Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
By Mike Kuchar
Senior Research Manager
X&O Labs
Editors Note: Mike Kuchar sat down with Joel Rodriquez to talk exclusively about the MAP
concept, a double-pull concept in Fordhams run game that has averaged 8.3 yards per carry.
Joel Rodriquez is the offensive line coach at Fordham. He had previously served in the same
capacity at Bryant College (RI).
Introduction
The crux of Fordhams offense- one that has netted 522 yards per game this year- is a no huddle,
high tempo, 10 and 11 personnel unit that takes advantage of misplace defenders by using the
zone read game and play action concepts off of them. In fact, my first interaction with what
Fordham does was when I sat and listened to the Rams head coach Joe Moorhead talk at a clinic
about the various pass concepts he uses of his zone read run game. Though this may be a topic
for another conversation, I couldnt move my pen fast enough to write down all of his coaching
points. What I did catch was his admirable comments about his Offensive Line coach and run
game coordinator Joel Rodriquez and the terrific job he does designing. So I made it a point to
go drop in on Coach Rodriquez to talk about how Fordham is so successful running the ball.
What he divulged to me is what he calls his MAP concept- a Man/Gap hybrid used to take
advantage of defenses that play various games (exchanges, scrapes, etc.) to the read side of the
zone read. At its core the MAP scheme is a man concept to the front side of the play and a zone
concept to the backside of the play. The offense lineman to the play side have man assignments
while the backside lineman are responsible for backside gaps, at least in theory. While it may
seem like Power in structure, the front side man blocking assignments prevent any possible
double teams while the backside Tackle is free to climb to the second level as a double
puller. (Diagram 1) We didnt want to Trey or Deuce block because we just dont have the
personnel, said Rodriquez. It doesnt take much to install it- its zone for the front side of the
line and its a different read for the linebackers. The reason why its a different read is because
the running back executes a cross bow assignment by lining up away from the call side. His
footwork will be different based on whether or not the Rams or giving it or reading it.
PST should always have inside leverage by alignment, so drive DE & fight to keep
inside leverage; widen the B-gap.
Must stay square & under control so we can redirect and react to
movement
Dont care which leverage he gives, by movement or alignment
the outside foot, give ground, cross over, give more ground and come down hill. We have more
ground to cover. It helps us get more depth. It gets us away from the line of scrimmage. So
many teams are used to spilling the power, we need to see it more and to do that we must get
depth. The Sickle allows us to do that.As he pulls, he looks for the first gap he can insert his
body into- A gap, to B gap to outside the B gap. That is his progression. He can do this
because the backside linebacker is being accounted for by the backside Tackle, which is
different than Power. If the Defensive End is trying to spill you, square it up. The ball could
get spit out to the front side. We have to run a tight path. Rodriquezs coaching points for the
backside Guard are below:
Backfield Action:
Fordham will either have a read principle built in (by reading the backside C gap player) or
simply just give it to the back. But his footwork will change based on which of these concepts
are being executed. If were giving it, the back takes an open step and gets downhill, similar to
Power, said Rodriquez. The back will be away from the call side and cross bow which holds
the linebackers. If we read it, then the back is taught to jab step away from the play . It throws
off the linebackers reads completely.
The QB will read the Defensive End on the read principle. If hes blocked, he gives the ball.
According to Rodriquez, it meshes perfectly with the zone read game. We are a big zone read
team so many teams will set the 3-tech to the back because they dont want to give you the
bubble to run zone. Now you get a good crease to run the MAP concept against a shade/5
technique. As it turned out, Fordham was more productive giving the ball in 2012. The Rams
averaged 11 yards per game on giving the ball and 5.7 yards per carry when they were reading it.
MAP Variants
The Rams will also utilize the same concept out of Empty by running Q MAP (Diagram 8)
where the QB will be the ball carrier. If Fordham wants to predetermine the give, they will also
use a backside Tight End to seal the C gap and while still getting the double pull (Diagram 9).
Rodriquez also found that out of his 11 personnel teams, many teams were naturally the 3technique to the Tight End side (Diagram 10), which usually opens up a wider entry point for
the back. We dont like it to the 3-technique, but we will run it, said Rodriquez. Now you
have a back and a puller in a tight spot.
MAP Conflicts
One of the issues that the MAP concept presents is the difficulty it can present against a backside
3 and 5 technique such as a reduction front. Its tough for the QB to read a five with a back
block on a 3-tech. We will usually block the backside end in that situation and give the ball.
Against Odd or three-down fronts, Rodriquez will utilize the T.Z.T. call to get the backside
Tackle on the backside linebacker.
To see film cutups of the MAP concept against various fronts, click on the link below:
Conclusion
The reason why we were so intrigued by the MAP concept are essentially the two components
that intrigues all football coaches to schemes- its inexpensive to install and it meshes well with
two common concept most coaches are utilizing already: the Zone Play and the Power Play.