Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
Housing Research Centre, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
h i g h l i g h t s
Compaction characteristics and consistency of the soil were improved by nanosilica.
Compressive strength of the soil increased under effect of nanosilica.
Hydraulic conductivity decreased when nanosilica was added.
pH of cement treated soil decreased when nanosilica was added.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 5 July 2013
Received in revised form 4 April 2014
Accepted 8 April 2014
Available online 4 May 2014
Keywords:
Nanosilica
Cement treated residual soil
Mechanical properties
Chemical
Microstructural properties
a b s t r a c t
An experimental study was performed to determine the effect of SiO2 nanoparticles on consistency, compaction, hydraulic conductivity, and compressive strength of cement-treated residual soil. Also, SEM, XRD
and FTIR tests were carried out to identify the underlying mechanisms. The addition of nanoparticles was
found to advantageously affect the compactability, hydraulic conductivity. Besides, addition of 0.4%
nanosilica to the cement treated soil improved the compressive strength by up to 80%. XRD, FTIR and
SEM test results showed that silica nanoparticles promoted the pozzolanic reaction by transforming
Portlandite into calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) gel.
2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The use of stabilization techniques has increased signicantly in
recent decades owing to new construction sites, increasingly being
located in areas of poor quality ground. It is suggested that ground
improvement will be critically important in future geotechnical
practices to adopt cost-effective solutions, to achieve reductions
in quantities of material used and etc. [13]. One of the extensively
used techniques for the improvement of problematic soils in
relatively tropical countries is soil treatment with customary
cementitous additives such as cement, lime and y ash.
Cement is often used as an additive to improve strength and
stiffness of residual soils in tropical areas. To achieve the maximum
possible strength for base construction, addition of 610% cement
in residual soils with plasticity indexes in the range of 1020 has
been recommended [46]. Furthermore, benets of cement treated
soil are not only limited to its enhanced strength but also the
compressibility of the cement-treated soil has much higher
Corresponding author. Tel.: +60 173180150; fax: +60 3 8946 4232.
E-mail address: h.bahmani.eng@gmail.com (S.H. Bahmani).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.086
0950-0618/ 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
351
In recent years, nanoparticles have attracted considerable scientic interest for many civil engineering applications. The types of
nanoparticles that are most commonly used in cementitous composites are SiO2, TiO2, Al2O3, and carbon nanotubes [1821]. Of
all the introduced nanoparticles, nano-SiO2 plays the most signicant role. Nanoparticles of SiO2 exhibit high pozzolanic activity due
to high amount of pure amorphous SiO2 [2123]. According to
Sobolev et al. [20], the changes observed in mixtures modied with
nano-SiO2 particles are the result of a chemical reaction between
SiO2 and Ca(OH)2 during cement hydration. Furthermore, nanosilica accelerates hydration of cement due to its high surface energy
[20,21,24]. Also, nanosilica causes physical alterations such as
improvement in the packing density which corresponds to lling
effect of its particles [18,2527]. Another known physical mechanism is nucleation effect by which hydration products envelop
the particles and hence a denser matrix with better distributed
hydration products is formed [24,28,29]. Experimental results have
shown that a joining effect of physical and chemical properties of
nanosilica results in up to 20% strength augmentation of cementitous composites [24].
This study addresses the development of cement-treated residual soil strengthened with nanosilica as a supplementary material.
Inclusion of nanosilica may reduce the cement consumption in the
soil and accelerate the stabilization process. This study tends to
investigate changes in consistency, compaction and hydraulic conductivity as well as unconned compressive strength of cement
treated residual soil loaded with SiO2 nanoparticles. To further
elaborate the results, induced microstructural changes were also
traced. Apart from clarifying the underlying mechanisms that lead
to changes in engineering behaviour of residual soils due to the
inclusion of SiO2, the results may also be representative of the
engineering behaviour of other low plasticity soils after stabilization with cement and nano-SiO2.
Table 1
Properties of the residual soil.
2.1. Materials
2.1.1. Soil
A typical residual soil, Malaysian granite soil, was used in this study. This soil
was tested to determine its physical propertiesits specic gravity, liquid limit
(LL), plastic limit (PL), shrinkage limit and grain size distributionusing standard
procedures specied in BS 1377-2 (1990) [30]. The particle size distribution curve
for the soil is shown in Fig. 1. Table 1 shows the classication properties of the soil,
which is an inorganic clay with high plasticity (CH). The consistency limits of the
soil are a LL of 51.4% and a PL of 30%. The maximum dry density (MDD) and optimum moisture content (OMC) are 15.1 kN/m3 and 20%, respectively. A characteristic X-ray diffraction (XRD) plot of the soil, shown in Fig. 2, indicates that the soil is
predominantly a kaolinite clay mineral with a strong diffraction line at 3.6 A,
which disappears when the clay is heated to 550 C.
2.1.2. Nanosilica
To investigate the effects of different sizes of SiO2 nanoparticles on the properties of cement treated soil, particles with two different sizes of 15 nm and 80 nm in
powder form were purchased from Nanostructure & Amorphous Materials, Inc.,
(USA). Table 2 shows the chemical and physical properties of nanosilica particles.
Properties
Value
Physical properties
Natural water content (%)
Liquid limit (%)
Plastic limit (%)
Plasticity index (%)
Linear shrinkage (%)
21
51.48
30
20.48
12.12
Compaction properties
Maximum dry unit weight (kN/m3)
Optimum water content (%)
pH
Specic gravity
Unied soil classication system (USCS)
15.1
20
4.01
2.63
CL
Chemical properties
Silica (SiO2) (%)
Alumina (AL2O3) (%)
Iron oxide (Fe2O3) (%)
Potash (K2O) (%)
Magnesia (MgO) (%)
Loss in ignition (%)
71.3
15.55
6
1.5
0.17
1
Table 2
The physical properties of SiO2 nanoparticles (adapted from Nanostructured &
Amorphous Materials, Inc., USA).
Diameter (nm)
Density (g/cm3)
Purity (%)
15 3
80 9
640 12
440 32
<0.14
<0.14
>99.9
>99.9
352
Table 3
Properties of the cement.
Properties
Cement
Physical properties
Specic gravity (g/cm3)
Fineness
Chemical composition
Silica (SiO2) (%)
Alumina (Al2O3) (%)
Iron oxide (Fe2O3) (%)
Calcium oxide (CaO) (%)
Potash (K2O) (%)
Magnesia (MgO) (%)
Sulphur trioxide (S03) (%)
Sodium oxide (Na2O) (%)
Loss on ignition (%)
1.7
3.12
21.89
5.3
3.34
53.27
0.98
6.45
3.67
0.18
3.21
and allowed to stand for at least 8hr. The values of pH were then measured using
a calibrated pH probe. The pH outputs were determined as the average of three
measurements of the same samples.
Fig. 3. Particle size distribution of the cement.
The nanoparticles were mixed with distilled water using a magnetic stirrer at
120 rpm [32]. The mixture was then sprayed on the different samples to exchange
moisture among the particles, forming a homogeneous blend and preventing
agglomeration of the nanoparticles [3336]. The mixtures were kept in sealed plastic bags for 24 h. The specimens were then prepared at 95% maximum dry density
(MDD) and on the wet side of optimum moisture content (OMC) with the mini compaction apparatus. The remoulded specimens were then cured in a plastic bag to
avoid evaporation at a temperature of approximately 23 C and 90% humidity for
seven days as in BS 1377-5 (1990) [30].
Km=s
a
L
h1
ln
A Dt
h2
1
where a (cm2) is the cross-sectional area of the inlet water valve, A (cm2) the crosssectional area of specimen, L (cm) the height of specimen, and Dt (s) the time needed
for the total head to drop from clearly marked graduations h1 to h2 (Fig. 4).
2.2.4. pH value
The pH value of the soil specimens with different proportions of nanoparticles
were determined in accordance with BS 1377-2 (1990) [30]. This test describes the
procedure for determining the pH value, by the electrometric method, which gives a
direct reading of the pH value of a soil suspension in water. 30 g of soil specimens
was placed in a 100 ml beaker, then 75 ml of distilled water was added to the
beaker and the suspension was stirred for a few minutes. Then, it was covered
of cement resulted in a decrease in plastic index which is in agreement with previous works [10,13]. Improvement in workability
and higher compressive strength were reported in line with the
PI augmentation [5,40,41].
Fig. 6ac shows the effects of different percentages of SiO2
nanoparticles on the LL and the PL of cement-treated residual soil.
There were no apparent changes in the LL of the nano-SiO2-treated
soil at any cement level. However, the PL of the specimens initially
increased at nano-SiO2 content of 0.2% but then decreased at
higher nano-SiO2 contents. Nonetheless, the inclusion of higher
(a)
353
(a)
(c)
(b)
(b)
(c)
Fig. 6. Variation of LL and PL of the SiO2 cemented soil (a) 4% cement, (b) 6%
cement and (c) 8% cement.
Fig. 7. Variation of PI of the SiO2 cemented soil (a) 4% cement, (b) 6% cement and
(c) 8% cement.
354
Fig. 9. Variation in compaction characteristics of cement-treated soil with SiO2 nanoparticles with average diameters of 15 and 80 nm.
355
356
Fig. 12. Relative strength development with cement dosage and nanoparticles SiO2
15 nm b) 80 nm.
3.2.1. XRD
The most important peaks which may refer to the effect of
cement and nanosilica were the ones related to calcium hydroxide
at 2 theta of 18 and 34 [50] as shown in Fig. 14. The major hydration product which is CSH cannot be traced using XRD due to
amorphous nature of CSH clusters although consumption of
CH may implicitly represent the formation of CSH networks.
As can be seen from the gure, the addition of cement to the soil
caused the CH related peaks to appear at the aforementioned 2 thetas. However, inclusion of the nanosilica to the matrix of soil,
reduced the intensity of the peak which is attributable to the formation of secondary CSH through pozzolanic activity of nanosilica particles [20,24,29,43]. The results from XRD may well explain
the increased compressive strength of specimens with nanosilica.
