Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

68122 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

216 / Wednesday, November 9, 2005 / Notices

amendments, all written statements proposal effective upon receipt of this (b) Dual Member No change.
with respect to the proposed rule filing by the Commission. The * * * * *
change that are filed with the Commission is publishing this notice to
Commission, and all written solicit comments on the proposed rule Rule 3013. Annual Certification of
communications relating to the change from interested persons. Compliance and Supervisory Processes
proposed rule change between the (a) Designation of Chief Compliance
Commission and any person, other than I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Officer No change.
those that may be withheld from the Statement of the Terms of Substance of (b) Annual Certification.
public in accordance with the the Proposed Rule Change Each member shall have its chief
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be NASD is proposing to amend NASD executive officer (or equivalent officer)
available for inspection and copying in Rule 3012 (Supervisory Control certify annually,6 as set forth in IM–
the Commission’s Public Reference System), Rule 3013 (Annual 3013, that the member has in place
Room. Copies of the filing also will be Certification of Compliance and processes to establish, maintain, review,
available for inspection and copying at Supervisory Processes), and IM–3013 test and modify written compliance
the principal offices of NASD. All (Annual Compliance and Supervision policies and written supervisory
comments received will be posted Certification) to allow members, by no procedures reasonably designed to
without change; the Commission does later than April 1, 2006, to submit the achieve compliance with applicable
not edit personal identifying initial annual report required by Rule NASD rules, MSRB rules and federal
information from submissions. You 3012 and to execute the initial annual securities laws and regulations, and that
should submit only information that certification required by Rule 3013 and the chief executive officer has
you wish to make available publicly. All IM–3013. Below is the text of the conducted one or more meetings with
submissions should refer to File proposed rule change. Proposed new the chief compliance officer in the
Number SR–NASD–2005–124 and language is in italics. preceding 12 months to discuss such
should be submitted on or before processes.
* * * * *
November 30, 2005. * * * * *
For the Commission, by the Division of
3012. Supervisory Control System
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated (a) General Requirements Statement of the Purpose of, and
authority.16 (1) Each member shall designate and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Jonathan G. Katz, specifically identify to NASD one or Change
Secretary. more principals who shall establish,
In its filing with the Commission,
[FR Doc. 05–22333 Filed 11–8–05; 8:45 am] maintain, and enforce a system of
NASD included statements concerning
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P supervisory control policies and
the purpose of and basis for the
procedures that (A) test and verify that
proposed rule change and discussed any
the member’s supervisory procedures
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE comments it received on the proposed
are reasonably designed with respect to
COMMISSION rule change. The text of these statements
the activities of the member and its
may be examined at the places specified
[Release No. 34–52727; File No. SR–NASD– registered representatives and
in Item IV below. NASD has prepared
2005–121] associated persons, to achieve summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
compliance with applicable securities and C below, of the most significant
Self-Regulatory Organizations; laws and regulations, and with aspects of such statements.
National Association of Securities applicable NASD rules and (B) create
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and additional or amend supervisory A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed procedures where the need is identified Statement of the Purpose of, and
Rule Change Relating to Amendments by such testing and verification. The Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
to Rule 3012, Rule 3013, and IM–3013 designated principal or principals must Change
submit to the member’s senior 1. Purpose
November 3, 2005.
management no less than annually, a
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the report 5 detailing each member’s system Rule 3013 requires that each
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of supervisory controls, the summary of member’s chief executive officer
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 the test results and significant identified (‘‘CEO’’), or other equivalent officer,
notice is hereby given that on October exceptions, and any additional or certify annually according to the terms
14, 2005, the National Association of amended supervisory procedures set forth in IM–3013 that the member
Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’) filed created in response to the test results. has in place processes to establish,
with the Securities and Exchange (2) No change. maintain, review, test and modify its
Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) written supervisory procedures. The
the proposed rule change as described 5 Rule 3012 became effective on January 31, 2005,
first annual certification is currently due
in Items I, and II below, which Items which would require a member’s first Rule 3012 by December 1, 2005.7 Before a CEO can
have been prepared by NASD. NASD report to be submitted by no later than January 31, complete the annual certification
has designated the proposed rule change 2006 and at least annually thereafter; however, a requirement, IM–3013 requires, among
as constituting a ‘‘non-controversial’’ member may elect to submit its first Rule 3012
report by no later than April 1, 2006. Importantly,
other things, that the CEO, chief
rule change pursuant to Section a member’s first Rule 3012 report must encompass
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b– the period from January 31, 2005 (the effective date 6 Rule 3013 and IM–3013 became effective on

