Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Ecological Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ecology.
http://www.jstor.org
Sciences
Biological
Abstract.
Most
year-round.
tive) reasons
all
although
South Wales
2006
Australia
reproduce
reptile
synchronizing
are
reptiles
on
of
driven
food
for
reproduce
factors
biotic
by
or
hatchlings)
Keelback
conditions).
from
reproduce
Australia
However,
temperatures.
most
do not
constraint,
be
might
tropical
reptiles
or hatchlings,
or
eggs
moist
incubation
suitably
in tropical
Colubridae)
ambient
high
thermal
in
reproduction
mairii,
with
embryogenesis
from
freed
this
of pr?dation
(e.g.,
peak
periods
factors
seasonal
(e.g.,
availability
(Tropidonophis
of Sydney,
Shine1
New
reptiles
restriction
tropical
Seasonal
year-round.
University
R.
even
occurs
in the tropics where
seasonally,
activity
to clarify
ideal model
the ultimate
provide
organisms
(adap
to specific
of reproduction
times
of year. Females
of almost
or offspring
their eggs
in the warmest
time of
species
produce
species
Squamate
for the
temperate-zone
the year,
thereby
A08,
and
P. Brown
G.
snakes
to November,
April
abiotic
as explanations
for this pattern:
the timing
of nesting
not minimize
does
pr?dation
on eggs,
nor maximize
or survival
rates for hatchlings.
our data
food
Instead,
availability
soon
nest
most
abiotic
factors:
female
keelbacks
after
the
of
cessation
implicate
intensely
are moist
to sustain
monsoonal
rains when
soils
(wetter
enough
optimal
embryogenesis
factors
nests
produce
Key
that
hatchlings,
to eggs).
is lethal
larger
(which
as well
waterlogged
in tropical
words:
as
temperate-zone
Australia;
mairii.
Tropidonophis
climate;
are more
developmental
Introduction
Most
and
animals
do not
year
plants
reproduce
but
instead
in
seasonal
distinct
peaks
display
some
cases
In
this
reproductive
activity.
reproductive
is extraordinarily
all gametes
with
seasonality
precise,
round,
a few
within
produced
or even
hours
coral
days
(e.g.,
et al. 1994).
cases
In other
the re
Babcock
spawning;
is spread
out
productive
activity
but nonetheless
is clearly
seasonal
uous
temperate-zone
(e.g., most
Abts
Homo
weeks
rather
species;
1992, Bauer
1988, Aichinger
Even
2000).
a continuously
over
of
life-history
to clarify
both
the observed
2000,
the
sapiens,
reproduction
extensive
occurs
is a major
axis
research
has sought
reasons
ultimate
for
variation,
the proximate
and
in patterns
diversity
factors
in day
1985,
1970,
19926, Alkins-Koo
of
length
Kumar
Chandola-Saklani
that
such
and
Kumar
et al.
1991,
2004),
13 December
received
Manuscript
accepted 21 July 2005. Corresponding
1
author. E-mail:
Corresponding
tim
reproductive
have
proved
ing. Proximate
generally
to study, with
amenable
robust
evidence
can be initiated
reproduction
by stimuli
Burns
contin
Fitch
of
archetypal
example
exhibits
breeding
species,
significant
in births
Because
the time
(Bronson
1995).
seasonality
at which
of year
ations
or months,
than
likely
abiotic
Thus,
animals.
more
seasonal
as
vari
1977,
Wikelski
et al.
temperature
(Ob
rainfall (Patterson
to survive)
factors may
plasticity;
are unlikely
to become
seasonal
reproduction
but
favor
hydric;
oviposition;
pr?dation;
reptile;
2003),
interactions
Johannes
1967,
et al. 2000,
Hau
2000,
1978,
between
these
factors
Kramer
1978,
Garrido
Hau
Pankhurst
2001,
(Janzen
et
al.
and Porter
2003).
more
to identify
cau
difficult
ultimate
proven
for reproductive
that is, the selec
seasonality,
tive advantages
and disadvantages
re
associated
with
at different
times
of year. Many
producing
hypotheses
It has
sations
have
been
tests
are
proposed
rare. For
mal
requirements
the highly
seasonal
ectothermic
animals
in this
reproductive
(which
to midsummer;
genesis
but
respect,
robust
authors
many
example,
for developing
empirical
invoke
ther
to explain
offspring
of cool-climate
cycles
restrict
typically
Fitch
1970,
Tauber
embryo
et al. 1986,
Vitt
cases
Mouton
and
hypothesis
except
Herselman
special
(e.g.,
extended
but with
in the
clear peaks
seasons,
breeding
of breeding
within
that longer
offer
intensity
period,
better
for study
in this respect
et
(Sexton
opportunities
et al.
cases
we
period,
as well
1997,
know
and
as
can
their
1993, Winemiller
et al.
Lemos-Espinal
that breeding
quantify
is possible
the conditions
consequences
133
for
1999).
over
the entire
at various
reproductive
1993,
In these
times
females
G.134 P. BROWN
their
and
Such
progeny.
from
predictions
sonally
then
be
to
used
about
hypotheses
test
sea
the
nest conditions,
(e.g., weather,
that might
restrict
repro
supply)
some
of
time within
the
subset
factors
varying
pr?dation
ductive
risk,
food
activity
to
broader
temporal
window
ically
can
data
alternative
AND
when
is phys
reproduction
offer
of
cycles
excellent
ma
In cool-climate
to investigate
these
topics.
species,
events
within
the
female
(ovu
cycle
jor
reproductive
are al
and parturition)
lation,
pregnancy,
oviposition,
most
down
ical
et al. 2003),
with
over
all year
sometimes
1991, Clerke
Schall
1994).
ous)
reproduction
climates
equatorial
female
by
and
(James
1985,
and
aseasonal
reptiles
Girons
and
(Saint
Shine
1993, Dearing
truly
al.
and Alford
Nonetheless,
et
(continu
is rare, even
Pfeffer
in
1971,
to
been
invoked
have
kinds
of hypotheses
major
in trop
the seasonality
of female
reproduction
explain
ical reptiles:
may
(1) Biotic
factors?egg
production
on eggs or nest
to periods
when
be restricted
pr?dation
that newly
such
is low, or timed
emerged
ing females
encounter
will
of
conditions
optimal
food
may
be
(e.g.,
same
The
later
kinds
of
to explain
seasonality
animals
(e.g., Wikelski
seasonally
risk
produced
at different
optimal
we
and
that
Shine
found
season
whereas
of reproductive
the wet-dry
trop
sea
is highly
seasonal
species'
to the geographic
in the wet-dry
tives.
Species
to arid-zone
related
lineages
Critically,
was
linked
season,
whereas
habitats
were
(1985)
otic"
of
the variables
taxa
wet-season
interpreted
hypothesis
this
bred
species
in the wet
bred
of
timing
distribution
tropics
tended
to breed
to those
related
pattern
with
above,
as
from
support
lineages
mostly
season.
and
for
the
preadapted
but
not
flooded
identified
by
to see whether
these
hypoth
is indeed
there
in the putative
selective
condi
of optimal
timing
season
the observed
reproductive
variation
annual
with
the
population.
mesic
of
floodplain
the
year,
with
and
to
species
the onset
Shine
on
empoundment
the Ade
60 km east of Darwin,
The
tropics.
but is shallowly
wet-dry
19966;
of
seasonal
see
Plate
in the
is dry for
for up to
floodplain
inundated
rains
monsoonal
In contrast
1).
to
maximum
regime,
precipitation
mean
warm
remain
(monthly
year-round
temperatures
minima
lower
with
maxima
31-34?C)
during
although
mean
Brown
minima
15-24?C:
the dry season
(monthly
the
highly
seasonal
2001).
