Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Summary
Contents
Authors
Figure S.1.
Germany
Special Thanks To
Furbish :: 3430 2nd Street, Suite 100 :: Baltimore, MD 21225 :: 443.874.7465 :: www.furbishco.com
Furbish 2015. All Rights Reserved
C o nc lu s i ons
Absorbent
Lightweight
Horticultural
Stable
Durable
Clean
Renewable
L ig htwe i g ht
Mineral wool is a lightweight,
durable construction material.
Mineral wool is an excellent material for retaining high
volumes of water on a roof, but with minimal weight.
It is an open fiber matrix that is typically over 90%
void space. The fiber matrix has a very low weight,
but voids within the matrix fill with water, which the
fibers retain via capillary action, yielding a saturated
weight that is only slightly higher than the weight of
pure water.
Due to its low dry density, mineral wool should typically
be protected from wind uplift. See Best Practices
for more information.
Dry Lbs/sf at 1
inch thick
Wet Lbs/sf at 1
inch thick
Lbs of water at
1 inch thick
Mineral wool
at 8-14 pcf
0.67-1.17
Lightweight
Green Roof
Media
4.5 +/-
5.5 +/-
7 +/-
4.5 +/-
2.5 +/-
Cradle to Cradle
Figure 2. Wet and dry weights of various grades of mineral wool. The vertical axis is pounds. The horizontal axis is wet/dry cycling
trials described in Appendix B.
H i gh Water Rete nt io n
Naturally hydrophilic, mineral
wool predictably and efficiently
retains water.
VWC per
ASTM
Material E-2397-9
LWA
35%
LWA
45%
LWA
65%
MW
94%
MW
94%
VWC as
FieldVerified
20%
25%
25%
85%
94%
Field-Verified
VWC / ASTM
E-2397-9 VWC
57%
55%
38%
90%
100%
Re-wettability
Figure 3. Volumetric water content (orange line) and rain events (vertical blue bars) for July - September 2014. Left axis is VWC
expressed as percent of total volume. Right axis is total daily inches of rainfall. Horiztonal axis is time. See Appendix A for full details.
D i me ns i ona l l y S table
Integrity
Strength
Density
Binders
10
11
Figure 5. Young, healthy vegetation on a newly installed green roof utilizing mineral wool
12
B e st Pra cti ce s
Mineral wool can be a valuable
component within a green roof
assembly when used according
to best practices. As is the
case with most construction
materials, context, application,
and handling are important
variables.
Compatibility
Vegetation
Aggregate Media
(weed suppression
layer)
Aggregate Media
(nutrient layer)
Filter Fabric
Nutrient
13
Plant Selection
Density
Traffic
Installation
When
installing,
wear
protective clothing, similar to
insulation installers. Mineral
wool may cause itching,
which is often best managed
by wearing long sleeves
and showering soon after
handling. Mineral wool is
lightweight and easily handled
dry, but is difficult to handle
when wet, so keep it dry until
it is in place. Once installed,
minimize construction impact
over the installed mineral
wool, and cover as soon as
practical. Ballast the same
day as installation.
Figure 7. Mineral wool installed before covering with media and filter fabric.
14
Sources
ASTM D6571-01. (2001) Standard Test Method for Determination of Compression Resistance and Recovery Properties of Highloft Nonwoven Fabric
Using Static Force Loading. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. www.astm.org
Beer, Carri. Brennan + Company Architects. Foam-free, mineral wool underslab insulation installed. October 9, 2014. http://brennanarch.com/
blog/2014/10/
BuildingGreen.com. (February 2012). Better Buildings by Design, Insulation Materials: Environmental Considerations. Retrieved from http://www2.
buildinggreen.com/
Cool Communities.org. The Ancient World, Adonis and New Departures. Retrieved February 9, 2015, from http://www.coolcommunities.org/greenroofs.htm.
Dunster, Andrew. Industrial sector study on the utilization of alternative materials in the manufacture of mineral wool insulation. Building Technology
Group. September 2007.
Ecofys (Project leader). Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and innovation Research. Oeko-Institut. Methodology for the free allocation of emission
allowances in the EU ETS post 2012, Sector report for the mineral wool industry. Study Contract: 07.0307/2008/515770/ETU/C2. 2012.
Ehrlich, B. (January 2009). Knauf Introduces Ecose Biobased Binder. BuildingGreen.com. Retrieved February 8, 2015 from https://www2.buildinggreen.
com/article/knauf-introduces-ecose-biobased-binder
Ehrlich, B. (October 2009). Mineral Wool Comercial and Residential Insulation. BuildingGreen.com. Retrieved February 8, 2015 from https://www2.
buildinggreen.com/print/article/mineral-wool-residential-and-commercial-insulation
Emery, J. A. (April 2002). Structural Wood Panels and Formaldehyde. Retrieved February 9, 2015, from http://www.frtw.com/sites/default/files/
specs/leed/apa_structural_wood_panels.pdf
Ernst, Daniel.Mineral Wool Sub-slab Insulation. Green Building Advisor. Retrieved May 2015, from http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/content/
mineral-wool-sub-slab-insulation
Eurima.org. Sustainable-Construction, Natural-Resources. Retrieved April 2015, from http://www.eurima.org/sustainable-construction/naturalresources
Fischer, Matthias. Product Management. Bonar Xeroflor GmbH. Gro Ippener, Germany. Circa November 2014 April 2015.
Forschungsgesellschaft Landschaftsentwicklung Landschaftsbau [FLL] Guideline for the Planning, Execution, and Upkeep of Green-Roof Sites. 2002.
Gardziella, A. Pilato, L.A. Knop, A. Phenolic Resins - Chemistry, Applications, Standardization, Safety and Ecology. 2nd Completely Revised Edition.
Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Germany. 2010.
Griffin, Whitney. Extensive Green Roof substrate Composition: Effects of Physical Properties on Matric Potential, Hydraulic Conductivity, Plant Growth
and Stormwater Retention in the Mid-Atlantic. Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland.
College Park, Maryland. 2014.
Greenroofs.com. Accessed April 2015, from http://www.greenroofs.com
Handreck, Kevin A., Black, Neil D. Growing Media for Ornamental Plants and Turf. New South Wales, Australia. University of New South Wales Press.
Fourth Edition. 2010.
Jahns, T. Schepp, R. Siersdorfer, C. Kailwasser, H. PubMed. Microbial urea-formaldehyde degradation involves a new enzyme, methylenediurease.
Febreuary 1998. Retrieved May 2015, from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/12773599_Microbial_urea-formaldehyde_
degradation_involves_a_new_enzyme_methylenediurease
Jersey.Uoregon.edu. Ask GeoMan, Which country on earth has the most basalt? Retrieved April 2015, from http://jersey.uoregon.edu/~mstrick/
AskGeoMan/geoQuerry78.html
Liu, Karen. Research and Development. Bonar Xeroflor GmbH. Vancouver, BC. Circa November 2014 April 2015.
Magill, J. D., Midden, K., Groninger, J. & Therrell, M. (2011). A History and Definition of Green Roof Technology with Recommendations for Future
Research. Research Papers. Paper 91. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp/91/
NAIMA. EPD Transparency Summary. Heavy Density Mineral Wool Board. Retrieved April 2015, from http://www2.owenscorning.com/literature/
pdfs/oc_epd_naima_trans_brief_heavy_density_min_wool_board.pdf
PassivetoPositive.com. (2014) passiveBIRDhouse. Retrieved February 8, 2015, from http://passivetopositive.com/projects/passivebirdhouse/
Patent EP1278410. (June 2004) Plant Growth Substrates. Retrieved on March 14, 2013, from http://www.freepatentsonline.com/EP1278410.html
Patent WO 2008009465 A1. (July 2007) Growth Substrates, Their Production and Their Use. Retrieved February 14, 2015, from https://www.google.
com/patents/WO2008009465A1?cl=en&dq=Patent+WO+2008/009465+A1&hl=en&sa=X&ei=SIBCVZeuJIP7ggSD9oDYDw&ved=0CB4Q6AE
wAA
Patent WO 2008089849 A1. (July 2008) Hydroponics growing media. Retrieved February 14, 2015, from http://www.google.com/patents/
WO2008089849A1?cl=en
15
Sources (continued)
Phanerochaete. (August 2014). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved February 2015, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ph
anerochaete&oldid=619788084
Phenol Formaldehyde Resin. (November 2014). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved February 2015, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Phenol_formaldehyde_resin
Philippi, P. M. (2002). Introduction to the German FLL-Guideline for the Planning, Execution and Upkeep of Green-Roof Sites. Forschungsgesellschaft
Landschaftsentwicklung Landschaftsbau e.V. http://www.fll.de
Pilato PhD, Louis. Pilato Consulting. Bound Brook, NJ. March 23, 2015.
