Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

14562 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

55 / Wednesday, March 22, 2006 / Notices

For the Commission, by the Division of Delisting of Securities their holdings shall not prevent the
Investment Management, under delegated application of this provision); or
authority. Section 3.
(6) all rights pertaining to the entire
Nancy M. Morris, 3.1. Suspension and/or Delisting by class of the security have been
Secretary. Exchange extinguished; provided, however, that
[FR Doc. 06–2764 Filed 3–21–06; 8:45 am] (a) No Change. where such an event occurs as a result
BILLING CODE 8010–01–M (b) Whenever the Board determines of an order of a court or other
that it no longer is appropriate for a governmental authority, the orders shall
security to continue to be traded on the be final, all applicable appeals periods
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Exchange, it may institute proceedings shall have expired and no appeals shall
COMMISSION to delist such security by filing the be pending.
appropriate application with the Notwithstanding the foregoing, the
[Release No. 34–53508; File No. SR–NSX– Commission (the ‘‘Delisting Board may determine that the
2005–09] Application’’) to strike a class of suspension or delisting of an issue is
securities from listing on the Exchange necessary for the protection of investors
Self-Regulatory Organizations; or from registration under Section 12(b)
National Stock Exchange; Notice of and the public interest.
of the Exchange Act within a reasonable
Filing of Proposed Rule Change To time after the Exchange makes the 3.2. Delisting by Issuer
Amend Exchange Delisting Rules To decision to suspend or delist a security.
Conform to Recent Amendments to A security, which in the opinion of
The Exchange shall provide: (1) notice
Commission Rules Regarding Removal the Board is eligible for continued
to the issuer of the Exchange’s decision
from Listing and Withdrawal from listing, may be removed from listing
to delist the issuer’s securities; (2) an
Registration upon the request or application of the
opportunity for the issuer to file an
issuer provided that the issuer: (a)
March 17, 2006. appeal [Any issuer or any other person
submits a certified copy of a resolution
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the aggrieved by such action may seek
adopted by the board of directors of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the relief] pursuant to the Exchange Rules
issuer authorizing withdrawal from
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 governing adverse actions; (3) public
listing and registration; [and] (b) a
notice is hereby given that on October notice, no fewer than ten days before the
statement setting forth in detail the
24, 2005, the National Stock delisting becomes effective, of the
reasons for the proposed withdrawal
Exchange SM (‘‘NSX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) Exchange’s final determination to delist
and the facts in support thereof; (c)
filed with the Securities and Exchange the security via a press release and
certifies its compliance with the
Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) posting on the Exchange’s website and
Exchange’s rules for delisting and
the proposed rule change as described (4) the prompt delivery of a copy of the
applicable state laws; (d) submits a
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items Delisting Application to the issuer.
written notification to the Exchange no
have been substantially prepared by the (c) The securities of an issuer will be
fewer than ten days before the issuer
Exchange. The Commission is subject to suspension and/or
files the appropriate form with the
publishing this notice to solicit withdrawal from listing and registration
Commission of its intent to withdraw its
comments on the proposed rule change as a listed issue if any of the following
securities from listing and/or
from interested persons. conditions are found to exist:
registration on the Exchange setting
(1) failure to comply with the listing
forth a description of the security
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s standards and agreements; or
involved, together with a statement of
Statement of the Terms of Substance of (2) sustained loss so that financial
all the material facts relating to the
the Proposed Rule Change condition becomes so impaired that it is
reasons for the withdrawal and another
questionable to the Exchange whether
The Exchange proposes to amend the notice to the Exchange, immediately
the company can continue operations
text of Article IV, section 3 of the after its withdrawal from listing
and/or meet its obligations as they
Exchange’s By-Laws to allow its becomes effective pursuant to the rules
mature or
delisting rules to be set forth in of the Commission; and (e)
(3) the entire class of securities has
sufficient detail to be in conformity with contemporaneous with providing
been called for redemption, maturity or
the recently adopted Rule 12d2–2 under written notice to the Exchange, the
retirement; appropriate notice thereof
the Act.3 issuer issues a public notice of its intent
has been given; funds sufficient for the
The text of the proposed rule change to delist, and/or withdraw its securities
payment of all such securities have been
is below. Proposed new language is in from Section 12(b) registration, via a
deposited with an agency authorized to
italics; proposed deletions are in press release and, if it has a publicly
make such payments, and such funds
[brackets]. accessible web site, post such notice on
have been made available to security
* * * * * such website.
holders; or
(4) the entire class of security has [The issuer may be required to submit
CODE OF REGULATIONS (BY-LAWS)
been redeemed or paid at maturity or the proposed withdrawal to the security
OF NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE
retirement; or holders for their vote at a meeting for
* * * * * (5) the instruments representing the which proxies are solicited provided the
ARTICLE IV. securities comprising the entire class stock is not also listed on another
have come to evidence, by operation of national securities exchange registered
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