Keelbacks
are medium-sized
(to
"abi
and
is an artificial
Dam
Fogg
laide River
snakes.
Shine
area
Study
et al.
closely
in the dry
more
James
breeders.
our data
the keelback
(Madsen
reproduction
of its rela
that were
moist
(cool,
if so whether
five months
1991), and
some
others
hatchlings
rates
(3.) pr?dation
Methods
most
in the dry
conditions
examine
significant
and
a comparative
analysis
from
in
species
squamate
seasonality
Australia.
ics of northern
Precipitation
for
rates)
of year;
nest
each
For
eses,
Australian
James
times
1976, Wolda
advanced
have
been
explanations
in other
of reproduction
types of
et al. 2001).
et al. 2000,
Aung
with
survival
thus,
(and
on eggs at different
of
we
to identify
the
paper,
attempt
to a series
of
with
respect
breeding
factors
that might
biotic
and abiotic
varying
sea
act as selective
for reproductive
forces
ality
1975,
spe
of
timing
coincides
1967, Barbault
in tropical
In this
1).
(Fig.
of
snake
mairii)
an opportunity
to test among
alter
provide
on the possible
and dis
advantages
hypotheses
This
breeds
of seasonal
breeding.
species
advantages
a strong peak of
over most
of the year, but with
breeding
two months
in May-June;
the eggs hatch
about
activity
tions
precipitation
Tropidonophis
colubrid
native
hence,
reproduction
tropical
con
nest
to periods
when
optimal
are available
but not flooded
moist
soils)
year-round,
areas
and
other
by
reproductive
faunas,
squamate
to fall
along
1996).
on a small
studies
(the keelback,
force,
high
restricted
ditions
Simberloff
is sea
are
made
divergent
soils).
to pr?dation (Tinkle
availability or low vulnerability
et
and Pfeffer 1971,
Saint
al.
Girons
Tinkle
1970,
1967,
ambient
Fitch 1982); or (2) Abiotic factors?although
temperatures
in many
sonal
diversity
long-term
plausibly
Two
offspring
with
the
and
Our
in
divergence
consistent
optimal
sympatric
been
prey
"biotic"
Australia
year
1975,
Ramirez-Bautista
1999,
Shine
Colli
and Hooker
within
that be
espe
taxo
merman
trop
each
months
several
documented
less
they
oc
of
the
predators,
not
similarity
have
when
reverse
argued
kinds
to similar
87, No.
appears
seasonality
when
cies
They
similar
used
predict
was
and hence,
timing
comments
have
Similar
that
nomic
taxa
would
cially
year
animals.
curring
cause
of these
many
and were
vulnerable
breaks
of many
females
1974, Fleming
Griffiths
1992,
2000, Luiselli
of
times
reproducing
species
the warmest
climates,
to
restricted
entirely
that preference
retaining
arid habitat,
and the
a seasonally
for mesic-habitat
studies
systems
Vol.
Ecology,
incubation
dry-soil
invaded
reproductive
their data.
(lizards
reptiles
with which
squamate
model
SHINE
hypothesis
possible.
Reproductive
and snakes)
R.
in
distributed
of
tropical
and
0.8
snout-vent
natricine colubrid
near-coastal
subtropical
habitats
Australia
January 2006
prior
and individually
measured,
weighed,
to release
at their mother's
site of capture.
Ten
established
grids were
2 X 3 m sections
of
survey
encompassing
the dam wall.
Each
100 m
the road
we
evening,
apart,
surface
the
recorded
Shaded
temperature
over
the
hourly
measured
gers
located ~1
values
were
and
relative
period
study
were
humidity
using
datalog
recorded
using
a rain
located
gauge
rainfall
2 km
wall.
These
were
weighed,
then
dried
and
re
Plate
1. Seasonal
over
shifts
in habitat
characteristics
season for keelback
the course of the extended
snakes.
nesting
The upper photograph
shows
the Adelaide
River
floodplain
below
the wet season
when
Fogg Dam during
(early March)
the area is inundated
and vegetation-covered,
whereas
the
lower photo
shows
the same location
late in the dry season
after a wildfire
most
has removed
and
(October)
vegetation
left bare, deeply
cracked
soil. Photo
credit: G. P. Brown.
clutches
a single
within
season,
breeding
through November
and
6;
Shine
2002a,
see
1). Two
Fig.
with
ovipo
nests
natural
gener
prob
in
the
present
were
paper
over
gathered
the
on
period,
an
average
of
27.2
nights
per
month
encountered
then measured
at
their
palpated
on
and
site
capture
prior
to
these
individuals
to release
marked
individually
prior
were
the following
Snakes
day.
to obtain
release
fecal
that
were
nature
females
later
(mean
days
their eggs were
release;
samples,
in
and if possible
con
the prey
that had been
were
until oviposition
retained
= 6.5
sd = 3.4)
before
days,
in the laboratory
incubated
and
of
JAS
Month
Fig.
1. Seasonality
of reproduction
in female keelbacks,
at Fogg Dam
in tropical Australia.
The
mairii,
Tropidonophis
the mean percentage
of adult female keel
upper graph shows
= 809
backs
shelled
oviductal
(total N
eggs
containing
over 5.5 years. Error bars rep
each month
snakes)
during
errors. The
resent
standard
lower graph
the dis
represents
tribution
of expected
hatch dates
of the mean
of
number
clutches
each month,
based on a two-month
incu
produced
com
bation period. Note
that the two graphs do not coincide
of monthly
because
variation
in the numbers
of fe
pletely,
males
For example,
hatch in Jan
v?ry few clutches
captured.
a reasonably
of gravid
females
uary despite
high percentage
two months
earlier (in November),
overall were captured
in November
in the year.
earlier
captured
because
compared
G.136P. BROWN
to determine
weighed
Brown
2002).
monthly
data
and
analyses
values
calculated
of
index
of
Thus,
for
the
are
figures
over
moisture
presented
those
interpolated
from
the
(1991).
Soil
moisture
rainfall
and
of moisture
1.0
averages
calculated
and
to plants
0.5-1
from
estimates
the
and
(McDonald
assess
of keelback
ability
occur
in water
(as might
we
rain),
eggs
placed
heavy
stages
opmental
the end
of
varying
to moist
whether
or
1 to 30
dictions
not
lation
is
to reduce
relations,
hence
of
In
total,
and
pre
approach
correlations,
c) Body
by
the
limiting
=
of N
hatchling
authors
Many
plain
invoked
seasonality
reproductive
we
conservative
of
size
sample
OH
-0.1
12.
sonally,
condition
study
and
area.
First,
second,
of hatchling
such
of
to ex
(e.g.,
year
Although
mean
the onset
in frog
do
frog abundances
rates
the feeding
influenced
snakes
by
are
abundance
frog
season
of the wet
numbers
among
(Table
tistically
significant
were
cm SVL)
backs
(<35
and few were
captured
July
tober,
dition
increased
offer
sea
vary
and
frog
body
abun
in 10 survey
Fig. 2.
of frogs seen per month
(a) Number
over 1465 nights over five years; (b) monthly
grids monitored
cm SVL) keelback
rates of 458 small
snakes
(<35
feeding
over five years;
condition
from general
(c) body
(residuals
vs. ln(snout-vent
linear regression
of ln(body mass)
length)
of 458 small (<35 cm SVL) keelback
snakes over five years.
? se.
are shown as mean
in all three panels
Values
1). Because
no
captured
between
during
small
keel
or
June
and
Oc
con
body
condition
to length,
relative
(mass
linear
general
regression
residual
using
vs.
of Inmass
scores
from
In SVL)
of
the
small
twofold
August
rates
and
data on feeding
pooled
over
the August-October
Body
period.
we
A-0
dance?
following
variation
Month
thus,
this hypothesis
in tropical
reptiles
times
that
(and
availability
is maximized
which
is timed
to establish
need
of small keelbacks
growth)
have
condition
-0.2
1. Oviposition
when
emerge
food
hatchlings
0.1
cor
of
A-0
0.2-,
Results
Hypothesis
an
used
1998). We
to adjust
the sample
overall
calculating
Peterman
means
and thereby
monthly
to a maximum
correlations
A-0
recorded
size
sample
more
them
making
and
such
time
exposure.
assumptions
"effective"
1995,
(Bence
Pyper
even more
conservative
sizes
near
of
auto
positive
I error
in corre
of Type
of compensating
for this
means
returned
we
and
the
risk
the
the
b) Feeding
hypotheses.
data exhibit
time-series
inflating
One
analyses.
0.7 -,
devel
and
lengths
were
then
eggs
to address
alternative
our
of
Some
different
for
incubation,
survived
they
us
allow
from
for
correlation,
risk
h. The
vermiculite
data
these
in water
incubation)
from
of
laid, mid-incubation,
(newly
to withstand
eggs
if a nest was flood
the
immersion
by
~~i-1?
F
J
1991).
were
over
at Fogg
Dam
recorded
temperatures
a 12-month
thermal
buried
0,
using
period
dataloggers
at two locations.
the soil surface
10, and 30 cm under
ed
a) Frog abundance
1.5
Soil
To
and McAlpine
rates,
available
87, No.
values
monthly
was
storage
evaporation
Vol.
Ecology,
2.0-1
statistical
60-year
15 of McDonald
2.5
of monthly
an additional
As
periods.
SHINE
of
years
our
on means
based
storage"
weekly
amount
Mc Alpine
five
R.
and
(Shine
to
variables;
we
in Fig.
content
two
have
above
soil moisture,
"soil
water
their
we
AND
be
but
like
rate
did
during
frog
not
vary
1). Correlation
show
surveys
young
2c).
Fig.
the dry season
and
abundance
(April-May;
lower
that
the
were
keelbacks
not
body
significantly
analyses
numbers
using
of frogs
correlated
=
10,
(N
Spearman
to
tended
(Fig.
condition,
among
mean
with
rates
Feeding
May-October
months
monthly
on our
seen
2b),
feeding
(Table
values
nightly
condition
of
body
r = -0.01,
P =
137
2006
January
Table
to examine
and biotic
1.
Results
of statistical
(ANOVA)
analysis
of keelback
and in abiotic
snakes,
activity
in this
of nesting
consequences
seasonality
nesting
fitness
variation
among
factors
that might
Variable
0.99),
P
0.20,
or their feeding
=
0.59).
These
a
be
df
frogs
months,
may
will
10,
r =
Spearman
that prey
young
availability
keelbacks.
to be more
not
may
prey
In fact,
vember.
few
1). This
(Fig.
falsifies
hatching
(December-January)
of nests
laid
are
clutches
mismatch
we
at
between
this
time
2. Oviposition
is timed
that
such
when
risk (and
thus,
pr?dation
is minimized
hatchling
mortality)
Hypothesis
hatchlings
Neonate
are
keelbacks
provide
at different
snakes
hatching
(7-mo)
emergence
we have
ple sizes
between
(Fig.
October
3). This
significantly
were
these
for hatchlings
when
numbers
larged
periods
comparison.
did not differ
(Table
1). Neonates
3. Oviposition
rates
of
the
higher
reproduction
rates
of
to produce
recapture.
hatchlings
If females
during
timed
this
is timed
egg
such
that
are
pr?dation
eggs
are
low
drive
reproductive
to oviposit
at times
risk from predators.
to a range
vulnerable
at
teeth
bladelike
the
rear
I/
g
B
?? 4*^ 3- T
of mammals
of
the maxilla
that
1\
\
I
\ 1
2
1
Jul
their
Fig.
backs
period,
year
fluctuations
snake
cucullatus.
slatey-grey
Stegonotus
at Fogg
to a phy
this species
Dam,
belongs
in which
is frequent,
and S.
lineage
oophagy
such as en
possesses
adaptations
egg-eating
are
abundant
seasonal
unlikely.
when
nests
impor
(wading
8-1
low
and
are
thus
our
varanid
G. P.
bandicoots,
lizards;
reptiles
(e.g.,
Brown
and R. Shine,
but the most
data),
unpublished
an oophagous
be
colubrid
may
important
predator
for
periods
(5.2%)
are
pressure
the most
and
released
were
and
site,
therefore
with
keelbacks
the prolonged
sam
acceptable
data
low
among
within
To maintain
January,
four time
leaves
rates
Recapture
times
period.
combined
and
study
at times
of year when
the
to survive.
Our mark
likely
rates
estimates
of survival
of
hatchlings
are most
data
recapture
snakes,
Keelback
and
case,
inconsistent
hypothesis
with
this conclusion,
at our
logenetic
cucullatus
(9.5-17.0
the
as
round
Abundant
cm SVL,
0.8
are eat
presumably
small
is not
This
birds,
snake,
emerge
of freedom
(degrees
of hatchling
predators
and varanid
lizards)
laid
and
prediction
seasonal
of
timing
food
availability
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
0.31
0.001
0.02
0.42
0.18
0.96
0.69
0.49
0.38
the
reject
In keeping
data.
Hypothesis
of
years
incubation).
can
would
in October-No
laid
the hypothesis
that the
to maximize
has evolved
oviposition
for hatchlings.
2-mo
in predator
the year. Ad
throughout
was
to coincide
timed
frequently
0.4
eggs
tant potential
Although
the wetter
abundant
during
common
Thus,
they
year-round.
frogs
remain
abundant
that young
keelbacks
sufficiently
if keelback
ditionally,
with
abundance
frog
to see a majority
expect
data
were
encounter
year
(N
1, 51
1, 42
42
42
56
19
19
19
1, 46
1, 56
1, 46
7, 29
7, 29
3, 14
were gathered
over periods
of 2-5
for which
data were obtained).
we
suggest
factor
for
analyses
limiting
tended
rates
in
the
species.
of females
11.2
Proportion
gravid
5.6
air temperature
Daily maximum
air temperature
9.7
Daily minimum
air temperature
17.7
Daily mean
Rainfall
19.2
Maximum
1.3
soil moisture
Minimum
5.0
soil moisture
Mean
soil moisture
2.8
Abundance
of frogs
1.1
Abundance
of slatey-grey
snakes
1.4
snakes eating keelback-sized
of slatey-grey
Proportion
keelbacks
condition
of hatchling
0.7
Body
of hatchling
keelbacks
with food 1.0
Proportion
keelbacks
1.1
of hatchling
Proportion
recaptured
Note:
Data on these variables
are based on number
of months
months
affect
3523
3.
hatchlings
rates
Sep
?
