Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Sampling Objectives
Applications of Fluid Analysis Data
Factors affecting Representative Sampling
Selecting a Sampling Method
Bottomhole Sampling
Surface Sampling
Sampling Objectives
Ideally, the aim of reservoir fluid sampling is to provide the PVT laboratories with small
volumes of fluids under pressure which would, either directly or after recombination,
lead to a sample which is representative of the overall hydrocarbon fluid that fills the
pores of the formation. Coring and logging programs can normally continue throughout
the development of a reservoir because data obtained from the last well is often of equal
value to that obtained from the first. Unfortunately, this is not the case for reservoir
fluids. Due to the change in phase behaviour that occurs once the pressure in the
formation reaches the saturation pressure, sampling should be performed at the very
earliest stage of the fields production history and preferably before the downhole
average pressure falls below its initial value Pi. This condition has best chance of being
satisfied while testing exploration and appraisal wells, which by definition, are the first
wells to penetrate hydrocarbon deposits and are normally only produced for a limited
period of time.
Experience from the Beryl field, a giant field in the North Sea, underlines the importance
of a thorough evaluation of PVT properties. In that case, initial plans to construct a
platform and the associated production facilities were based on the fluid properties of
samples recovered from the first two wells. These plans had to be changed, at
considerable cost, when further evidence showed that the reservoir oil was much more
volatile than originally anticipated1.
Since erroneous reservoir fluid data can be so costly to the operator it is clear that both
the sampling and analysis must be conducted with the utmost care. Sampling is probably
the most delicate of field operations since it requires not only solid experience in open
hole logging or well testing, but a also a thorough understanding of reservoir
engineering, and well behaviour problems.
Introduction to Sampling 1.0
Revision 4
Page 1
Discipline
Applications
Reservoir Engineering
Production Engineering
Facilities/Process Engineering
Geology
Environmental Engineering
Page 2
r1
O il
W a ter
W a ter
L
Sma ll p c
La rge ra dius
La rge p c
Sma ll ra dius
? Pflow ? ? Pcapillary
? Pflow ?
?P
*L
?L
1 1
? Pcapillary ? 2? cos? ( ? )
r1 r2
Conditions for liberating trapped bubbles/droplets due to capillary entrapment
Page 3
Typical values of the critical saturation for the flow to occur vary between 10-20% for the
oil phase and 5-10% for the gas phase. The position of the reservoir temperature
isotherm with respect to the fluids phase envelope determines how quickly, in terms of
time-dependent pressure drop, the second phase will attain its critical saturation. It can
vary from a few psi for a near critical oil to a few hundred psi for a black oil system. In
the PVT laboratory, a 0-60% change in gas saturation has been observed for a pressure
drop of the order of 5 psi. The critical phase saturations are also referred as end point
saturations in the two-phase relative permeability curve plots.
1.0
Imbition
kr = k / k
krg
kro
1.0
Sgma x
Sgc
Residual Gas
Saturation
(=1-Swi)
In a simple single well reservoir model (Figure a) cylindrical flow dictates a pressure
distribution out from the wellbore which can be divided in two sectors:
Liquid pha se of
va rying
com positions
Ga s pha se
bubbles
p>>p b
p>>p b
Vicinity
of w ellbore
Reservoir
Page 4
1. A sector near the wellbore where pressure gradients due to flow are high.
2. A sector in the reservoir beyond the first where pressure gradients due to flow are
low.
As long as the fluid remains monophasic, everywhere in the zone the composition is the
same and identical to the original one.
Once the second phase starts to drop out, the composition of the produced and of the
remaining fluids in the reservoir are altered by the selective distribution of the individual
components in the two streams. As the downhole flowing pressure drops slightly below
the saturation point (Figure b), small bubbles (droplets for gas condensates) of the minor
phase are released but remain rather isolated from each other inside the network of the
porous media.
Liquid pha se of
va rying
com positions
Ga s pha se
bubbles
p
p>p b
pb
Vicinity
of w ellbore
Reservoir
As they have not obtained saturation values high enough to allow them to flow, they
remain in the formation whereas the mobile phase composition is now poorer (richer for
gas condensates) in light and intermediate fractions. This phenomenon explains the
slight reduction in the producing GOR that is often reported during production from oil
reservoirs and which lasts for a short period of time before it starts picking-up again.
While the condensed phase in a gas condensate may never attain its critical saturation
to flow, the gas saturation in an oil reservoir will almost certainly reach a point where
gas flow will occur. Once this critical saturation has been attained (Figure c), the flow of
the gas phase will increase rapidly because of its relatively low viscosity and thereby
increase its contribution to the total production.
Page 5
Liquid pha se of
va rying
compositions
Ga s pha se
bubbles
p<p b
p<p b
Vicinity
of w ellbore
Reservoir
The GOR will typically rise and will attain a maximum value before, after a long
producing time, it will follow a soft declining trend once the remaining in-situ fluid has
been stripped from its light end. Nevertheless, Serra et al7 could not verify in their work
that in all cases of oils with bubble points close to the flowing pressure the GOR started
increasing when the gas saturation around the wellbore obtained values higher than its
critical one.
Pressure, Rs
pi
Producing
GOR
Pb
Pressure
Decline
Rsi
Time
Typical patterns of the GOR and pressure evolution during production from an oil reservoir
Page 6
A sample of such fluid will not be representative of the original reservoir fluid existing
farther out in the reservoir and thus it will not be suitable for sampling and PVT analysis.
Steps must be taken to determine the reservoir pressure, temperature, and the general
category of the reservoir fluid. If the relationship between reservoir pressure and
bubble point or dew point pressure can be estimated, steps can be taken to ensure that
the sampled fluid is representative.
Page 7
Page 8
Timing
Timing is an important consideration in obtaining a representative sample of the original
reservoir fluid. Obviously, it makes sense to sample as early in a reservoirs producing
life as possible. Once production creates significant volumes of free gas on a reservoirwide basis, obtaining a sample of the original fluid may be impossible. Often, a reservoir
fluid sample will be taken as part of a well testing procedure that immediately follows
the completion of the first well in a reservoir. An example would be a newly discovered
field where development plans may rely on the early determination of expected reserves
and production rates. In such cases, it is important that the new well be cleaned up
before sampling to remove all traces of drilling fluid from the well and the near wellbore.
Selecting a Sampling Method
In general, one has a choice of taking monophasic samples close to the formation with
bottomhole sampling tools or sampling the separated streams of oil and gas at the
surface and recombining them later in the laboratory to obtain a representative reservoir
fluid sample. The choice of sampling technique is influenced by:
o The volume of sample required for analysis.
o The type of reservoir fluid to be sampled.
o The degree of reservoir depletion.
o The surface process and well completion design.
Page 9
Bottomhole Sampling
Bottomhole sampling is the trapping of a volume of fluid at reservoir conditions in a
pressure vessel run in the well close to the productive interval, either suspended on
wireline or in the DST string. This sampling method is used exclusively during openhole
logging and is the most effective technique during cased hole operations such as
exploration well testing or production testing, when reservoir flowing conditions permit.
Bottomhole sampling applies when:
o the flowing bottom hole pressure is believed to be greater than the reservoir fluid
saturation pressure.
o the subsurface equipment or nature of the fluid (e.g. API<10) will not prevent the
sampler from reaching the appropriate depth or make its retrieval difficult.
o relatively small volumes of fluid are required for analysis.
o an asphaltene study is required.
Surface Sampling
During exploration well testing and production testing it is possible to obtain
representative surface samples from various locations such as the wellhead, choke
manifold or test separator depending on the fluid properties and flow conditions. Surface
sampling upstream of the separator requires the wellhead pressure be above saturation
pressure using conventional sampling techniques or at least homogeneous for
specialised techniques such as Isokinetic sampling.
By far the most common surface sampling technique is separator recombination
sampling. This involves taking simultaneous samples of separator oil and gas, along
with accurate measurements of their relative production, and reconstructing a
representative sample in the PVT laboratory.
Page 10
Surface sampling is routinely used as a back-up to a good quality bottomhole sample but
may be the primary source of samples when:
o a large volume of both pressurised oil and gas are required for analysis (e.g. EOR
study)
o bottomhole flowing conditions are less than saturation pressure or there is a high
water cut such that the fluid in the hole may not be representative.
The main challenge in separator recombination sampling is ensuring the accuracy of the
separator flow measurements and stability of separation conditions before and during
sampling. The separator liquid and gas are in dynamic equilibrium. Any drop in pressure
or increase in temperature of the separator liquid, which is at its bubble point, will result
in the formation of gas. For the separator gas, which is at its dew point, any increase in
pressure or decrease in temperature will result in the condensation of heavy
components.
Generally, a bottomhole sample is preferred, if gas and oil surface measurement
capabilities are in question. However, if they are reliable, the surface sampling
technique can give a statistically valid value of GOR measured over a long period of time.
Isokinetic gas sampling at the separator gas outlet line is occasionally performed to
determine the amount of liquid carryover in the separator during high flowrate gas
condensate testing. This liquid, which would otherwise go unmeasured, can be a very
significant proportion of the total liquid in a lean gas condensate.
Page 11