S

IS PEC
SU IA
E L
... H
FR EA
EE LT
! H
Autumn 2008
SEE: www.uncensored.co.nz; healthfreedom.co.nz; and/or www.holisticmed.com/index.shtml

Your Health at Risk as Government Again! Tries to Ban Vitamins

Government Declares War

on Natural Medicine

Current government
health policies are
creating a nation
that is getting sicker
and sicker. Why?

is enforcing their agenda.

Whether it promotes dodgy vaccines

many of which are known to have
harmful side-effects or mercury
amalgam dental fillings, this government is ignoring the evidence of
harm to our health these things can
cause.

In 2007, the Labour-led government

attempted to ruin NZs natural health
industry by selling it out to Australias notorious TGA. (The TGA regulated hundreds of nutritional and
other natural health products out of
the Australian market, greatly diminishing the peoples health choices
and pushing up the prices of many
remaining products.)

Whose health are they looking after?

Ours, or that of the pharmaceutical
companies?
It condones genetically engineered
food, and promotes failed cancer
treatments like chemotherapy and
radiation (which may themselves
be carcinogenic). It pushes toxic
fluoride into our once pure drinking
water, and allows poisonous sprays
on the food we eat, ignoring the successes of organic agriculture.
If this werent bad enough, the government is once again (!) trying to
make it illegal to sell health-giving
vitamins, minerals and herbal supplements.
This is because the multi-national
pharmaceutical corporations have
declared war on the NZ natural
health industry and the government

In fact Medsafe*, the government

agency supposedly there to ensure
our safety, is threatening companies
that make and/or distribute natural health products! Natural health
practitioners such as naturopaths and
herbalists have also been targeted.

But thanks to thousands of New

Zealanders who pressured their MPs
of ALL PARTIES, the NZ government
shelved their TGA-type anti-vitamin bill.
So what happened then? Medsafe
hired a team of enforcers to silence
the natural health industry, demanding website owners remove references to research, clinical trials and links
to other websites that have the proof
that natural products have therapeutic benefit. If this is permitted to
stand up, no one will be permitted
to make claims about any therapeutic product even water (as it
cures dehydration)! If Medsafe has
its way it will become illegal even
to tell people that orange juice will
help their cold! They have already

threatened one practitioner with a

huge fine simply for making claims
about the efficacy of time tested remedies like lavender oil.
Medsafe maintains it is protecting
the NZ consumer. But this is simply
untrue. Vitamins are safer than food,
with no proven deaths from vitamins
recorded in the last 20 years in NZ,
according to the NZ Coroner.
By contrast, conventional medicine is
the 3rd leading cause of death in NZ
with about 1400 deaths per year!
Medical fascism has arrived in New
Zealand, and if it is allowed to continue we will surrrender our cherished
freedom to make our own health
choices. If the government succeeds
in destroying New Zealanders right
to use vitamins and other natural
medicines, what will they do next?
Will they try to make vaccination,
antibiotics or chemotherapy compulsory? Will they make it illegal to
grow or use culinary herbs that also
have medicinal properties? Much of
this happened in Australia; it could
also happen here.
We stand at the precipice. Natural
medicine has made tremendous
strides in recent years, and in many
cases has cured the incurable, where
orthodox medicine has failed. It is
now thanks to these successes that it
is coming under such intense pressure, in New Zealand and around the
world. (google: Codex.)
CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE ....

The Medsafe-Big Pharma Agenda:

DESTROY NATURAL MEDICINE IN NZ

What this means

for you and your
family:
Your access to nutritional supplements of all kinds
would
become severely restricted and/or made prohibi-

tively expensive. In Australia where this has already

happened, more than 600 products are no longer
available. Naturopaths and health food stores are being forced to shut down. The Australian people are not
even permitted to import many natural products for personal use from other countries. (Queensland excepted.)
In NZ, nutritional medicine, traditional Chinese and Indian
(ayurvedic) medicine, Chiropractors, sports nutrition people and even Maori herbal medicine are now under
threat by a bureaucracy that is making up the law as it
goes along.
CONTINUED FROM FRONT PAGE
Many doctors are now embracing
natural medicine a good sign to all
but the pharmaceutical giants that
view this development as an economic threat, and are using governments to quash it.
However, the battle involves much
more than mere economics. For
millions of people this is a matter of
life or death, as they rely on natural
medicine to maintain good health or
treat illness.
More than 70% of all New Zealanders take nutritional supplements,
and if these become unavailable
thanks to the governments following the orders of the pharmaceutical
giants, their and perhaps your own
health will suffer as a result.
Now is the time to act. This is of the
utmost seriousness.
* Medsafe is the branch of the Ministry of Health charged with regulating
medicines and medical devices. They
are now trying to define anything of
therapeutic value as a medicine.

Medsafe now maintains that it is illegal for any natural

health
practitioner to even refer you to the literature
on nutritional supplements! No recommendations, no
websites, not even articles or books! Medsafe says that
this means that they are making a claim and they want
to forbid it, even if these claims can be proved.

This is medical fascism. There is no other term for it.

Herbal
and Nutritional medicine often WORKS so WELL
that it has taken away business from the pharmaceutical companies. Now these companies have apparently
decided that they must be stopped at any cost.

Medsafe and Big Pharma dont want an educated public,

questioning their doctor and using nutritional therapies to
get well and stay well. They dont seem to want a healthy
population, either, that doesnt need its drugs.

Does this all sound familiar? The NZ Labour-led government

tried to pass an anti-vitamin law in 2007 but un-

able to get sufficient support, they shelved it. After that,

the bureaucracy Medsafe began harassing the natural
health industry. Unless Medsafe are stopped as well,
there will soon be no alternative health care available in
New Zealand. We must all fight this, together.

There is a world-wide economic war being waged by the

pharmaceutical industry against Traditional Medicine and
Natural Health and the NZ government is helping to wage
it. Here is WHAT YOU CAN DO TO STOP THE AGGRESSION
AGAINST NATURAL HEALTH:
Write and/or ring the office of David Cunliffe, NZ Minister of Health.
( Tel: 09 - 827-3062. Email: Ministerial.Office.of.Hon.David.Cunliffe@
ministers.govt.nz ) and let him know what you think about the Medsafe
campaign of harassment. Ring your local talkback show: RADIO LIVE
0800 723 465; ZB TALKBACK 0800 80 1080 RADIO WATEA (09) 257 0603
Write to your local newspaper. Contact your local MP. This is an election
year. You can help make this a political issue asap. See: www.healthfreedom.co.nz and/or www. uncensored.co.nz and/or www.celestialessentials.co.nz and/or http://www.iahf.com/world/index.html and/or http://
www.iahf.com/world/index.html

PLEASE DONATE TO THIS EFFORT!

A donation to support this campaign is AN INVESTMENT in the future
health of you, your family and generations to come. Please give generously to help us inform the country about whats happening!
at www.healthfreedom.co.nz
Donate
Subscribe
to UNCENSORED to help us get the word out!
PLEASE DISTRIBUTE
COPIES OF THIS REPORT. (See back
cover for details on bulk WIDELY
orders.)

Diet Soft Drinks Are Poison

What has Medsafe done about this? Nothing.

Aspartame is a chemical widely used in

diet soft drinks and
other products as an
artificial sweetener.
Everyone who drinks
(or eats) it assumes it
is safe otherwise it
would not be allowed
on the market, right?
Wrong.
Aspartame was shown to be a
cancer-causing agent more than 30
years ago, and in fact was opposed
by a majority of scientists at
the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) until Donald
Rumsfeld, known today as the
architect for the invasion of
Iraq, pushed it through when he
was part of the US Administration in the 1970s.
So what did the experts say
back then, and what are they
saying now?
1. Aspartame is a neurotoxin. It
causes brain damage.

6. Aspartame is implicated in Parkinsons Disease. (Remember the

actor Michael J Fox? Addicted to
Diet Pepsi, now hes almost completely disabled.)
7. There are 92 documented symptoms associated with Aspartame
from coma to death. Thats right,
people actually may die from aspartame poisoning.
8. Other symptoms may include
headaches, dizziness, seizures, confusion, visual impairment and joint

The issue is so important that we

dont think we should wait for
schools to ban this poison in years
to come. Rather, we should take
responsibility NOW for what we
eat and drink, based on the facts
rather than simply accept what is
readily available from the tuck shop
or the vending machine.
Perhaps if we stop buying products
made with aspartame, the message
will get through to the schools as
well as the suppliers.
Students (and others) need to understand that not everything being
sold as food is good or wholesome,
and that poisonous additives in
diet drinks will have an effect on our
health and our well-being sooner
or later.

http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/
http://www.safefood.org.nz
http://thisisyourbrainonpsychdrugs.blogspot.
com/2008/04/aspartame-and-brain.html

2. Aspartame degrades into

methanol and formaldehyde. Both
are deadly poisons.
3. Aspartame actually increases the
craving for carbohydrates. Far from
helping people lose weight, it helps
people gain weight, and may be
partly responsible for the epidemic
of obesity we are seeing now in
western countries.
4. Aspartame is highly addictive. It
is very hard to get off it. It is like a
drug.

5. Aspartame can cause rashes and

convulsions. Its effects are cumulative. While you may not immediately
experience health problems, over
time you probably will.

pain, cramps, vomiting, memory

loss, fatigue and weakness.
So, with what we now know about
this harmful chemical, why is it still
being sold in schools as a healthy
alternative to sugar? Why does the
NZ Ministry of Health still allow this
poison to be put into our food supply? The answer, unfortunately, has
to do with corporate profits which
often take precedence over public
health. Companies now largely dictate to government agencies, rather
than the other way round.

Too many people are dying

now from PREVENTABLE cancer, including brain tumours.
Boycott diet soft drinks now.
You will feel better for it.
Check labels on everything
you eat. (Aspartame is numbered 951 on the label.) Also
look for the warning contains phenylalanine on the
food/beverage labels. Foods
with this warning may also
contain aspartame.

A three year Italian study on

Aspartame in rats revealed a connection between the artificial sweetener and leukaemia, lymphoma and
malignant brain tumours. It conclusively proved that aspartame is a
carcinogen, say the studys authors.

Why isnt Medsafe

doing its job? Why
are these chemical
poisons allowed to be
sold while vitamins
are under attack?

males at dose
levels very
near those to
which humans can be
exposed, the
authors wrote
in their conclusion. The
number of
cancers that developed in rats given
zero aspartame was zero.

Aspartame Causes
Cancer in Rats and
Damages DNA
ATLANTA (PRWEB)July 22, 2005
The European Ramazzini Foundation of Oncology and Environmental
Sciences Cancer Research Centre
in Bolonga, Italy, just released their
three year study confirming the link
between aspartame and lymphomas
and leukaemias.
The report by Morando Soffritti Aspartame induces lymphomas and
leukemias in rats is in the European
Journal of Oncology for July, 2005.
Dr. Soffritti and his team carefully
set the conditions whereby genetically-uniform test rats were treated
equally with the exception of being
divided into groups given varying
levels of the toxic chemical sweetener.
Rats are deemed appropriate
subjects for testing aspartame on
humans because both humans and
rats metabolise the methyl ester in
aspartame into methyl alcohol, then
formaldehyde then formic acid all
deadly poisons. The carcinogenicity
of substances in rats and mice is a
consistent predictor of cancer risk
in humans exposed to those substances.
The study commenced with 8 week
old rats and continued until the
last one died at 159 weeks. Their
physical status and behaviour were
examined three times daily and detailed records of their growth were
kept. Every two weeks each of the
3,600 rats were clinically examined
for gross changes. As each rat died,
a complete autopsy was performed.
Organs, tissues and bones were
preserved for further study.
In our experimental conditions, it
has been demonstrated that APM
[aspartame] causes a dose-related
statistically significant increase in
lymphomas and leukemias in fe-

Increases of lymphomas and leukaemias at the lowest exposure level was 62 percent and an increase
in the incidence of these types of
neoplasias was also observed in
males exposed to the highest dose,
as stated in the study.
Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, MD,
one of the worlds leading authorities on aspartame neurotoxicity,
extensively reviewed the Soffritti
report. This study confirmed the
previous study by Dr. Trocho and
co-workers (1998), which also found
the formaldehyde breakdown product of aspartame to be damaging to
cellular DNA and that this damage
was cumulative. The type of damage
was a duplicate of that associated
with cancers. These two studies
strongly indicate that drinking a
single diet cola sweetened with
aspartame every day could significantly increase ones risk of developing a lymphoma or leukemia,
Blaylock said.
This study should terrify mothers
and all those consuming aspartame
sweetened products, he continued.
This was a carefully done study
which clearly demonstrated a statistically significant increase in
several types of lymphomas and
leukaemias in rats. Both of these
malignancies have increased
significantly in this country since
the widespread use of aspartame.
They also found an increased incidence of malignant brain tumors,
even though it was not statistically
significant. This does not mean there
is no association to brain tumours,
since ONLY the animals exposed to

aspartame developed the tumours.

