Sie sind auf Seite 1von 1

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

108 / Tuesday, June 6, 2006 / Notices 32525

Decision Memorandum for Final Results DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE payoffs for the nation than they would
of Expedited Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) otherwise pursue. This request is for the
Review of the Countervailing Duty Order National Institute of Standards and information collection requirements
on Cut–to-Length Steel Plate from Spain Technology associated with completing project
(‘‘Decision Memo’’), from Stephen J. surveys once an award is granted. The
Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Proposed Information Collection; intent of the collection is to meet
Import Administration, to David M. Comment Request; Advanced statutory requirements for ATP, as well
Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Technology Program Business as compliance with 15 CFR part 14 and
Administration, dated May 30, 2006, Reporting System the Government Performance and
which is hereby adopted by this notice. ACTION: Notice. Results Act.
The issues discussed in the Decision
II. Method of Collection
Memo include the likelihood of SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
continuation or recurrence of a (DOC), as part of its continuing effort to The baseline, quarterly, anniversary,
countervailable subsidy and the net reduce paperwork and respondent and closeout business reports are
countervailable subsidy rate likely to burden, invites the general public and submitted in a Web-based survey
prevail if the order were revoked. other Federal agencies to comment on instrument. The post-project survey
Parties can find a complete discussion the continuing and proposed report is conducted as a telephone
of all issues raised in this sunset review information collection, as required by survey interview and supplemented
and the corresponding recommendation the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, with a Web-based survey instrument.
in this public memorandum which is on Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)). III. Data
file in B–099, the Central Records Unit,
of the main Commerce building. In DATES: Written comments must be OMB Number: 0693–0009.
addition, a complete version of the submitted on or before August 7, 2006. Form Numbers: None.
Decision Memo can be accessed directly ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
on the Department’s Web page at http:// to Diana Hynek, Departmental Type of Review: Regular submission.
ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and Paperwork Clearance Officer, Affected Public: Business or other for-
electronic version of the Decision Memo Department of Commerce, Room 6625, profit organizations; and not-for-profit
are identical in content. 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., institutions.
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Estimated Number of Respondents:
Final Results of Review Internet at dHynek@doc.gov). 425.
The Department determines that FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Estimated Time per Response: 5
revocation of the countervailing duty Requests for additional information or Hours.
order on CTL Plate from Spain is likely copies of the information collection
instruments and instructions should be Estimated Total Annual Respondent
to lead to continuation or recurrence of Burden Hours: 2,125.
countervailable subsidies at the directed to the attention of Barbara
following countervailing duty rate: Lambis/Advanced Technology Program Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Senior Policy and Operations Advisor/ Cost Burden: $212,500.
Net Subsidy Margin 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 4700, IV. Request for Comments
Manufacturer/Exporter (percent) Gaithersburg, MD 20899–4700/301–
975–4447/barbara.lambis@nist.gov. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
All Producers/Exporters SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the proposed collection of information
from Spain ................. 33.68
is necessary for the proper performance
I. Abstract
of the functions of the agency, including
This notice also serves as the only This submission under the Paperwork whether the information will have
reminder to parties subject to Reduction Act represents a request for practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
administrative protective orders (APO) extension of a currently approved agency’s estimate of the burden
of their responsibility concerning the collection by the Department of (including hours and cost) of the
return or destruction of proprietary Commerce’s National Institute of proposed collection of information; (c)
information disclosed under APO in Standards and Technology. The ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
accordance with section 351.303 of the Advanced Technology Program (ATP) clarity of the information to be
Department’s regulations. Timely provides cost-shared multi-year funding collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
notification of the return or destruction to single companies and to industry-led burden of the collection of information
of APO materials or conversion to joint ventures to accelerate the on respondents, e.g., the use of
judicial protective order is hereby development of challenging, high-risk automated collection techniques or
requested. Failure to comply with the technologies that promise significant other forms of information technology.
regulations and terms of an APO is a commercial payoffs and widespread Comments submitted in response to
violation which is subject to sanction. benefits for the nation. This this notice will be summarized or
We are issuing and publishing this government-industry partnership aids included in the request for OMB
determination and notice in accordance companies in accelerating the approval of this information collection;
with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i) of development of emerging or enabling they also will become a matter of public
the Act. technologies that lead to revolutionary record.
new products and industrial processes
Dated: May 30, 2006. and services that can compete in rapidly Dated: June 1, 2006.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

David M. Spooner, changing world markets. ATP Gwellnar Banks,


Assistant Secretary for Import challenges the research and Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Administration. development community to take on Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–8757 Filed 6–5–06; 8:45 am] higher technical risk with [FR Doc. 06–5140 Filed 6–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S commensurately higher potential BILLING CODE 3510–13–P

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:06 Jun 05, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM 06JNN1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen