Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Lakshmi durga**
** Luckyreddy.595@gmail.com
Shashikar**
**Samboor.shashikar@gmail.com
Bhargav ram**
** bhargavseetha@gmail.com
ABSTRACT: Traditionally the brain has been under constant research and the source of numerous technologies. One such
technology, brain-computer interface, is the extraction of brain signals and their use in real time applications .The brain
consists of three main regions of which the cerebellum is focused on by this technology. This technology uses electrodes to
extract signals from corresponding regions of the brain and use these signals to operate devices. This paper gives an idea
about the brain-computer interface and its applications. Extraction of brain signals from various regions of the brain using
both invasive and noninvasive techniques and the use of this signal in real time applications has been shown in this paper
with the development of Brain Controlled Car (BCC), a device for persons with physical disabilities. In this paper the
technology has been taken a step further with the design of the BCC that provides mobility to persons with motor immobility.
The car works on the asynchronous mechanism of Artificial Intelligence. It is a great advance of technology which will make
the disabled fit for doing everything a normal man does.
KEYWORDS: Brain-Computer Interface (BCI), Brain Controlled Car (BCC), Electroencephalography, Bio Control System,
Electromechanical Control Unit.
1. INTRODUCTION
A brain-computer interface uses electrophysiological
signals to control remote devices. Most current BCIs are
not invasive. They consist of electrodes applied to the
scalp of an individual or worn in an electrode cap, these
electrodes pick up the brains electrical activity (at the
microvolt level) and carry it into amplifiers such as the
ones shown in Figure1.These amplifiers amplify the signal
approximately ten thousand times and then pass the
signal via an analog to digital converter to a computer
for processing . The computer processes the EEG
Signal and uses it in order to accomplish tasks such as
communication and environmental control. BCIs are slow
in comparison with normal human actions, because of the
complexity and noisiness of the signals used, as well as
the time necessary to complete recognition and signal
processing. The phrase Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)
when taken literally means to interface an individuals
electrophysiological signals with a computer. A true BCI
only uses signals from the brain and as such must treat
eye and muscle movements as artifacts or noise. On the
other hand, a system that uses eye, muscle, or other body
potentials mixed with EEG signals, is a brain-body
actuated system. The BCI system uses oscillatory
ElectroEncephaloGram (EEG) signals, recorded during
specific mental activity, as input and provides a control
option by its output. The obtained output signals are
presently evaluated for different purposes, such as
Figure1: A 32-channel electrode cap (above) and a 32channel set of analog grass amplifiers (below)
implanted methods
evoked potentials
3. BCI ARCHITECTURE
The processing unit is subdivided into a preprocessing
unit, responsible for artifact detection, and a feature
extraction and recognition unit that identifies the
command sent by the user to the BCI. The output
subsystem generates an action associated to this
command. This action constitutes a feedback to the user
who can modulate her mental activity so as to produce
those EEG patterns that make the BCI accomplish her
intents. Interfaces based on brain signals require on-line
detection of mental states from spontaneous activity;
different cortical areas are activated while thinking
different things (i.e. a mathematical computation, an
imagined arm movement, a music composition, etc). The
information of these "mental states" can be recorded with
Figure 4: LFASD
Figure 7: Electroencephalogram
5.1.1. Test Results Comparing Driver Accuracy
With/Without BCI
i) Able-bodied subjects using imaginary movements
could attain equal or better control accuracies than
able-bodied subjects using real movements.
ii) Subjects demonstrated activation accuracies
in the range of 70-82% with false activations below 2%.
iii) Accuracies using actual finger movements
were observed in the range 36-83%
iv) The average classification accuracy of imaginary
movements was over 99%
.
Figure 5: Person operating a BCC
7. BIOGRAPHY
S Bhargav ram
(Email: bhargavseetha@gmail.com)
III Year
Kasireddy Narayan Reddy College of Engineering &
Research (KNRR)
Shashikar
(Email: Samboor.shashikar@gmail.com)
III Year
Kasireddy Narayan Reddy College of Engineering &
Research (KNRR)
Lakshmi durga
(Email: Luckyreddy.595@gmail.com)
III Year
Kasireddy Narayan Reddy College of Engineering &
Research (KNRR)