Oct-Jan
(mean
se) of marked
baby keel
calculated
from 183 recaptures
of
period,
over five years.
released
Recapture
by hatching
-1-1-1-1
Aug
138 P. BROWN
G.
AND
22
did
snake abundance
a) Slatey-grey
R.
SHINE
not
vary
(Fig. 4b),
in on keelback
are
eggs
of
16
keelback
dation.
14
12
are
10H
potential
M
0.6 -,
seasonality
in occurrence
data).
rates of slatey-grey
snakes
thermal
case
but
hatching,
only
also
many
2004).
Brown
significant
that air
whereas
mer
numbers
of slatey-grey
snakes
(Ste
(a) Monthly
= 756 over five
(b)
(N
cucullatus)
gonotus
caught
years);
of slatey-grey
snake fecal samples
(from
monthly
proportion
=
a total TV
All
keelback-sized
246)
eggshells.
containing
? se.
are shown as mean
values
soil
that
the
to penetrate
function
eggs
in our
P. Brown
(Shine
1991).
leathery
eggshells
iden
of all prey
items
>20%
comprise
at Fogg
Dam
studies
of S. cucullatus
(G.
and
R.
Shine,
some
of
ards,
these
unpublished
small
and
are
eggs
feces
unambiguously
The most
plausible
that
times
of year
(1)
than
of
numbers
did
not
eggs
would
shifts
at others.
wall
ble
significantly
in
variation
be
in habitat
keelback
Contrary
snakes
slatey-grey
dam
vary
seasonal
if slatey
use or diet
eggs
some
at
to this prediction,
on the
encountered
among
months
tended to be highest
(Ta
during
period
snake
to the keelback
nesting
corresponding
of
the
The
4a).
slatey-grey
proportion
(Fig.
on
of keelback
diet
(as based
eggs
composed
shells
in the feces
May-September,
of
recently
captured
specimens).also
studies
have
are optimal
thus,
(and
the
Hence,
be
might
restrict
the year
could
be
(or both)
mean
values
reveal
5b).
these
Reflecting
(Fig. 5c)
nest
sites
soil water
also
vary
1). Correlation
(Table
climatic
and
pat
content
the
through
reveal
analyses
relative
not
ilar
snakes.
for
fewer
contain
they
Although
to liz
belong
in Stegonotus
of eggshells
to keelback
belong
reason
on keelback
rates
pr?dation
show
snakes
seasonal
grey
such
data).
likely
found
body
2001,
of nesting
1)
intensity
activity
(Fig.
to either
related
maximum
air tem
monthly
=
r = -0.20,
or
P = 0.53)
12, Spearman
(N
perature
=
mean
to monthly
air temperature
12, Spearman
(N
r = -0.46,
P = 0.14).
relative
of
However,
intensity
was
re
(and
nesting
activity
significantly
inversely)
=
to monthly
lated
minimum
air temperature
12,
(N
=
=
r
P
and to monthly
rain
-0.83,
0.001)
Spearman
=
r = -0.94,
P < 0.0001).
fall (N
Sim
12, Spearman
was
Reptile
tified
(Fig.
temperatures
in potential
5d)
(Fig.
course
of
et al.
5a),
mid-year
(Fig.
concentrated
in the midsum
is highly
season
wet
suc
of
availability.
rainfall
terns,
the
species,
a
keel
by
larger
reproduction
are
eggs
its overall
hatchlings.
or moisture
temperature
in this respect.
Monthly
are
lowest
temperatures
Either
4.
2004)
Shine,
the pheno
Webb
generating
Shine
of keelback
peak period
ed by nest
Fig.
and
of
aspects
Experimental
moist
conditions
that relatively
cool,
keelback
incubation,
fitter;
the
optimal
reptile
strength;
R.
that
are
snake (including
Shine
and
experienced
its probability
not
shown
for
pr?
of
the
support
Varanid
lizards
such
other
and muscular
shape,
and
Brown
is timed
conditions
hydric
can
affect
egg
cessful
egg
to
fail
conditions
for many
and
back
also
(G. P. Brown
4. Oviposition
incubation
the
timing
of
abundance
hypothesis.
when
is
on
predators
unpublished
As
b) Feeding
are
Hypothesis
laid
rates
reduce
but especially
year-round,
of keelback
(the peak period
nesting).
seen
no clear
in the area, with
rarely
season
in the dry
Bandicoots
6H
not
egg pr?dation"
on the dam wall
active
the observed
1). Thus,
observations
Qualitative
other
only
"seasonal
months
but peaked
in
snakes
slatey-grey
key
most
time when
keelback
the
(Fig.
does
nesting
that
suggesting
at
eggs
incubating
87, No.
among
significantly
June
20
Vol.
Ecology,
correlation
strong
soil
temperature
P = 0.004)
but no
monthly
-0.76,
and
activity
=
-0.22,
Thus,
lowest
Figs.
soil
=
is scarce
relation
for
analyses
between
nesting
link
water
soil
(N
parameters
activity
=
12,
relationship
=
content
(N
and
showed
minimum
r =
Spearman
between
nesting
12,
Spearman
0.50).
occurs
when
rainfall
by keelbacks
are
cor
low.
The
temperatures
relatively
are
is less than perfect,
however:
temperatures
peak
and
nesting
in July
but
1 vs.
5a),
but
September
of
the
part
dry
season
(May-June;
compare
Figs.
1 vs.
139
2006
January
Month
Month
5.
atures;
water
Soil
5b).
content
is higher
latter
pattern
ation: flooding.
experience
logged
To assess
inundation
rain
different
each
the
additional
wet
and
that
of
ability
two mid-incubation,
eggs
rates were
near
two
1 and
survived
50%
after
8.5
4 h
are likely to
5b,d),
(Fig.
in water
drown
keelback
the
(two
end
h; 67%
1-30
h.
laid,
newly
of
incubation).
but mortality
12, 17.5, and 21
immersion,
after
logistic
variable
pendent
significantly
(X2
8.57,
regression
showed
that
affected
1 df, P
did not
development
=
teraction
0.83,
x2
possibly
until
nesting
and 5b,d).
the
as
survival
the duration
the probability
of
explaining
cessation
for more
keelbacks
why
of monsoonal
the
de
immersion
in
eggs
are
do
not
(Figs.
from
these
that
invoke
ductive
and disadvantages
of reproduction.
egg
analyses
biotic
pr?dation
abiotic
prey
at
factors
cies,
and
keelback
forces
availability,
and
with
inconsistent
as
ideal
our
nesting
field
coincides
factors
Instead,
in keelbacks.
nesting
incubation
data
as
such
survival
predic
as causal
our
Results
paradigms
for repro
Factors
times
constrain
year.
reptiles.
these
hypotheses
invoking
on reproductive
cyclicity.
support predictions
nest
of
enhances
associated
for hatchlings
or peaked
from
costs
selective
in tropical
rates,
further
conventional
challenge
as
factors
seasonality
broadly
ideal
hypotheses
associated
with
schedules
influences
begin
an
offer
In partic
a clear
of nesting
dates
but with
range
us to compare
the fate of hatchlings
1) allows
peak
(Fig.
at different
from
clutches
times
of year. Our
produced
set (809
data
clutches
3523
unusually
large
totaling
tions
of
stage
0.15;
snakes
alternative
the broad
the year,
seasonal
probabilities
of egg mortality
with
keelback
respects,
to test
with which
system
the advantages
study
about
ular,
of
eggs
submerged
in water
for
eggs
several
different
to withstand
eggs
we
In
consider
substrate
varying
periods,
of development
stages
we used
time period
six
All
abiotic
they might
for
Discussion
period
Eggs
heavy
the possibility
nests.
raising
At
an
suggests
season
the wet
during
with
that
that
Exper
environments
show
data
the
for
peak
the availability
this
spe
of
timing
of such
140 P. BROWN
G.
conditions.
That
when
the
when
soil
soil
but
about
hypotheses
failed
the
For
seasonality.
that reproductive
heavy
are
temperatures
we
have
Inevitably,
nest
is, keelbacks
is moist
AND
the period
during
rain is unlikely,
and
low.
relatively
to consider
other
output
concentrated
both
in time and space because
of benefits
to predator
satiation
Barbault
1967,
(Janzen
are most
to survive
That
is, hatchlings
likely
related
1975).
in a
hatch
they
even
escape
if
Unlike
hatching.
so
group,
large
there
the
reviewed
hypotheses
both
occurring
R. Shine,
Contrary
site are not
entire
sea
synchrony
weeks
and months
wall
(G. P. Brown
a temporal
to generate
On
satiation
predator
at a scale
instead
concentrated,
spatially
dam
data).
unpublished
expect
might
the
along
the
above,
predict
selection
that
will
only
and spatial
concentration
of nest
to this prediction,
nests
keelback
temporal
ing activity.
at our study
not
does
if
inevitably
soon
after
pressure
satiation"
"predator
hypothesis
sonal
of reproduction,
timing
favor
that many
is predator
scale,
hours
seen
How
reptile
erable
ality
are
general
species
this
(Fig.
looks
phenomenon
determinants
with
this
However,
seasonality.
in theory,
in a way
least
are
There
testing.
empirical
to further
why
sympatric
even
if in all
times,
that
conditions
(incubation)
inconsistent
at
reasons
three
at different
duce
to be
of reproductive
resolved
is easily
paradox
that is amenable
least
there
restrict
taxa might
repro
cases
it is abiotic
their
incubation
fer
and
among
species,
in incubation
gence
In an
area
with
ture content
and
embryonic
can
generate
dif
physiology
diver
significant
Badham
1971).
(e.g.,
in soil mois
variation
requirements
seasonal
strong
taxa with
Fogg Dam),
differing
hydric
at different
to breed
would
be
forced
(like
requirements
times
of year.
respect
careous
involves
(Bauer
1992a,
the
in
shell
most
The
dramatic
evolution
some
of
of
lineages
and Russell
to
reduce
Shine
can
hold
desiccation
pythons
Thompson
1999).
et
al.
so
5a),
Fig.
water
allows
1996:
secure
locations
from
flooding
(G.
P. Brown
and
R.
Shine,
data).
unpublished
selection
2) Nest-site
that
slatey-grey
tree snakes
con
can modify
the physical
nest.
For
in
the
eggs
example,
experience
and golden
snakes
cucullatus)
(Stegonotus
at Fogg
punctulatus)
(Dendrelaphis
season
nest
rather
than the dry season
in the wet
and R. Shine,
1991; G. P. Brown
unpublished
Dam
1996?,
the
that
condi
1999a).
Attend
off
a flooded
eggs
from
parental
protection
to exploit
optimally
of their eggs.
vs. oviparity)
pro
(viviparity
conditions
experienced
by
an tgg
Inside
the maternal
uterus,
developing
embryos.
to relatively
is exposed
constant
water
and high
po
tential
of seasonal
in soil water
variations
independent
mode
Reproductive
modifies
foundly
content
the abiotic
et al.
(Packard
Maternal
The
ectothermy)
environmental
optimize)
to a sub
to
embryo
1993),
(and
regulate
of
temperatures
their
rather
viviparous
er
abiotic
also
can
risks
than
taxa
et al.
(Bolton
than
aseasonal
(Shine
1982),
influence
as
such
of
the causal
en
likely
especially
reflects
biotic
rath
as
such
parental
Adaptations
to
the offspring's
vulnerability
and
starvation
(via pa
pr?dation
and
conditions
in
reproduction
1986),
factors.
protection
that
can
biology
a developing
conditions.
of reproductive
adaptations
the vulnerability
buffer
of
variable
incubation
seasonally
tropical
dotherms
hydric
can
mammals)
developmental
seasonal
rental
al.
significantly
Hence,
thermal
(en
regulation
buffer
embryos
endothermic
Thus,
variation.
birds,
(pythons,
1977).
the
body-temperature
can further
vs.
against
parents
hence
of
mode
dothermy
pect
buffer
experienced
by developing
embryos
et
Peterson
1987,
(Peterson
degree
not entirely
et al. 2004).
(Lourdais
albeit
5)
and Gibbons
can
also
thermor?gulation
regimes
stantial
Tinkle
1977,
but
feeding)
the
nest-site
pythons
incubation
for
temperatures
4)
biotic
Presum
punctulatus
also.
of the clutch
in dry
conditions
in water
Embryonic
development
more
in relatively
hot
effectively
season
of
the
late
(Shine
typical
dry
2003).
proceeds
as are
conditions,
cal
con
from
substratum
hydric
independence
seasons
a
wider
of
allow
range
egg-laying
might
are laid in elevated
if the eggs
in such
taxa, especially
ably,
ditions
ditions
and
pythons
et al.
(Aubret
care
lizards
gekkonid
them
this
in
divergence
a water-resistant
for
modify
(Madsen
In summary,
structure,
of D.
true
be
can
behavior
female
ing
timing:
1) Eggshell
habits
will
ameliorate
offspring
reproductive
arboreal
same
constraints.
For
climate-imposed
water
at
nest
Liasis
Dam
example,
pythons
fuscus
Fogg
season
late
in the dry
and fe
(September-October),
males
remain
with
their
clutch
generally
throughout
tions,
high
most
Although
and
87, No.
of S. cucullatus
suggests
monitoring
nest
in the hollows
of standing
trees,
risk of flooding
et al.
any
(Brown
the
Parental
3)
we
tropical
is consid
seasonally,
season
in reproductive
diversity
a single
area (Barbault
1976). At first
at
results?
reproduce
interspecific
even within
sight,
our
that
desiccation
1).
females
suggest
Vol.
Ecology,
eliminating
The
highly
and
hatching
than the
or days
rather
at Fogg Dam
in keelbacks
of
that most
2005).
that modify
reproductive
authors
have
many
suggested
a population
within
be
may
SHINE
Radiotelemetric
thus
some
factors
example,
R.
incubation.
biotic
overall,
than will
factors
Hence,
might
ex
sea
factors
generating
reproductive
to
in tropical
will
differ
sonality
organisms
according
of
features
outlined
above.
the kinds
reproductive
Many
(probably
with
ectotherms
care,
ations
(Shine
gimes)
seasonal
data).
as
and
for
in hydric
be
may
most)
tropical
eggs
water-permeable
taxa we
that
such
expect
conditions
the most
of egg
timing
calcareous
eggshells,
are oviparous
no parental
organisms
(and
important
production.
parental
and
seasonal
thermal
perhaps
on
constraints
However,
care,
traits
viviparity,
vari
re
the
such
and
January2006
less
organisms
increasingly
in ambient
environmental
variations
will
endothermy
vulnerable
render
to such
This
shift to a great
potentials.
rather
than abiotic
factors
may
For
features.
endo
example,
and water
temperatures
er importance
be reinforced
of biotic
other
by
an animal's
thermy
compromises
term
of
(because
energy
storage
for
capacity
extensive
et al.
Bonnet
thermor?gulation;
physiological
cannot
the sea
endotherms
dissociate
impede
Hence,
1998).
of feeding
from
the sea
intake)
(energy
as
of reproduction
timing
(energy
expenditure)
as
can
et
In
ectotherms
al.
this
(Bonnet
1998).
readily
to act as "income
endotherms
be forced
situation,
may
sonal
timing
sonal
such
breeders",
that
their
seasonal
of offspring
timing
seasonal
of
by
availability
or her
the reproducing
female
is constrained
production
resources
food
for either
offspring
et al.
Bolton
(e.g.,
1982,
and Millar
Duquette
1995).
are
there
sumably
of tropical
diversity
reptiles,
for which
species
reproductive
immense
is the result
sonality
see
(e.g.,
of biotic
constraints
phylogenetic
ductive
in some
timing
are
a broad
taxa.
of
in
groups
of
expected
a priori.
constraint
portant
taxa,
physical
Thermal
at
true
for
to hold
temperate-z?ne
season
similar
than
in most
these
two
would
be
a more
are
conditions
than moisture
rel
for
driving
reproductive
of habitats,
in
and
be more
may
the
breed
reptiles
conditions
appears
likely
as well
as
tropical
the processes
two
these
types
Similarly,
in repro
variation
that
im
cool-climate
theless,
itats,
may
especially
be a major
in relatively
cool and highly
seasonal
hab
in the arid zone,
of rainfall
seasonality
on
influence
seasonal
patterns
of reptile
there may
1988,
Thus,
(Andrews
1991).
reproduction
be strong
between
the forces
parallels
driving
ductive
in tropical,
and
arid-zone,
seasonality
ate-zone
reptile
of embryonic
species.
emphasizes
requirements
the intimate
bryogenesis
on
incubation
In
the
turn,
the
central
repro
influence
reproductive
of
dependence
conditions
seasonality
em
reptilian
available
for
(Deeming 2004).
their
thank E. Cox
continued
ideas, assistance,
by the Australian
the staff
Research
Council.
Literature
Abts,
ard,
M.
L.
1988.
Sauromalus
Cited
Reproduction
obesus:
the
of
R. M.
of variable
1988. Demographic
correlates
for a tropical
lizard. Oecologia
76:376-382.
egg survival
R. M. 1991. Population
Andrews,
stability of a tropical lizard.
72:1204-1217.
Ecology
Andrews,
R. Shine,
and S. Maumelat.
2003.
E, X. Bonnet,
Aubret,
success
Clutch
size manipulation,
and offspring
hatching
in the ball python
phenotype
regius, Pythonidae).
(Python
Journal of the Linnean
78:263-272.
Biological
Society
S. Htung,
A. Than, T. M. Soe, S.
Aung, M., W. J. McShea,
and C. Wemmer.
and social or
2001.
Monfort,
Ecology
of a tropical deer (Cervus eldi thamin).
Journal
ganization
of Mammalogy
82:836-847.
R. C, B. L. Wills,
and C. J. Simpson.
1994. Mass
Babcock,
on a high-latitude
of corals
coral-reef.
Coral
spawning
13:161-169.
J. A. 1971. Albumen
in eggs of the agam
formation
Badham,
id Amphibolurus
barbatus
barbatus.
1971:543-545.
Copeia
sur la repro
R.
1975. Observations
Barbault,
?cologiques
en
des l?zards
les strategies
de ponte
tropicaux:
de la Soci?t?
foret et en savane.
Bulletin
de
Zoologique
France
100:153-167.
R.
and reproductive
1976.
Barbault,
Population
dynamics
of three African
skinks. Copeia
1976:483-490.
patterns
D. G., and T. M. Barker.
The
1996.
Barker,
reproductive
of blood pythons.
4(2):24-34.
husbandry
Reptiles
1992?. Lizards.
in H. G. Cogger
126-173
Bauer, A. M.
Pages
and R. G. Zweifel,
editors. Reptiles
and amphibians.
Smith
mark, New York, New York, USA.
Bauer, R. T. 19926. Testing
in reproduction
variation
cyoniid
duction
and
about
generalizations
and recruitment
caridean
latitudinal
patterns
Invertebrate
with
series:
correcting
shrimp
species.
and Development
22:193-202.
J. R. 1995. Analysis
of short time
Bence,
for autocorrelation.
76:628-639.
Ecology
si
Repro
B. L., A. E. Newsome,
and J. Merchant.
1982. Re
in the agile wallaby,
(Gould),
production
Macropus
agilis
in the tropical
lowlands
of the Northern
oppor
Territory:
in a seasonal
tunism
environment.
Australian
Journal
of
Bolton,
7:261-277.
Ecology
and R. Shine.
versus
1998. Capital
Bonnet,
X., D. Bradshaw,
an ectothermic
income
Oikos
83:
breeding:
perspective.
333-342.
F. H. 1995.
Bronson,
tion: environmental
temper
Acknowledgments
We
in a
fishes
Biology
Seasonal
variation
factors.
Quarterly
in human
Review
reproduc
of Biology
influence
of weather
70:141-164.
on
physical
of
Reproductive
timing
stream.
Environmental
duction
2003).
available,
range
factors
Nonetheless,
hypothesis,
suitable
Thus,
ality
abiotic
than
limit
may
lineages.
abiotic
atively
simple
the times of year when
incubation
rather
and Wikelski
Rubenstein
pre
sea
2000.
intermittent
tropical
Fishes
57:49-66.
Reefs
the
Given
M.
Alkins-Koo,
long
stores
fat
R. D., K. A. Williams,
2003.
and R. R. Teillery.
Aldridge,
in the watersnake
and coelomic
Seasonal
fat mass
feeding
in Veracruz,
Nerodia
werleri
Mexico.
rhombifer
Herpeto
logica 59:43-51.
in the saxicolous
female
reproductive
1988:382-393.
Copeia
M.
and breeding
1992. Fecundity
sites
Aichinger,
uran community
in a seasonal
tropical environment.
on Neotropical
Fauna and Environment
27:9-18.
desert
liz
cycle.
of an an
Studies
2002a.
G. P., and R.
Brown,
a tropical natricine
20026.
dae).
Brown,
and
Shine.
snake,
tropical
The
snakes.
Austral
Reproductive
mairii
Tropidonophis
258:63-72.
(London)
Journal of Zoology
G. P., and R. Shine.
2004. Maternal
in a tropical
fitness
snake
offspring
Ecology
of
ecology
(Colubri
nest-site
choice
(Tropidonophis
85:1627-1634.
mairii,
Colubridae).
Ecology
G. P., R. Shine,
and T. Madsen.
2001.
of
Brown,
Responses
three sympatric
snake
to tropical
in
species
seasonality
northern
Australia.
Journal
of Tropical
18:549
Ecology
558.
2005.
Brown, G. P., R. Shine, and T. Madsen.
Spatial ecology
of slatey-grey
snakes
cucullatus,
(Stegonotus
Colubridae)
on a tropical Australian
of Tropical
Journal
floodplain.
in press.
Ecology,
142 P. BROWN
G.
lizards
of four species
of tropical Australian
on the factors regulating
lizard reproductive
of Herpetology
27:400-406.
and comments
Journal
cycles.
(Sauria, Teiidae)
1991:1002-1012.
G. R., A. K.
Colli,
of Central
Brazil.
Copeia
AND
R.
SHINE
and M. G. Zatz.
1997. Foraging
Peres,
in tropical
and reproductive
lizards. Jour
seasonality
nal of Herpetology
31:490-499.
M. D., and J. J. Schall.
1994. Atypical
Dearing,
reproduction
Island whip
and sexual dimorphism
of the tropical Bonaire
murinus.
tail lizard, Cnemidophorus
1994:760-766.
Copeia
87, No.
rainforest
bird. Journal of Experimental
Zool
neotropical
ogy 286:494-504.
and R. Shine.
1985. The seasonal
James, C,
timing of re
a tropical-temperate
in Australian
production:
comparison
lizards. Oecologia
67:464-474.
of sexual reproduction
Janzen, D. H. 1967. Synchronization
the dry season
of trees within
in Central America.
Evolution
21:620-637.
R. E. 1978. Reproductive
of coastal ma
Johannes,
strategies
rine fishes
in the tropics.
Environmental
of Fishes
Biology
3:65-84.
D. L. 1978. Reproductive
in the fishes
Kramer,
seasonality
of a tropical
stream. Ecology
59:976-985.
in
1991. Seasonal
Kumar, B. S., and V Kumar.
reproduction
Sturnus
role of
myna,
subtropical
brahminy
pagodarum:
and Comparative
General
photoperiod.
354-365.
83:
Endocrinology
and V Medialdea.
allocation
1996. Energy
Lampo, M.,
terns in Bufo marinus
in Venezuela.
from two habitats
nal of Tropical
12:321-331.
Ecology
J. A., G. R. Smith,
in Gadow's
spiny
Lemos-Espinal,
Reproduction
mode
Vol.
Ecology,
from
arid
(Phrynosomatidae),
western
Naturalist
44:57-63.
O., R. Shine, X. Bonnet,
Lourdais,
leau.
2004.
Climate
and R. E. Ballinger.
lizard,
Sceloporus
Mexico.
tropical
M.
embryonic
aspis. Oikos
1999.
gadovae
South
and G. Naul
Guillon,
affects
pat
Jour
development
104:551-560.
in a
D. C. 2004.
effects
of
Deeming,
Post-hatching
phenotypic
on reptiles.
in D. C. Deeming,
229-251
incubation
Pages
incubation.
evolution
and
editor. Reptilian
Environment,
snake, Vipera
viviparous
F. M. Angelici,
E. Odegbune,
M. A.
L., C. Effah,
Luiselli,
and E. Politano.
Female
2002.
breed
Inyang, G. C. Akani,
clutch
size and dietary
habits of a Nigerian
ing frequency,
of Calabar
Ground
Calabaria
rein
population
Python,
UK.
Press, Nottingham,
Nottingham
University
of sup
1995. The effect
S., and J. S. Millar.
of a
food on life-history
traits and demography
plemental
Journal of Animal
mexicanus.
Peromyscus
tropical mouse
64:348-360.
Ecology
en
care: key to understanding
Parental
Farmer, C. G. 2000.
Journal
12:127-129.
Herpetological
Determinants
of repro
1996a.
T., and R. Shine.
in female water pythons
(Liasis fuscus,
output
Py
52:146-159.
thonidae).
Herpetologica
Seasonal migration
of pred
19966.
T., and R. Shine.
Madsen,
ators and prey: pythons
and rats in tropical Australia.
Ecol
behaviour.
L.
Duquette,
features
and other convergent
dothermy
Naturalist
155:326-334.
mals. American
in birds
and mam
the adaptive
Farmer, C. G. 2003.
significance
Reproduction:
American
Naturalist
162:826-840.
of endothermy.
in lizards and snakes.
Fitch, H. S. 1970. Reproductive
cycles
of Natural
of Kansas Museum
History Miscel
University
52:1-247.
laneous Publications
in tropical
Fitch, H. S. 1982. Reproductive
cycles
reptiles.
Occasional
Papers
of Kansas
of
the Museum
96:1-53.
versity
Fitch, H. S., and A. V. Fitch.
on physical
tolerances
of
of Natural
History
1967. Preliminary
the eggs of lizards
48:160-165.
T. H., and R. S. Hooker.
Fleming,
of a lizard to tropical
response
1243-1261.
Uni
experiments
and snakes.
Ecology
Garrido,
M.
J., R. J. Haroun,
1975.
Anolis
cupreus:
Ecology
seasonality.
the
56:
and H. A. Lessios.
2000. Annual
antil
of the sea urchin Diadema
periodicity
reproductive
Islands.
Bulletin
in the Canary
larum Philippi
67:989-996.
Science
and P. Licht.
1974.
G. C,
Gorman,
Seasonality
of Marine
in ovarian
lizards. Ecology
55:360-369.
among
cycles
tropical Anolis
and home
A. D.
1999. Demography
Griffiths,
range of the
in
frillneck
lizard,
Chlamydosaurus
kingii
(Agamidae),
1999:1089-1096.
northern Australia.
Copeia
in relation
Cladoceran
Hart, R. C. 2004.
patterns
periodicity
warm
in two cascading
to selected
environmental
factors
water
Hau, M.
reservoirs
over
a decade.
Hydrobiologia
in variable
of breeding
Timing
birds as model
systems.
2001.
526:99-117.
environments:
Hormones
and Behavior
tropical
40:281-290.
and
2000. Visual
and J. C. Wingfield.
Hau, M., M. Wikelski,
in a
nutritional
food cues fine-tune
timing of reproduction
hardtii.
Madsen,
ductive
ogy 77:149-156.
1999a. Life history
T., and R. Shine.
Madsen,
consequences
in tropical
of nest-site
variation
(Liasis fuscus).
pythons
80:989-997.
Ecology
Rainfall
and rats: climat
19996.
Madsen,
T., and R. Shine.
of a tropical
rodent
dynamics
ically-driven
population.
Journal of Ecology
24:80-89.
N.
S., and J. Mc Alpine.
the northern
climate.
Pages
Australian
Floods
and
in C. D.
A. J. Williams,
editors.
and man
in the
ecology
McDonald,
drought:
M. G. Ridpath,
and M.
