Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

72874 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

234 / Wednesday, December 7, 2005 / Notices

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Otto DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Comments are invited on: Whether
Strassburg, Maritime Administration, the proposed collection of information
400 Seventh Street Southwest, Maritime Administration is necessary for the proper performance
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone: of the functions of the agency, including
202–366–4161; FAX: 202–366–7901; or Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping whether the information will have
E-mail: Joe.strassburg@dot.gov. Copies Requirements; Agency Information practical utility; the accuracy of the
of this collection also can be obtained Collection Activity under OMB Review agency’s estimate of the burden of the
from that office. Maritime Administration, DOT.
AGENCY: proposed information collection; ways
Notice and request for
ACTION:
to enhance the quality, utility and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Maritime clarity of the information to be
Administration (MARAD). comments.
collected; and ways to minimize the
Title: Approval of Underwriters for SUMMARY: In compliance with the burden of the collection of information
Marine Hull Insurance. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 on respondents, including the use of
OMB Control Number: 2133–0517. U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice automated collection techniques or
announces that the Information other forms of information technology.
Type of Request: Extension of A comment to OMB is best assured of
Collection abstracted below has been
currently approved collection. having its full effect if OMB receives it
forwarded to the Office of Management
Affected Public: Marine insurance and Budget (OMB) for review and within 30 days of publication.
brokers and underwriters of marine approval. The nature of the information
insurance. collection is described as well as its Authority: 49 CFR 1.66.
Forms: None. expected burden. The Federal Register Issued in Washington, DC on November 30,
Notice with a 60-day comment period 2005.
Abstract: This collection of Joel C. Richard,
soliciting comments on the following
information involves the approval of
collection of information was published Secretary, Maritime Administration.
marine hull underwriters to insure
on September 9, 2005, and comments [FR Doc. E5–6920 Filed 12–6–05; 8:45 am]
MARAD program vessels. Applicants
were due by November 8, 2005. No BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
will be required to submit financial data
comments were received.
upon which MARAD approval would be
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
based. This information is needed in DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
order that MARAD officials can evaluate or before January 6, 2006.
the underwriters and determine their FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
National Highway Traffic Safety
suitability for providing marine hull Ruth DeVelbis, Maritime
Administration
insurance on MARAD vessels. Administration, 400 Seventh Street,
Southwest, Washington, DC 20590. Reports, Forms and Record Keeping
Annual Estimated Burden Hours: 46 Telephone: 202–366–2314; FAX: 202–
hours. Requirements; Agency Information
366–9580; or E-mail: Collection Activity Under OMB Review
Addressee: Send comments to the ruth.develbis@dot.gov. Copies of this
Office of Information and Regulatory collection also can be obtained from that AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
Affairs, Office of Management and office. Safety Administration, DOT.
Budget, 725 17th Street Northwest, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Maritime ACTION: Correction notice.
Washington, DC 20503, Attention Administration (MARAD). SUMMARY: This document corrects the
MARAD Desk Officer. Title: Records Retention Schedule. estimated total burden hours published
Comments are invited on: Whether OMB Control Number: 2133–0501.
on October 19, 2005 (70 FR 60878) for
the proposed collection of information Type of Request: Extension of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
is necessary for the proper performance currently approved collection.
Affected Public: U.S. Shipping (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., OMB Control
of the functions of the agency, including Number 2127–0503.
whether the information will have Companies.
Forms: None. DATES: Comments must be submitted on
practical utility; the accuracy of the or before January 6, 2006.
Abstract: Section 801, Merchant
agency’s estimate of the burden of the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marine Act, 1936, as amended, requires
proposed information collection; ways Donovan Green, NHTSA 400 Seventh
retention of financial records pertaining
to enhance the quality, utility and Street, SW., Room 5307—NVS–122,
to financial assistance programs for ship
clarity of the information to be Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Green’s
construction and ship operations. These
collected; and ways to minimize the telephone number is (202) 493–0248.
records are required to permit proper
burden of the collection of information
audit of pertinent records at the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NHTSA is
on respondents, including the use of
conclusion of a contract. The correcting an error in the Information
automated collection techniques or
information will be used to audit Collection published in the Federal
other forms of information technology.
pertinent records at the conclusion of a Register on October 19, 2005 (70 FR
A comment to OMB is best assured of
contract when the contractor was 60878). Specifically, NHTSA is
having its full effect if OMB receives it
receiving financial assistance from the correcting the estimated total annual
within 30 days of publication.
government. burden from $3,611,460.00 to the
Authority: 49 CFR 1.66. Annual Estimated Burden Hours: 50 estimated total annual burden hours of
Issued in Washington, DC on November 29, hours. 265,702.
2005. Addressee: Send comments to the Since the correction made by this
Office of Information and Regulatory document is only to inform the public
Joel C. Richard,
Affairs, Office of Management and of previous agency actions, and do not
Secretary, Maritime Administration. Budget, 725 17th Street, Northwest, impose any additional obligations on
[FR Doc. E5–6919 Filed 12–6–05; 8:45 am] Washington, DC 20503, Attention any party, NHTSA finds for good cause
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P MARAD Desk Officer. that the revisions made by this notice

VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:01 Dec 06, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM 07DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 7, 2005 / Notices 72875

should be effective as soon as this notice moisture and dust particles to enter the water, and other environmental
is published in the Federal Register. swivel bearing mechanism, resulting in particles that could contaminate the
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 1, premature wear. The approximately bearing and cause corrosion and
2005. 22,200 Volkswagen and 29,700 Audi accelerated wear of the ball and socket
H. Keith Brewer, vehicles affected by this recall joint.
Director, Office of Crash Avoidance (identified by NHTSA Recall No. 99V– In February 1998, VW began using
Standards. 248) were built from January 1998 aluminum tie rod ends for both vehicle
[FR Doc. E5–6917 Filed 12–6–05; 8:45 am] through July 1998 and fell within a production and service replacement
specific Vehicle Identification Number parts in an effort to reduce weight. VW
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
(VIN) range. initiated recall 99V–248 after it
In November 2000, VW chose to determined that the aluminum tie rod
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION expand the scope of the recall ends used in certain MY 1998–99
(identified by NHTSA Recall No. 00V– vehicles were defective. The
National Highway Traffic Safety 414) after it determined that some manufacturer identified a specific
Administration potentially defective tie rods may have production range of vehicles built using
been installed in an additional 44,000 aluminum tie rod ends and later
Denial of Motor Vehicle Defect Petition Volkswagen and 39,000 Audi vehicles expanded the scope (00V–414) to
built from August 1998 through April include vehicles built two months
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
1999. These subject recall actions were before and after this range to ensure that
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
not influenced by ODI. Instead, VW any vehicle that may have been built
Department of Transportation.
made an independent determination to using defective aluminum tie rod ends
ACTION: Denial of petition for a defect conduct a recall after German vehicle was included in the recall action.
investigation. inspection authorities notified it of Due to aluminum’s low inherent
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the ‘‘worn’’ tie rods and factory inspection material hardness, rapid and excessive
reasons for the denial of a petition of some ‘‘worn’’ tie rods revealed wear of the bearing could result if the
submitted by Ms. Miriam Schneider to improper sealing. integrity of the seal is compromised and
NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation According to a December 2004 report, the bearing is left exposed to the
(ODI), received on August 2, 2005, the petitioner brought her MY 1999 elements. VW reports that damage to the
under 49 U.S.C. 30162, requesting that Passat to an authorized Volkswagen protective rubber boot may be caused by
the agency commence a proceeding to dealer for an unrelated recall repair external forces such as impact or in-use
determine the existence of a defect where she was notified by service damage, or by improper assembly.
related to motor vehicle safety with personnel that, after 59,000 miles Design changes intended to improve
respect to the performance of the tie rod traveled, the tie rods ‘‘have too much sealing (revised boot material) and ease
ends on certain model year (MY) 1999 play,’’ and the recommended repairs of assembly (introduction of stop ring)
Volkswagen Passat vehicles not would not be covered free of charge were implemented. Additionally, the tie
because her VIN rod end was changed from aluminum to
included in two previous safety recall
(WVWNA63B1XE499116) was outside a steel body to improve bearing wear
campaigns. After a review of the
the recall range. In June 2005, after characteristics in the event of boot
petition and other information, NHTSA
65,400 miles traveled, the petitioner damage. This revised steel tie rod end
has concluded that further expenditure
paid $588.59 to replace worn inner and entered vehicle production in March
of the agency’s investigative resources
outer tie rod ends on both sides of the 1999 and was the replacement part used
on the issues raised by the petition does
vehicle. The petition letter specifically in the recall remedy.
not appear to be warranted. The agency According to VW, aluminum tie rod
requests that the scope of VW’s recall be
accordingly has denied the petition. The ends show a very different pattern for
expanded to include the petitioner’s
petition is herein after identified as replacement than the steel parts, as
vehicle and that she be reimbursed for
DP05–003. the cost of the repairs. evidenced by analysis of consumer
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. There are a total of 191 non- complaints and warranty claims. The
Kyle Bowker, Vehicle Control Division, duplicative complaints to ODI and VW defective aluminum tie rod ends were
Office of Defects Investigation, NHTSA, that allege premature wear of either one replaced at a much lower mileage range,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, or both outer tie rod ends in the subject whereas the steel parts are being
DC 20590. Telephone: (202) 366–9597. vehicles. As of November 18, 2005, ODI replaced at a significantly higher
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August is not aware of any allegations of tie rod mileage after years of service. Steel tie
2, 2005, ODI received a petition separations resulting in a loss of vehicle rod ends show a progression of failure
submitted by Ms. Miriam Schneider of control, crash or injury in the subject symptoms which is clearly
Olney, MD requesting an investigation vehicles. demonstrated and confirmed by the
of allegedly defective tie rods in certain The steering system converts rotary complaint reports identified in response
MY 1999 Volkswagen Passat vehicles motion of the steering wheel (input) into to this petition, the vast majority of
not included in two previous safety a turning motion of the vehicle’s steered which include allegations limited to
recall campaigns (identified henceforth wheels to effect directional control noise and/or excessive wear
as the subject vehicles). In a September (output). In the subject vehicles tie rods necessitating replacement during the
1999 letter, Volkswagen of America, Inc. are used to transmit force from both course of routine maintenance. The
(VW) notified the agency that an ends of the rack and pinion gearbox to manufacturer recommends periodic
undetermined percentage of MY 1998– the steering arm at each front wheel. inspection of the steering system on the
1999 Volkswagen Passat and Audi A4, Each tie rod is affixed to the steering subject vehicles, including the tie rods,
A6, and A8 vehicles contained a safety- arm via a spherical bearing enclosed in every 12 months. Furthermore, VW
related defect affecting the tie rods in a steel body (known as the outer tie rod recommends a more detailed inspection
the steering system. VW indicated that end) and a bolt. The bearing is protected of the tie rod ends (and replacement, if
it was possible that some tie rods would by a rubber boot that is intended to necessary) every 4 years or 40,000 miles
not seal properly which could allow prevent the intrusion of dirt, dust, traveled.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:01 Dec 06, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM 07DEN1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen