Dr ZDr ZDr ZDr Z
Joseph Zernik, PhD PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750; Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
Blog: http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
THURSDAY, MARCH 11, 2010
10-03-11 Richard Fine: Complaint filed with H Marshall Jarrett, Director, US Attorneys Office
H Marshall Jarrett
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:58:43 -0800 To: "Attention: H. Marshall Jarrett,Director" <202.616.2278@metrofax.com>, From: joseph zernik
Subject: False imprisonment of Attorney Richard Fine: Complaint against Attorney Kevin McCormick and Courtroom Assistant Donna Thomas; Request for equal protection under the law for Richard Fine.
Executive Office for United States Attorneys H. Marshall Jarrett,Director PH 202.514.2121 Fax 202.616.2278 Email:
RE: False imprisonment of Attorney Richard Fine: Complaint against Attorney Kevin McCormick and Courtroom Assistant Donna Thomas; Request for equal protection under the law for Richard Fine.
Dear Special Agent Steven Goldman: Please accept the writing below as a complaint against Attorney Kevin McCormick and against Courtroom Assistant Donna Thomas, of the US District Court, Los Angeles, for perversion of justice in the Habeas Corpus Petition of Attorney Richard Fine - Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914). Together, the two were instrumental in affecting his ongoing false imprisonment. The Local Los Angeles FBI, California Attorney General, and Los Angeles District Attorney Office continue to refuse to
Page 2/5 March 11, 2010
take any action in matters pertaining to corruption of the justice system.
Respectfully, Dated: March 11, 2010 La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California Joseph H Zernik, PhD By: ______________ JOSEPH H ZERNIK PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 Phone: 323.515.4583 Fax: 323.488.9697 Email Blog: http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
Scribd:
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs Los Angeles, March 11 - in response to an article in the ABA Journal, titled: 70-Year-Old Lawyer Hits One- Year Mark in Jail in Contempt Case, Dr Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles resident, posted the correction, copied and linked, below.
[1]
Dr Zernik concluded: The case of Attorney Richard Fine is a historic landmark and a textbook case in providing a catalog of the ingenious methods employed by the corrupt justice system to pervert justice.
JUDICIARY
Page 3/5 March 11, 2010
70-Year-Old Lawyer Hits One-Year Mark in Jail in Contempt Case
Posted Mar 10, 2010 1:03 PM CST By Sarah Randag A year ago, a Los Angeles County superior court judge sentenced lawyer Richard Fine to jail indefinitely after he refused to provide personal financial information in an attorney fee dispute. Now? He is still in jail, Dan Walters writes in a column for the Sacramento Bee, if not still a lawyer: TheState Bar of California indicates that he has been disbarred. Fine has been a longtime critic of Los Angeles County's practice of giving its judges nearly $50,000 in extra pay over their state salaries, and that it creates a conflict of interest for judges hearing cases involving the county, Walters writes. And, on top of that, Fine says that because of the extent of his criticism, it's a conflict for any judge to hear a case involving him. A state appellate court agreed with Fine in 2008, saying the payments violated California's constitution. But the legislature passed a retroactive authorization of the payments last year, Walters writes. Fine has petitioned for his release, but the California Supreme Court refuses to interfere, and the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has denied his petition, Walters writes. "Fine holds the key to his jail cell," Kevin McCormick, an attorney for the Los Angeles court, said in an appellate brief. "By simply agreeing to answer the questions and produce documents concerning his assets, that he has a legal obligation to provide, his coercive confinement will end."
COMMENTS
1. B. McLeod Mar 10, 2010 4:37 PM CST Its probably just that he enjoys the food there. 2. Peter C. Lomtevas Mar 11, 2010 6:12 AM CST The issue here is not Fines holding the key to his confinement. He dared to expose a potential fraud upon the public that has to do with judicial impartiality and in California, one dare not question the integrity of the judiciary. The animosity between bar and bench is legendary and this has bred some California superlawyers who dedicated their practice before one or two judges and always win no matter the odds. Justice depends upon retaining one of these. California is said to be the land of fruits, nuts and flakes. No one ever stepped into a California courtroom without that thought popping into his mind. 3. Joseph Zernik Mar 11, 2010 12:19 PM CST Please stand corrected, being the ABA Journal, regarding the facts in the Richard Fine Case: 1) Richard Fine was never sentenced for Contempt, there is no valid court record such as judgment or
Ihre Neugier belohnen
Alles, was Sie lesen wollen.
Jederzeit. Überall. Auf jedem Gerät.
Keine Verpflichtung. Jederzeit kündbar.