With children and pregnant women
drinking the largest amount of
diet colas, this puts children at the
greatest risk of developing one of
these horrible diseases. They found
that even lower doses of aspartame
could cause these malignancies, yet,
the higher the dose, the more cancers that were seen, said Blaylock.
Since aspartame can increase
obesity and may even cause the
metabolic syndrome that affects 48
million Americans, there is no reason to ever consume this product.
At the least, it should be immediately banned from all schools, said
Blaylock.
Aspartame was approved for use in
dry goods in 1981 under extremely
controversial circumstances. The
artificial sweetener is currently
found in more than 6,000 productssoft drinks, chewing gum, candy,
desserts, table sweeteners, some
sweetened vitamin products and
pharmaceutical drugs and is responsible for more than 80 percent
of consumer complaints filed with
the FDA each year.
The FDA itself has published a
list of 92 potentially adverse reactions to aspartame that includes
weight gain, blindness, chronic
headaches, insanity and death.
Soffritti et al conducted this study
because they wanted to determine
whether or not the ADI for aspartame (50 and 40 milligrams per
kilogram of body weight per day in
the U.S. and Europe respectively)
was an appropriate limit. Their
report concludes with these words:
Results of our study call for urgent
re-examination of permissible exposure level of aspartame in both food
and beverages, especially to protect
children.
Makers and sellers of aspartame
tried to rebut this impeccable European research saying: With billions
of man-years of safe use, there is no
indication of an association between
aspartame and cancer in humans.
http://www.wnho.net/whopper.htm

U.S. Govt Admits Vaccines

May Cause Autism:
Does Medsafe Care???
The Vaccine Compensation Act has already compensated over 2,000 individuals who proved that
they were harmed by vaccines, resulting in settlements of nearly two billion dollars.
The U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, the federal agency
that oversees the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) and the U.S.
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), recently conceded the first vaccine-autism case.

harmed anyone in any way.

The facts are that the Vaccine Compensation Act has already compensated over 2,000 individuals who
proved that they were harmed by
vaccines, resulting in settlements of
nearly two billion dollars.

This case was filed in the no-fault

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program as part of the Autism
Omnibus proceedings in the U.S.
Federal Court of Claims.

Additionally, hundreds of peer-reviewed scientific/medical articles

from some the worlds best universities have long implicated Thimerosal in vaccines as a causal factor

It was one of the first three cases

chosen that alleged Thimerosal
(the mercury-based preservative) in some childhood vaccines
significantly contributed to a child
developing autism.

This concession shows the dishonesty of the continual media spin

coming from public health officials
and others who maintain there is
no evidence that Thimerosal, or any
other part of any vaccine, has ever
caused autism or, for that matter, has

Published studies from the US

and France showing that urinary
porphyrins, a biomarker for bodyburden of mercury, are elevated
in patients diagnosed with autistic
disorders ( http://www.mercuryfreedrugs.org).
A published study by researchers at Harvard University that found
twice as much mercury and oxidative stress in the brains of those with
an autism diagnosis as found in the
brains of those who were normal.
A study from the US showing a
significant relationship between
increasing blood mercury levels
and an increased risk of a diagnosis of an autistic disorder.
Numerous papers by independent researchers showing a link
between increasing mercury exposure from childhood vaccines
and the risk of a child developing
an autistic disorder.

Clifford Shoemaker, of Shoemaker

and Associates of Vienna, Virginia,
is the attorney of record in the
Hanna Poling v. Secretary of HHS
(case: 02-1466V).
Experts filing on behalf of the
petitioner, Hanna Poling, included
pediatric neurologist, Dr. Andrew
Zimmerman of Johns Hopkins University, and Maryland geneticist and
epidemiologist, Dr. Mark Geier of
the Genetic Centers of America.

between mercury and autism include:

in neurodevelopmental disorders
including autism.

Several papers showing that

adding low levels of Thimerosal
to certain blood, brain, eye, immune, liver and/or muscle cells
poisons their cellular mitochondrial pathways and can induce
cell death.

Furthermore, in 2003, the U.S. House

of Representatives Government
Reform Committee, after a 3.5-year
investigation, concluded that Thimerosal caused the autism epidemic
and that the FDA and health authorities were guilty of institutional
malfeasance in covering it up.

Today, despite being banned in Europe and restricted in 7 U.S. states,

Thimerosal-containing flu vaccines
are still recommended for routine
administration to pregnant women
and infants, with little or no warning
of the presence of this known poison
in these and other vaccines.

Evidence supporting the connection

www.mercury-freedrugs.org

Our Health System is our

third leading cause of death
NZ Ministry of Health (1998 statistics)
and The Journal of the American Medical Association
by Alan R. Yurko
A generation ago, people trusted
their doctors blindly and implicitly.
There seemed to be a personal
bond with ones doctor which has
eroded with the emphasis on
medicine as a business, CPT codes,
HMOs and iatrogeny (death by
doctors), among other things. The
health care market place is not kind
and people have lost trust. Iatrogeny
plays a large and ugly role in this.
A recent study published in The
Joumal of The American Medical
Association (2000:284:94); by Barbara Starfield, MD, MPH showed that
in the US, this data was found:
12,000 deaths/year from unnecessary surgery
7,000 deaths/year from medication
errors in hospitals
20,000 deaths/year from other errors in hospitals
80,000 deaths/year from hospitalacquired infections
106,000 deaths/year from adverse
effects of medications
This totals 225,000 deaths per year
from iatrogenic causes, placing iatrogeny as the third leading cause of
death in the US, second only to heart
disease and cancer.
The scary part is that this does not
include disabilities and disorders,
just deaths in hospitalised patients.
Iatrogeny is not exclusive to the US.
The British Medical Journal stated
on 18 March 2000 that:
In Australia, medical error results
is an many as 18,000 unnecessary
deaths, and more than 50,000 patients become disabled every year.
Studies released in the last ten
years show similar trends in the UK,

Canada and New Zealand. New Zealand has a large percentage ratio of
adverse drug reactions comparable
to the US. (It should be noted that
the US and New Zealand are the
only countries that allow aggressive
pharmaceutical drug advertisements.)
One very interesting statistic I came
across which deserves mention are
deaths attributed to addictive drugs
in the UK between 1990 and 1995:
Benzodiazepines - 1,810
Methadone - 676
Heroin - 291
Millions of dollars and great concern through organisations and
associations are given to the deaths
and disablements from myriad
causes except iatrogeny. Here we
have two legal prescription drugs
causing more deaths each, than
heroin.
Drug companies spend huge fortunes for political influence, in fact
lobbying for pharmaceutical interests in the first half of 2000 reached
$US 42.9 million ; and it was estimated that $US 230 million would be
spent during the election. George
Bush welcomed $US 1.7 million from
drug companies just for his inauguration celebrations! (British Medical Journal 27 January 2001). Drug
companies are a business and have
always been a business. They do not
give such an investment without an
expected return with profits.
Perhaps this is why officials turn a
blind eye to the fact that doctors and
hospitals are responsible for nearly
a quarter-million deaths in the US
per year. Or perhaps this is why the
pharma companies manufacture
pesticides and chemicals that cause
cancer and disease and then manufacture drugs to treat diseases they
cause ... and then can cause even

more disorders to create a market

for more drugs and more profit. A
very lucrative cycle. Perhaps this is
why funding for disease research
successfully diverts attention from
the pharma cartels own carcinogenic and deadly products. One need
not look too hard for reasons why
doctors and hospitals mistakes are
the third leading cause of death in
America, with no end in sight.
Many believe that Barbara Starfields study cited earlier is just the
tip of the iceberg. After all, the study
only looked at hospitalised patients.
What of the in-home and outpatient
errors? There are more people to
consider in these groups, and certainly more iatrogeny. Could it be
that iatrogeny is the leading cause
of death in the US? The World? As
startling and unsupported as that
sounds, it may very well be true. At
any rate, the iatrogenic holocaust
makes World War II deaths pale in
comparison. Yet only patronising
and minimal attempts to recognise
and correct iatrogeny have been
made.

