Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
e-ISSN: 2278-5728, p-ISSN: 2319-765X. Volume 11, Issue 5 Ver. I (Sep. - Oct. 2015), PP 82-94
www.iosrjournals.org
Abstract: In the present paper, the effect of dimensionless parameter on mixed convection flow within a liddriven triangular cavity has been numerically investigated. The bottom wall of the cavity is considered as
heated. Besides, the left and the inclined wall of the triangular cavity are assumed to be cool and adiabatic
respectively. The cooled wall of the cavity is moving up in the vertical direction. The developed mathematical
model is governed by the coupled equations of continuity, momentum and energy to determine the fluid flow and
heat transfer characteristics in the cavity as a function of Rayleigh number, Prandtl number and the cavity
aspect ratio. The proposed numerical procedure adopted in this investigation yields consistent performance
over a wide range of parameters such as Rayleigh number Ra (10 3-104), Prandtl number Pr (0.71 6.00) and
cavity aspect ratio (0.5 1.5). The numerical results have been presented in terms of stream functions,
temperature profile and Nusselt numbers. It is found that the streamlines, isotherms, average Nusselt number
and average fluid temperature in the cavity strongly depend on Rayleigh number, Prandtl number and cavity
aspect ratio.
Keywords: Finite element method, Lid-driven triangular cavity, mixed convection, Prandtl number, Rayleigh
number
Nomenclature
CAR
Cavity aspect ration
Gr
Grashof number
Re
Reynolds number
Ra
Rayleigh number
Pr
Prandtl number, /
Nu
Average Nusselt number
g
Gravitational acceleration (ms2)
k
Thermal conductivity of the fluid (Wm-1K1)
h
Convective heat transfer coefficient (W/m2
K)
N
Non-dimensional distance
Cavity volume
V
L
Height of the cavity
p
Pressure (Nm2)
P
Non-dimensional pressure
q
Heat flux (Wm2)
Tc
Temperature of cold wall (K)
Th
Temperature of hot wall(K)
Dimensional temperature
av
Average temperature
I.
T
Temperature (K)
T
Temperature difference
V0
Lid velocity (ms-1)
Cp
Specific heat at constant pressure (J/kg K)
x, y Cartesian coordinates (m)
X, Y
Non-dimensional Cartesian coordinates
u, v
Velocity components (ms1)
U,V
Non-dimensional velocity components
Greek symbols
Fluid temperature
Introduction
Mixed convection phenomenon occurs in many engineering systems such as cooling of electronic
devices, drying technology, solar collectors, flat glass manufacturing, nuclear reactors etc. The cavity with
moving lid is the most important application for these heat transfer mechanisms, which is seen in cooling of
electronic chips, solar energy collection, food industry etc. Numerical analysis of these kinds of systems can be
found in many literatures. Akinsete and coleman [1] first studied the various flow system in triangular cavity.
They solved the problem for various aspect ratios and Grashof numbers (Gr) and concluded that heat transfer
across the base wall increase towards the hypotenuse and base intersection. Karyakin and Sokovishin [9]
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11518294
www.iosrjournals.org
82 | Page
II.
Model Specifications
The physical model considered here is shown in Fig.1, along with the important geometric parameters.
The heat transfer and the fluid flow in a two-dimensional triangular cavity with a fluid whose left wall is
subjected to cold temperature Tc (k) and moving with velocity V. The bottom wall of the cavity is subjected to
hot temperature Th (k) while the inclined wall is kept adiabatic. The fluid was assumed with Prandtl number (Pr
= 0.71-6.0), Reynolds number (Re = 40-100) and Newtonian, and the fluid flow is considered to be laminar. The
properties of the fluid were assumed to be constant.
Adiabatic wall
V(m/s)
g(ms-2)
Tc(k)
X
Th(k)
Figure-1. schematic diagram of the physical system
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11518294
www.iosrjournals.org
U(m/s
)
83 | Page
0
X
Y
(1)
Momentum equations
U
U
P 1 2U 2U
U
V
X
Y
X Re X 2 Y 2
V
V
P 1 2V 2V
U
V
) Ra Pr
X
Y
Y Re X 2 Y 2
(2)
(3)
Energy equation
1 2 2
U
V
X
Y Re Pr X 2 Y 2
(4)
expressed as Nu
0
y 0
III.
Numerical Analysis
The governing equations along with the boundary conditions are solved numerically by employing
Galergkin weighted residual finite techniques. The application of this technique is well described by Taylor and
Hood [19] and Dechaumphai [5, 6].The finite element formulation and computational procedure have been
omitted here for brevity.
IV.
Preliminary results are obtained to inspect the field variables grid independency solutions. Test for the
accuracy of grid fineness has been carried out to find out the optimum grid number. In order to obtain grid
independent solution, a grid refinement study is performed for a triangular cavity with Pr = 0.71, Re= 50 and Ra
= 104. Fig.2 shows, the convergence of the average Nusselt number, Nu at the heated surface with grid
refinement. It is observed that grid independence is achieved with 13967 elements where there is insignificant
change in Nu with further increase of mesh elements. We believe that for this inconsequential change before the
element 13967 should not be taken as for grid independence. In table 1, Six different non-uniform grids with the
following number of nodes and elements were considered for the grid refinement tests: 9138 nodes, 1523
elements; 36102 nodes, 6017 elements; 49260 nodes, 8210 elements; 62280 nodes, 10380 elements; 83802
nodes, 13967 elements; 99192 nodes, 16532elements. From these values,83802 nodes, 13967 elements can be
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11518294
www.iosrjournals.org
84 | Page
9138
(1523)
2.4095029
8.297
36102
(6017)
2.5207933
34.0
49260
(8210)
2.5207523
47.703
62280
(10380)
2.6746807
67.297
2.8
83802
(13967)
2.7484171
94.828
2.75818
112.25
13967
2.75
20704
2.7
16532
3670
2.65
Nu
99192 (16532)
10380
2.6
2.55
8210
2.5
6017
2.45
1523
2.4
2.35
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
Elements Number
Figure-2: convergence of average nusselt number with grid refinement for Pr = 0.71, Re= 40 and Ra = 104.
V.
Numerical results are presented in order to conclude the properties of the presence of dimensionless
parameters in lid-driven triangular cavity with a heat conducting horizontal bottom wall and the adiabatic
inclined wall. The left wall of the cavity is kept at cooled temperature T c (k) which is moving with V (m/s)
vertically.
Two-dimensional forms of Navier-Stokes equations along with the energy equations have been solved
using Galerkin finite element method. The dimensionless parameters that must be specified for the system are
Reynolds number Re, Rayleigh number Ra, and Prandtl number Pr. Since so many basic dimensionless
parameters are required to characterize a system, an analysis of all combinations of these parameters is not
practical. The numerical results will be aimed to explain the effect of several parameters at a small fraction of
the possible situations by simplifying the configuration. Results are obtained for a range of Rayleigh number
from 103 to 104 at Pr = 0.71- 6.0 and Re = 40-100, with constant physical properties. The parametric studies for
a wide range of governing parameters show consistent performance of the present numerical approach to obtain
as stream functions and temperature profiles. The computational results indicate that the heat transfer coefficient
is strongly affected by Rayleigh number. Representative distributions of average Nusselt number at the heated
surface and average bulk temperature of the fluid in the cavity will then be presented.
The results were compared with those reported by Basak et al.[3], obtained with an extended
computational domain. In Table 2, a comparison between the average Nusselt numbers is presented. The results
from the present experiment are almost the same as Basak et.al.
Table 2: Comparison of The Results For The Constant Surface Temperature With Pr = 0.71
Nuav
Ra
103
104
105
Present work
Basak et al.[3]
5.49
5.77
7.08
5.40
5.56
7.54
5.1
www.iosrjournals.org
85 | Page
Ra= 104
1.50
0.50
Ra= 103
1.50
1.50
7
0.2
0.70
0.03
0.03
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11518294
0.50
0
0.5
0
1.0
2.00
2.15
0.50
0.59
2.00
2.15
0
2.0 2.33
1.50
1.00
2.50
1.0
1.00
0.27
1.50
Re=40
1.
00
0.50
0.50
2.50
1.33
1.50
1.50 1.00
0.50
3.00
3.0
0.50
1.50
3.00
2.00
3.50
2.00
2.00
0.05
2.50
1.00
www.iosrjournals.org
2.00
1.50
0.50 0.05
86 | Page
0.50
1.21
0.72
1.21
0.50
0.88
0.50
0.50
0.21
1.29
0.
33
0.72
1.50
2.00
0.04
2.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
0.50
2.50
1.00
Re=70
1.5
1.00
0.72
0.0
1.00
1.50
0.50
2.00
0.06
0.60
0.
33
1.21
3.00
0.60
1.29
0.50
2.00
0.19
0.5
00
2.
3.50
0.50
0.50
1.00
2.00
0.12
.50
1.50 2
0
0.5
0.12
2.5
0.85
0.20
0.50
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
2.00
0.18
1.00
1.50
0.50
0.50
1.50
1.83
0.00
0.50
0.50
1.83
0.63
1.00
5
1.50
50
0.
1.50
0.2
2.00
2.50
0.50
0.50
1.30
3.00
1.50
0.50
1.00
5
0
0.8 1.3
0.50
0.50
85
0.
0.8
0.20
0.50
Re=100
0.63
1.0
0.50
2.50
0.20
28
275.0
0.0
2.
97
Ra= 104
0.0
310.00
5.0
0
31
6.6
00
5.
.92
301.92
29
31 2
.00
285.00
0
2 90
77
7.
290.00
0.0
0.0
305.00
31
28
.51
305.00
300.00
315.00
318.60
295.00
30 7
295.00
310.00
285.00
305.00
300.00
Re=40
275.00
30
290.00
28
273.43
300.00
31
27
Ra= 5103
318.66
319.83
5
8.1
31 319.44
27
2.
7
73 2
285.00
285.00
300.00
5.0
6.
86
31
312.94
280.0
0
285.00
300.00
.00 28
0
285
7.
43
310.00
5.0
www.iosrjournals.org
30
302.34
29
302.24
305.00
290.00
305.00
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11518294
3
.31 08.
6
0.0
317.52
319.15
30 7
31
0.0
315.00
295.00
31
305.00
295.0
Re =70
.00
274.03
275.0
31
10
3.
275.00
273.57
31 9
.18
87 | Page
3.
02
0
280.0
315.00
8.
06
.40
300.00
31
0
3.4 .24
7
31
3 02
285.00
31
31
319.41
307.71
.00
7.
72
.00
295.00
.88
.00
310.00
2.5
305
2 95
00
0.
30
315.00
3 06
290.00
305.00
0.0
305.00
300.00
7.
95
31
0.0
280
30
30
290.00
31
Re= 100
.94
2 73
275.00
285.00
28 0
.00 2
7
273.37
5 .0
27
Re=40
Re=50
Re=70
Re=100
3.2
0.6
0.55
av
Nu
3
2.8
0.45
2.6
Re= 40
Re= 50
Re=70
Re= 100
0.4
2.4
0.35
2.2
2
0.5
0.3
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
2000
4000
Ra
6000
8000
10000
Ra
5.2
www.iosrjournals.org
88 | Page
Ra= 5103
27
273.19
3.0
27 1
3.
22
275.00
275.00
280.0
273.56
.00
5.0
28
315
5.0
0
0.0
31
315.00
318.63
290.00
28
300.00
5.0
81
1 8.
3.3
285.00
27
.00
3 10
298.44
296.92
295.00
315.00
280.00 275.0
2 75
.00
315.00
0.0
0.0
30
31
0.0
3
298.5
00
5.
285.00 290.00
300.31
295.0
302.3
30
31
00
5.
315.00
0.0
46
6.
29
30
30
5.
00
290.00
285.00
.3
298
5.
00
301.06
285.00
30
300.00
30
290.00
280.00
Pr = 3.0
0 .0
302.21
29
00
5.
31
29
305.00
285.00
0.0
.00
302.1
69
7.
31
30 0
285.00
00
310 .
0
5.0
30
00
3 0 0.
317.31
319.0
8.
17
305.00
30
30
280.00
275.00
Pr = 0.71
Ra= 104
301.71
285.00
303.63
300.93
30
300.00
280.00
.62
297.15
0.0
0
.00
.00
2 95
315.00
29
302.46
21
9.
298.57
298.08
305.00
296.92
295.00
31
290
0.0
315.00
280.00
31
295.00
00
5.
2
298
280.00
298.06
296.77
8
.3
99
30
00
5.
Pr = 6.0
300.00
290.00
300.00
303.07
290.00
320.00
310.00
Figure-7: Isotherms patterns for different Pr (0.71, 3.0, 6.0) when Re = 40.
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11518294
www.iosrjournals.org
89 | Page
Ra= 104
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
1.00
0.02
0.50
1.00
1.00
2.00
0.06
2.5
3.00
3.50
1.50
1.50
0.29
2.00
0.29
0.50
3.00
3.00
1.50
1.00
3.00
1.50
0.70.50
6
00
2.
2.00
1.00
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
2.00 1.0
2.
50
3.00
2.00
2.00
0.50
0.29
1.
00
1.5
1.50
2.50
0.76
2.50
1.50
2.50
1.00
1.50
0.29
0.50
1.00
1.50
3.00
0.09
1.00
2.00
Pr = 3.0
00
1.
0.50
0.37
1.00
2.00
0.50
0.50
0.37
0.04
0.6
1.00
1.50
0.15
0.37
0.50
0.50
3.0
3.50
1.50
1.50
2.65
2.50
2.0
1.50
3.00
2.00
1.00
1.50
1.00
1.50
1.50
0.50
0.08
0.50
2.00
1.50
2.00
3.00
2.50
Pr = 0.71
Ra= 103
3.00
0.50
2.00
1.00
1.50
0.50
2.00
3.00
1.31
0.7
3
1.50
2.50
2.00
1.00
3.00
2.00
0.3
0.7
1.00
2.
50
0.50
3.00
1.00
0.50
2.00
0.12
1.31
0.50
3.
50
0.50
1.50
2.00
0.3
0.50
2.00
2.00
Pr = 6.0
1.0
0.50
0.50
1.00
1.00
2.50
1.50
1.00
Figure-8: streamline patterns for different Pr (0.71, 3.0, 6.0) when Re = 40.
9
Pr= 0.71
Pr= 2
Pr= 3
Pr= 6
8
7
0.6
0.55
Nu
av
5
4
0.5
Pr= 0.71
Pr= 2
Pr= 3
Pr= 6
2
0.45
1
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
2000
4000
Ra
6000
8000
10000
Ra
90 | Page
Ra= 104
Ra= 10
0.4
0.4
273.48
275.00
CAR =0.5
273.67
275.00
305.00310.00
0.2 280.00
0.2
280.00
285.00
5
29
.00
285.00
295.00
00
0..00
33110315.00
315.00
317.89
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.0
2.
97
0.2
28
27
0.4
285.00
300.00
31
.00
2 90
0.0
28
77
7.
00
5.
315.00
318.60
301.92
29
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11518294
290.00
295.00
310.00
285.00
30
305.00
310.00
5.0
0
275.00
305.00
300.00
CAR =1.0
273.43
319.83
www.iosrjournals.org
5
8.1
31 319.44
91 | Page
275.00
272.88
273.42
CAR =1.5
305.00
275.00
305.00
301.84
310.00
305.00
300.00
295.00
317.75
310.00
295.00
319.48
318.69
Figure-11: Isotherms patterns for different CAR (0.5, 1.0, 1.5) when Pr = 0.71 and Re=40.
Ra= 103
Ra= 104
0.5
0.4
1.6
0.4
3.60
1.20
0.2
0.60
0.04
0.1
0.20
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.3
0.4
0.5
1.40
1.20
0.20
0.80 1.00
0.60
1.601.40
2.20
2.00
1.20
1.20
0.20
0
0.20
0.1
0.2
X 0.3
0.4
0.5
0.50
0.07
0.80 1.00
0.40
0.07
1.20
0.04
1.40 0.20
0.40
1.60
0.80
1.80
0.3
1.60
2.40
60
0.2
2.00
CAR =0.5
2.0
2.50
1.50
1.50
0.27
1.50
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11518294
0.2
0.70
1.0
0.59
2.00
CAR =1.0
1.
00
0.50
2.50
1.50
0.03
0.03
2.00
2.50
1.00
3.00
3.0
0.50
1.50
2.00
3.00
2.00
3.50
2.00
www.iosrjournals.org
2.00
1.50
0.50 0.05
92 | Page
1.00
0.50
1.50
1.00
0.25
1.00
2.50
4.00
0.50
4.00
CAR =1.5
1.50
2.00
2.
00
0.50
1.50
1.50
0.25
1.00
0.04
0.50
2.50
3.00
4.50
1.00
0.04
0.50
Frame 001(0.5,
20 Nov 2012
Tempereture
for different
at Re=50 and
and Pr=0.71
Figure-12: Stream line patterns for different CAR
1.0, Bulk1.5)
when
Pr CAR
= 0.71
Re=40
4
CAR= 0.5
CAR= 1.0
CAR= 1.5
3.5
CAR= 0.5
CAR= 1.0
CAR= 1.5
1.5
3
Nu
av
1
2.5
0.5
2
0
1.5
2000
4000
6000
Ra
8000
10000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Ra
VI.
Conclusion
A finite element method for steady-state incompressible conjugate effect of mixed convection and
conduction has been presented. The finite element equations were derived from the governing flow equations
that consist of the conservation of mass, momentum, and energy equations. The derived finite element equations
are nonlinear requiring an iterative technique solver. The Galerkin weighted residual method is applied to solve
these nonlinear equations for solutions of the nodal velocity components, temperatures, and pressures. The
above example demonstrates the capability of the finite element formulation that can provide insight to steadystate incompressible conjugate effect of mixed convection and conduction problem. The investigation is carried
out for a number of relevant dimensionless groups, namely Rayleigh number Ra, Hartmann number Ha,
Reynolds number Re, and Prandtl numbers Pr. From an examination of heat transfer and fluid flow phenomena
revealed by the numerical experiments, the following major conclusions have been drawn:
Interesting behavior of the flow and thermal fields with varying Reynolds number is observed. In
addition, the numerical solutions indicate that the increasing values of Re leads to higher heat transfer
rate from the heat source but other side the average bulk temperature decline significantly.
As Ra escalates the value of the magnitude of the stream function is and the cells become larger in size,
become more attested to the boundary wall.
The impact of Prandtl number on the flow and thermal fields in the cavity is found to be more
pronounced, if Re is kept fixed. The maximum heat transfer is experimented at the highest value of Pr for
the considered value of Ra.
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11518294
www.iosrjournals.org
93 | Page
Acknowledgements
Authors would like to thank the Department of Mathematics, Bangladesh University of Business &
Technology (BUBT), for providing computer facility during this work. We also express our gratitude to
anonymous reviewers for their suggestions which improved the quality of the manuscript.
References
[1].
[2].
[3].
[4].
[5].
[6].
[7].
[8].
[9].
[10].
[11].
[12].
[13].
[14].
[15].
[16].
[17].
[18].
Akinsete V.A., Coleman T.A., Heat transfer by steady laminar free convection in triangular enclosures, International Journal of
Heat and Mass Transfer, 25(7), 1982, 991998.
Aydin, O., Yang, W. J., Mixed convection in cavities with a locally heated lower wall and moving side walls, Numer. Heat
Transfer, 37(7), 2000, 695-710.
Basak T., Roy S., Krishna Babu S., Balakrishnan A.R., Finite element analysis of natural convection flow in a isosceles trian gular
enclosure due to uniform and non-uniform heating at the side walls, International Journal of Heat Mass Transfer, 51(17), 2008,
44964505.
Braga, E. J., de Lemos, M. J. S., Laminar natural convection in cavities filed with circular and square rods, Int. Commun. in Heat
and Mass Transfer, 32(10),2005, 1289-1297.
Dechaumphai, P., Adaptive finite element technique for heat transfer problems, Energy, Heat & Mass transfer, 17(2) .1995, 87-94.
Dechaumphai, P., Finite Element Method in Engineering (Bangkok, Chulalongkorn University Press, 1999)
Hossain, M. A., Gorla, R. S. R., Effect of viscous dissipation on mixed convection flow of water near its density maximum in a
rectangular enclosure with isothermal wall, Int. J. of Numer. Methods for Heat and Fluid Flow 16 (1), 2006, 5-17.
Karyakin YU.E, Sokovishin YU.A., Transient natural convection in triangular enclosures, International Journal of Heat and Mass
Transfer, 31(9), 1988, 17591766.
Lee, J. R., Ha, M. Y., A numerical study of natural convection in a horizontal enclosure with a conducting body, Int. J. of Heat and
Mass Transfer, 48(16),2005, 3308-3318.
Lee, J. R., Ha, M. Y., Numerical simulation of natural convection in a horizontal enclosure with a heat-generating conducting body,
Int. J. of Heat and Mass Transfer, 49(15-16), 2006, 2684-2702.
Luo, W. J., Yang, R. J., Multiple fluid flow and heat transfer solutions in a two-sided lid-driven cavity, Int. J. of Heat and Mass
Transfer, 50(11-12),2007, 2394-2405.
Li M., Tang T., Steady viscous flow in a triangular cavity by efficient numerical techniques, Comput. Math. Appl.,31 (1),1996, 5565.
Moallemi, M. K., Jang, K. S., Prandtl number effects on laminar mixed convection heat transfer in a lid-driven cavity, Int. J. Heat
and Mass Transfer, 35(8),1992,1881-1892.
Oztop, H. F., Dagtekin, I., Mixed convection in two-sided lid-driven differentially heated square cavity, Int. J. of Heat and Mass
Transfer, 47(8-9),2004, 1761-1769.
Prasad, A. K., Koseff, J. R., 1996. Combined forced and natural convection heat transfer in a deep lid-driven cavity flow, Int. J.
Heat and Fluid Flow 17(5),1996, 460-467.
Rahman, M.M., Mamun M.A.H., Saidur, R., and Nagata Shuichi, Effect Of a Heat Conducting Horizontal Circular Cylinder on
MHD Mixed Convection In A Lid- Driven Cavity Along With Joule Heating, Int. J. of Mechanical and Materials Eng. (IJMME), 4
(3), 2009, 256-265.
Roychowdhury, D.G, Das, S.K., Sundararajan, T.S., 2002, Numerical simulation of natural convection heat transfer and fluid flow
around a heated cylinder inside an enclosure, Heat and Mass Transfer, 38(7-8), 2002, 565-576.
Taylor,C., Hood,P., A Numerical Solution of the Navier-Stokes Equations Using Finite Element technique, Computer and Fluids 1,
73 (1973). doi:10.1016/0045-7930(73)90027-3
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11518294
www.iosrjournals.org
94 | Page