Haynes,
Australia:
Monsoonal
landscape,
A. A. Balkema,
northern
lowlands.
lands.
B. H., B. H. Rey, V. H. Serrano,
Mojica,
Pinilla.
2003.
Annual
of Cnemidophorus
nal of Herpetology
1991.
19-29
Rotterdam,
Nether
and M.
activity
reproductive
lemniscatus
(Squamata:
37:35-42.
P. Ramirez
of a population
Jour
Teiidae).
Mouton,
UK.
Oxford
Press, Oxford,
cycles.
University
M. E., and R. J. Brooks.
Prediction
of the
1987.
Obbard,
season of the common
onset of the annual nesting
snapping
43:324-328.
turtle, Chelydra
serpentina.
Herpetologica
as
of parturition
M. M., and R. Shine.
1998. Timing
Olsson,
a maternal
care
tactic
in an alpine
lizard
species.
Evolution
52:1861-1864.
in the northernmost
1994. Female
cycles
reproductive
of the two gekkonid
lizards, Hemidactylus
fren
populations
atus and Lepidodactylus
Research
9:
lugubris.
Ecological
121-130.
Ota, H.
January2006
Packard,
Reviews
Pankhurst,
or warm
G. C,
iological
evolution
control of reproduction.
Fish
28:385-389.
J. W.
1991. Rainfall
Patterson,
of the tropical
419-423.
lizard Mabuya
Physiology
and Biochemistry
in females
and reproduction
86:
striata striata. Oecologia
244:
Journal of Zoology
reticulatus).
(Python
giant snakes
405-414.
M. Elphick,
and P. Harlow.
1996. The
Shine, R., T. Madsen,
and maternal
influence
of nest temperatures
thermogenesis
on hatchling
78:
of water
Ecology
pythons.
phenotypes
1713-1721.
in the
1993. Reproduction
Smith, G. R., and J. B. Iverson.
from the
lizard Leiocephalus
psammodromus
curly-tailed
71:2147
Islands.
Journal
of Zoology
Caicos
Canadian
2151.
M. J., C. A. Tauber,
and S. Masaki.
1986. Seasonal
of insects. Oxford University
Press, New York,
adaptations
New York, USA.
M. B., and K. J. Russell.
and en
1999. Growth
Thompson,
marmor
of embryos
of the gecko, Phyllodactylus
ergetics
Jour
atus, a species with hard-shelled
eggs. Herpetological
Tauber,
1993. Snake
and M. E. Dorcas.
C. R., A. R. Gibson,
Peterson,
of body
the causes
and consequences
thermal
ecology:
in R. A. Seigel
and
241-314
variation.
temperature
Pages
Mc
J. T. Collins,
editors.
Snakes:
and behavior.
ecology
New York, New York, USA.
Graw-Hill,
in the body
1987. Daily
variation
C. W
Peterson,
tempera
tures of free-ranging
68:160-169.
garter snakes. Ecology
of meth
1998. Comparison
Pyper, B. J., and R. M. Peterman.
in correlation
ods to account
for autocorrelation
analyses
of Fisheries
and Aquatic
of fish data. Canadian
Journal
Sciences
55:2127-2140.
and L. J. Vitt.
Ramirez-Bautista,
A., C. Balderas-Valdivia,
of the whiptail
lizard Cnem
2000.
ecology
Reproductive
in a tropical
lineatissimus
Teiidae)
idophorus
(Squamata:
2000:712-722.
dry forest. Copeia
of
and fat-body
1992. Reproductive
C. F. D.
Rocha,
cycles
the tropical
sand lizard (Liolaemus
lutzae) of southeastern
26:17-23.
Journal of Herpetology
Brazil.
2003.
Seasonal
D. R., and M. Wikelski.
Rubenstein,
changes
a proximate
cue for reproductive
in food quality:
timing in
84:3013-3023.
marine
iguanas. Ecology
sexual des
1971. Le cycle
Saint Girons,
H., and P. Pfeffer.
des Sciences
Annales
Naturelles
du Cambodge.
serpentes
et Biologie
Animale
13:543-572.
Zoologie
R. E. Ballinger,
L. M. Hathaway,
O. J., E. P. Ortleb,
Sexton,
and P. Licht.
of three species
1971. Reproductive
cycles
of Panama.
of anoline
lizards
from the isthmus
Ecology
52:201-215.
of a low-energy
food
R.
1986.
Shine,
Ecology
specialist:
of the arafura filesnake
habits
and reproductive
biology
1986:424-437.
(Acrochordidae).
Copeia
in a strange
land: ecology
of the
Shine, R. 1991.
Strangers
colubrid
snakes. Copeia
1991:120-131.
Australian
an adaptationist
scenario:
R. 2002.
Shine,
Reconstructing
in
what
forces
favor
the evolution
of viviparity
selective
montane
Naturalist
160:582-593.
reptiles? American
2002. Effects
of seasonally
Shine, R., and G. P. Brown.
vary
on hatchling
of keelback
ing hydric conditions
phenotypes
from the Aus
snakes
mairii,
Colubridae)
(Tropidonophis
Journal of the Linnean
tralian wet-dry
tropics. Biological
76:339-347.
Society
and Boeadi.
J. S. Keogh,
1998. The
Shine, R., P. S. Harlow,
of life-history
traits: insights
from a study of
allometry
nal 9:37-42.
D. W.
life and demography
of the side
1967. The
Tinkle,
stansburiana.
Miscellaneous
Publi
blotched
lizard, Uta
cations
of the Museum
of Zoology
of Michigan
University
132:1-182.
and J.W. Gibbons.
and
1977. The distribution
Tinkle, D. W,
in reptiles. Miscellaneous
of viviparity
Publi
evolution
cations
of the Museum
of Zoology
University
of Michigan
154:1-55.
D. W,
Tinkle,
H. M. Wilbur,
and S. G. Tilley.
1970. Evo
in lizard reproduction.
Evolution
24:
lutionary
strategies
55-74.
G. M., R. T. F. Bernard,
and R. M. White.
2001.
Tinney,
on the male
Influences
of food quality
and quantity
repro
ductive organs of a seasonally
rodent, the pouched
breeding
from a seasonal
but un
(Saccostomus
campestris),
environment.
36:23-30.
African
Zoology
predictable
to the ecology
of Cerrado
Vitt, L. J. 1991. An introduction
lizards. Journal of Herpetology
25:79-90.
and life
1991. Ecology
Vitt, L. J., and D. G. Blackburn.
of the viviparous
lizard Mabuya
bistriata
(Scinci
history
Amazon.
1991:916-927.
dae) in the Brazilian
Copeia
J. K,
and R. Shine.
G. P. Brown,
2001.
Webb,
size,
Body
in a tropical
locomoter
behaviour
speed and antipredator
mouse
snake
the influence
of
mairii,
Colubridae):
(Tropidonophis
and genetic
incubation
environments
factors.
Functional
15:561-568.
Ecology
2000.
Wikelski,
M., M. Hau, and J. C. Wingfield.
Seasonality
of reproduction
in a neotropical
rain forest bird. Ecology
81:2458-2472.
K. O. 1993. Seasonality
of reproduction
Winemiller,
by live
fishes
in tropical rainforest
streams. Oecologia
95:
bearing
266-276.
H.
Wolda,
fall? Not