Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
and
Porosity
1
Outline
Background
Techniques
Surface area
External
Porosity
meso
micro
2
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Length
1 nm
10
100
1 m
10
100
1 mm
macro
meso
micro
10-10m
C-C
bond
metal
crystallite
10-9m
10-8m
Carbon
nanotube
cell
membrane
10-7m
10-6m
10-5m
red blood
cell
Transistor
gate
10-4m
human
hair
10-3m
red
ant
Techniques
Mercury intrusion
Adsorption
Physical
Chemical
Temperature Programmed Methods
4
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Physical Adsorption
5
Characterization via
Adsorption
Material Characterization
Physical properties
Differentiate
Gas Adsorption
Modeled properties
Surface area
Pore structure
Non-destructuve
6
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Static Adsorption
P
V
Adsorption
Quantity adsorbed - always normalized for mass cm3/g or moles/g
Relative pressure - equilibrium pressure divided by
saturation pressure - p/po
Sample Preparation
Clean the surface
Remove volatiles
Water
CO2
Solvents
Controlled environment!
Physical Adsorption
Molecules from the gas phase strike the surface.
At equilibrium the molecule adsorbs, lose the heat
of adsorption, and subsequently desorb from
surface.
At equilibrium the rate of condensation = the rate of
desorption
Constant surface coverage at equilibrium.
10
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Physical Adsorption
Not activated (no barrier)
60
Rapid
40
20
0
20
40
60
80
100
11
Chemical Adsorption
May be activated
60
40
20
May be dissociative
20
40
Often irreversible
60
80
100
3
4
Distance from Surface,
Limited to a monolayer
Wide temperature range
12
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Isotherm Types
nads
II
III
IV
VI
Constant temperature
Quantity adsorbed as a
function of pressure
Six classifications
Quantity is normalized for
sample mass
Vacuum to atmospheric
13
Classical View of
Adsorption
As the system pressure is
increased the formation of a
monolayer may be observed.
qads
IV
p/po
14
Tuesday, December 4, 12
15
Classical View of
Adsorption
As the system pressure is increased
(gas concentration also increases)
multiple layers sorb to the surface.
qads
IV
B
A
p/po
16
Tuesday, December 4, 12
17
Classical View of
Adsorption
As pressure is further increased
we may observe capillary
condensation in mesopores.
B-C
qads
IV
C
B
A
p/po
18
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Classical View of
Adsorption
As pressure approaches the saturation
pressure, the pores are filled and we
may estimate total pore volume.
qads
IV
B-C
C
B
A
p/po
20
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Adsorptives
Nitrogen
Argon
Krypton
21
Nitrogen
Broad usage
Limitations
Strong interactions
t-plot
Pore size
distributions
Reduced precision
for materials with <
1m2/g (10mol/g
monolayer)
Surface area
NLDFT - excess
density
22
Tuesday, December 4, 12
250
ZSM-5
Faujasite
Vads, cm3/g
200
150
100
50
0
1e-08
1e-07
1e-06
1e-05
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
p/po
Confinement
23
Argon
Pore size distributions
H-K calculations
NLDFT - excess
density
Benefits
Reduced interaction
compared to N2
Limitations
Statistical t-curves
based upon N2
24
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Faujasite (H+)
250
Nitrogen
Argon
Vads, cm3/g
200
150
100
50
0
1e-07
1e-06
1e-05
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
p/po
Y zeolite, Ar Adsorption
25
ZSM-5 (LN2)
200
180
Nitrogen
Argon
160
Vads, cm3/g
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1e-08
1e-07
1e-06
1e-05
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
p/po
ZSM-5, Ar Adsorption
26
Tuesday, December 4, 12
140
Adsorption
Desorption
120
Vads, cm /g
100
80
60
40
20
0
1e-07
1e-06
1e-05
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
p/po
Krypton
Surface area estimates BET
Benefits
Limitations
Pressure range
limited to < 1 torr at
77 K (<0.3 p/po)
General agreement
with N2
Cost
Limited to surface
area applications
28
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Error analysis
Gas Law calculations
Error
Typical values
Relative error
29
Error Reduction
Probe
Temperature, K Reference
P ratio
Relative
Error
Ar
77
N2
200/760
0.26
Kr
77
N2
2.4/760
0.003
Kr
87
Ar
50/760
0.07
30
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Surface Area
31
Surface Area
nm - monolayer
NA - Avogadros number
Tuesday, December 4, 12
32
Chemical Adsorption
nads
Micropore filling
33
Langmuir
Reduces to the familiar form of the
Langmuir equation for associative
adsorption
34
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Nitrogen adsorption on
Graphitized Carbon
1
Henrys Law
Adsorption
Desorption
CarboPack F
nads, (mmoles/m2)/g
0.1
0.01
Sterling FT
0.001
0.0001
1e-05
6 m2/g
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
10 m2/g
P
0.1
nads, (mmoles/m2)/g
0.01
0.001
19 (mmols/m2) / atm
0.0001
1e-05
1e-06
1e-05
0.0001
P
0.001
0.01
35
Adsorption
200
Langmuir
Estimate of nm
150
100
50
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
p/p
13X
13X
0.007
0.005
0.006
620 m2/g
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Pressure, mmHg
0.8
36
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Type II Isotherm
Non-porous
Macro-porous
Flat Surfaces
II
nads
Multilayer adsorption
Infinite adsorption as
pressure approaches
saturation
37
p = 0.5000
p = 0.2000
p = 0.1000
p = 0.0100
p = 0.0010
p = 0.0002
p = 0.0001
0
39
BET Equation
Similar to Langmuir - a mass
balance for each layer is used
The first layer is unique and
subsequent layers are common
E is the heat of liquefaction
An infinite series is formed
The sum of surface fractions is 1
The total quantity adsorbed is a function
of the monolayer and the surface fractions
The multilayer may approach infinite
thickness as pressure approaches
saturation
40
Tuesday, December 4, 12
BET Equation
Linear form of
BET
41
42
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Adsorption
Desorption
35
BET
estimate of nm
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
p/po
Linear BET, Lichrosphere 1000
0.045
100 nm SiO2
Lic 1000
0.04
0.035
25.7 m2/g
1/Q(p /p-1)
0.03
0.025
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.005
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
43
Type IV Isotherm
IV
Multilayer adsorption
nads
Meso-porous
Capillary condensation
P
44
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Adsorption
Desorption
400
Amorphous
Silica-Alumina
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
p/po
0.007
0.006
11 nm pores
1/(qads(po/p - 1))
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
215.5 m2/g
0.001
0
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
p/po
45
Silica, 4 nm pores
600
500
MCM-41
Adsorption
Desorption
400
300
200
100
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
p/po
0.0016
0.0014
4 nm pores
1/(qads(po/p - 1))
0.0012
0.001
0.0008
0.0006
0.0004
926.8
m2/g
0.0002
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
p/po
46
Tuesday, December 4, 12
SiO2-Al2O3 MCM-41
SiO2
100 nm pores
11 nm pores
25.7 m2/g
215.5 m2/g
Silica, 4 nm pores
600
Adsorption
Desorption
400
Adsorption
Desorption
500
25
20
15
10
350
30
926.8 m2/g
Adsorption
Desorption
35
4 nm pores
300
250
200
150
400
300
200
100
100
50
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.1
0.2
p/po
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0
1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
p/po
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
p/po
47
FCC catalyst
Adsorption
Desorption
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
p/p
0.004
0.0035
Y & binder
1/(qads(po/p - 1))
173.5 m2/g
0.003
0.0025
0.002
0.0015
0.001
0.0005
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
p/po
48
Tuesday, December 4, 12
FCC
49
FCC - Rouquerol
50
Tuesday, December 4, 12
t-Plot
Standard Isotherms
Monolayer region is sensitive to isotherm shape
Multilayer region is not sensitive to isotherm shape
Multilayer region is less dependent on the
adsorbent structure
qads
IV
C
B
A
p/po
53
nads
t-Plot
Standard Isotherms
thickness,
thickness,
t-Plot
Standard Isotherms
nads
External Area
Flat Surface
Pore Vol
thickness,
thickness,
55
t-Plot
Standard Isotherms
nads
External Area
External Area
Flat Surface
Pore Area
Pore Vol
thickness,
thickness,
Statistical
t-curves
20
15
Thickness, angstroms
Halsey
BJH
Harkins-Jura
Halsey
Harkins and Jura
Jaroniec et. al.
Broekhoff de Boer
t-plot
10
Silica
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
p/po
Broehkhoff de Boer
57
t-Plot
58
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Adsorption
Desorption
35
Surface
Modifications
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
The reference
surface may be
modified to be similar
to the porous material
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
p/po
35
DFT
ODMS
Thickness, angstroms
30
25
20
15
10
Hydrophilic vs.
hydrophobic
5
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
p/po
59
Adsorption
200
150
100
50
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
p/p
160
140
0 intercept
Reference curve
External area
120
100
80
60
Micropore filling
40
20
0
0
0.5
1
1.5
Thickness, angstroms
2.5
60
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Adsorption
Desorption
400
Amorphous
Silica-Alumina
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
6
8
Thickness, angstroms
10
0.8
0.9
p/po
350
Capillary
condensation at
large t values
0
400
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
12
14
61
MCM-41
Silica, 4 nm pores
600
Adsorption
Desorption
500
400
300
200
100
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
6
8
Thickness, angstroms
10
0.8
0.9
p/po
700
600
Quantity Adsorbed, cm3/g
500
400
300
200
Pore area
100
0
0
12
14
62
Tuesday, December 4, 12
t-Plot summary
Area
Pore area
External area (matrix)
Pore volume
Isotherm
LP to 0.7 p/p
Positive or 0 intercept
t-curve
Reference curve is preferred
Statistical curve is convenient
63
Meso-porosity
Capillary
condensation
Fluid has bulk
behavior
BJH or DH models
Adsorbed layer
Liquid core
64
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Meso-porosity
BJH models
Thickness curve to
estimate the
adsorbed layer
Kelvin equation to
V =
Ad
4
66
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Adsorption
Desorption
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
p/po
0.7
2
1.8
0.6
1.6
1.4
1.2
0.4
1
0.3
0.8
0.6
0.2
0.5
BJH
First V is assumed to be
from pore emptying
Subsequent V are a
combination of pore
emptying and thinning of
the adsorbed layer
Amorphous
Silica-alumina
0.4
0.1
0
0.2
10
100
width,
67
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
p/po
300
250
200
dSA/dD
BJH
From pore volume and calculated
diameter, we can estimate surface
area for a cylinder
Common to observe the BJH
estimate of area is greater than the
BET estimate
Adsorption
Desorption
400
Amorphous
Silica-alumina
150
100
50
0
10
100
D, angstroms
1000
68
Tuesday, December 4, 12
400
Amorphous
Silica-alumina
450
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
p/po
0.7
4.5
4
0.6
3
0.4
2.5
0.3
2
1.5
0.2
dV/d(log(D)), (cm3/g)/
3.5
0.5
pore volume, cm3/g
BJH
Desorption data has been
used - historically
Best to use both Adsorption
and Desorption - they should
share common features
1
0.1
0.5
0
10
100
width,
69
BJH - PVD
Pt/Al2O3
70
Tuesday, December 4, 12
Thank-you
72
Tuesday, December 4, 12