4(f)(6) thereunder,4 which renders the of Rule 3012) up to the submission date (or a December 1, 2004, which would require a member’s
reasonable period of time immediately preceding first certification to be executed by December 1,
16 17 the submission date). Each ensuing Rule 3012 2005 and annually thereafter; however, a member
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). may elect to execute its first certification by no later
1 15
report may not be for a period greater than 12
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). months from the date of the preceding Rule 3012 than April 1, 2006 and annually thereafter.
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
report (but may be for a shorter time period if a 7 Each ensuing annual certification must be
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
member elects to prepare a report more frequently effected no later than on the anniversary date of the
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4. than annually). previous year’s certification. See IM–3013, n.1.

VerDate jul<14>2003 16:18 Nov 08, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00137 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM pfrm13 PsN: 09NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 216 / Wednesday, November 9, 2005 / Notices 68123

compliance officer (‘‘CCO’’), and any members have indicated that it would order to allow NASD members to have
other necessary officers review a report be nearly impossible to combine the as much time as possible to adjust their
that evidences the member’s processes. reports.9 procedures to the new submission dates
Rule 3012(a)(1) requires, among other Accordingly, NASD is filing this for the initial Rule 3012 report and the
things, that each member submit to its proposed rule change to address those initial certification required by Rule
senior management no less than issues. Specifically, the proposed rule 3013 and IM–3013. The effective date
annually a report detailing its change will amend Rule 3012 to provide and the implementation date will be the
supervisory controls system that will that a member may submit its initial date of filing, October 14, 2005.
test and verify the adequacy of its Rule 3012 report by no later than April
supervisory procedures, the summary of 1, 2006. The proposed rule change 2. Statutory Basis
the test results, and any additional or explains that due to Rule 3012’s January NASD believes that the proposed rule
amended supervisory procedures 31, 2005 effective date, a member change is consistent with the provisions
created in response to the test results. choosing to rely on any date after of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act, which
Currently, members must complete and January 31, 2005 through April 1, 2006 requires, among other things, that NASD
submit the report by January 31, 2006 as the submission deadline for its initial rules must be designed to prevent
and at least annually thereafter.8 Rule 3012 report will have to fraudulent and manipulative acts and
Since the adoption of these rules, encompass the period from January 31, practices, to promote just and equitable
NASD has received a number of 2004 up to that submission date (or a principles of trade, and, in general, to
inquiries from members regarding reasonable period of time immediately protect investors and the public interest.
whether the reports required by Rule preceding the submission date). Each NASD believes that synchronizing the
3012 and IM–3013 could be combined. ensuing Rule 3012 report must date of the report required by Rule 3012
Although NASD has advised members encompass the 12 months following the and the date of execution of the
that they may combine the Rule 3012 previous Rule 3012 report (or such certification required by Rule 3013 and
report with the report required by IM– shorter time period if a member elects IM–3013 will reasonably serve to
3013 as long as all of the required to prepare a report more frequently than minimize duplication of effort on the
elements of the respective reports are annually). part of members, while still ensuring the
addressed and clearly identified, Additionally, the proposed rule protection of investors.
members have indicated that it would change will amend Rule 3013 and IM–
be difficult to combine the reports since 3013 to provide that a member may B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
the first annual certification required by execute its first annual certification by Statement on Burden on Competition
Rule 3013 must be executed by no later than April 1, 2006 and annually NASD does not believe that the
December 1, 2005 (and thus the related thereafter. A member should keep in proposed rule change will result in any
report must be prepared in advance of, mind that the report required by IM– burden on competition that is not
but reasonably close in time to, such 3013 that evidences the member’s necessary or appropriate in furtherance
execution), while the Rule 3012 report processes must be prepared in advance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
is not required to be submitted until of, but reasonably close in time to, April
1, 2006. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
January 31, 2006. Statement on Comments on the
In addition, dual members have As a result of these proposed changes
members will be able, if they so choose, Proposed Rule Change Received From
inquired whether they can combine the
to combine the respective reports, Members, Participants, or Others
reports required by Rule 3012 and IM–
3013 with the Annual Report required provided the single report clearly Written comments were neither
by NYSE Rule 342.30, which is due by identifies and addresses all of the solicited nor received.
April 1st of each year. As support for requirements set forth in Rule 3012,
Rule 3013 and IM–3013. The proposed III. Date of Effectiveness of the
their request, dual members have noted Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
that the NYSE Rule 342.30 Annual rule change will also allow dual
members to comply with the respective Commission Action
Report mandates similar, though not
identical, requirements as the Rule 3012 reporting requirements of Rule 3012, The foregoing proposed rule change is
report. Dual members have also noted Rule 3013, IM–3013, and NYSE Rule subject to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the
that IM–3013 specifically provides that 342.30 without undue duplication of Act 10 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder 11
the IM–3013 report may be combined effort. because the proposal (i) Does not
with any other compliance or other NASD has filed the proposed rule significantly affect the protection of
similar report required by another self- change for immediate effectiveness and investors or the public interest; (ii) does
regulatory organization. Dual members has requested that the Commission not impose any significant burden on
waive the 5-day pre-filing requirement competition; and (iii) does not become
assert that being able to complete one
and the 30-day period for the proposed operative for 30 days from the date on
report instead of being required to
rule change to become operative, in which it was filed, or such shorter time
complete three reports that could cover
overlapping topics and issues would as the Commission may designate if
9 It should be noted that Rule 3012(b) provides
prevent the duplication of significant consistent with the protection of
that any dual member electing to comply with the
resources. However, because of the substantially similar requirements of the NYSE investors and the public interest;
disparate dates by which the three shall be deemed in compliance with the provisions provided that the self-regulatory
reports must be completed, the dual of Rule 3012. A dual member must comply with all organization has given the Commission
of the NYSE’s substantially similar requirements to notice of its intent to file the proposed
be considered in compliance with Rule 3012.
8 See Notice to Members 04–71 (October 2004)
Accordingly, any dual member electing to comply rule change, along with a brief
(announcing, among other things, the effective date with the substantially similar requirements of the description of the text of the proposed
of January 31, 2005); see also Transcript of NYSE would comply with Rule 3012’s reporting rule change, at least five business days
December 16, 2004 Call-in Workshop (‘‘Transcript’’) requirement by completing the NYSE Rule 342.30
reminding members that Rule 3012 Report is due
prior to the date of filing of the
Annual Report. The member, however, would still
within one year of the January 31, 2005 effective be required to complete the report required by IM–
10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
date and at least annually thereafter. The Transcript 3013 prior to the initial certification date required
is available at www.nasd.com/SupervisoryControl. by Rule 3013 and IM–3013. 11 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).

VerDate jul<14>2003 16:18 Nov 08, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00138 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM pfrm13 PsN: 09NON1
68124 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 216 / Wednesday, November 9, 2005 / Notices

proposed rule change, or such shorter rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the change.3 On October 31, 2005, the
time as designated by the Commission. submission, all subsequent Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the
NASD has requested that the amendments, all written statements proposed rule change.4 The Exchange
Commission waive the five-day pre- with respect to the proposed rule filed the proposed rule change pursuant
filing requirement and the 30-day change that are filed with the Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 5 and
operative delay so that the proposed Commission, and all written Rule 19b–4(f)(2) 6 thereunder, which
rule change will become immediately communications relating to the renders the proposal effective upon
effective upon filing. The Commission proposed rule change between the filing with the Commission. The
believes that waiving the five-day pre- Commission and any person, other than Commission is publishing this notice to
filing provision and the 30-day those that may be withheld from the solicit comments on the proposed rule
operative delay is consistent with the public in accordance with the change, as amended, from interested
protection of investors and the public provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be persons.
interest.12 Waiving the pre-filing available for inspection and copying in
requirement and accelerating the I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
the Commission’s Public Reference
operative date will merely permit the Statement of the Terms of Substance of
Room, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC
immediate implementation of changes the Proposed Rule Change
20549. Copies of such filing also will be
that will allow firms to more efficiently available for inspection and copying at NSX proposes to amend its manual
discharge their reporting obligations. the principal office of NASD. All processing fee for crosses and meets
For these reasons, the Commission comments received will be posted phoned into the NSX Control Room and
designates the proposed rule change as without change; the Commission does the book fees charged to its Designated
effective and operative immediately. not edit personal identifying Dealers.
At any time within 60 days of the information from submissions. You The text of the proposed rule change
filing of such proposed rule change, the should submit only information that is reproduced below. Additions are
Commission may summarily abrogate you wish to make available publicly. All indicated by italics. Deletions are
such rule change if it appears to the submissions should refer to the File contained within the brackets.
Commission that such action is Number SR–NASD–2005–121 and
necessary or appropriate in the public RULES OF NATIONAL STOCK
should be submitted on or before EXCHANGE
interest, for the protection of investors, November 30, 2005.
or otherwise in furtherance of the * * * * *
purposes of the Act. For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated CHAPTER XI
IV. Solicitation of Comments authority.13 Trading Rules
Interested persons are invited to Jonathan G. Katz,
* * * * *
submit written data, views and Secretary.
arguments concerning the foregoing, [FR Doc. 05–22335 Filed 11–8–05; 8:45 am] Rule 11.10 National Securities Trading
including whether the proposed rule BILLING CODE 8010–01–P System Fees
change is consistent with the Act. A. Trading Fees
Comments may be submitted by any of (a)–(d) No change.
the following methods: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE (e) Crosses and Meets
COMMISSION (1)–(3) No change.
Electronic Comments (4) Users executing crosses and meets
• Use the Commission’s Internet [Release No. 34–52713; File No. SR–NSX– in Tape A, B or C securities through the
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 2005–08] Exchange’s System Supervisory Center
rules/sro.shtml); or shall be charged [$15 per contra-party]
• Send an e-mail to rule- Self-Regulatory Organizations; $.0025 per share, up to a maximum of
comments@sec.gov. Please include File National Stock Exchange; Notice of $75 per side of transaction. This
Number SR–NASD–2005–121 on the Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of transaction fee shall be in lieu of any
subject line. Proposed Rule Change and transaction fee otherwise applicable
Paper Comments Amendments No. 1 and 2 Thereto under Paragraphs (A)(e)(1) through
Relating to Manual Processing Fee (A)(e)(3) above.
• Send paper comments in triplicate (f)–(l) No change.
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, November 1, 2005. (m) DD Issue/Book Fees. Designated
Securities and Exchange Commission, Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Dealers will be charged a monthly book
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC Securities Exchange Act of 1934 fee based on the following incremental
20549–9303. (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 schedule:
All submissions should refer to File notice is hereby given that on
Number SR–NASD–2005–121. This file September 28, 2005, National Stock Number of issues Fee per
number should be included on the issue
ExchangeSM (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NSXSM’’)
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the filed with the Securities and Exchange 0 to 150 ........................................ $30.00
Commission process and review your Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the 151 to 300 .................................... 20.00
comments more efficiently, please use proposed rule change, as described in 301 to 500 .................................... 15.00
only one method. The Commission will Items I, II, and III below, which Items
post all comments on the Commission’s have been prepared by the Exchange. 3 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchanged (1)

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ On October 21, 2005, the Exchange filed clarified who may phone orders into the NSX
Control Room, (2) defined ‘‘cross’’ and ‘‘meet,’’ and
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule (3) made other technical changes.
12 For purposes only of accelerating the operative
4 In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange made a
date of this proposal, the Commission has
13 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). correction to the rule text.
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 515 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 617 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).

VerDate jul<14>2003 16:18 Nov 08, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00139 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM pfrm13 PsN: 09NON1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen