Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

53372 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

173 / Thursday, September 8, 2005 / Notices

Dated: August 30, 2005. data and generates project evaluation Æ Date of activity.
Joan F. Karr, documents and semi-annual reports on Æ Type of activity.
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for the Internet. CDC will use the reported Æ Activity title or name.
Disease Control and Prevention. data to assess project progress towards Æ Part of project activity relates to.
[FR Doc. 05–17766 Filed 9–7–05; 8:45 am] achieving its objectives: Æ Project objective activity relates to.
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P 1. Measurable information about Æ Percent of activity funded by
grantees’ prevention training activities. cooperative agreement.
2. Evaluate prevention training needs, Æ Was partner involved in activity?
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND complexity, diversity, and availability. Æ Name of partner.
HUMAN SERVICES 3. Comparisons between the trained Æ Linked to technical assistance?
population and the general population Æ Which specific technical
Centers for Disease Control and of the local area. assistance?
Prevention 4. Evaluate special cultural and D. Information describing traditional
regional needs. classroom training events (from each
[30Day–05–0440X] event).
5. Describe the complexity of the
trained workforce. • Training description.
Proposed Data Collections Submitted Æ Type of training.
for Public Comment and 6. Grant grantees access to on-line
Æ Skill level of the training.
Recommendations data reports.
Æ Is this the first offering of this
Grantees’ semi-annual performance
The Centers for Disease Control and training?
reports are due April 30 and October 30
Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of Æ Total training hours.
during each year of the 5-year
information collection requests under Æ Did training last multiple days?
cooperative agreement. Using the on- Æ Did training include skills practice
review by the Office of Management and line system, grantees enter data during
Budget (OMB) in compliance with the activities?
each reporting period, then, generate a Æ Were continuing education credits
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. copy of their training report. Next, by
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these offered?
the specified dates, grantees deliver this Æ Delivered in language other than
requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance performance report and their non-
Officer at (404) 371–5983 or send an e- English?
structured narrative report, which Æ Location of training.
mail to omb@cdc.gov. Send written explains additions, deletions, changes, Æ Were participants given learning
comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of and redirections of training objectives or objectives?
Management and Budget, Washington, activities, to CDC’s Procurement and Æ Was a pre-training knowledge test
DC or by fax to (202) 395–6974. Written Grants Office. used?
comments should be received within 30 Grantees’ on-line performance reports Æ Mean score on pre-training
days of this notice. incorporate the following: knowledge test.
Proposed Project A. Log-in information. Æ Was a post-training knowledge test
• Cooperative agreement number. used?
Integrating HIV and Other Prevention • Grantee organization name. Æ Mean score on post-training
Services into Reproductive Health and • Fiscal year. knowledge test.
Other Community Settings On-Line B. Information describing grantees Æ Was there a follow-up survey of
Performance Reporting System—New— and their partners. this training?
National Center for Chronic Disease • Grantee contact information. Æ Number of participants followed.
Prevention and Health Promotion Æ Contact names for principal staff. Æ Number using new skills.
(NCCDPHP), Centers for Disease Control Æ Phone numbers and email Æ Follow-up time in weeks.
and Prevention (CDC). addresses. Æ Participants.
Background and Brief Description Æ Project roles and responsibilities. Æ Number of pre-registered
Æ Web site URL. participants.
Integrating HIV and Other Prevention • Project partner information. Æ Number of participants completing
Services into Reproductive Health and Æ Relationship to grantee. training.
Other Community Settings is a training Æ Organization of facility. Æ From each participant, basic
project of the CDC, National Center for Æ Mailing address. demographics ‘‘ age, ethnicity, primary
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Æ Street location. racial identity, gender, staff title, staff
Promotion, and its grantees, their ten Æ Partner contact name, phone position, language fluencies.
family planning regional training number and email address. Æ From each participant, employer
centers. The project requires twice Æ Project role and responsibility. characteristics—location, type of
yearly reports from its grantees (each of • Application goals and objective organization, title-X funded?, employer
whom corresponds to one of the ten information. provides protocol related to this
federal public health regions), on their Æ Statement of goals. training?
training-centered intervention activities. Æ Statement of objectives. E. Information describing distance
CDC guidelines also obligate grantees, Æ Progress toward completion. learning events (from each event).
under cooperative agreements to Æ Barriers encountered. • Type.
provide such performance reporting. To Æ Changes or modifications. • Location.
facilitate grantees’ compliance with Æ Lessons learned. • Duration in hours.
performance reporting requirements, a Æ Project role and responsibility. • First-time offered?
secure online performance reporting Æ Due dates and delivery dates for • Offered in language other than
system has been designed to capture semi-annual reports. English?
training activity information, an Æ Where reports are electronically • Continuing medical education
indicator of consistent and measurable stored at CDC. credits offered?
project progress. Each grantee enters C. Activity information (for each • Number of downlink sites, Web
and edits their own training activity activity). hits, media copies, etc.

VerDate Aug<18>2005 15:25 Sep 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM 08SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 173 / Thursday, September 8, 2005 / Notices 53373

Æ Number of downlink site locations • Final evaluation checklist score. • Was all or some (portion)
(for satellite broadcasts, Web G. Information describing meetings contracted out?
conferences, etc). (for each meeting). • Language developed in.
Æ Number of participants at site. • Purpose.
F. Information from Technical • Total number of training staff • Materials appropriate for low-
Assistance activities (for each activity). present. literacy populations?
• Type of technical assistance. • Number of other regional partners The information obtained from the
• Location. present. on-line performance reporting system
• Was needs assessment done? • Total attending.
• Number of organizations will help the CDC meet its evaluation
• Was an evaluation plan done?
• Was a logic model used? represented. objectives as described above. No
• Number of items on evaluation H. Information describing proprietary items or sensitive
checklist. development (for each event). information will be collected. There is
• Initial evaluation checklist score. • Type. no cost to respondents.

ESTIMATE OF ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE


Average
Number of
Number of burden 1 Total burden
Respondents responses per
respondents per response (in hours)
respondent (in hours)

Region 1 Grantee ............................................................................................ 1 2 1.28 2.57


Region 2 Grantee ............................................................................................ 1 2 1.28 2.57
Region 3 Grantee ............................................................................................ 1 2 1.28 2.57
Region 4 Grantee ............................................................................................ 1 2 1.28 2.57
Region 5 Grantee ............................................................................................ 1 2 1.28 2.57
Region 6 Grantee ............................................................................................ 1 2 1.28 2.57
Region 7 Grantee ............................................................................................ 1 2 1.28 2.57
Region 8 Grantee ............................................................................................ 1 2 1.28 2.57
Region 9 Grantee ............................................................................................ 1 2 1.28 2.57
Region 10 Grantee .......................................................................................... 1 2 1.28 2.57
1 Estimate based on reporting of 20 events per grantee per semi-annual report, with each event requiring 3.85 minutes data-entry time.

Dated: August 30, 2005. Management and Budget, Washington, topics of emerging importance.
Joan F. Karr, DC or by fax to (202) 395–6974. Written Specifically, three new topics were
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for comments should be received within 30 added to the School Policy and
Disease Control and Prevention. days of this notice. Environment questionnaires: Physical
[FR Doc. 05–17767 Filed 9–7–05; 8:45 am] school environment; crisis
Proposed Project
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P preparedness, response, and recovery;
School Health Policies and Programs and school climate.
2006, OMB No. 0920–0445— SHPPS 2006 will assess the
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Reinstatement with Change—National characteristics of eight components of
HUMAN SERVICES Center for Chronic Disease Prevention school health programs at the
and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP), elementary, middle/junior, and senior
Centers for Disease Control and Centers for Disease Control and high school levels: Health education,
Prevention Prevention (CDC). physical education, health services,
mental health and social services, food
[30Day–05–0445] Background and Brief Description
service, school policy and environment,
CDC intends to continue to conduct faculty and staff health promotion, and
Proposed Data Collections Submitted
the School Health Policies and Programs family and community involvement.
for Public Comment and
Study (SHPPS) in 2006. SHPPS is a SHPPS 2006 data will be used to
Recommendations
national study of school health policies provide measures for 16 Healthy People
The Centers for Disease Control and and programs at the state, district, 2010 national health objectives. No
Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of school, and course levels. Much of the other national source of data exists for
information collection requests under information collected will expand upon these objectives. The data also will have
review by the Office of Management and data gathered from the SHPPS 1994 significant implications for policy and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with the (OMB No. 0920–0340, expiration date 1/ program development for school health
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 31/95) and 2000 (OMB No. 0920–0445, programs nationwide.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these expiration date 10/31/2002). There are no direct costs to the
requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance Modifications were made to the respondents except for their time to
Officer at (404) 371–5983 or send an e- SHPPS 2000 survey to improve the participate in the survey. The total
mail to omb@cdc.gov. Send written clarity of items. New items were estimated annualized burden hours are
comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of developed to capture information on 22,840.

VerDate Aug<18>2005 15:25 Sep 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM 08SEN1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen