Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

53686 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

174 / Friday, September 9, 2005 / Notices

businesses, and from individuals DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR other reasonable alternatives, if any,
identifying themselves as identified during the NEPA process. The
representatives or officials of National Park Service EIS will also consider mitigation
organizations or businesses available for measures to minimize potential adverse
public inspection in their entirety. Utah Museum of Natural History, environmental effects. Based on current
The responsible official is Ernest Environmental Impact Statement, information it is not expected that the
Quintana, Regional Director, Midwest University of Utah and National Park EIS alternatives will include alternative
Region, National Park Service. Service and as Joint Lead Agencies, sites for the museum facility, for several
Salt Lake County, UT reasons. (1) The University of Utah and
Dated: July 28, 2005.
AGENCY: The University of Utah and the Museum concluded a site selection
Ernest Quintana,
National Park Service, Interior. process in 1995, and in 1997 the
Regional Director, Midwest Region.
University of Utah Board of Trustees
[FR Doc. 05–17854 Filed 9–8–05; 8:45 am] ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
reserved the Research Park site for use
BILLING CODE 4312–94–P Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
by the Museum. Since that time
for the construction and operation of a
considerable resources have been
proposed new Utah Museum of Natural
devoted to site planning, and substantial
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR History at the University of Utah.
private, state and federal financial
National Park Service SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National commitments have been received for
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 design, construction and operation of a
Fire Management Plan, Final U.S.C. 4332 (C) and (D) (NEPA), the museum on the designated site. It would
Environmental Impact Statement, University of Utah and the National not be practical or economically feasible
Saguaro National Park, AZ Park Service as Joint Lead Agencies, are for the Museum to abandon this site for
preparing an Environmental Impact an alternative location. (2) Congress, in
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. Statement (EIS) on the construction and enacting the 2002 Utah Public Lands
ACTION: Notice of availability of the operation of a proposed new Utah Artifact Preservation Act and in making
Final Environmental Impact Statement Museum of Natural History museum subsequent appropriations,
for the Fire Management Plan, Saguaro facility at the University of Utah, Salt contemplated that the new museum
National Park. Lake County, Utah. would be located at the 17-acre
The NEPA process is being followed Research Park site and it authorized and
SUMMARY: Pursuant to National because federal funds, as grants through has since appropriated funding for a
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 the National Park Service, are facility at that site. (3) If the new
U.S.C. 4332(C), the National Park contributing to the design and museum were built at an alternative
Service announces the availability of a construction costs of the new museum location, the Research Park site would
Final Environmental Impact Statement facility. The EIS will identify potential nonetheless still be developed, meaning
for the Fire Management Plan, Saguaro environmental effects of construction that there would not likely be a decrease
National Park, Arizona. and operation of the proposed 169,000 in overall impacts.
DATES: The National Park Service will square foot museum building, parking, Issues that were identified by the
execute a Record of Decision (ROD) no and related appurtenances and public during scoping for the EA and
sooner than 30 days following mitigation measures to minimize that will be addressed in the EIS
publication by the Environmental adverse environmental impacts on the include: vegetation and wildlife;
Protection Agency of the Notice of 17-acre site provided to the Museum by recreation and trail use; open space,
Availability of the Final Environmental the University of Utah. This site is near visual quality and aesthetics; traffic,
Impact Statement. the University of Utah’s Research Park, transportation and parking;
ADDRESSES: Information will be south of Red Butte Gardens and socioeconomics/cultural; air quality;
available for public inspection in the Arboretum in Salt Lake County, Utah. soils, geological and seismic concerns;
office of the Superintendent, Sarah The Utah Public Lands Artifact surface and groundwater quality and
Craighead, Saguaro National Park, Preservation Act, Pub. L. 107–329, management; consideration of
Headquarters and Rincon Mountain enacted in 2002, authorizes the alternative sites; hazardous materials;
District, 3693 South Old Spanish Trail, Secretary of the Interior to make a grant and archaeological, cultural, historic
Tucson, AZ 85730–5601, phone 520– to the University of Utah to pay the and paleontological resources. Scoping
733–5101; and at the following Federal share of the costs of for the EA was conducted February 15
locations: construction of a new facility including through March 16, 2005 with a scoping
Internet: http://www.nps.gov/sagu/ design, planning, furnishing, and meeting on March 8. The meeting was
pphtml/documents.html. equipping of the Museum. Seventy-five widely publicized and was attended by
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
percent of the Museum’s collection is over 90 members of the public.
Kevin Parrish, Fuels Management material recovered from federally Approximately 350 comments were
Specialist, Saguaro National Park, managed public lands including lands received by letter or email. A scoping
Headquarters and Rincon Mountain administered by the National Park brochure has been prepared that details
District, 3693 South Old Spanish Trail, Service. In January 2005, the Museum the issues identified to date. Copies of
Tucson, AZ 85730–5601, phone 520– initiated an Environmental Assessment the brochure may be obtained from the
733–5132, or Kevin_Parrish@nps.gov. on the proposed project. After project’s NEPA contractor, Bear West,
completion of public scoping and the 145 South 400 East, Salt Lake City, Utah
Dated: August 3, 2005. identification of issues, the agencies 84111, phone (801) 355–8816. The
Roger Maxwell, decided to prepare an EIS. scoping brochure along with a request
Acting Director, Intermountain Region, The EIS will analyze the proposed for any additional scoping comments is
National Park Service. action, a no action alternative, being mailed to the project mailing list
[FR Doc. 05–17851 Filed 9–8–05; 8:45 am] alternative approaches to site and including those who attended the initial
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P facilities design and placement, and scoping meeting or submitted written

VerDate Aug<18>2005 15:19 Sep 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM 09SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 174 / Friday, September 9, 2005 / Notices 53687

comments. One or more workshops, made available for public inspection in review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of
open houses or similar meetings may be their entirety. the Act should proceed (70 FR 41426,
conducted during preparation of the Dated: August 2, 2005. July 19, 2005). A record of the
EIS. Because there was a well attended Kate Cannon,
Commissioners’ votes, the
public meeting during scoping for the Commission’s statement on adequacy,
Acting Deputy Director, Intermountain
EA, no additional public meetings are and any individual Commissioner’s
Region, National Park Service.
planned as part of the EIS scoping statements are available from the Office
[FR Doc. 05–17853 Filed 9–8–05; 8:45 am]
process. of the Secretary and at the
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
For questions regarding the proposed Commission’s Web site.
action, contact Utah Museum of Natural Participation in the review and public
History, Sarah George, Director, 1390 E. service list. Persons, including
Presidents Circle, University of Utah, INTERNATIONAL TRADE industrial users of the subject
Salt Lake City, Utah 84112–0050. For COMMISSION merchandise and, if the merchandise is
questions regarding NEPA compliance, [Investigation No. 731–TA–856 (Review)] sold at the retail level, representative
contact National Park Service, Cordell consumer organizations, wishing to
Roy, Utah State Coordinator, 324 South Ammonium Nitrate From Russia participate in this review as parties
State Street, Suite 200, Box 30, Salt Lake must file an entry of appearance with
AGENCY: United States International the Secretary to the Commission, as
City, UT 84111. Trade Commission. provided in section 201.11 of the
DATES: Comments from the public will ACTION: Scheduling of a full five-year Commission’s rules, by 45 days after
be accepted through October 11, 2005. review concerning the suspended publication of this notice. A party that
Any comments received during that investigation on ammonium nitrate from filed a notice of appearance following
time will be reviewed and, if Russia. publication of the Commission’s notice
appropriate, a supplemental scoping of institution of the review need not file
brochure will be prepared. Comments SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives an additional notice of appearance. The
received after the close of formal notice of the scheduling of a full review Secretary will maintain a public service
scoping will continue to be accepted pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the list containing the names and addresses
and considered. It is anticipated that a Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) of all persons, or their representatives,
Draft EIS will be available for public (the Act) to determine whether who are parties to the review.
review in early 2006 and the Final EIS termination of the suspended Limited disclosure of business
will be completed in the summer 2006. investigation on ammonium nitrate from proprietary information (BPI) under an
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Russia would be likely to lead to administrative protective order (APO)
Ralph Becker, Bear West, 145 South 400 continuation or recurrence of material and BPI service list. Pursuant to section
East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 (801– injury within a reasonably foreseeable 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the
355–8816), or e-mail to time. For further information Secretary will make BPI gathered in this
rbecker@bearwest.com. concerning the conduct of this review review available to authorized
and rules of general application, consult applicants under the APO issued in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you the Commission’s Rules of Practice and review, provided that the application is
wish to comment on the scoping Procedure, part 201, subparts A through made by 45 days after publication of
brochure or on any other issues E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, this notice. Authorized applicants must
associated with the proposed project, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part represent interested parties, as defined
you may submit your comments by mail 207). by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to
to UMNH EIS, c/o Bear West, 145 South the review. A party granted access to
400 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 or EFFECTIVE DATE: September 2, 2005.
BPI following publication of the
via the internet to bcall@bearwest.com. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Commission’s notice of institution of
Please include in any internet Elizabeth Nesbitt (202–205–3355), the review need not reapply for such
comments your name and return Office of Investigations, U.S. access. A separate service list will be
address for the project mailing list. If International Trade Commission, 500 E maintained by the Secretary for those
you do not receive a confirmation of Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. parties authorized to receive BPI under
receipt of your email message, contact Hearing-impaired persons can obtain the APO.
Bear West directly at (801) 355–8816. information on this matter by contacting Staff report. The prehearing staff
Comments, including names and home the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– report in the review will be placed in
addresses of respondents will be 205–1810. Persons with mobility the nonpublic record on December 21,
available for public review. Individual impairments who will need special 2005, and a public version will be
respondents may request that we assistance in gaining access to the issued thereafter, pursuant to section
withhold their home address from the Commission should contact the Office 207.64 of the Commission’s rules.
record, which will be honored to the of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. Hearing. The Commission will hold a
maximum extent allowable by law. General information concerning the hearing in connection with the review
There also may be circumstances in Commission may also be obtained by beginning at 9:30 a.m. on January 19,
which we would withhold from the accessing its Internet server (http:// 2006, at the U.S. International Trade
record a respondent’s identity, as www.usitc.gov). The public record for Commission Building. Requests to
allowable by law. If you wish to have this review may be viewed on the appear at the hearing should be filed in
your address withheld, you must state Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) writing with the Secretary to the
this prominently at the beginning of at http://edis.usitc.gov. Commission on or before January 9,
your comment. All submissions from SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 2006. A nonparty who has testimony
organizations or businesses, and from Background. On July 5, 2005, the that may aid the Commission’s
individuals identifying themselves as Commission determined that responses deliberations may request permission to
representatives or officials of to its notice of institution of the subject present a short statement at the hearing.
organizations or businesses, will be five-year review were such that a full All parties and nonparties desiring to

VerDate Aug<18>2005 15:19 Sep 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM 09SEN1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen