 267-73.
18. Mattar, L., Brar, G.S., and Aziz, K.: "Compressibility of Natural
Gases," J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. (Oct.-Dec. 1975) 14, 77-80.
19. Lee, A.L., Gonzales, M.H., and Eakin, B.E.: "The Viscosity ofNatural
Gases," JPT (Aug. 1966) 997-1000; Trans., AIME (1966) 234.
20. Gold, D.K., McCain, W.D .. Jr., and Jennings, J.W.: "An Improved
Method for the Determination of the Reservoir-Gas Specific Gravity
for Retrograde Gases," JPT(July 1989) 747-52; Trans., AIME, 287.
21. Log Imerpretation Charts, Schlumberger Well Services, Houston ( 1986)
5.
271
Author
Wllllam D. McCaln Jr. Is an executlve
consultant wlth S.A. Holdltch & Assocs.
In College Statlon, TIC. He prevlouslywas
a petroleum englneer wlth Cawley,
Glllesple & Assocs. lnc. In Fort Worth
and taught petroleum englneerlng at
Texas A&M U. and Mlsslsslppl State U.
He holds a es degree from Mlsslsslppl
State U. and MS and PhD degrees from
Georgia lnst. of Technology. McCaln was
a member of the 1986-89 Career
Guldance Commlttee and the 1972-75
Textbook Commlttee. He was 1972 Mlsslsslppl Sectlon chalr
man and a member of the Educatlon and Accredltatloneom
mlttee from 1967 to 1971, chalrlng lt In 1970.
g/cm '
Pa
m3
C
kPa
std m3/m3
SPERE
Original SPE manuscript received for review June 15, 1988. Paper (SPE 18571) accepted
for publlcation Feb. 22, 1989. Revised manuscript received March 17, 1989.
272
= g/cm3
C
std m3/m3
SPERE
(SPE 23583)
510
Referencea
l. Moses, P.L.: "Engineering Applications of Phase Behavior of Crude
Oil and Condensate Systems," JPT (July 1986) 715-23.
2. McCain, W.D. Jr.: "Reservoir-Fluid Property Correlations-State of
the Art," SPERE (May 1991) 266-72.
3. McCain, W .D. Jr.: Te Properties of Petroleum Fluids, second edition,
PennWell Books, Tulsa (1989) 149-53.
(SPE 23594)
SPERE