Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

8 / Thursday, January 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 1941

400 Seventh Street, SW., Room PL–401, As of February 22, 2006, the Director Has FAA taken any action to this
Nassif Building, Washington, DC; on the of the Federal Register approved the point? We issued a proposal to amend
Internet at http://dms.dot.gov; or at the incorporation by reference of certain part 39 of the Federal Aviation
National Archives and Records publications listed in the regulation. Regulations (FAR) (14 CFR part 39) to
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at the NARA, ADDRESSES: To get the service include an AD that would apply to all
call (202) 741–6030, or go to http:// information identified in this AD, The Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna)
www.archives.gov/federal_register/ contact The Cessna Aircraft Company, Models 208 and 208B airplanes. This
code_of_federal_regulations/ Product Support, P.O. Box 7706, proposal was published in the Federal
ibr_locations.html. Wichita, Kansas 67277–7706; telephone: Register as a notice of proposed
Issued in Renton, Washington, on (316) 517–5800; facsimile: (316) 942– rulemaking (NPRM) on June 21, 2005
December 30, 2005. 9006. (70 FR 35565). The NPRM proposed to
Linda Navarro, To view the AD docket, go to the require you to install a pilot assist
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Docket Management Facility; U.S. handle, Cessna part number SK208–
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. Department of Transportation, 400 146–2, for all affected airplanes, install
[FR Doc. 06–184 Filed 1–11–06; 8:45 am] Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, deicing boots on landing gear struts and
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590– cargo pod, Cessna part number AK208–
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
001 or on the Internet at http:// 6C, for all affected airplanes, and make
dms.dot.gov. The docket number is changes to the Pilot’s Operating
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAA–2005–21275; Directorate Identifier Handbook (POH) and FAA-approved
2005–CE–28–AD. Airplane Flight Manual (AFM), and to
Federal Aviation Administration the POH and AFM Supplement S1 for
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul all affected airplanes.
14 CFR Part 39 Pellicano, Aerospace Engineer (Icing),
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, c/o Comments
[Docket No. FAA–2005–21275; Directorate Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office Was the public invited to comment?
Identifier 2005–CE–28–AD; Amendment 39– (ACO), One Crown Center, 1985
14450; AD 2006–01–11] We provided the public the opportunity
Phoenix Boulevard, Suite 450, Atlanta, to participate in developing this AD.
RIN 2120–AA64 GA 30349; telephone: (770) 703–6064; The following presents the comments
facsimile: (770) 703–6097; or Robert P. received on the proposal and FAA’s
Airworthiness Directives; The Cessna Busto, Aerospace Engineer, Wichita response to each comment:
Aircraft Company Models 208 and ACO, FAA, 1801 Airport Road, Wichita,
208B Airplanes Kansas 67209; telephone: (316) 946– Comment Issue No. 1: Allow
4157; facsimile: (316) 946–4107. Installation of Replacements Parts
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Approved Under 14 CFR 21.303
Administration (FAA), DOT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ACTION: Final rule. What is the commenter’s concern?
Discussion
The commenter, the Modification and
SUMMARY: The FAA adopts a new What events have caused this AD? Replacement Parts Association
airworthiness directive (AD) for all The The FAA has received several reports of (MARPA), states that the Parts
Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna) accidents and incidents concerning Manufacturer Approval (PMA), 14 CFR
Models 208 and 208B airplanes. This problems with Cessna Models 208 and 21.303, provides an alternative
AD requires you to install the pilot 208B airplanes during operations in mechanism for the design, production,
assist handle (part number (P/N) icing conditions. This includes a total of sale, and installation of aeronautical
SK208–146–2) (or FAA-approved six accidents in the previous two icing items other than those specified by the
equivalent part number) and deicing seasons and nine other incidents. One- original equipment manufacturer
boots on the cargo pod and landing gear third of the Model 208 icing-related (OEM). While no alternative PMA parts
fairings (part number (P/N) AK208–6C) accidents occurred as a result of loss of are currently known to exist, alternative
(or FAA-approved equivalent part control after takeoff in ground icing PMA parts may be created in the future
number); and make changes to the conditions. One-third is suspected to and the AD action should take into
Pilot’s Operating Handbook (POH) and have occurred in supercooled large account that possibility.
FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual droplets, icing conditions outside the 14 The MARPA requests that the AD
(AFM). This AD results from reports of CFR part 25 Appendix C certification language state that installation of
several accidents involving the affected envelope. The Cessna Models 208 and replacements parts approved under 14
airplanes during operations in flight and 208B are certificated to 14 CFR part 23, CFR 21.303 is permitted.
in ground icing conditions. We are but 14 CFR part 23 references 14 CFR What is FAA’s response to the
issuing this AD to provide a safe method part 25 Appendix C for icing concern? We agree with the MARPA.
to detect ice, snow, frost, or slush certification. The FAA will add the phrase ‘‘or FAA-
adhering to the upper wing (a critical Findings from the accidents conclude approved equivalent part number’’, and
surface) prior to takeoff; and to reduce that there was a reduction in airplane add language to cover the PMA
drag in-flight by shedding ice on the performance due to drag from airframe replacement parts.
cargo pod and landing gear fairings. Ice ice accretion. The airplanes could not
adhering to the upper wing surface, perform a safe takeoff, climb, or Comment Issue No. 2: Withdraw the
cargo pod, or landing gear fairings could maintain altitude. Requirement for the Pilot Assist Handle
result in a reduction in airplane What is the potential impact if FAA What is the commenter’s concern?
performance with the consequences that
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES

took no action? Ice adhering to critical Three commenters, two owners/


the airplane cannot perform a safe surfaces could result in a reduction in operators and the Regional Air Cargo
takeoff or climb. airplane performance with the Carriers Association (RACCA), request
DATES: This AD becomes effective on consequence that the airplane cannot the withdrawal of the requirement for
February 22, 2006. climb or maintain altitude. the pilot assist handle.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:48 Jan 11, 2006 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12JAR1.SGM 12JAR1
1942 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations

The commenters justify the request the proposed requirement to install Airplane Flight Manual Known Icing
for withdrawal of the proposed deicing boots on the cargo pod and Supplement Limitations and Procedures
requirement for the pilot assist handle landing gear. The first commenter wants during 2005.
reasoning that it is more cost effective FAA to also show the statistical We have revised the AD to modify the
and the results will be better to continue probable cause and result of each estimated costs of compliance.
the course of crewmember training and known icing accident involving Cessna Comment Issue No. 4: Require Cargo
education. Further, a handle will not Models 208 and 208B airplanes.
Pod and Landing Gear Deicing Boots on
allow the pilot to make better decisions. Further, the commenter wants FAA to
Only Those Airplanes Equipped With
Lastly, the affected airplanes’ ability to prove that the proposed additional
Pneumatic Deicing Boots and Approved
operate in and out of smaller airports, equipment would have prevented a
for Flight in Icing Conditions
which typically do not have ground de- substantial number of these accidents.
ice facilities or capabilities, require the The second commenter, an airline What is the commenter’s concern?
flight crew to be especially diligent in transport pilot, in a personal anecdote Two commenters, one the U.S.
pre-takeoff examination, assessment, describes ice adhering to critical Parachute Association (USPA), write
and judgment. surfaces of the Cessna Model 208B that many operators operate their
The RACCA also notes these reasons airplane that he was piloting despite the Models 208 and 208B airplanes in
to withdraw the requirement for the airplane being equipped with deicing visual meteorological conditions (VMC)
pilot assist handle: boots on the landing gear struts and and have no intention on flying into
—The operator may employ alternative cargo pod. The commenter describes known icing conditions or instrument
methods of gaining access to upper loss of control at high airspeed under meteorological conditions (IMC).
wing surface, and these methods may icing conditions. Comments from the USPA note that
provide better access to a variety of The second commenter expresses some jump-configured Cessna Models
locations along the wingspan. concern that the installation of deicing 208 and 208B airplanes are equipped
—It may be extremely dangerous and boots on the landing gear struts and with pneumatic deicing boots. The
result in personal injury (from a fall) cargo pod on Cessna Models 208 and USPA letter also indicates that on some
to do the tactile inspection while 208B airplanes will give pilots and airplanes the boots have been
attempting to stand on the doorsill operators of these airplanes a false sense deactivated. In other cases, the boots are
and hang from the pilot assist handle of security that the problem of ice operational, but the operator indicates
after the application of deicing/anti- handling ability of the airplane has been that the aircraft does not have the added
icing fluid may be extremely resolved. This commenter indicates that equipment that would permit flight into
dangerous and result in personal poor performance of the existing deicing known icing conditions; is not flown in
injury from a fall. boots is a factor in loss of control instrument meteorological conditions;
—It may be challenging or impossible accidents and that redesign of the or is not flown in known icing
for some pilots to reach the intended existing systems is needed. conditions. The requirement for deicing
tactile inspection area, and this could We conclude that the second boots on the cargo pod and landing gear
easily be challenged under the commenter wants FAA to withdraw the might result in some operators removing
Americans with Disabilities Act. proposed requirement to install deicing or deactivating the deicing boots to
What is FAA’s response to the boots on the cargo pod and landing gear. avoid the requirements of the AD.
concern? The FAA acknowledges the What is FAA’s response to the In light of the above, the USPA
points made by the commenters to this concern? Loss of control after takeoff proposes that instead of installing the
issue. Rather than mandating caused one-third of the fatal accidents deicing boots, allow the owners/
installation of a pilot assist handle for involving the affected airplanes, and the operators of jump airplanes to install a
all affected airplanes, FAA will mandate other two-thirds occurred in-flight. placard (within the pilot’s clear view)
a revision to the Required Equipment Approximately 50-percent of the that restricts the airplane from flight
List in the Limitations section of the airplanes involved in in-flight icing into known icing conditions.
basic AFM. This revision will require related accidents were not equipped What is FAA’s response to the
installation of the pilot assist handle in with deicing boots on the landing gear concern? The FAA recognizes that some
ground icing conditions currently and on the cargo pod if equipped with owners/operators of the affected aircraft
defined in the AFM Limitations section. a cargo pod. Approximately 80-percent do not operate in known icing
This AD does not mandate where on the of the airplanes involved in in-flight conditions. Our intent in the proposed
wingspan a pre-takeoff tactile inspection accidents suspected to be in rule was not to mandate the cargo pod
is done and does not preclude an supercooled large drops were not and landing gear deicing boots on
owner/operator from inspecting the equipped with these boots. Our drag airplanes unapproved for flight in icing
upper wing with a ladder. It provides analysis shows that the service ceiling or for airplanes owners to remove or
the type design one safe method to do in icing is decreased by more than 1,000 deactivate the deicing boots.
the tactile check on the upper wing feet in critical icing conditions without For the final rule, we added an option
surface, particularly the pretakeoff this equipment. Cessna flight-testing of for airplanes discussed in the previous
contamination check required in part artificial ice shapes validated this paragraph to require installing a placard
135 operations during ground icing analysis. Regarding the loss of control at that prohibits flight in icing conditions
conditions. high airspeed, FAA and the instead of installing the cargo pod and
We have revised the final rule to manufacturer evaluated longitudinal landing gear fairing deicing boots.
reflect this change. control with artificial ice shapes and
have found no problems. Comment Issue No. 5: Delay the
Comment Issue No. 3: Withdraw the As for performance of the deicing Proposed Requirement To Install the
Proposed Requirement To Install Cargo Pod and Landing Gear Deicing
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES

boots, FAA has conducted icing tunnel


Deicing Boots on the Cargo Pod and tests on a similar general aviation airfoil Boots Until Cessna Flight Tests Are
Landing Gear and deicing boots. The results will be Completed
What is the commenter’s concern? reported in 2006. The results of these What is the commenter’s concern?
Two commenters seek the withdrawal of tests are reflected in revisions to the Two commenters, Cessna and the

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:48 Jan 11, 2006 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12JAR1.SGM 12JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 1943