Securities Listed on the Exchange law or otherwise, other securities in under Section 6 of the Act having
* * * * * substitution therefore and represent no similar requirements or on a facility of
other right, except, if such be the fact, a national securities association
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). the right to receive an immediate cash registered under Section 15A of the Act
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. payment (the right of dissenters to having similar requirements.]
3 17 CFR 240.12d2–2. receive the appraised or fair value of * * * * *

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:47 Mar 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 22, 2006 / Notices 14563

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s securities are contained in Article IV, proposed withdrawal to the security
Statement of the Purpose of, and section 3. The current provision holders for their vote in a meeting for
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule provides that the Exchange’s Board of which proxies are submitted. This
Change Directors, in the exercise of its business requirement is no longer deemed by the
In its filing with the Commission, the judgment, may determine to delist a Exchange to be necessary for the
NSX included statements concerning security by instituting a proceeding to protection of shareholders as the
the purpose of and basis for the delist the security. The issuer or any procedural requirements of Rule 12d2–
proposed rule change. The text of these party aggrieved by such decision may 2(c) fulfills that need.
statements may be examined at the choose to seek relief from such action by
following Chapter X of the Exchange 2. Statutory Basis
places specified in Item IV below. The
Rules governing adverse actions. The Exchange believes that the
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
Although section 3.2(b) of Article IV proposed rule change is consistent with
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of provides procedural protection for the
the most significant aspects of such the provisions of section 6(b) of the
issuer of the security proposed to be Act,5 in general, and section 6(b)(5),6 in
statements. delisted, the Exchange’s By-Laws do not particular, in that the proposed rule
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s set forth the detailed steps required by change is designed to promote just and
Statement of the Purpose of, and the Adopting Release. While the equitable principles of trade, to prevent
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Exchange’s procedures contain the fraudulent and manipulative acts, to
Change central elements—notice to the issuer remove impediments to and perfect the
and an opportunity for appeal—they are mechanisms of a free and open market
1. Purpose not spelled out in detail. Accordingly, and a national market system and, in
The Commission recently adopted this filing proposes to add the general, to protect investors and the
amendments to its Rule 12d2–2, Rule procedural requirements of: (i) Filing an public interest.
19d–1 and Form 25 under the Act and application (Form 25) with the
Rule 101 of Regulation S–T to Commission; (ii) sending a notice to the B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
streamline the procedures for delisting a issuer of the Exchange’s decision to Statement on Burden on Competition
security traded on a national securities delist, which contains a notice of the The proposed rule change does not
exchange and/or deregistering the appeals mechanism contained in impose any burden on competition that
security under section 12 of the Act.4 Chapter X of the Rules and a copy of is not necessary or appropriate in
The Commission decided, in order to Form 25; and (iii) public notice of the furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
give time for the national securities determination to delist via a press
exchanges to adopt rules to comply with release and the posting of such decision C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
the new requirements in Rule 12d2–2 on the Exchange’s Web site. Statement on Comments on the
under the Act, that the Commission’s Section 3.2(c) of Article IV provides Proposed Rule Change Received from
rule amendments will not become some specific events which may cause Members, Participants or Others
effective until April 24, 2006. the Exchange to delist securities of
The Exchange has neither solicited
The amendments to Rule 12d2–2 issuers that meet the criteria. While the
nor received written comments on the
under the Act provide that an exchange Exchange may delist any security for the
proposed rule change.
may strike a class of securities from protection of the investing public and
listing and/or withdraw the registration the public interest, this filing proposes III. Date of Effectiveness of the
of such security under Section 12(b) by to adopt the rationale set forth in Rule Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
filing an application on Form 25. The 12d2–2(a)(1)–(a)(4) for delisting. Commission Action
delisting of the security will be effective This filing also proposes to amend the
criteria the Exchange would employ for Within 35 days of the date of
ten days after Form 25 is filed with the publication of this notice in the Federal
Commission. The withdrawal from issuers that desire to delist their security
from the Exchange. This proposal would Register or within such longer period (i)
section 12(b) registration will take effect as the Commission may designate up to
90 days after the filing of the Form, or adopt certain provisions contained in
Rule 12d2–2(c). Specifically, it would 90 days of such date if it finds such
such shorter period as the Commission longer period to be appropriate and
may determine. The Adopting Release add provisions that: (i) The issuer must
certify that it is in compliance with the publishes its reasons for so finding or
also stated that the exchanges must, at (ii) as to which the Exchange consents,
a minimum, provide that (i) the Exchange’s rules for delisting and
applicable state law (in conformity with the Commission shall:
exchange issues a notice to the issuer of (a) By order approve such proposed
the exchange’s decision to delist its Rule 12d2–2(c)(2)(i)); (ii) the issuer must
submit written notice (that is in rule change, or
securities; (ii) the issuer is given the
conformity with the requirements of (b) Institute proceedings to determine
opportunity to appeal to the national
Rule 12d2–2(c)(2)(ii)) to the Exchange whether the proposed rule change
securities exchange’s board of directors
no fewer than ten days before the issuer should be disapproved.
or to a committee designated by the
board; and (iii) the exchange provides files its application to delist with the IV. Solicitation of Comments
public notice, no fewer than ten days Commission and another notice when
such application becomes effective (in Interested persons are invited to
before the delisting becomes effective, of
order to provide the Exchange with submit written data, views, and
the exchange’s final determination to
adequate notice of the effective date); arguments concerning the foregoing,
delist the security via a press release
and (iii) like the Exchange, the issuer is including whether the proposed rule
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

and posting on the exchange’s Web site.


The Exchange’s current By-Law required to post notice of its decision to change is consistent with the Act.
provisions respecting the delisting of delist and make public disclosure of the Comments may be submitted by any of
same (in conformity with Rule 12d2– the following methods:
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52029 2(c)(iii)).
(July 14, 2005), 70 FR 42456 (July 22, 2005) Finally, the proposal would eliminate 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
(‘‘Adopting Release’’). the need for the issuer to submit the 6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:47 Mar 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1
14564 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 22, 2006 / Notices

Electronic Comments SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s


COMMISSION Statement of the Purpose of, and
• Use the Commission’s Internet Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Change
[Release No. 34–53485; File No. SR–PCX–
rules/sro.shtml); or
2006–15] 1. Purpose
• Send an e-mail to rule-
comments@sec.gov. Please include File Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific The purpose of this proposed rule
No. SR–NSX–2005–09 on the subject Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and change is to make certain housekeeping
line. Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed changes to the PCX Schedule.
Rule Change To Make Certain Trade Related Charges
Paper Comments
Housekeeping Changes to Its On the present Schedule, in the
• Send paper comments in triplicate Schedule of Fees and Charges section entitled Trade Related Charges,
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, March 14, 2006. the rate table shows transaction fees for
Securities and Exchange Commission, different market participants. Presently
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the the Firm transaction fee is $0.10 per
Washington, DC 20549–1090. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 contract, the Broker/Dealers transaction
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 fee is $0.21 per contract and the Market
All submissions should refer to File notice is hereby given that on February
Number SR–NSX–2005–09. This file Makers transaction fee is $0.21 per
23, 2006, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. contract. Customers are not charged a
number should be included on the (‘‘PCX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the transaction fee. In this same table is the
Securities and Exchange Commission On-Line Comparison fee, which is
Commission process and review your (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule $0.05, assessed on all Firm, Broker/
comments more efficiently, please use change as described in Items I, II and III Dealer and Market Maker transactions.
only one method. The Commission will below, which Items have been prepared The On-Line Comparison fee is not
post all comments on the Commission’s by the Exchange. The PCX filed the assessed on Customer transactions.
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ proposed rule change pursuant to Since the On-Line Comparison fee is
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 3 and the same for Firm, Broker/Dealer and
submission, all subsequent Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which Market Maker transactions, and is not
amendments, all written statements renders the proposal effective upon charged on Customer transactions, the
with respect to the proposed rule filing with the Commission. The PCX proposes to simplify the Schedule
change that are filed with the Commission is publishing this notice to by eliminating the separate On-Line
Commission, and all written solicit comments on the proposed rule Comparison fee and incorporating it
communications relating to the change from interested persons. into the transaction fees. Under the new
proposed rule change between the Schedule, the rate table will now show
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Commission and any person, other than the Firm transaction Fee of $0.15 per
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
those that may be withheld from the contract, the Broker/Dealer transaction
the Proposed Rule Change
public in accordance with the fee of $0.26 per contract and the Market
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be The PCX proposes to amend its Maker transaction fee of $0.26 per
available for inspection and copying in Schedule of Fees and Charges contract. The Customer transaction fee
the Commission’s Public Reference (‘‘Schedule’’) in order to make certain will remain at zero. While the published
Room. Copies of such filing also will be housekeeping changes to the Schedule. rate schedule will appear different than
available for inspection and copying at The text of the proposed rule change is it presently does, there is actually no net
the principal office of the Exchange. All available at NYSE Arca, at http:// change to the amount the Exchange
comments received will be posted www.archipelago.com/regulation/ assesses for trade related charges.
without change; the Commission does filings.asp and at the Commission. Order Cancellation Fee
not edit personal identifying II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s The PCX proposes to correct an error
information from submissions. You Statement of the Purpose of, and in the footnote associated with this fee.
should submit only information that Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule The PCX charges an OTP Firm a
you wish to make available publicly. All Change cancellation fee, under certain
submissions should refer to File conditions, when it cancels a certain
Number SR–NSX–2005–09 and should In its filing with the Commission, the number of orders in any given month.
be submitted on or before April 12, Exchange included statements In the footnote attached to this fee,
2006. concerning the purpose of, and basis for, under condition (i), where it reads ‘‘500
the proposed rule change and discussed contracts’’ the word ‘‘contracts’’ was
For the Commission, by the Division of
any comments it received on the mistakenly used instead of ‘‘orders.’’ In
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
proposed rule change. The text of these order to make the rule text consistent,
statements may be examined at the the PCX proposes to change the word to
Nancy M. Morris,
places specified in Item IV below. The now read ‘‘orders’’.
Secretary. PCX has prepared summaries, set forth
[FR Doc. 06–2793 Filed 3–17–06; 4:16 pm] in Sections A, B, and C below, of the 2. Statutory Basis
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

BILLING CODE 8010–01–P most significant aspects of such The PCX believes the proposed rule
statements. change is consistent with Section 6(b) of
the Act,5 in general, and furthers the
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,6
2 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
7 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 6 15.U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:47 Mar 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen