Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Volume: 3 Issue: 5
ISSN: 2321-8169
3151 - 3154
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Dr. K. M. Alaskar
Abstract Since last few years, so many statistical tools have been used to analyze students performance from different points of
view. This paper presents data mining in education environment that identifies students failure patterns using association rule
mining technique. The identified patterns are analyzed to offer a helpful and productive recommendations to the academic
planners in higher institutions of learning to improve their decision making process. This will also aid in the curriculum structure
and modification in order to improve students academic performance and reduce failure rate.
Keywords- Higher Education, Knowledge Discovery, Frequent Pattern, Association Rule Mining, Apriori Algorithm
__________________________________________________*****_________________________________________________
I.
INTRODUCTION
REVIEW OF LETERATURE
_______________________________________________________________________________________
ISSN: 2321-8169
3151 - 3154
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
important relationship between the attributes, producing an ifthen statement concerning attribute values in form of rules.
The formal definition of association rule mining is
Let I = {I1,I2,,Im} be an itemset. Let D, the task-relevant
data, be a set of a database transaction where each transaction T
is a nonempty itemset such that T I. Each transaction is
associated with an identifier, called a TID. Let A be a set of
items. A transaction T is said to contain A if A T .An
association rule is an implication of the form AB. where A
I, B I, A , B and AB= . The rule AB holds in
the transaction set D with support s, where s is the percentage
of transactions in D that contain A B (i.e., the union of sets A
and B say, or, both A and B). This is taken to be the
probability, P(A B). The rule AB has confidence c in the
transaction set D, where c is the percentage of transactions in D
containing A that also contain B. This is taken to be conditional
probability, P(B|A). That is
Support (AB) = P(AB)
Confidence (AB) = P(B|A)
The association rule mining can be viewed as a two-step
process:
1. Find all frequent itemsets: Each of these itemsets will occur
at least as frequently as predetermined minimum support count.
2. Generate strong association rules from the frequent itemsets:
The rules must satisfy minimum support and confidence. These
rules are called strong rules[6]
Percentage
Grade
points
Grade
[75, 100]
10.0
[70, 74.9]
9.0
A+
[65, 69.9]
8.0
[60, 64.9]
7.0
B+
[55,59.9]
6.0
[50,54.9]
5.5
C+
[45, 49.9]
5.0
[40,44.9]
4.5
[00, 39.9]
0.0
3152
IJRITCC | May 2015, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
ISSN: 2321-8169
3151 - 3154
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Grade
F
C
C+
B
D
Count
31
8
2
2
24
TABLE III
C. Result Analysis using WEKA
Fig. 2 is the snapshots showing different Association
Rules with various Support and Confidence factors
Lateral
CN
University
BVU
OTH
OTH
BVU
C+
OTH
OTH
B+
OTH
BVU
C+
OTH
OTH
B+
BVU
B+
OTH
B+
OTH
BVU
BVU
OTH
OTH
OTH
OTH
OTH
OTH
OTH
OTH
OTH
OTH
BVU
OTH
OTH
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
BVU
V.
CONCLUSION
_______________________________________________________________________________________
ISSN: 2321-8169
3151 - 3154
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
[6]
[7]
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
3154
IJRITCC | May 2015, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________