Murder Or Mistake?
By making iatrogeny, through semantics, sound as if it is an infectious disease beyond the control
of physicians and hospitals, we
allow the medical profession and
pharmaceutical cartels to distance
themselves from responsibility and
relieve them from the culpability of
what mirrors negligent homicide.
It would be humanly impossible to
eliminate genuine mistakes entirely.
The problem is that, How many
times does a mistake happen until
its not just a mistake anymore, but
negligence?
This author believes that 225,000
deaths every year may be an example of when mistakes cross over
to the darkness of negligence. If so,
then we are witnessing the greatest
holocaust to befall mankind ever.
http://www.vaclib.org/basic/iatrogen.htm ALSO: http://www.newciv.
org/nl/newslog.php/_v145/__show_
article/_a000145-000013.htm

Drugs
and Medical
* See UNCENSORED Issue #10
Errors Killing 1 in 5
Where is Medsafe?
In a recent British Medical Journal (BMJ),
Ron Law, Executive Director of the NNFA,
in New Zealand and member of the New
Zealand Ministry of Health Working
Group advising on medical error, offered some enlightening information on
deaths by drugs and medical errors.
He notes the prevalence of deaths from
medical errors and also from properly
researched and prescribed medications
in Australia and New Zealand. He cites
the following statistics and facts:

Official Australian government reports reveal that preventable medical error in hospitals is responsible for 11%
of all deaths in Australia.(1,
2), which is about 1 of every 9
deaths. If deaths from properly
researched, properly registered, properly prescribed
and properly used drugs were
added along with preventable
deaths due to private practice
it comes to a staggering 19%,
which is almost 1 of every 5
deaths.
New Zealand figures are very similar.
According to Mr. Law: The equivalent
of New Zealands second largest city
(Christchurch) has been killed by preventable medical error and deaths from
properly researched, properly registered, properly prescribed and properly
used drugs in Australasia in the past
decade and its biggest city Auckland
either killed or permanently maimed.

Study finds 98% of child drug

trials lack independent safety
checks Where is Medsafe?
Research highlights adverse effects of tests
Surprise at lack of monitoring committees
Sarah Boseley, Health Editor
The Guardian, (UK)
March 19, 2008
Only a tiny minority of drug trials
on children have an independent
safety monitoring committee to pick
up potentially dangerous side-effects, a study has revealed.
Researchers from Nottingham University found that under 2% of the
739 international drug trials published between 1996 and 2002 had
such committees of
independent experts
who would scrutinise
data and warn, if necessary, that it was not
safe to carry on.

In the past drugs have gone into

the marketplace without trials and
we have picked up the side-effects
later, she said. Until a few years
ago drugs were rarely
tested or licenced for
use in children. Doctors had no alternative but to use adult
medicines, guess at the
appropriate dose and
hope they worked the
same way in children.
But, said Sammons, children were
not small adults. The assumption is
if its fine in adults, it will be fine in
children, but the child has a different metabolism, she said.

The study found

that in 7 out of
10 trials adverse
events were
reported.
Among the 2%, six trials had to be stopped
early because of toxic effects on the
child patients.

More than 5 milion people have been

killed by Western medical practice in
the past decade (Europe, USA, Canada,
Australia, and NZ) and millions more
permanently maimed. Sounds like a war
zone, doesnt it?

We were very surprised by the low

level of trials that had independent
safety monitoring committees and
are urging pharmaceutical companies to include these in all future
trials involving children, said Dr
Helen Sammons, associate professor
of child health at Nottingham and
lead author of the paper, published
in the child health journal Acta Paediatrica.

The economic impact of deaths due to

preventable medical error and deaths
from properly researched, properly
registered, properly prescribed and
properly used drugs is approximately
$1 trillion over the past decade. Mr Law
notes that only 0.3% of these deaths are
properly coded and classified in official
statistics as being attributed to these
causes.

It is essential that appropriate

drugs are developed for use in
children and clinical trials need to
continue. They are vital because
they increase the chance of picking
up adverse reactions before drugs
are introduced into general clinical
practice.

