Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CA et al
before the RTC Pasay, for annulment of contract with damages. The
trial court directed the cancellation of the exclusive option to
covered by a TCT.
Jose and Dominador sold their share (eastern portion of the land) to
ISSUE:
1.
and
Private
2.
3.
settle the case with their said nephews and nieces. Salud did not
heed the suggestion; respondents informed Atty. Bernardo that
Contract to SELL
by agreement the ownership is reserved in the vendor and is
they are canceling the transaction. Atty Bernardo made offers but
they were all rejected.
RTC Makati dismissed the civil case. A few days after, private
respondents executed a Deed of Conditional Sale in favor of Chua,
over the same parcel of land.
Contract of SALE
the title passes to the vendee upon the delivery of the thing
sold
the vendor has lost and cannot recover ownership until and
respondents.
There are two features which convince us that the parties never
intended to transfer ownership to petitioner except upon the full
(1)
the alleged option money was actually earnest money which was
intended to form part of the purchase price. The amount was not
distinct from the cause or consideration for the sale of the property,
but was itself a part thereof. It is a statutory rule that whenever
(a) earnest money is part of the purchase price, while option money
ids the money given as a distinct consideration for an option
contract;
(b) earnest money is given only where there is already a sale, while
claim that Atty. Bernardo had possession of the title only because
he was their counsel in the petition for reconstitution.
Article 1478 of the civil code does not require that such a
stipulation be expressly made. Consequently, an implied stipulation
Respondent informed the spouses that he had set aside P1, 290,
000.00 as evidenced by Citibank Check No. 278107 as full payment
of the purchase price. But Arturo and Esther failed to deliver the
property which prompted respondent to file a complaint for specific
performance with damages against petitioners.
his promise and may, accordingly, withdraw it, since there may be
no valid contract without a cause or consideration. Pending notice
of its withdrawal, his accepted promise partakes of the nature of an