Dr ZDr ZDr ZDr Z
Joseph Zernik, PhD PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750; Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
Blog: http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
10-03-14 Richard Fine: Repeat complaint and request for responses by Terry Nafisi, Clerk of the United States Court, Central District of California, Los Angeles in re: Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914)
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:18:40 -0700 To: "Clerk of the Court" <terry_nafisi@cacd.uscourts.gov>, lawsters@googlegroups.com From: joseph zernik <jz12345@earthlink.net> Subject: Richard Fine: Complaint and request for information by Clerk Terry Nafisi, US District Court, Los Angeles in re: Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) Cc: "Record Supervisor" <dawn_Bullock@cacd.uscourts.gov>, "Attention Audrey Collins, Chief Judge" <Angela_Bridges@cacd.uscourts.gov> To Terry Nafisi, Clerk of the United States Court, Central District of California; By email
RE: Richard Fine: Complaint and request for information by Clerk Terry Nafisi, US District Court, Los Angeles in re: Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914)
Dear Clerk Nafisi: It has also been over half a year that I have been denied access to court records in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) at the US District Court, Los Angeles,
[1]
with no explanation at all, and since I filed a complaint alleging dishonest manipulation of the records in the same caption at the Office of the Clerk of the Court.
[4]
It has been a couple of months since I requested your responses on related questions. I again write to request an explanation for the denial of access to court records at the United States Court, Los Angeles, for responses on my complaint and the questions, which your office last indicated were being researched. The matter involved the alleged abuses and deprivation of Liberty of Richard Fine. Questions addressed to your office included, but were not limited to the following: 1) Was the PACER docket of Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) held by the office of the Clerk of the Court as an honest, valid and effectual court record of the US District Court, Central District of California, in compliance with US law?
2) What was the legal foundation for the operation of PACER and CM/ECF at the US District Court, Central District of California?
3) Why was the General Order 08-02, which I was informed by staff of your office was the foundation for the operations of PACER and CM/ECF at the US District Court, Central District of California unsigned, not even mentioning the name of its author?
[2]
4) Why were procedures for authentication and certification of court records, which were drastically changed with the introduction of PACER and CM/ECF, never published as Local Rules of Court, as required by law?
5) Why was public access denied to the paper record which was the Habeas Corpus petition of Richard Fine Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) in disregard of First Amendment rights?
6) Why was public access denied to the NEFs (notices of electronic filings) in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) in disregard of First Amendment rights? 7) Why was no honest, valid and effectual NEF ever issued for any of the minutes, orders, judgment in in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) ? 8) Was Donna Thomas authorized as Deputy Clerk at the time that she engaged in transactions in the docket of Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914)?
Digitally signed by Joseph H Zernik
DN:cn=Joseph H Zernik,o,ou,email=jz12345@earthlink.net,c=US Location:La Verne,California Date:2010.03.1406:31:02-07'00'
Page 2/2 March 14, 2010 Your office last indicated that such questions were being researched.
[3]
In addition, a complaint was filed August 1, 2009 with your office, regarding alleged dishonest manipulations of the paper record that was the habeas corpus petition of Richard Fine in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914).
[4]
Such concerns were seconded by the Supervisor of the Intake Unit, Ms Sharon McGee. At least two staff members of the US District Court, Los Angeles were alleged as involved in such conduct, or worse: a) Pro Se Clerk Chris Sawyer b) Courtroom Assistant Donna Thomas. Refusal of the Clerk of the Court to answer on any of these questions appeared to a lay person as nothing more than "taking the Fifth", in a case that appeared for all practical purposes a fraud and abuses by the United States Court on Mr Richard Fine, deliberately intended to deprive him of Liberty. Respectfully, Dated: March 14, 2010 La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California Joseph H Zernik, PhD By: ______________ JOSEPH H ZERNIK PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 Phone: 323.515.4583 Fax: 323.488.9697 Email <jz12345@earthlink.net> Blog: http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
[1]
Denial in person of access to court records in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) took place twice: September 18, 2009 and December 29, 2009. a) http://www.scribd.com/doc/28340297/09-07-31-Richard-Fine-US-District-Court-Los-Angeles-Request-to-Access-Court-Records-s b) http://www.scribd.com/doc/28340080/09-09-18-Declaration-of-Joseph-Zernik-in-Re-Denial-of-Access-to-Court-Records-at-the-US-District-Court-Los-Angeles-s c) http://www.scribd.com/doc/24747753/09-12-29-Declaration-of-Joseph-Zernik-in-Re-Visit-to-United-States-District-Court-Los-Angeles
[2]
General Order 08-02 of the US District Court, Central District of California http://www.scribd.com/doc/28339822/08-02-General-Order-US-District-Court-Central-District-of-California-Authorizing-the-Operations-of-CM-ECF-and-Digital-Authentication-Attestation-in
[3]
January 19, 2010 response by office of the Clerk, US District Court, Central District of California. http://www.scribd.com/doc/25442978/10-01-19-Office-of-Terry-Nafisi-Clerk-of-US-Court-still-researching-whether-the-dockets-of-the-court-were-honest-valid-and-effectual-s
[4]
August 1, 2009 Complaint and request for investigation filed with Terry Nafisi, Clerk of the Court regarding alleged dishonest manipulations of the paper record that was the habeas corpus petition of Richard Fine (commencing record) in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) http://www.scribd.com/doc/28340585/09-08-01-Complaint-and-Request-for-Investigation-Filed-with-Terry-Nafisi-Clerk-of-the-Court-Regarding-Dishonest-Manipulation-of-Records-of-the-Hab
Ihre Neugier belohnen
Alles, was Sie lesen wollen.
Jederzeit. Überall. Auf jedem Gerät.
Keine Verpflichtung. Jederzeit kündbar.