British Medical Journal: 11/ November/

2000; 321: 1178A (emailed response)

by the drugs in a third of the trials

nearly 37%. In 11%, side-effects
were moderate or severe and even
sometimes life-threatening. Sammons stressed that the point of a
trial was to find out whether the
benefits of the drug outweighed any
side-effects before the drug was
used in the population at large.

The team found that children experienced adverse effects caused

The study found that in seven out

of 10 trials adverse events were
reported.
These included bleeding, high
blood pressure, seizures, psychosis,
suicide and acute renal failure, but
in most cases they were not thought
to be caused by the drug. In 11%
of the trials there were deaths, but
most were also not thought to be
related to the drug.
Deaths were highest in trials involving premature babies who are
often very sick. There were also
deaths in trials of drugs for infectious diseases, neurology, and respiratory and kidney problems.

PL

At last: A New Zealand

magazine for people who
can still think for themselves
EA

UNCENSORED was the first magazine in NZ

to break the story of 9/11 being an inside job,
and that this is the endgame for the US, the
UK and Australia all of which are morphing into
military dictatorships.
Each issue has a special
section on What Your
Doctor Will Never Tell
You, presenting the evidence that mammograms,
sunscreen and airport Xrays may cause cancer ...
as well as alternative therapies for serious illnesses
that really work.

SE
TH HE
IS LP
RE DI
PO ST
RT RIB
U
!

Each fascinating issue of UNCENSORED details advances being made in non-polluting and
free energy technologies, putting paid to the
energy crisis scam.

We have also published some of the most

astonishing archaeological discoveries ever
made such as the ancient
Egyptian hierglyphics found
in Australia (!) as well as a
year old carved tree
ABSOLUTELY FREE ! ! 25,000
stump found in Auckland.

SUBSCRIBE NOW AND

GET 3 GREAT DVDS

We published the PROOF that NASA

has been lying about the existence
of life on Mars. We ran European
Space Agency pictures of forests,
surface water and possible underground artificial structures ... We
even published the real Roswell
story with the REAL pix from
1947.

In this dark era of increasing

censorship and control UNCENSORED
is still totally committed to freedom of
thought, inquiry, and a free press. Unlike our friends in mainstream media,
we really present the other side of the
story.
See for yourself what youve been missing. Or why not send it to a friend or
library as a great gift idea!

PLEASE RUSH ME ( ) COPIES OF THIS SPECIAL REPORT FOR ONLY $ .50 EACH (MINIMUM ORDER 20 COPIES).
( ) I enclose full payment of $_______ ( ) Charge to my credit card (details below)
PLEASE POST ORDERS FOR THIS SPECIAL REPORT TO UNCENSORED, PO BOX 44-128, PT CHEVALIER, AK
Please start my subscription to Uncensored Magazine with [ ] Current issue (#11) / [ ] Next issue (#12) for only NZ$39.60/year (4 issues)
NOTE: Australian orders add NZ$25 for postage / US orders add NZ $40 for postage. AND SEND ME 3 OF YOUR BEST DVDs FREE!
SINGLE ISSUE ORDERS: I would like to order the following back issues @ NZ$10 each (P&H included in NZ). Overseas add $5 ea for p/h.
[ ] #1 (CD-ROM Only) [ ]#2 [ ]#3 [ ]#4 [ ]#5 [ ]#6 [ ]#7 [ ]#8 [ ]#9 [ ]#10 [ ]#11 (CURRENT ISSUE)
UNCENSORED LIBRARY: [ ] I would like to purchase ALL 10 back issues for only NZ$60.00 (Add $25 for orders outside NZ)
PAYMENT: [ ] I enclose full payment of $_________ (Please make cheque payable to Uncensored Publications Ltd);
[ ] Please charge my [ ] VISA [ ] MASTERCARD for the full payment of items selected above
Name on Card: _____________________________Card Number: ___________-___________-___________-___________Exp:_________
Billing Address: _____________________________City / Suburb: _____________________ Post Code:_______Country: _____________
SHIPPING INFORMATION: [ ] Same as billing information

[ ] This is a gift. Please inform the recipient.

[ ] Name ______________________________________Address:_______________________________________
City_____________________________________Post Code___________Country__________________________

SUBSCRIPTION
ORDERS ONLY:
Clip and mail to:

UNCENSORED
PO Box 104-220
Lincoln North
Auckland 0654

TE