RACCA, forwarded correspondence to the reasoning of the AACA for this note that sandpaper ice, which has been
FAA that suggests delaying the comment issue. The FAA has shown to be just as critical as ice shapes
proposed requirement to install the determined that the requirements for ICTS susceptibility, has been
deicing boots on the cargo pod and regarding a Regulatory Flexibility evaluated on the Cessna Model 208. As
landing gear. Analysis have been met and that, since mentioned in our above responses to
In a recent letter to RACCA, Cessna’s an unsafe condition exists, we should other commenters, Cessna is conducting
Director of Airworthiness and Product issue the AD. Further, the impact on flight tests that will include intercycle
Safety stated the following: continued operational safety outweighs ice with horn shapes associated with
‘‘Cessna does not believe that an the cost to comply. The FAA does not glaze ice along the entire span of the
unsafe condition exists in the design of believe that there is a need for any horizontal stabilizer and on the elevator
aircraft equipped with pneumatic deice public meetings. horns. The flight tests will also evaluate
boots for flight into known icing and not We are not making changes to the longitudinal control and trim at critical
equipped with cargo pod and main final rule based on this comment except center of gravity. Before deciding on any
landing gear deice boots.’’ He continued we have modified the estimated cost of further rulemaking action, FAA will
by indicating that Cessna is planning to compliance. Also, owners and operators review the test results and the potential
conduct additional flight tests to always have the option to apply for a for ice to accrete on the vortex
determine if the rate of climb FAA-approved alternative method to the generators and the resulting effect.
performance is significantly improved pilot assist handle that will allow the The FAA is not making changes to the
in icing conditions and that mandatory inspection required in the AFM final rule based on this comment.
action (presumably the AD) ‘‘should be Limitations section. An example is a
delayed until completion of analysis of ladder that allows inspection of the Conclusion
this testing.’’ upper wing extending out to two feet What is FAA’s final determination on
We conclude that in light of the letter behind the deicing boot and is properly this issue? We have carefully reviewed
from Cessna, the RACCA wants FAA to secured inside the airplane when not in the available data and determined that
delay requiring owners/operators of the use. Such an alternative would not be air safety and the public interest require
affected aircraft to install the cargo pod considered for part 135 operators that adopting the AD as proposed except for
and landing gear deicing boots until are approved to operate in ground icing the changes discussed above and minor
Cessna’s flight tests are completed. conditions. The pilot assist handle is
What is FAA’s response to the editorial corrections. We have
required to safely and quickly conduct determined that these changes and
concern? The FAA reviewed the results a pretakeoff contamination check within
of Cessna artificial ice shape testing and minor corrections:
five minutes of takeoff.
determined the results validate the FAA —Are consistent with the intent that
drag analysis. We have retained the Comment Issue No. 7: Prohibit Flights was proposed in the NPRM for
requirement to install deicing boots on Into Forecast and Known Icing correcting the unsafe condition; and
the cargo pod and landing gear. Conditions, Make a Special —Do not add any additional burden
Airworthiness Review of the Aircraft upon the public than was already
Comment Issue No. 6: Withdraw the Certification for Operations in Icing proposed in the NPRM.
Proposed Rule, Conduct Public Conditions, and Evaluate Alternative
Hearings, and as a Result of the Public Airframe Ice Protection Technologies Docket Information
Hearings, Issue a New NPRM Where can I go to view the docket
What is the commenter’s concern?
What is the commenter’s concern? The commenter states that the row of information? You may view the AD
The Alaska Air Carriers Association vortex generators on top of the docket that contains information
(AACA) requested that FAA withdraw horizontal stabilizer just forward of the relating to this subject in person at the
the proposed rule, conduct at least two elevator, which enhance nose down DMS Docket Offices between 9 a.m. and
public hearings on the proposed elevator and trim authority, may lose 5 p.m. (eastern time), Monday through
changes; and based upon the comments effectiveness in icing conditions. Friday, except Federal holidays. The
received under this docket and from the Additionally, the commenter states that Docket Office (telephone 1–800–647–
public hearings, issue another document the pilot assist handle will not permit 5227) is located on the plaza level of the
on this proposed rule. The AACA (without use of a ladder) adequate Department of Transportation NASSIF
reasoning for the comment issue inspection of all the upper tailplane Building at the street address stated in
included the following points. surfaces including the vortex generators. ADDRESSES. You may also view the AD
—The proposed rule is extremely Therefore, the commenter recommends docket on the Internet at http://
burdensome, especially in light of the that FAA prohibit flights of Cessna dms.dot.gov.
requirements of the Regulatory Model 208 and 208B aircraft into
Changes to 14 CFR Part 39—Effect on
Flexibility Analysis. The AACA forecast and known icing conditions
the AD
estimated that the cost of outfitting until a Special Airworthiness Review of
each Cessna 208/208B with the the Aircraft Certification for operations How does the revision to 14 CFR part
required items and making the in icing conditions (with focus on the 39 affect this AD? On July 10, 2002, the
proposed changes to the POH/AFM is tailplane icing issue) is done, including FAA published a new version of 14 CFR
$13,041, not $9,653 as FAA estimated review and evaluation of alternative part 39 (67 FR 47997, July 22, 2002),
the cost impact. airframe ice protection technologies. which governs the FAA’s AD system.
—The proposed rule would expand What is FAA’s response to the This regulation now includes material
requirements without any evidence concern? The FAA does not concur. The that relates to altered products, special
that it would enhance safety. tailplane vortex generators were flight permits, and alternative methods
—The proposed rule does not address
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES

installed to improve trim authority not of compliance. This material previously


necessary training for owners/ as a result of ice contaminated tailplane was included in each individual AD.
operators of the affected aircraft. stall (ICTS). The critical tail surface is Since this material is included in 14
What is FAA’s response to the the underside of the tail, and the critical CFR part 39, we will not include it in
concern? The FAA does not agree with wing surface is the upper surface. We future AD actions.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:48 Jan 11, 2006 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12JAR1.SGM 12JAR1
1944 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations

Costs of Compliance What is the cost impact of this AD on assist handle (P/N SK208–146–2) for all
How many airplanes does this AD owners/operators of the affected Cessna Models 208 and 208B airplanes:
impact? We estimate that this AD affects airplanes? We estimate the following
743 airplanes in the U.S. registry. costs to do the installation of the pilot

Total cost
Labor cost Parts cost per air- Total cost on U.S. operators
plane

5 work hours × $65 = $325 ..................................................................................... $858 $1,183 721 × $1,183 = $852,943.

We estimate the following costs to do 6C) for all Cessna Models 208 and 208B
the installation of the cargo pod and airplanes:
landing gear deicing boots (P/N AK208–

Total cost
Labor cost Parts cost per air- Total cost on U.S. operators
plane

37 work hours × $65 = $2,405 ................................................................................ $10,151 $12,556 343 × $12,556 = $4,306,708.

We estimate the following costs to do


the installation of a placard for all
Cessna Models 208 and 208B airplanes:

Total cost
Labor cost Parts cost per air- Total cost on U.S. Operators
plane

2 work hours × $65 = $130 ..................................................................................... $500 $630 29 × $630 = $18,270.

We estimate the following costs to do Handbook (POH) and FAA-approved


the changes to the Pilot’s Operating Airplane Flight Manual (AFM):

Total cost
Labor cost Parts cost per air- Total cost on U.S. operators
plane

2 work hours × $65 = $130 ..................................................................................... Not $65 752 × $130 = $97,760.
Applicable

Authority for This Rulemaking Regulatory Findings We prepared a summary of the costs
to comply with this AD (and other
What authority does FAA have for Will this AD impact various entities?
We have determined that this AD will information as included in the
issuing this rulemaking action? Title 49
not have federalism implications under Regulatory Evaluation) and placed it in
of the United States Code specifies the
Executive Order 13132. This AD will the AD Docket. You may get a copy of
FAA’s authority to issue rules on
aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106 not have a substantial direct effect on this summary by sending a request to us
describes the authority of the FAA the States, on the relationship between at the address listed under ADDRESSES.
Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation the national government and the States, Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2005–21275;
Programs, describes in more detail the or on the distribution of power and Directorate Identifier 2005–CE–28–AD’’
scope of the agency’s authority. responsibilities among the various in your request.
We are issuing this rulemaking under levels of government.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
the authority described in Subtitle VII, Will this AD involve a significant rule
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, or regulatory action? For the reasons Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that discussed above, I certify that this AD: safety, Incorporation by reference,
section, Congress charges the FAA with 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory Safety.
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the Adoption of the Amendment
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
■ Accordingly, under the authority
the Administrator finds necessary for (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
delegated to me by the Administrator,
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES

safety in air commerce. This regulation 3. Will not have a significant


the Federal Aviation Administration
is within the scope of that authority economic impact, positive or negative,
amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation
because it addresses an unsafe condition on a substantial number of small entities
that is likely to exist or develop on under the criteria of the Regulatory Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
products identified in this AD. Flexibility Act.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:48 Jan 11, 2006 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12JAR1.SGM 12JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 1945

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS When Does This AD Become Effective? airplanes during operations in-flight and in
DIRECTIVES (a) This AD becomes effective on February ground icing conditions. We are issuing this
22, 2006. AD to provide a safe method to detect ice,
snow, frost, or slush adhering to the upper
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 What Other ADs Are Affected by This wing (a critical surface) prior to takeoff; and
continues to read as follows: Action? to reduce drag in-flight by shedding ice on
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. (b) None. the cargo pod and landing gear fairings. Ice
adhering to the upper wing surface, cargo
§ 39.13 [Amended] What Airplanes Are Affected by This AD? pod, or landing gear fairings could result in
(c) This AD affects Models 208 and 208B, a reduction in airplane performance with the
■ 2. FAA amends § 39.13 by adding a all serial numbers, that are certificated in any consequences that the airplane cannot
new AD to read as follows: category. perform a safe takeoff or climb or maintain
altitude.
2006–01–11 The Cessna Aircraft Company: What Is the Unsafe Condition Presented in
Amendment 39–14450; Docket No. This AD? What Must I Do To Address This Problem?
FAA–2005–21275; Directorate Identifier (d) This AD is the result of reports of (e) To address this problem, you must do
2005–CE–28–AD. several accidents involving the affected the following:

Actions Compliance Procedures

(1) Install the pilot assist handle SK208–146–2 subkit (part Within the next 125 Install the pilot assist handle SK208–146–2 subkit (part
number (P/N) SK208–146–2( (or FAA-approved equiva- days after February number (P/N) SK208–146–2 (or FAA-approved equiva-
lent part number if the airplane will be operated in the 22, 2006 (the effec- lent part number) following step 4 of the Accomplish-
ground icing conditions defined under ‘Visual/Tactile tive date of this AD), ment Instructions of Cessna Caravan Service Kit No.
Check’ in the LIMITATIONS section of the AFM after the unless already done. SK208–146, dated October 4, 2004.
compliance time).
(2) 14 CFR 21.303 allows for replacement parts through Not Applicable ............. Not Applicable.
parts manufacturer approval (PMA). The phrase ‘‘or
FAA-approved equivalent part number’’ in this AD is in-
tended to signify those parts that are PMA parts ap-
proved through identicality to the design of the part
under the type certificate and parts to correct the unsafe
condition under PMA (other than identicality). Equivalent
replacement parts to correct the unsafe condition under
PMA (other than identicality) may also be installed pro-
vided they meet current airworthiness standards, which
include those actions cited in this AD.
(3) Insert the text in Appendix 1 of this AD after the Before further flight The owner/operator holding at least a private pilot certifi-
‘‘OTHER LIMITATIONS’’ in the LIMITATIONS section of after compliance to cate as authorized by section 43.7 of the Federal Avia-
the Cessna Models 208 or 208B Pilot’s Operating Hand- paragraph (e)(1) of tion Regulations (14 CFR 43.7) may insert the informa-
book (POH) and FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual this AD. tion into the POH as specified in paragraph (e)(3) of
(AFM). this AD. You may insert a copy of this AD into the ap-
propriate sections of the POH to comply with this ac-
tion. Make an entry into the aircraft records showing
compliance with portion of the AD in accordance with
section 43.9 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 43.9).
(4) For Cessna Model 208B with Pratt & Whitney of Can- Within the next 125 Install the cargo pod and landing gear fairing deice kit
ada Ltd., PT6A–114 Turbo Prop engine installed (600 days after February (part number (P/N) AK208–6C2) (or FAA-approved
SHP) or equivalent, and equipped with pneumatic deic- 22, 2006 (the effec- equivalent part number) following the Installation In-
ing boots, do one of the following:. tive date of this AD), structions of Cessna Caravan Service Bulletin No.
(i) Install Cessna Accessory Kit AK208–6C per unless already done. CAB95–19, dated October 13, 1995, and Cessna Cara-
Cessna Service Bulletin CAB95–19; or. van Accessory Kit No. AK208–6C, Revision C, dated
(ii) Install a placard in view of the pilot which states August 27, 1993. The owner/operator holding at least a
‘‘This airplane is prohibited from flight in known or private pilot certificate as authorized by section 43.7 of
forecast icing’’. the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 43.7) may in-
stall the placard as specified in paragraph (e)(4) of this
AD. You may insert a copy of this AD into the appro-
priate sections of the POH to comply with this action.
Make an entry into the aircraft records showing compli-
ance with portion of the AD in accordance with section
43.9 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
43.9).
(5) For all Cessna Model 208 and 208B airplanes Within the next 125 Do the installation following the Installation Instructions of
equipped with pneumatic deicing boots and not included days after February Cessna Caravan Service Bulletin No. CAB93–20, Revi-
in paragraph (e)(4) of this AD, do one of the following:. 22, 2006 (the effec- sion 1, dated October 13, 1995, and Cessna Caravan
(i) Install Cessna Accessory Kit AK208–6C per tive date of this AD), Accessory Kit No. AK208–6C, Revision C, issued Au-
Cessna Service Bulletin CAB93–20 Revision 1; or. unless already done. gust 27, 1993. The owner/operator holding at least a
(ii) Install a placard in view of the pilot with the fol- private pilot certificate as authorized by section 43.7 of
lowing words: ‘‘This airplane is prohibited from flight the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 43.7) may in-
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES

in known or forecast icing’’. stall the placard as specified in paragraph (e)(5)(ii) of


this AD. Make an entry into the aircraft records showing
compliance with portion of the AD in accordance with
section 43.9 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 43.9).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:48 Jan 11, 2006 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12JAR1.SGM 12JAR1
1946 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations

Actions Compliance Procedures

(6) Insert the text in Appendix 2 of this AD in the ‘‘KINDS Before further flight The owner/operator holding at least a private pilot certifi-
OF OPERATION LIMITS’’ in the LIMITATIONS section after compliance to cate as authorized by section 43.7 of the Federal Avia-
of the Cessna Models 208 or 208B Pilot’s Operating paragraph (e)(4)(i) or tion Regulations (14 CFR 43.7) may insert the informa-
Handbook (POH) and FAA-approved Airplane Flight (e)(5)(i) of this AD. tion into the POH as specified in paragraph (e)(3) of
Manual (AFM). this AD. You may insert a copy of this AD into the ap-
propriate sections of the POH to comply with this ac-
tion. Make an entry into the aircraft records showing
compliance with portion of the AD in accordance with
section 43.9 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 43.9).
(7) Delete the text in Appendix 3 of this AD from the ‘‘RE- Before further flight The owner/operator holding at least a private pilot certifi-
QUIRED EQUIPMENT’’ in the LIMITATIONS section of after compliance to cate as authorized by section 43.7 of the Federal Avia-
the Cessna Models 208 or 208B Pilot’s Operating Hand- paragraph (e)(4)(i) or tion Regulations (14 CFR 43.7) may insert the informa-
book (POH) and FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual (e)(5)(i) of this AD. tion into the POH as specified in paragraph (e)(3) of
(AFM) Supplement S1 ‘‘Known Icing Equipment’’. this AD. You may insert a copy of this AD into the ap-
propriate sections of the POH to comply with this ac-
tion. Make an entry into the aircraft records showing
compliance with portion of the AD in accordance with
section 43.9 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 43.9).

Note: Cessna Caravan Service Bulletin No. DC 20590–001 or on the Internet at http:// Appendix 3 to AD 2006–01–11
CAB04–9, dated October 4, 2004, also dms.dot.gov. The docket number is FAA–
addresses the installation of the pilot assist Changes to the Cessna Models 208 or 208B
2005–21275; Directorate Identifier 2005–CE–
handle. Pilot’s Operating Handbook (POH) and FAA-
28–AD.
Approved Airplane Flight Manual
May I Request an Alternative Method of Appendix 1 to AD 2006–01–11 Supplement S1
Compliance?
Changes to the Cessna Models 208 or 208B Affected Cessna Models 208 or 208B Pilot’s
(f) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft Operating Handbook (POH) and FAA-
Pilot’s Operating Handbook (POH) and FAA-
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the Approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM)
Approved Airplane Flight Manual
authority to approve alternative methods of Supplement S1
compliance for this AD, if requested using Affected Cessna Models 208 or 208B Pilot’s
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. For Operating Handbook (POH) and FAA- Remove the paragraph under ‘‘REQUIRED
information on any already approved Approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) EQUIPMENT’’ in the Limitations section of
alternative methods of compliance, contact the FAA Approved Flight Manual
Insert the following text after the ‘‘OTHER
Paul Pellicano, Aerospace Engineer (Icing), Supplement S1 ‘‘Known Icing Equipment’’,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, c/o Atlanta LIMITATIONS’’ in the LIMITATIONS section
that currently reads as follows:
ACO, One Crown Center, 1985 Phoenix of the Cessna Models 208 or 208B Pilot’s
Operating Handbook (POH) and FAA- The following additional equipment is not
Boulevard, Suite 450, Atlanta, GA 30349; required for flight into icing conditions as
telephone: (770) 703–6064; facsimile: (770) approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM):
defined by FAR 25, but may be installed on
703–6097; or Robert P. Busto, Aerospace
Engineer, Wichita ACO, FAA, 1801 Airport COLD WEATHER OPERATIONS early serial airplanes by using optional
Road, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone: The airplane must be equipped with the accessory Kit AK208–6. On later serial
(316) 946–4157; facsimile: (316) 946–4107. following equipment when operating at an airplanes, this equipment may be included
airport in the ground icing conditions with the flight into known icing package. If
Does This AD Incorporate Any Material by installed, this equipment must be fully
Reference? defined under ‘Visual/Tactile Check’ in the
LIMITATIONS section: operational:
(g) You must do the actions required by
this AD following the instructions in Cessna 1. Pilot assist handle, Cessna P/N SK208– Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on January
Caravan Service Kit No. SK208–146, dated 146–2 (or FAA-approved equivalent part 5, 2006.
October 4, 2004 and Cessna Caravan number) John R. Colomy,
Accessory Kit No. AK208–6C, Revision C, Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Appendix 2 to AD 2006–01–11
dated August 27, 1993. The Director of the
Aircraft Certification Service.
Federal Register approved the incorporation Changes to the Cessna Models 208 or 208B
by reference of this service bulletin in [FR Doc. 06–225 Filed 1–11–06; 8:45 am]
Pilot’s Operating Handbook (POH) and FAA-
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Approved Airplane Flight Manual BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
part 51. To get a copy of this service
information, contact The Cessna Aircraft Affected Cessna Models 208 or 208B Pilot’s
Company, Product Support, P.O. Box 7706, Operating Handbook (POH) and FAA-
Wichita, Kansas 67277–7706; telephone: Approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM)
(316) 517–5800; facsimile: (316) 942–9006. Add the following to the equipment listed
To review copies of this service information, under ‘‘FLIGHT INTO KNOWN ICING’’ in
go to the National Archives and Records the ‘‘KINDS OF OPERATION LIMITS’’ in the
Administration (NARA). For information on LIMITATIONS section of the FAA approved
the availability of this material at NARA, go
Airplane Flight Manual:
to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/ Lower main landing gear leading edge
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES

ibr_locations.html or call (202) 741–6030. To deice boots


view the AD docket, go to the Docket Cargo pod nosecap deice boot
Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Nassif Building, Room PL–401, Washington,

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:48 Jan 11, 2006 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12JAR1.SGM 12JAR1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen