Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
QUESTION
Assessing Adenoid Hypertrophy in Children: X-ray
or Nasal Endoscopy?
BACKGROUND
Upper airway obstruction is a common complaint in
children presenting to otolaryngology clinics. In such
children, adenoid hypertrophy is often suspected. There
are numerous ways to determine adenoid size, including
palpation, mirror examination, endoscopic examination,
lateral neck roentgenogram (X-ray), magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI), and acoustic rhinometry. Pediatric
patient cooperation limits the utilization of palpation
and mirror examination, while acoustic rhinometry and
MRI are not practical in the clinical setting. Thus, flexible fiberoptic nasal endoscopy (FNE) and lateral neck
X-ray are the two most common diagnostic tools used to
assess for adenoid hypertrophy. Cost-effective, age-specific guidelines on how best to evaluate adenoid size are
lacking. The aim of this review is to determine whether
X-ray or endoscopy is superior in assessing adenoid
hypertrophy in pediatric patients presenting with upper
airway obstruction.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Different measurements have been proposed for
assessing adenoid size on lateral neck X-ray, including:
1) the adenoid-nasopharynx ratio (A/N ratio), 2) the
1509
BEST PRACTICE
Flexible nasal endoscopy is well tolerated in most
children and has the advantage of allowing for direct
1510
visualization of the adenoid. Adenoid hypertrophy diagnosed on flexible nasal endoscopy correlates with airway
obstruction symptomatology. While A/N ratio on lateral
neck X-ray frequently correlates with adenoid size, lateral neck films can be impacted by patient positioning
and involve radiation exposure. Furthermore, the cost of
flexible nasal endoscopy and lateral neck X-ray are comparable. Thus, in children presenting with upper airway
obstruction and suspected adenoid hypertrophy, flexible
nasal endoscopy is the best initial choice for evaluation
of adenoid size. Clinicians may consider lateral neck Xray in those children who need an objective assessment
of their adenoid size and are unable to cooperate with
flexible nasal endoscopy. Future research is necessary to
determine whether initial adenoid size noted on FNE or
lateral neck X-ray correlates with improvement in airway obstruction symptoms following surgical removal of
the adenoid.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
MFN Feres et al.1 is a systematic review of mostly
level 3 and 4 studies. F. Caylakli et al.2 is a blinded, prospective level 3 study. Wang D. et al,3 A. Mlynarek
et al.,4 and K. Lertsburapa et al.5 are level 4 studies.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Feres MFN, Hermann JS, Cappellette M, et al. Lateral X-ray view of the
skull for the diagnosis of adenoid hypertrophy: a systematic review. Int
J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011;75:111.
2. Caylakli F, Hizal E, Yilmazer C. Correlation between adenoid-nasopharynx
ratio and endoscopic examination of adenoid hypertrophy: a blind, prospective clinical study. Int J Pediatric Otorhinolaryngol 2009;73:
15321535.
3. Wang D, Clment P, Kaufaman L, et al. Fiberoptic examination of the nasal
cavity and nasopharynx in children. Int J Pediatri Otorhinolaryngol
1992;24:3544.
4. Mlynarek A, Tewfik M, Hagr A, et al. Lateral neck radiography versus
direct video rhinoscopy in assessing adenoid size. J Otolaryngol 2004;33:
360365.
5. Lertsburapa K, Schroeder J, Sullivan C. Assessment of adenoid size: a
comparison of lateral radiographic measurements, radiologist assessment, and nasal endoscopy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010;74:
12811285.