International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication

Volume: 3 Issue: 5

ISSN: 2321-8169
3006 - 3009

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Implementation in Automation using ML unit Tool

Mamta

Rajiv Munjal

Computer Science and Engineering(MDU)

CBS Group of Institution(CBSGI)
Jhajjar, India
e-mail: mamta.yadav.2817@gmail.com

Computer Science and Engineering(MDU)

CBS Group of Institution(CBSGI)
Jhajjar, India
e-mail: rajiv.mujal@rediffmail.com

Abstract A primary function of assessment would be to find application downfalls to ensure that flaws can be identified and corrected.
Assessment are unable to determine that the merchandise features properly underneath many problems however can certainly only determine
that no operate properly underneath particular problems. This extent regarding application assessment typically involves study of code and also
performance of their code in numerous surroundings and problems and also reviewing the actual areas of code: will it carry out what exactly it
can be supposed to carry out and carry out what exactly it requires to complete.
Keywords-Automation assessment, assessment methods, matlab, mlunit tool

__________________________________________________*****_________________________________________________
I.

INTRODUCTION

Automation Tests indicates utilizing an automation instrument

to help carry out the test out scenario room. The actual
automation computer software can also enter test out files in to
the System under Analyze, examine anticipated in addition to
actual effects in addition to crank out detailed test out
studies[5].
Analyze Automation demands substantial investments
connected with money in addition to Automation Tests
indicates utilizing an automation instrument to help carry out
the test out scenario room. The actual automation computer
software can also enter test out files in to the System under
Analyze, examine anticipated in addition to actual effects in
addition to crank out detailed test out studies[2].
Analyze Automation demands substantial investments
connected with money in addition to assets. Effective
improvement series requires setup connected with exact same
test out room regularly[2].
Using a test out automation instrument it's possible to history
that test out room in addition to re-play that seeing that
expected. If the test out room will be automated, simply no
individual input is essential. This particular enhanced ROI
connected with Analyze Automation.
Target connected with Automation is usually to lessen volume
of test out conditions to become run hand and never get rid of
guide assessment as a whole.
Analyze automation just might lessen or maybe get rid of the
cost of actual assessment. Your personal computer can
certainly comply with some sort of rote sequence connected
with ways faster than the usual person, also it can certainly run
the actual testing right away to provide the final results every
day. On the other hand, the actual labour which is saved in
actual assessment has to be invested as a substitute authoring
the actual test out method[5].
Based on the style of request to become examined, and the
automation instruments which have been preferred, this may
involve far more labour than the usual guide strategy. In
addition, a number of assessment instruments found an
exceptionally great deal of files, probably creating a frustrating
activity connected with interpreting the final results[2].

Issues for example gadget individuals in addition to computer

software your local library has to be examined employing test
out applications. In addition, assessment connected with more
and more consumers (performance assessment in addition to
fill testing) is typically simulated in computer software in lieu
of executed in practice.
II.

SELECTION OF AUTOMATION TOOLS

Selecting the right instrument can be a tough job. Following

requirements will assist you to select the finest instrument for
ones requirement[20]

Environment Support
Ease of use
Testing associated with Data bank
Object id
Image Assessment
Error Healing Assessment
Object Mapping
Scripting Vocabulary Utilised Support regarding
numerous kinds associated with examination : such as
well-designed, examination administration, cell phone,
and so forth...
Support regarding a number of assessment frameworks
Easy for you to debug the automation computer software
scripts
Ability to realize physical objects in different atmosphere
Extensive examination studies and also benefits
Minimize instruction cost associated with decided on
equipment

Tool choice is usually considered one of main issues to be

discussed prior to going regarding automation. Initial,
distinguish the prerequisites, discover several equipment and
its particular capabilities, arranged the requirement through the
instrument and also go for a Evidence of Principle.

1
IJRITCC | May 2015, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org

_______________________________________________________________________________________

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication

Volume: 3 Issue: 5

ISSN: 2321-8169
3006 - 3009

_______________________________________________________________________________________________
III.

FRAME WORK

IV.

Framework in Automation
A construction is placed associated with automation tips that
really help with[15]
Maintaining regularity associated with Examining
Improves check structuring
Minimum using code
Less Maintenance associated with code
Improve re-usability
Non Technical testers may be involved with code
Training period of with all the device may be lessened

Involves Information wherever appropriate

Sort of Platform
You will discover a number of kinds of platform
utilized in application automation screening:
1. Info Influenced Automation Platform
Info driven scripts are those people applicationspecific scripts taken or even hand coded inside
automation tools little-known terminology and
changed to accommodate varied files. Issues will be
for important request feedback areas and also
software alternatives making it possible for your
script to drive the applying along with exterior files
given by your getting in touch with schedule or even
your spend which invoked your test out script.
2. Search phrase Influenced Automation Platform
Your type focuses on implementing the search phrase
driven automation platform. It doesn't contain any
additional characteristics including following
prerequisites or even giving traceability concerning
robotic test out effects and also any other perform of
the test out course of action. This just supplies a type
for any search phrase driven delivery powerplant
pertaining to robotic exams.
3. Modular Automation Platform
Your test out script modularity platform demands
your creation associated with little, separate scripts
which represent quests, sections, and also capabilities
of the application-under-test. These little scripts are
after that utilized in the hierarchical trend to make
more substantial exams, recognizing a unique test out
situation several.
4.Cross Automation Platform
Cross Automation platform is actually mix of three
platform Info driven, Search phrase Influenced,
Modular Automation Platform

BENEFITS OF AUTOMATION TESTING

Following are benefits of automated testing[20]:

70% faster than the manual testing

Wider test coverage of application features

Reliable in results

Ensure Consistency

Saves Time and Cost

Improves accuracy

Human Intervention is not required while execution

Increases Efficiency

Better speed in executing tests

Re-usable test scripts

Test Frequently and thoroughly

More cycle of execution can be achieved through

automation

Early time to market

V.

PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION

Computer software an atomist Automated Computer

software Testing intended for Matlab Computer software
assessment could boost software package top quality. To
check properly, professionals as well as fitters ought to
discover how to compose as well as run testing, establish
appropriate test conditions, decide anticipated components,
as well as appropriately deal with floating-point math[31].
Employing Matlab mlUnit programmed assessment
framework, professionals as well as fitters using Matlab
will make software package assessment a built-in portion of
his or her software package improvement regimen[30].
Produce Unit Tests
Assemble test strategies in to test-case classes
Script-Based Unit Tests
Produce Script-Based Product Checks
Function-Based Unit Tests
Write Function-Based Unit Checks
Write Basic Test Situation using Functions
Write Test Case Create as well as Teardown Function
Class-Based Unit Tests
Author Class-Based Product Tests with MATLAB
Write Basic Test Case using Class

2
IJRITCC | May 2015, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org

_______________________________________________________________________________________

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication

Volume: 3 Issue: 5

ISSN: 2321-8169
3006 - 3009

_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tag Product Tests
Write Tests using shared Fixture
Create Standard Test using Shared Fixture
Create Sophisticated Custom made Fixture
Create Standard Parameterized Test
Create Sophisticated Parameterized Test
Run-Based Unit Tests
Run test packages inside the assessment framework
All testing within a bundle
All testing within a class
All testing within a folder

fib(x)
function y = fib(x)
% Simple queue implementation of Fibonacci function..
if x < 0 || (int64(x) ~= x)
error('invalid input: please input only non-negative
integers.');
end
if x < 2, y = x; return;
end
q = [0 1];
for k = 2:x
q = [q sum(q)];
q(1) = [];
end
y = q(2);
when we call fib function

Analyze Test Outcomes

Analyze Test Situation Outcomes
Analyze Was unable Test Outcomes

VI.

IMPLEMENTATION OF AUTOMATED TESTING IN MATLAB

Fig. 1

USING MLUNIT

mlunit originally began as an update to mlUnit

(http://sourceforge.net/projects/mlunit/), also available from
MATLAB Central file exchange[31].

When assert is used with fib function

The purpose was to add support for the new "classdef" style
classes in MATLAB 2008a[28]. Creating tests involves
subclassing a class named TestCase, then adding methods
whose names begin with "test". Inside each method you can
rited
validation
methods
(assert,
assertEquals,
assertNotEquals) to check for success or failure. All tests are
run automatically and their results recorded and reported after
the run[30].
Example of Function Based Unit Test:
Testing Fibonacci function
We all know the Fibonacci series
0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13
In which we always consider the sum of last two number at
third location
Loc1
0
Loc2

Loc3

1(Loc1 + Loc2)

Loc4

2(Loc2 + Loc3)

Loc5

3(Loc3 + Loc4)

Loc6

5(Loc4 + Loc5)

Loc7

8(Loc5 + Loc6)

Loc8

13(Loc6 + Loc7)

Fig. 2
Testing fib using mlunit
test_fib.m
function self = test_fib(name)
%test_fib constructor.
%
% Class Info / Example
% ====================
% The class test_fib is the fixture for all tests of the testdriven
% Fibonacci. The constructor shall not be called directly, but
through
% a test runner.
tc = test_case(name);
3

IJRITCC | May 2015, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org

_______________________________________________________________________________________

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication

Volume: 3 Issue: 5

ISSN: 2321-8169
3006 - 3009

_______________________________________________________________________________________________
self = class(struct([]), 'test_fib', tc);

<properties/>

test_null.m
function self = test_null(self)
%test_null checks, whether the return value of fib(0) is 0.

<testcase classname="@test_fib" name="test_null"/>

<testcase classname="@test_fib" name="test_value"/>

assert_equals(0, fib(0));
test_value.m
function self = test_value(self)
%test_value tests different values of the fibonacci function (y
= fib(x)).
assert_equals(1, fib(1));
assert_equals(1, fib(2));
assert_equals(2, fib(3));
assert_equals(3, fib(4));
assert_equals(5, fib(5));
assert_equals(8, fib(6));
assert_equals(13, fib(7));
assert_equals(21, fib(8));
assert_equals(34, fib(9));
assert_equals(55, fib(10));

test_value1.m
function self = test_value1(self)
%test_value1 tests different values of the fibonacci function (y
= fib(x)).
assert_equals(0, fib(1));
After Running mlunit test result will be as follow

<testcase classname="@test_fib" name="test_value1">

<failure><![CDATA[Data not equal:
Expected : 0
Actual : 1
In <a href = "matlab:opentoline
('C:\Users\aa\Documents\MATLAB\mlunit\test\@test_fib\test
_value1.m',10)">test_value1.m</a> at line 10]]></failure>
</testcase>
<system-out/>
<system-err/>
</testsuite>

VII. FUTURE SCOPE

Manual Testing Examining of most do the job moves, all

job areas, all unfavorable scenarios is usually moment
along with expense ingesting[3].

It's difficult to evaluate regarding numerous lingual websites personally.

Automation will not involve People intervention.

You possibly can work programmed examination

unattended (overnight).

Automation
setup[16].

Automation allows enhance Test Coverage.

Manual Testing Examining can be uninteresting and

therefore error prone

increases

rate

involving

examination

VIII. CONCLUSION

After testing following xml file is creating representing

failures, errors, testcases, time take to test
TEST-@test_fib.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<testsuite name="@test_fib" errors="0" failures="1" tests="3"
time="0.428" hostname="unknown" timestamp="2015-0423T14:33:46">

Automation Screening can be use of instruments in order to

implement test out conditions whilst manual tests requires
human being input regarding test out delivery[16].
In the car region, hardly any in advance tests continues to be
accomplished. Using the intro associated with executable
modeling instruments including MLUnit this in advance tests
can be more possible. It does not take task in the tool
companies to make this tests technology offered and also
sensible for the user[4].
Automation Screening helps you to save period, price and also
manpower. Once registered, it can be simpler to operate a
good automatic test out room when comparing manual tests
which will need competent work[2].
Any kind of program may be analyzed physically but
automatic tests can be proposed only reserved for secure
systems and it is typically employed for regression tests.
Furthermore, specific tests forms including ad-hoc and also
goof tests are more fitted to manual delivery[10].
Information tests may be grow to be recurring and also boring.
Not so, the boring section of executing same test out
4

IJRITCC | May 2015, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org

_______________________________________________________________________________________

International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication

Volume: 3 Issue: 5

ISSN: 2321-8169
3006 - 3009

_______________________________________________________________________________________________
conditions repeatedly can be taken care of through automation
computer software in automation tests.
REFERENCES
[1] Artem, M., Abrahamsson, P., & Ihme, T. (2009). LongTerm Effects of Test-Driven Development A case study. In:
Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme
Programming,10th International Conference, XP 2009,. 31,
pp. 13-22. Pula, Sardinia, Italy: Springer.
[2] Bach, J. (2000, November). Session based test
management. Software testing and quality engineering
magzine(11/2000),
( http://www.satisfice.com/articles/sbtm.pdf).
[3] Bach, J. (2003). Exploratory Testing Explained, The Test
Practitioner 2002,
(http://www.satisfice.com/articles/et-article.pdf).
[4] Bach, J. (2006). How to manage and measure exploratory
testing. Quardev Inc.,
(http://www.quardev.com/content/whitepapers/how_measur
e_exploratory_testing.pdf).
[5] Basilli, V., & Selby, R. (1987). Comparing the
effectiveness of software testing strategies. IEEE Trans.
Software Eng., 13(12), 1278-1296.
[6] Berg, B. L. (2009). Qualitative Research Methods for the
Social Sciences (7th International Edition) (7th ed.).
Boston: Pearson Education.
[7] Bernat, G., Gaundel, M. C., & Merre, B. (2007). Software
testing based on formal specifications: a theory and tool.
In:Testing Techniques in Software Engineering, Second
Pernambuco Summer School on Software Engineering.
6153, pp. 215-242. Recife: Springer.
[8] Bertolino, A. (2007). Software Testing Research:
Achievements Challenges Dreams. In:International
Conference on Software Engineering, ISCE 2007, (pp. 85103). Minneapolis:IEEE.
[9] Causevic, A., Sundmark, D., & Punnekkat, S. (2010). An
Industrial Survey on Contemporary Aspects of Software
Testing. In: Third International Conference on Software
Testing, Verification and Validation (pp. 393-401). Paris:
IEEE Computer Society.
[10] Chillarege, R. (1999). Software Testing Best Practices.
Tehcnical Report RC2145, IBM.
[11] Frankl, P. G., & Hamlet, R. G. (1998). Evaluating Testing
Methods by Delivered Reliability. IEEE Trans. Software
Eng., 24(8), pp. 586-601.
[12] Galin, D. (2004). Software Quality Assurance: From theory
to implementation. Pearson Education Ltd.
[13] Butts, K., et. al., Automotive Powertrain Control
Development Using CACSD, Perspectives in Control:
New Concepts and Applications, Tariq Samad (ed.), IEEE
Press, 1999.
[14] Butts, K., Toeppe, S., Ranville, S., Specification and
Testing of Automotive Powertrain Control System
Software using CACSD tools, 1998, Proceedings of the
17th AIAA/IEEE/SAE Digital Avionics System
Conference
[15] Toeppe, S., Ranville, S., Model Driven Automatic Unit
Testing Technology: Tool Architecture Introduction and

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]

Overview,
1999,
Proceedings
of
the
18th
AIAA/IEEE/SAE Digital Avionics System Conference
Toeppe, S., Ranville, S., An Automated Inspection Tool
For a Graphical Specification and Programming
Language, 1999, Quality Week Conference
Toeppe, S., Ranville, S., Bostic, D., Rzeimen, K.,
Automatic Code Generation Requirements For Production
Automotive Powertrain Applications, 1999, IEEE
International Symposium on Computer Aided Control
System Design
Toeppe, S., Ranville, S., Bostic, D., Wang, C., Practical
Validation of Model Based Code Generation for
Automotive Applications, 1999, Proceedings of the 18th
AIAA/IEEE/SAE Digital Avionics System Conf.
Patel, S., Smith, P., Sun, W., Ramanan, R., Donald, H.,
Toeppe, S., Ranville, S., Bostic, D., Butts, K., CACSD in
Production Development: An Engine Control Case Study,
2000, Global Powertrain Conference
Toeppe, S., Ranville, S., Bostic, D., "Automating Software
Specification, Design and Synthesis for Computer Aided
Control System Design Tools", 2000, Proceedings of the
19th AIAA/IEEE/SAE Digital Avionics System Conf.
Chilenski, J. J., Miller, S., Applicability of modified
condition/decision coverage to software testing, 1994,
Software Engineering Journal
Biezer, B., Software Testing Techniques, Second Edition,
International Thomson Computer Press, 1990
The Mathworks, www.mathworks.com
WindRiver, www.windriver.com
ETAS, www.etasinc.com
I-Logix, www.ilogix.com
Rational, www.rational.com
ADI, www.adi.com
T-VEC, www.t-vec.com
http://sourceforge.net/p/mlunit/mlunit/HEAD/tree/trunk/
http://in.mathworks.com/help/matlab/write-unit-tests1.html

5
IJRITCC | May 2015, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org

_______________________________________________________________________________________