Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Gaurav Nirala
Y0911017
th
8 Sem (Phy)
Introduction
Sagnac Effect
In this experiment ,light source from the source L is split by the beam splitter
in such a way that one half of the intensity goes in the clockwise direction and
the other in the anti-clockwise direction. The interference pattern is seen on
a screen.The whole setup is placed on a rotating platform.The screen and the
observer are both placed on the rotating platform. The interference pattern
shifts (this is the central result). At rest, an interference pattern is observed
but it changes when the whole setup is rotated.
The change in interference fringes is observed because of the different distances traversed by the two light rays due to rotation of the platform. The
following is a simple derivation of the above fact using a circular ring rotating
at an angular velocity .
If a light source emits in both directions from one point on the rotating ring,
light traveling in the same direction as the rotation direction needs to travel
more than one circumference around the ring before it catches up with the light
source from behind.The t1 it takes to catch up with the light source is :
t1 =
2R + L
c
(1)
L is the distance the mirror has moved during the same time.
L = Rt1
(2)
2R
c R
(3)
Likewise, the light traveling in the opposite direction of the rotation will travel
less than one circumference before hitting the light source on the front side. So
the time for this direction of light to reach the moving source again is:
t2 =
2R
c + R
1
(4)
4R2
c2 R 2 2
(5)
Since
R = v c
4R2
4A
2
c2
c
t =
(6)
(7)
c
The number of fringes is thus proportional to the angular speed and the
are A.
N=
(8)
(9)
dr = dr
(10)
d = d + dt
(11)
(12)
Rd0
(c R)
(13)
(14)
(15)
t01 t02 =
(c2
(16)
(17)
A certain rate of rotation induces a small difference between the time it takes
light to traverse the ring in the two directions according to the Sagnac effect. This introduces a tiny separation between the frequencies of the counterpropagating beams, a motion of the standing wave pattern within the ring,
and thus a beat pattern when those two beams are interfered outside the ring.
Therefore the net shift of that interference pattern follows the rotation of the
unit in the plane of the ring.
2.1
Mathematical Description
We shall describe it with the respect of Doppler Shift.Suppose the natural frequency of the laser is 0 . If it now starts moving at a velocity v, the frequency
shift due to doppler effect is given by:
v
= 0 1 +
(18)
c
If the velocity has been produced as a result of rotation, then the following value
of v is obtained:
vrot = r.
(19)
Here is the agular speed and r is the distance from the centre of rotation.
Thus the emission frequency changes to :
r.
+ = 0 1 +
(20)
c
This is the expression when the velocity v is in the direction of rotation.The
following expression is for against the rotation.
r.
+ = 0 1
(21)
c
3
4A
2.r.
=
.
c
L
(22)
Here A = r2 and L = 2..r. Thus it gives the same expression for the sagnac
effect.
Original setup
The adaptor to the power source of our was faulty , so we could not work with
the above mentioned apparatus. Instead we built a different setup.It was on a
rectangular optical table . We attached this table to the rotating platform of the
original setup. There is no lasing involved in our setup , we used a readymade
laser. Thus we worked with a passive sagnac interferometer.
Our setup looked like this one:
In order to observe, the beat pattern , we fed the signal to the computer
and analysed the pattern using COBRA software. But no categorical beat
pattern was obtained.
We could not detect any discernible signal out of the background noise in our
proposed setup. Even with the COBRA software , we did not manage to get
a frequency clearly higher than the background noise.While rotating the setup ,
no shift in interference pattern was observed also. The possible reasons for that
is explained below along with the discussion of the theory.
I do not think there was any flaw in the alignment of the setup. Since we
obtained the interference pattern with the setup. The flaw either arises
from our understanding or the measuring capacity of the apparatus used.
The size of our setup was smaller then origional setup.
No beat frequency was observed since it was a passive sagnac interferometer.
The back reflection from the flat surfaces of the beam splitter produces
spurious beams which can be a source of distraction.
The original setup uses a polarised laser beam . But we did not use any
which can be a source of error.