Decreased hydraulic conductivity may also be corresponded to
the increased rate of gel formation throughout the soil matrix.
3.2.2. FTIR
Fig. 15 shows the FTIR spectra of SiOSi band in soil, cement
treated soil and cement treated soil with nanosilica at 7 day curing
time. The FTIR spectrum of the treated soil shows a broad group of
SiOSi band in the region of 6001500 cm1. This band may be
related to the complex spectra of CSH. The vibration bands
appearing in the FTIR spectra were consistent with the characteristic signals of CSH gels previously described in the literature
[25,29,51]. In addition, the spectra centred around 1450 cm1
may be associated with calcium carbonate (CaCO3) as a result of
carbonation. Given these observations, the differences in the transmittance percentages and positions of the peaks in the untreated
soil, the cement-treated soil and the soilcement mixture with
nanosilica may reveal that the nature and amount of the CSH
phase has changed and may conrm the additional formation of
CSH gel. From the aforementioned results, it can be concluded
that SiO2 nanoparticles readily reacted with water and calcium
hydroxide, a by-product of cement hydration, to produce additional CSH gel. The additional CSH may increase the compressive strength of nano-cement specimens. In addition to this effect
of CSH on the strength of the soil, the additional CSH may
reduce the porosity of the soil by lling the capillary pores and
thus improving the microstructure of the soil, which may also contribute to the increased compressive strength.
3.2.3. SEM
Three specimens (an untreated specimen, a specimen treated
with 8% cement and a specimen treated with 8% cement and
0.4% SiO2 nanoparticles) were subjected to SEM analysis (Figs. 16
357
Fig. 14. X-ray diffractograph of patterns of untreated, cement-treated and nanoparticles-treated soil. The reection are labelled p (Portlandite), q (Quartz).
Fig. 15. FTIR patterns of untreated, cement-treated, and cement- and SiO2nanoparticle-treated specimens.
and 17). It was revealed that the untreated soil consisted of some
particle packs (Fig. 16a). This may be because with the presence
of water, clay particles adhere to each other to form large particle
packs, resulted in many micropores in the untreated soil. As can be
seen from Fig. 16b, some pores between the particles were lled
with cementitious gel, which resulted in particle packs with smaller pores contributing to a denser soil matrix.
Fig. 17 illustrates the micrograph of cement treaded soil with
the presence of nanosilica. As can be seen, a very dense matrix
was formed and pores were lled to a great extent. It may reect
the formation of secondary CSH gel in reactions between the
cement products and the SiO2 nanoparticles. These reaction products envelope the soil particles and strengthen the soil. Also, nanolling effect of SiO2 particles may increase the packing density of
the soil [7,42,49]. At the same time, nucleation effect of particles
may help to a better distribution of the CSH in the matrix
[21,24,29,52]. The SEM analysis is consistent with a study by Lti
et al. [27]. It was shown that more stable CSH gel was formed
when nanosilica was added to cement mortars which further densied the matrix.
3.2.4. pH value
The changes in pH level of the soil due to addition of SiO2 nanoparticles are shown in Fig. 18. The pH of the untreated sample was
4.0, indicating a strongly acidic soil. The pH increased to 10, 10.9,
and 11.9 when 4%, 6%, and 8% cement was added to the soil,
respectively. The formation of hydroxyl ions from CH due to
cement hydration may be the main reason for this phenomenon.
As can be seen from the gure, incorporation of nanosilica
decreased the pH of the samples up to 7 with presence of 1%
Fig. 16. Scanning electron micrographs of soil specimens: (a) untreated soil and (b)
cement-treated soil.
358
4. Conclusions
The following conclusions can be drawn from this study:
There were no apparent changes in the LL of the nano-SiO2treated soil at any cement level. However, the PL of the
specimens initially increased at nano-SiO2 content of 0.2%
but then decreased at higher nano-SiO2 contents. In general,
the PL index of samples with 15 nm silica particles were
lower than that of samples with 80 nm silica particles at
cement dosages of 4% and 6%. As the cement percentage
increased to 8%, the PL of samples with 80 nm silica particles decreased to a level below that of 15 nm silica particles.
Consequently, lower loads of nanosilica of up to 0.2%
resulted in the lowest PI for all samples with the cement
levels of 4 and 6%. The nanosilica dosage associated to the
lowest PI increased to 0.4% at 8% cement level.
The addition of nanoparticles resulted in an increase in the
OMC and a slight decrease in the MDD of the specimens. A
greater increase in the MDD was observed with the addition
of nanoparticles with an average diameter of 80 nm than
that of 15 nm at all cement levels. It was also observed that
an increase in the nanomaterial content resulted in a
decrease in the MDD but an increase in the OMC.
Addition of nanosilica increased the compressive strength of
samples dramatically. However, lower loads of SiO2 nanoparticle resulted in higher strengths. The maximum
strength was 673 kPa, 1020 kPa, 1611 kPa for 4%, 6%, 8%
cement, respectively when silica particles of 15 nm were
359