Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The Honourable Speaker of the House, fellow members of Parliament, Ladies and
Gentlemen
Before us lies a decision which carries with it far-reaching consequences,
whether or not to commit huge sums of taxpayers money to build nuclear power
plants in the near future to help supply a significant proportion of South Africas
energy needs. I would like to put before you logical reasons why it would be
unwise for South Africas leaders to consider this route.
We have been blessed with a country that spills natural beauty from each corner.
The issue of nuclear energy in South Africa is a delicate one, but the fact that a
new plant would be destructive to our country is unequivocally true.
Nuclear energy produces radioactive waste which is terribly hazardous to
surrounding communities and is difficult to manage. Such waste can leak
radiation for tens of years and can have many disastrous effects for generations
to come. The aftereffects of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are still seen in genetics
today and can lead to diarrhoea, vomiting, nausea and fatigue with many babies
being born with birth defects. This waste can also contaminate sand and water,
leading to dangerous consequences. It has a major impact on aquatic life too and
eutropication can cause environmental harm that could take up to ten throusand
years to repair.
Another issue is the high possibility of nuclear accidents. While technologies are
available to help prevent these incidents, incidents like Chernobyl and most
recently, Fukushima, tell us that even in todays society and with modern
engineering, complete safety is not guaranteed. We should learn from these past
mistakes so that history does not repeat itself.
A very practical disadvantage of nuclear power plants is the high cost. It costs an
immense amount to set up a nuclear plant and a similarly large amount to
decommission them. Continents that have previously set up plants had the