Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1 of 6
http://www.elcm.org/theology/OlsonOrdination.html
Oliver K. Olson
In a world hostile to the gospel, the ecumenical movement is bringing us closer together. The closer Christians
are, of course, the oftener the ideas that once separated us, reappear. Among other matters, the several
traditions about the relationship between clergy and lay persons have also reappeared. For sorting among the
competing ideas, the following collection of quotations from Martin Luther should be helpful for those who
trust his judgment as teacher of the Bible.
______________
So I cannot understand at all why one who has once been made a priest cannot again become a layman, for
the sole difference between him and a layman is his ministry... .For that fiction of an indelible character has
long since become a laughingstock. 3
You will ask, if all who are in the church are priests, how do these whom we now call priests differ from
laymen? I answer: injustice is done those words Priest, cleric, spiritual, ecclesiastic, when they are
transferred from all Christians to those few who are now by a mischievous usage called ecclesiastics. Holy
Scripture makes no distinction between them, although it gives the name minister, servant, steward to
those who are now proudly called popes, bishops and lords and who should according to the ministry of the
Word serve others and teach them the faith of Christ and the freedom of believers.4
2/28/2015 11:34 AM
2 of 6
http://www.elcm.org/theology/OlsonOrdination.html
Well-known as the universal priesthood of all believers, Luthers teaching has become famous. His insight
has had a lasting influence on both church and societybut sometimes misinterpreted. Some people, for
instance, assumed he was simply about democracy. . Brian Gerrish noticed that the term has been used to
support a bewildering variety of practices, such as Congregational polity, the Quaker meeting, pietistic
ecclesiolae, and the Methodist commissioning of lay preachers. Sometimes, again, it has become associated
with such slogans as the right of private judgment or immediate access to God, and interpreted so
individualistically that any institutional or corporate expression of it becomes unthinkable.5
But Luther was not concerned with the universal rights of the American, or, especially, the French
revolution. In fact, the universal priesthood of believers cannot be understood as a bold assertion of rights
at all. Quite the opposite! Unlike the revolutionary propaganda, the Bible talks about sacrifice. The New
Testament priest is expected to crucify self, as an offering to God.(Romans 12.1, Revelation 1,6; 5.10; 206).
The expression, universal priesthood, does not reflect the thought of Thomas Jefferson or the American
constitution, but, (with Luther) the mind of the Bible.
_______________
3 6, 567, 17.
4 7. 58. 12f.
5 Brian A. Gerrish. Luther on Priesthood and Ministry. Church History 34. 1965. 402-22. Here, 404.
_______________
2/28/2015 11:34 AM
3 of 6
http://www.elcm.org/theology/OlsonOrdination.html
_______________
6 10 III, 195,25ff..
7 10. 394. 24.
8 1, 184, 21ff.
_______________
_______________
2/28/2015 11:34 AM
4 of 6
http://www.elcm.org/theology/OlsonOrdination.html
Some writers have observed that Roman Catholic bishops have chosen to prefer the welfare of priests above
the rights of children because they believed that priests have a higher rankthat they are betterthan others.
Opposition to the notion that ordination is a promotion to a higher rank has led in Anglican circles to the
assertion of Lay Presidency, the right of lay persons to preside over the sacrament. The word, president,
however, presupposes that a certain person is present--in Anglican theology, a person with ordained rank.
Although psychological or sociological reasons may lead to resentment of the clergy, there is no basis for
clerical superiority it in Lutheran doctrine. Thus, in a Lutheran context, it is absurd for lay persons to struggle
for their rights to preside.
The operative word in Article XIV of the Augsburg Confession, which limits Holy Communion to those with a
call is not preside, but administer..
_______________
It is one thing to perform publicly, and another thing to do it in necessity. To perform it publicly is not allowed,
unless with universal consensus, or the consent of the church. 16
2/28/2015 11:34 AM
5 of 6
http://www.elcm.org/theology/OlsonOrdination.html
It is not said: the sacrament is made through the Word, and therefore I may practice it at home. For that is
not Gods ordinance and command, He wills that the sacrament be offered through the public office.18
In his famous Letter to the Bohemians, he advised private baptism and teachingbut, since they had no
pastors, abstention from Holy Communion.19
For eucharist is not necessary under the peril of [loss of salvation; The gospel and baptism suffice, since faith
alone sanctifies.... 20
The Sacrament of the Altar is a means of grace, it is not the only one. .For Luther, Lieberg observes, being
deprived of the sacrament of the altar is not to be cut off from Gods grace. The nature of grace itself plays a
role, overflowing richness of grace, which shows itself in many forms.21
Since Gods grace is otherwise abundant, Holy Communion is not necessary for salvation. He gave the same
advice in his letter to Pastor Wolfgang Brauer. 22 - even if throughout their life they did not care or could not
receive the eucharist. For the eucharist is not so necessary that salvation depends on it. The gospel and
Baptism are sufficient, since faith alone justified and love alone.
_______________
16 12. 189. 251.
17 Lieberg 137.
18 Briefe 7, 366, 42ff.
19 12,171, 17ff.
20 12,171,21f.
21 50.240, 32f.Lieberg 73.
22 Briefe 7 338, 1.
_______________
2/28/2015 11:34 AM
6 of 6
http://www.elcm.org/theology/OlsonOrdination.html
the pastor has the pulpit, baptism, sacrament, and all pastoral care [in his parish] is entrusted to him.
Luther feared that other arrangements would result in scandal and sectarianism.28 Worse, they would be a
denial of the Office of the Ministry, instituted by God himself.
_______________
23 6.564.15f.
24 Lieberg 171.
25 6.566.26ff.
26 12, 189,22f. 49600, 11ff.
27 50 641 181.
_______________
Our theological tradition has it straight. We do not talk about ecclesiastical orders, but an ecclesiastical
office. Here is the heretical mistake of the Call to Common Mission The historical episcopate. assumes
the higher rank of the order of bishops. Lutheran pastors are set aside not because of an indelible character,
but a different assignment.
Luther, Lieberg writes, understands the concrete office, which is transmitted to individuals, as a permanent
institution that belongs to the essence of the church and derives the institution immediately from the divine
will and Christs institution.29 He often emphasized that although it is mediated by humans, the call to
pastoral office is a call by Christ himself.
I hope that you will have understood so much of Christian (doctrine) that the pastoral office, preaching office
and the gospel do not belong to us, nor to some people.. .but alone to God the Lord, who has . . . instituted
it.30
The concrete office is by divine right.31
_______________
28 Lieberg. 73.
29 Ibid. 106
30 257.87ff.
31 28. 470. 39ff.
_______________
2/28/2015 11:34 AM