Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CASE STUDIES
Driver identification
Figure 11 provides an example of how ElectricIQ
identified and organized the key drivers and then
tiered them to guide data collection and analysis
(Step 3 in the scenario planning work approach).
Candidate drivers were identified in three ways:
1. Views of the current management team and
investors in the company;
2. Input from current customers; and
3. Discussions with external thought leaders in
both the public and private sectors, including the
European Community, OECD, General Electric,
IBM and Shell.
FIG U R E 1 1
LE VEL 1 DRIVERS
LE VEL 2 DRIVERS
Social opinion
Technical viability
Price
Demand for renewable
energy sources
Subsidies
Political action
Regulations
Taxes
DRIVER
Social opinion
Climate change
Technical viability
Q UANTITATIVE DATA
SOU RCES
Pricing
Thought leaders
Climate statistics
Futurists
CO 2 emissions
Climatologists
Adoption rates
Product availability
Economic cost
Vehicle sales
Political action
Polling data
Renewable usage
Availability
Subsidies
Level of investment
Acceptance rates
Regulation
E XPERT OPINION
Polling data
Relative pricing
Emissions growth
(decline)
Violations
Taxation
Redistribution effects
Growth rates
Scientific journals
Demand patterns
and forecasts
Think tanks
Economists
Press coverage
Pressure groups
Environmental impact
analyses
Patents
New product launches
Consumer willingness
to pay
Policy statements
Lobbyists
Environmental scientists
Behavioral studies
on impact
Evolution of regulation
Legislative agendas
Legal experts
Government agencies
Assessment of scope
and impact
Macroeconomic
policy analyses
HIGH
KEY DRIVERS
Fuel prices
BASELINE
FOR ALL
SCENARIOS
GDP
Public
opinion
Competitors
Government
stimulus
IM PAC T
Construction
activity
Technical
feasibility
Climate
change
Demographics
LOW
LOW
TAB LE 1 2
DRIVER
HIG H IM PAC T
Public opinion
Construction activity (at a given GDP level)
Fuel prices
Emergence of new competitors
HIGH
FIG U R E 1 3
Scenario development
MANDATE
Cost of doing
business
Do it or die
PUBLIC
POLICY
Steady
as she goes
Better be
the best
SUBSIDIZED
EARLY ADOPTER
MASS MARKET
ADOPTION
PUBLIC OPINION
TAB LE 1 3
Scenario implications
DO IT OR DIE
B E T TER
B E TH E B EST
COST OF DOING
BUSIN ESS
STE ADY
AS SH E GOES
Approach
to
innovation
The minimum is
not enough; must
be best to win
Innovative
leadership has
real value
Focus on select
areas where there
is strong demand
and we have a
capability
Marketing
strategies
Must be a leader
Partner with
builders and
owners to
secure share
Be number one in
select niches
Market
goals
Acquire share
Be the preferred
supplier
Build share in
niches
Financial
goals
High margins
Focus on size
and scale
Low-cost producer
Modest growth
over time
TAB LE 1 4
SCENARIO
Do it or die
Cost of doing
business
GDP growth
3%
5%
1%
2%
15%
24%
5%
4%
Demand: Remediation
20%
22%
8%
4%
Existing products
12%
32%
3%
7%
New products
5%
28%
1%
3%
2%
7%
0%
0%
Revenues
18%
30%
3%
5%
Gross margins
4%
8%
0%
2%
Net margins
7%
12%
1%
1%
R&D investment
15%
25%
9%
5%
MARKET METRICS
ELECTRICIQ VOLUMES
This case study is based on a real organization (the author serves on its board and finance committee);
however, the content has been modified for illustrative purposes.
STE P 1
10
STE P 2
E X TERNAL TO TH E SCHOOL
Demographic change
Marketing effectiveness
Expense management
Parental expectations
STE P 3
11
12
FIG U R E 21
STAGNATION
Local
economy
ACADEMIC ELITE
STE P 4
Develop scenarios
Having identified the two primary dimensions, the team plotted each dimension
onto a matrix (Figure 22) to frame a possible set of future scenarios.
FIG U R E 22 Scenarios
GLOBAL CITIZEN
Give me
choices
Whatever
you want
STAGNATION
REVITALIZATION
Get me out
of here
Ivy league
or else
ACADEMIC ELITE
The team developed labels for each of the four quadrants as a frame of reference.
They came up with Give me choices, Whatever you want, Get me out of here,
and Ivy League or else.
With the basic framework for the scenarios in place, the team looked at the behavior of
each of the key drivers under each scenario and drafted narrative descriptions for each.
13
14
Give me choices
The local economy is stagnant with little growth in
population. The public school system is weak and
constantly wrestling with budget cuts. However, the
global economy is reasonably strong, fueled by massive
investments in environmental technologies. Global
connections fueled by technology continue quickly
and young people are increasingly mobile in both their
physical location and career choices. Parents want
their children to get a good academic grounding but
also value development of their children into socially
aware and responsible citizens with a strong commitment to service and sustainability.
STE P 5
Apply scenarios
Having developed four different scenarios, the team then went through a process of
analyzing the impact of each scenario on key aspects of the school from enrollment
to the curriculum. Table 22 summarizes some of the findings.
TAB LE 22
WHATE VER
YOU WANT
G E T M E OUT
OF H ERE
IV Y LE AG U E
OR EL SE
Enrollment
Reduce to two
streams per grade
(400+)
Reduce to two
streams per grade
(400+)
Tuition
pricing
Seek to minimize
need for financial
aid with a smaller
enrollment
Emphasize diversity
and price to achieve
Selective use of
financial aid to
manage enrollment
levels
Market
positioning
Clearing a path
to success
Superior academic
achievement
guaranteed
Curriculum
Structure driven
by need to maximize
student options
upon graduation
within the confines
of a limited budget
Excellence in the
basics; outperform
the public
alternatives by
a wide margin
Singular focus on
preparing for elite
high schools and
colleges
Endowment
Steady focus on
growing size of
unrestricted funds
that can offset tuition
and staff costs
Aggressive
solicitation to fund
new programs
and plant
Balance endowment
growth with annual
giving to manage
to a tight budget
Aggressive growth
but with a focus on
funding to reduce
student/teacher
ratios
15
16
STE P 6
This publication is one in a series on Scenario Planning. An Overview and Guidance are also
available on our website. For additional information, please contact Carol Raven, Principal,
Strategic Management Accounting & Finance at 416-204-3489 or email craven@cpacanada.ca.
17