Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
5-05
Geotechnical recommendations for the Design
of Maritime and Harbour works
English version
January 2008
EDITOR:
Puertos del Estado
DRAFTING COMPOSITION:
Antonio Soriano Pea
UNIVERSIDAD POLITCNICA DE MADRID
INGENIERA DEL SUELO S.L.
English version of this ROM
0.5-05:
Marion Bailey
Manuel Valderrama Conde
INGENIERA DEL SUELO S.L.
INTERIOR AND COVER
DESIGN:
Emilio Pieiro Daz
PUERTOS DEL ESTADO
PRINTER:
V.A. Impresores S.A.
I.S.B.N.:
978-84-88975-62-2
LEGAL DEPOSIT:
M-21328-2008
Puertos del Estado
PRICE:
50 (VAT included)
Foreword
The current ROM Programme comprises a variety of studies and debate activities for developing the set
of reflections released as the Recommendations for Maritime Works. This series of publications set up a
permanent framework of technical regulations in harbour and coastal engineering that is dependant on the Public
Administrations that have competence over ports of general interest for the State.
The ROM programme is aimed at consolidating the extensive Spanish experience in this field and to establish
the various standards of Reliability, Serviceability and Operability to which each Project should conform. In
summary, it will foster a higher quality in the performance of all the stages of Harbour Works from their planning,
design, construction and first operation to their maintenance and potential repairs or dismantlement.
This regulatory Programme of Recommendations was started in 1987, by the then called Ministry of Public
Works, through the General Directorate of Coasts and Ports. The programmes activities have continued ever
since, in a constant evolution that has materialised in a set of publications of wide applicability.They have received
general praise in Spain and abroad as excellent technical tools for the design and construction of harbour
infrastructures.
These documents are the outcome of continuing processes of discussion and subsequent agreements
between the different technical viewpoints existing in this field.They go through various Working Groups made
up of experts, collaborating with the main document proponent- and several extended Committees for revising
the drafts from the future users perspective. This procedure is and will be the best guarantee of the
publications technical rigour and applicability, as they incorporate a critical revision of the latest techniques
employed and valuable experience gained by Spanish port engineers, both from practical applications and
theoretical developments.
The publications now included in the ROM Programme can be grouped according to several subjects:
Series 0: Description and characterization of the factors of projects of maritime and port works.
Series 1: Works providing shelter against sea oscillations.
Series 2: Works inside the sheltered port areas.
Series 3: Planning, management and operation of port areas.
Series 4: Superstructures and land facilities in port areas.
Series 5: Maritime and port works in the surroundings of the coastal area.
Series 6: Technical, administrative and legal provisions.
E/ROM discussion forum: Scientific and technical studies and analyses on the ROM Guidelines.
The first one, geared toward characterising the works site and design factors in maritime and harbour works,
includes some Recommendations already approved and released: on Use and Operation Factors: Actions in
Design (ROM 0.2-90), Climate Agents I: Sea Level Oscillations (ROM 0.3-91), Weather Agents. Atmospheric
Processes: wind (ROM 0.4-95) and Geotechnical Recommendations for Maritime Structures (ROM 0.5-94) and
the last one on General Procedure and Requirements in the Design of Harbour and Maritime Structures, Part I
(ROM 0.0). Some documents are still being prepared, like those on Construction Materials (ROM 0.1), Seismic
agents (ROM 0.6) and Measurement and Monitoring Systems (ROM 0.7).
So, back in 1994, Series 0 included a fist publication on Geotechnical Recommendations for the Design of
Maritime and Harbour Works (ROM 0.5-94).After more than a decade in force, they have proved to be very useful
and influential in improving harbour designs in the geotechnical field. Today, these recommendations have been
revised and updated taking into account the results of their application, the new developments and the latest
experience in order to keep this text permanently in line with current needs and best practise.
Foreword 5
This new ROM 0.5-05 therefore is the first finished revision or update of one of the Recommendations for
Maritime Works previously released. Some revisions of current documents will follow suit.
The procedure for preparing the present Recommendations has been the one adopted for the regulatory
ROM Programme. It has been drawn up under the responsibility and the supervision of Puertos del Estado, with
the participation of the following people:
ROM Programme Director:
Jos Llorca Ortega, Puertos del Estado.
Main proponent for ROM 0.5-05:
Antonio Soriano Pea, Universidad Politcnica de Madrid.
Working Technical Committees:
Germn Burbano Juana, DRAGADOS-ACS.
Antonio Capote del Villar, FERROVIAL-AGROMAN.
Luis Casero Mejas, INTECSA.
Francisco Esteban Lefler, FCC.
Jos Luis Fernndez Martn, Autoridad Portuaria de Sevilla.
Luis Fort Lpez-Tello, NECSO.
Gonzalo Gmez Barqun, Puertos del Estado.
Miguel ngel Gmez Caldito, ALATEC.
Ramiro Gmez Escoubes, IBERINSA.
Jess Gonzlez Galindo, INGENIERA DEL SUELO, SA
Juan Ignacio Grau Albert, Puertos del Estado.
Miguel ngel Losada Rodrguez, Universidad de Granada.
David Marcano Ceballos, Autoridad Portuaria de Santander.
Claudio Olalla Maran, Laboratorio de Geotecnia del CEDEX.
Eloy Pita Carpenter, Puertos del Estado.
Csar Sagaseta Milln, Universidad de Cantabria.
Carlos Sanchidrin Fernndez, PROES.
Juan Carlos Su Recio, Autoridad Portuaria de la Baha de Algeciras.
Javier Uzcanga Salas, Autoridad Portuaria de Barcelona.
Chairman of the Working Group for ROM 0.5-05:
Francisco Esteban Rodrguez-Sedano [ 2006], Puertos del Estado.
ROM Programme General Coordinator:
Francisco J. Gonzlez Portal, Puertos del Estado.
The Expert Groups work finished on July 2005 and the Document was approved unanimously by the extended
Technical Committee.The President of Puertos del Estado ratified it on November that year.
This new version of the Geotechnical Recommendations for Maritime and Harbour Works (ROM
0.5-05) distinguishes itself from the previous one in the adoption of the new General and Calculation Procedure
that the ROM 0.0 (2001) established for all Ports Works specially its new requirements on Safety and works
capability for Service and Use or Operation. Moreover, this version includes new contents in the light of new
technological developments and knowledge gathered in recent years. In this respect, it is worth noting a
preliminary approach to the influence that dynamic agents earthquakes, wave action or other sea-level
oscillations may have on saturated soil behaviour and, consequently, on the verification for various geotechnical
failure modes affecting harbour works.
6 Foreword
Nevertheless, these new updated Recommendations keep the essential goal of the preceding version, which
is no other than combining methodological, regulatory and technological aspects in a true Guide modern, wideranging and comprehensive for providing technical assistance in everything affecting, conditioning or involved in
ports infrastructure from the geotechnical point of view. For that reason, ROM 0.5-05 includes the following:
Definitions of programmes and techniques for Geotechnical Investigation.
Setting up of Design Criteria for choosing geotechnical parameter values, verification procedures and
safety requirements against failure modes.
Coverage of specific geotechnical problems in different types of maritime and ports works, with
recommended analysis methods and solutions for each one.
Any comments, suggestions, requests for clarification or other contributions that may arise about the
contents of this new ROM 0.5-05, as well as on the practical results of its application, will be welcome.They shall
be taken into account in future revisions of this document.
The entire ROM 0.5-05 can be downloaded from http://www.puertos.es
Please send comments to the ROM Programme Coordinators, at programarom@puertos.es
Foreword 7
Index
FOREWORD ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
PART I. GENERAL
1.1. SCOPE AND FIELD OF APPLICATION ............................................................................................................................................
31
31
31
32
35
40
40
47
55
55
55
56
57
57
58
58
59
59
60
61
61
62
63
63
64
64
65
65
65
66
66
67
68
69
69
Index 9
ROM 0.5-05
Geotechnical recommendations for the design of maritime and harbour works
70
72
2.4.1.
2.4.2.
2.4.3.
72
73
75
76
77
78
2.7.1.
2.7.2
78
80
82
83
83
86
88
90
92
92
95
95
96
96
97
98
2.11.1.
2.11.2.
2.11.3.
2.11.4.
2.11.5.
2.11.6.
2.11.7.
2.11.8.
2.11.9.
2.11.10.
98
99
99
99
100
101
101
101
101
102
102
104
104
107
108
109
109
110
110
111
111
112
113
114
10 Index
ROM 0.5-05
Geotechnical recommendations for the design of maritime and harbour works
115
115
115
115
116
117
117
117
119
119
129
130
132
133
3.3.6.
3.3.7.
3.3.8.
133
134
135
135
137
139
141
141
143
146
150
154
155
157
157
158
158
158
159
161
162
162
Index 11
ROM 0.5-05
Geotechnical recommendations for the design of maritime and harbour works
3.4.2.1.
3.4.2.2.
3.4.2.3.
3.4.2.4.
164
164
165
165
3.4.3.
166
166
166
166
166
3.4.4.
3.4.5.
3.4.6.
3.4.7.
3.4.8.
3.4.9.
3.4.10.
3.4.4.1.
External Water Levels and Saturation Lines in Natural Ground and Fills .......................... 168
171
173
175
176
177
178
178
179
180
181
3.4.11. Porewater Pressures Generated by Waves and Other Sea Level Oscillations ....................................... 182
3.4.11.1. Porewater Pressure Distribution in Seabeds ....................................................................................... 182
3.5. SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................................................................................................. 188
3.5.1.
3.5.2.
3.5.3.
3.5.4.
3.5.4.9.
193
194
195
196
197
198
198
200
3.5.4.8.1.
3.5.4.8.2.
3.5.4.8.3.
3.5.4.8.4.
200
203
206
207
12 Index
3.5.5.
ROM 0.5-05
Geotechnical recommendations for the design of maritime and harbour works
3.5.6.
212
213
214
217
217
217
219
219
221
222
222
222
223
224
225
225
225
225
226
226
227
227
228
228
229
229
230
233
235
3.5.7.
3.5.8.
3.6.4.
239
239
241
242
243
243
244
244
245
246
247
247
3.6.5.
248
249
251
253
3.6.6.
Evaluating
3.6.6.1.
3.6.6.2.
3.6.6.3.
257
257
258
259
Index 13
ROM 0.5-05
Geotechnical recommendations for the design of maritime and harbour works
3.6.7.
14 Index
259
259
260
260
261
261
263
264
264
264
265
265
265
266
268
269
270
271
271
271
272
272
272
274
274
276
277
279
279
280
280
280
281
281
281
283
286
286
289
292
293
295
296
296
297
298
299
300
ROM 0.5-05
Geotechnical recommendations for the design of maritime and harbour works
3.7.6.2.
3.7.6.3.
3.7.7.
3.7.8.
3.7.9.
310
311
311
313
315
315
315
320
321
323
326
327
327
327
330
330
331
331
331
331
3.8.3.
3.8.4.
3.8.5.
3.8.6.
3.8.7.
Most Common Failure Modes of Slopes Associated with Limit States of Serviceability ..................
Overall Stability Analysis in Soils ..........................................................................................................................................
3.8.4.1. Types of Slide .........................................................................................................................................................
3.8.4.2. Characterising Design Situations .................................................................................................................
3.8.4.3. General Principles of Calculation ...............................................................................................................
3.8.4.4. Indefinite Plane Sliding .......................................................................................................................................
3.8.4.5. Study of Circular Sliding ...................................................................................................................................
3.8.4.5.1. Friction Circle Method ..............................................................................................................
3.8.4.5.2. Taylors Stability Charts .............................................................................................................
3.8.4.5.3. Method of Slices. Circular Lines ...........................................................................................
3.8.4.6. Analysis of Non-Circular Sliding ..................................................................................................................
3.8.4.6.1. Method of Slices, Non-Circular Lines ...............................................................................
3.8.4.6.2. The Wedge Method ...................................................................................................................
Calculating Overall Stability in Rocks ................................................................................................................................
3.8.5.1. Types of Instability ................................................................................................................................................
3.8.5.2. Characterising the Design Situation ..........................................................................................................
3.8.5.3. General Principles of Calculation ...............................................................................................................
Minimum Safety Factors against Loss of Overall Stability ...................................................................................
Comments on Deformations ................................................................................................................................................
333
333
333
334
337
338
339
339
341
341
345
345
346
347
348
349
350
352
353
Index 15
ROM 0.5-05
Geotechnical recommendations for the design of maritime and harbour works
3.9.2.
3.9.3.
3.9.8.
3.9.7.
354
355
355
356
356
3.9.4.
3.9.5.
3.9.6.
366
366
367
368
Magnitude .........................................................................................................................................
Intensity ..............................................................................................................................................
Ground Acceleration .................................................................................................................
Response Spectrum ....................................................................................................................
376
377
377
378
386
387
387
387
16 Index
ROM 0.5-05
Geotechnical recommendations for the design of maritime and harbour works
399
400
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
406
407
409
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
416
416
417
418
418
420
420
421
422
422
424
424
425
425
426
426
426
427
427
430
432
433
436
436
436
437
437
Index 17
ROM 0.5-05
Geotechnical recommendations for the design of maritime and harbour works
4.4.6.
4.4.7.
439
439
441
441
441
442
442
444
444
445
447
448
451
453
456
457
457
457
458
458
459
461
465
465
465
466
466
466
4.6.4.
4.6.5.
467
468
468
468
469
4.6.6.
4.6.7.
470
470
470
470
470
470
470
18 Index
ROM 0.5-05
Geotechnical recommendations for the design of maritime and harbour works
4.7.2.
474
474
474
477
478
478
481
482
482
483
483
483
486
487
487
488
489
489
489
491
492
493
493
494
495
495
495
496
497
497
497
498
500
501
501
502
502
502
502
503
503
504
504
504
507
509
510
510
512
512
4.7.3.
4.7.4.
4.7.5
Index 19
ROM 0.5-05
Geotechnical recommendations for the design of maritime and harbour works
4.9.6.
513
513
513
516
516
517
517
517
518
518
518
519
519
520
520
521
521
522
522
523
4.9.7.
20 Index
Figures
PART II. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Figure 2.2.1.
Figure 2.9.1.
Figure 2.9.2.
Figure 2.9.3.
Figure 2.9.4.
Figure 2.9.5.
Figure 2.9.6.
Figure 2.9.7.
Figure 2.12.1.
Figure A1.1.
Figure A1.2.
Figure A1.3.
56
85
86
88
89
91
92
93
107
116
117
118
3.3.1.
3.3.2.
3.4.1.
3.4.2.
3.4.3.
3.4.4.
3.4.5.
3.4.6.
3.4.7.
3.4.8.
138
160
165
167
168
172
174
179
181
183
185
187
189
192
192
200
206
207
208
214
218
220
222
228
231
232
234
Index 21
ROM 0.5-05
Geotechnical recommendations for the design of maritime and harbour works
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
3.6.6.
3.6.7.
3.6.8.
3.6.9.
3.6.10.
3.6.11.
3.6.12.
3.6.13.
3.6.14.
3.6.15.
3.7.1.
3.7.2.
3.7.3.
3.7.4.
3.7.5.
3.7.6.
3.7.7.
3.7.8.
3.7.9.
3.7.10.
3.7.11.
3.7.12.
3.7.13.
3.7.14.
3.7.15.
3.7.16.
3.7.17.
3.7.18.
3.7.19.
3.7.20.
3.7.21.
3.7.22.
3.7.23.
3.7.24.
3.7.25.
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
3.7.26.
3.7.27.
3.7.28.
3.7.29.
3.7.30.
3.7.31.
3.7.32.
3.7.33.
3.7.34.
3.7.35.
3.7.36.
3.7.37.
3.8.1.
3.8.2.
3.8.3.
3.8.4.
3.8.5.
3.8.6.
3.8.7.
22 Index
236
240
250
252
255
257
262
262
263
267
271
273
275
275
276
277
278
282
283
284
288
289
291
293
294
296
297
298
299
300
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
310
312
312
316
317
319
321
324
326
328
332
333
339
340
342
343
344
ROM 0.5-05
Geotechnical recommendations for the design of maritime and harbour works
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
3.8.8.
3.8.9.
3.8.10.
3.8.11.
3.9.1.
3.9.2.
3.9.3.
3.9.4.
3.9.5.
3.9.6.
3.10.1.
3.10.2.
Figure 3.10.3.
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
3.10.4.
3.10.5.
3.10.6.
3.10.7.
3.10.8.
3.10.9.
345
347
348
352
357
359
360
363
363
367
372
373
375
377
378
379
381
388
390
4.2.1.
4.2.2.
4.2.3.
4.2.4.
4.2.5.
4.2.6.
4.2.7.
4.3.1.
4.3.2.
4.3.3.
4.3.4.
4.4.1.
4.4.2.
4.4.3.
4.4.4.
4.4.5.
4.4.6.
4.4.7.
4.4.8.
4.4.9.
4.5.1.
4.5.2.
4.5.3.
4.5.4.
4.5.5.
4.5.6.
4.5.7.
4.5.8.
4.5.9.
4.5.10.
399
400
401
403
404
408
408
412
416
419
421
424
428
428
430
432
433
434
436
437
440
440
443
444
446
447
449
449
450
450
Index 23
ROM 0.5-05
Geotechnical recommendations for the design of maritime and harbour works
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
4.5.11.
4.5.12.
4.5.13.
4.5.14.
4.5.15.
4.5.16.
4.6.1.
4.6.2.
4.6.3.
4.6.4.
4.7.1.
4.7.2.
4.7.3.
4.7.4.
4.7.5.
4.7.6.
Figure 4.7.7.
Figure 4.7.8.
Figure 4.7.9.
Figure 4.7.10.
Figure 4.7.11.
Figure 4.7.12.
Figure 4.7.13.
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
24 Index
4.8.1.
4.8.2.
4.9.1.
4.9.2.
4.9.3.
4.10.1.
4.10.2.
4.10.3.
4.10.4.
452
453
455
456
459
460
463
464
467
469
472
472
473
473
474
479
481
484
487
490
491
492
494
496
499
503
510
515
518
520
521
524
Tables
PART I. GENERAL
Table 1.4.1.
Table 1.7.1.
Eurocodes. Minimum Values Recommended for the Reliability Index (Ultimate Limit States) 33
Basic Conventional Notations, Abbreviations and Symbols Used in this ROM 0.5 ................... 41
2.2.1.
2.2.2.
2.4.1.
2.4.2.
2.4.3.
2.6.1.
2.7.1.
2.10.1.
2.12.1.
Table 2.12.2.
Table 2.12.3.
Table 2.14.1.
63
65
73
75
75
77
79
97
103
104
108
114
Individual Failure Probability Associated with Level I Verification methods Adopted in this
ROM 0.5 (Ultimate Limit States. Geotechnical Failure Modes) ...............................................................
Maximum Recommended Individual Failure Probability Associated with Level I Verification
methods (Limit States of Serviceability. Geotechnical Failure Modes) .................................................
Representative Levels to Be Adopted for External Waters as a Function of the Combination
Type Under Consideration ............................................................................................................................................
Partial Factors for Actions for Verifying the Failure Modes Assigned to Ultimate Limit States
(ULS). Fundamental Combinations ...........................................................................................................................
Minimum Safety Factors Recommended for Verifying Geotechnical Failure Modes Assigned
to Ultimate Limit States (5 SERI 19) ..............................................................................................................
and p Values .......................................................................................................................................................................
Maximum Differences to Be Adopted between Representative Levels of Free External Water
and Saturation Lines in Natural Ground or Fills ...............................................................................................
Minimum Safety Factors against Bottom Heave, Low SERI Rating (5 - 19) .....................................
Methods for Verifying Safety against Bearing Failure .......................................................................................
Correction Factor of the SPT N-index to Account for the Effective Earth Overburden.
N(Corrected) = f N .............................................................................................................................................................
Bearing Capacity Factors for the Brinch Hansen Formula ..........................................................................
Safety Factors against Bearing Failure in Shallow Foundations. Minimum Recommended Values
for Works with a Low SERI (5 - 19) ........................................................................................................................
Minimum Values for the Safety Factors against Horizontal Sliding. Works with Low SERI
(5 - 19) ......................................................................................................................................................................................
132
132
140
148
149
162
170
175
194
195
201
210
212
Index 25
ROM 0.5-05
Geotechnical recommendations for the design of maritime and harbour works
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
3.5.6.
3.6.1.
3.6.2.
3.6.3.
3.6.4.
3.6.5.
3.7.1.
Table 3.7.2.
Table 3.8.1.
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
3.9.1.
3.9.2.
3.10.1.
3.10.2.
3.10.3.
Minimum Safety Factors against Plastic Overturning, Works with Low SERI (5 - 19) ...............
Minimum Safety Factors, F, against Bearing Failure in Piles. Works with a Low SERI (5 - 19) ......
Minimum Safety Factors Relative to Horizontal Ground Failure, Low SERI Works (5 - 19) ....
Values for Parameter nh (MPa/m) ..............................................................................................................................
Reduction Factors for Forces and Moments in the Buried Portion of Piles ....................................
Maximum Average Compression in Piles ..............................................................................................................
Maximum Values for the Angle of Friction between Wall Face and Ground, Depending on
the Ground's Angle of Friction, ..............................................................................................................................
Values of Kah according to Blum .................................................................................................................................
Minimum Safety Factors Recommended against Loss of Overall Stability. Low SERI Works
(5 - 19) ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Example of Possible Improvements Resulting from Preloading ...............................................................
Applicability of Deep Compaction Treatments to Different Ground Types .....................................
Examples of Seismic Damage to Ports in the Past Two Decades ..........................................................
Values of the CRR Parameter ......................................................................................................................................
Correction Factor for the CRR Parameter as a Function of Earthquake Magnitude (Youd &
Idriss, 1997)...............................................................................................................................................................................
217
258
264
267
268
270
280
290
353
355
359
380
381
381
26 Index
Minimum Recommended Safety Factors for Designing Gravity Quays, Works with low SERI
(5 - 19) .......................................................................................................................................................................................
4.3.1. Minimum Recommended Safety Factors for the Design of Piled Quays and Jetties, Low SERI
Works (5 - 19) ......................................................................................................................................................................
4.4.1. Minimum Recommended Safety Factors for the Design of Diaphragm Quays, Works with
Low SERI (5 - 19) ................................................................................................................................................................
4.5.1. Minimum Safety Factors for Sheetpile Cellular Structures in Quay,Works with Low SERI (5 - 19)
4.7.1. Minimum Safety Factors for Rubble-Mound Breakwaters (for Occurrence Probability of
Failure Modes in the Order of 0.01) ........................................................................................................................
4.7.2. Minimum Safety Factors for Vertical Breakwaters (for an Occurrence Probability of the Failure
Mode in the Order of 0.01) ..........................................................................................................................................
4.9.1. Classification of Soil to be Dredged According to its Compacity or Consistency ........................
4.9.2. Terms to Be Used to Define the Degree of Rock Weathering ...............................................................
4.9.3. Terms to Be Used to Describe Rock Matrix Strength ..................................................................................
4.9.4. Criteria for the Objective Description of the State of Rock Fracturing .............................................
4.9.5. Classification of Rock Masses according to their RQD Index ...................................................................
4.9.6. Values of Side Slopes (H/V) Common in Dredging ........................................................................................
4.9.7. Minimum Recommended Safety Factors against Loss of Stability in Dredging Slopes, Works
with Minor SERI (< 5) .......................................................................................................................................................
4.9.8. Typical Values for Some Properties of Recently Dumped Submerged Fills ......................................
4.9.9. Typical Values for Some Properties of Fills Compacted in the Dry .......................................................
4.10.1. Geotechnical Problems and Investigation Methods Associated with Discharge Outfalls and
Underwater Pipelines .........................................................................................................................................................
410
422
438
458
488
491
505
506
506
506
506
508
509
511
512
522