Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
111
an inter-correlation among all four variables i.e. aggeression, anxiety, selfconcept and adjustment of medalist and non-medalist kabaddi players was
worked out and results has been given in the table-4.1 and table-4.2. Further
mean difference of all four variables i.e. aggression, anxiety, self-concept and
adjustment of medalist and non-medalist Kabaddi players have been
calculated in table 4.3 to 4.8.
4.1 INTER-CORRELATION AMONG AGGRESSION, ANXIETY, SELFCONCEPT AND ADJUSTMENT OF MEDALIST KABADDI PLAYERS
Table-4.1
Inter-correlation among Aggression, Anxiety, Self-concept and
Adjustment of Medalist Kabaddi players.
Aggression
Anxiety
Selfconcept
Adjustment
Aggression
1.000
-.055
.061
-.077
Anxiety
-.055
1.000
.157
-.182
Self-concept
.061
.157
1.000
.403**
Adjustment
-.077
-.182
.403**
1.000
112
Anxiety
Self-concept
Adjustment
Aggression
1.000
.158
.268
.175
Anxiety
.158
1.000
.-.007
.102
Self-concept
.268
-.007
1.000
.107
Adjustment
.175
.102
.107
1.000
Table 4.3
t-value of medalist and non-medalist men kabaddi players on the
variable of Aggression
Sr.
No.
Group
Mean
SD
SEM
Medalist
48
90.27
9.44
1.36
Non-Medalist
48
86.06
10.89
1.56
t-value
2.034*
114
Group
Mean
SD
SEM
Medalist
48
19.52
2.72
.39
Non-Medalist
48
18.67
2.78
.40
t-value
1.522
115
significantly from each other. Hence it is evident that the two groups of players
exhibits more or less equal level of anxiety. Hence the hypothesis that, there
will be no significant difference in between the level of anxiety of medalist and
non-medalist men kabaddi players at the level of inter university, is accepted.
4.5
Group
Mean
Medalist
48
1.80
Non-Medalist
48
1.88
SD
MD
SDEM
t-value
1.11
116
It is evident from table 4.5 that t-value for self-concept of medalist and
non-medalist men kabaddi players at the level of All India Inter University
Tournament came out to be 1.11 which is less than the tabulated value of 1.99
found to be not significant at 0.05 level. This indicates that the two groups of
players do not differ significantly from each other. Hence it may be interpreted
that the two groups of players exhibits more or less equal level of selfconcept. Hence the hypothesis that, there will be no significant difference in
between the level of self-concept of medalist and non- medalist men kabaddi
players at the level of Inter University Tournament, is accepted.
4.6
Group
Mean
SD
Medalist
48
19.25
2.93
Non-Medalist
Medalist
Non-Medalist
Medalist
Non-Medalist
Medalist
Non-Medalist
Medalist
Non-Medalist
Medalist
Non-Medalist
Medalist
Non-Medalist
Medalist
Non-Medalist
Medalist
Non-Medalist
Medalist
Non-Medalist
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
17.18
27.43
27.22
18.89
18.50
11.83
12.29
23.35
23.04
14.22
14.08
10.56
11.20
14.37
13.77
11.47
11.79
11.29
10.68
2.90
4.07
3.38
3.13
3.18
2.65
2.62
3.79
3.77
2.52
2.71
1.87
1.83
2.59
3.21
2.12
2.59
2.78
2.97
117
MD
2.06
0.02
0.39
-0.45
0.31
0.14
-0.64
0.60
-0.31
0.60
SEDM
0.42
0.41
0.58
0.48
0.45
0.46
0.38
0.37
0.547
0.544
0.36
0.39
0.27
0.26
0.37
0.46
0.30
0.37
0.40
0.42
t-Value
3.46**
0.27
0.614
-0.851
0.404
0.272
-1.705
1.013
-0.646
1.027
Group
Mean
SD
MD
SDEM
Medalist
48
49.12
11.40
-3.62
1.64
Non-Medalist
48
52.75
9.33
-3.62
1.34
119
t-value
-1.70
120
Table 4.8
t-value of medalist and non-medalist men kabaddi players with respect
to four areas of Adjustment variable.
Area
Group
Mean
SD
Medalist
48
12.62
4.06
Home
MD
SEDM
0.58
-2.00
Non-Medalist
48
14.62
3.12
Medalist
48
13.39
3.40
Emotional
-2.704
0.45
0.49
2.08
Non-Medalist
48
13.37
2.93
Medalist
48
11.29
3.24
Educational
0.032
0.42
0.46
-1.10
Non-Medalist
48
12.39
2.71
Medalist
48
11.91
3.40
Social
-1.808
0.39
0.49
-1.04
Non-Medalist
48
12.95
3.63
t-Value
-1.450
0.52
121
122