Pilato PhD, Louis (Editor). Phenolic Resins: A Century of Progress. DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-04714-5. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelbert. Berlin,
Germany. 2000.
Rockwool International A/S. Rockwood Insulation your safe choice towards sustainability. Data Sheet. Retrieved April 25, 2015, from http://www.
rockwool.com/files/rockwool.com/Environment/PDF%20-%20Environment/Sustainability_guide.pdf
Roofmeadow.com. Accessed April 2015, from http://www.roofmeadow.com
ROXUL.com. ROXUL DRAINBOARD. Products. Retrieved February 8, 2015, from http://www.roxul.com/products/commercial/products/
roxul+drainboard
ROXUL.com. ROXUL DRAINBOARD. Products, Technical Specifications. Retrieved February 8, 2015, from http://www.roxul.com/products/products/
technical+specifications
Rugh, Clayton. Manager and Technical Director. Xero Flor America, LLC. Durham, NC. Circa November 2014 April 2015.
Senate Department for Urban Development and the Environment. Business in Berlin Supports Biodiversity, Recommendations for Action A Guide.
Medialis Offsetdruck GmbH. Berlin, Germany. September 2014.
Starry, O. The comparative effects of three Sedum species on green roof stormwater retention. Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Graduate
School of the University of Maryland. College Park, Maryland. 2013.
Steponaitis, L, Vejelis, S. Strength and Deformability of Mineral Wool Slabs Under Short-Term Cyclic Compression. Vilnius Gediminas Technical
University, Institute of Thermal Insulation. Vilnius, Lithuania. June 8, 2010.
Thoma, B. Straube, E. Scholz, H. Dahouk, S. Soeller, L. Pfeffer, M. Neubauer, H. Tomaso, H. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibilities of
Ochrobactrum spp. International Journal of Medical Microbiology 299 (2009) 209220. June 17, 2008. Retrieved February 2015, from http://
www.sciencedirect.com/
Urbanscape. RMW material performance. Retrieved April 29, 2013, from http://www.green-urbanscape.com
United States Environmental Protection Agency 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories. EPA 822-S-12-001. April 2012.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) AP 42, Fifth Edition, Volume I, Chapter 11: Mineral Products Industry. Retrieved May 2015,
from http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch11/final/c11s18.pdf
United States Environmental Potection Agency. TEACH Chemical Summary. Formaldehyde. September 20, 2007. Retrieved May 2015, from http://
www.epa.gov/teach/chem_summ/Formaldehyde_summary.pdf
United States Environmental Potection Agency. Human Health Criteria-Phenol. EPA 822-F-009-001. May 2009. Retrieved May 2015, from http://
water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/criteria/health/phenol_index.cfm#what
Urea-formaldehyde. (January 2015). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved February 8, 2015, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ureaformaldehyde
Velazquez, Linda. European Airport Greenroofs A Potential Model for North America. Greenroofs.com. February 6, 2008. http://www.greenroofs.
com/
Vrana, Tomas. Impact of moisture on long term performance of insulating products based on stone wool. Licentiate Thesis. KTH The Royal Institute
of Technology School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Division of Building Technology. Stocklholm, Sweden. September 2007
http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:12526/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Wilson, A. (November 2014). Move Over, Foam: Sub-Slab Mineral Wool is Here. BuildingGreen.com. Volume 23, Number 11. Retrieved February 8,
2015 from https://www2.buildinggreen.com/article/move-over-foam-sub-slab-mineral-wool-here
Womersleys Ltd. Warmshell product data and installation instructions. Product Data. Retrieved February 3, 2012, from http://www.womersleys.
co.uk/
World Health Organization. Formaldehyde in Drinking-water. 2005. Retrieved May 2015, from http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/
chemicals/formaldehyde130605.pdf
16
Errata
The original publication of Mineral Wool in Green Roofs, dated May 2015 listed Whitney Griffin, PhD., as a contributing author of this report. Dr.
Griffin was instrumental in the work of Appendix A; however, upon further review, Dr. Griffins contributions are not extensive enough to warrant
co-authorship, so her name is removed as a contributing author.
Page 6 was amended to more accurately cite the research conducted at the University of Maryland.
The list of sources was updated to correct the citation date for Dr. Starrys dissertation.
Appendix 1 was amended to more specifically identify the roles of Furbish and the University of Maryland in this resarch.
17
A1
Figure A.1 Total daily rainfall (inches) and green roof system volumetric water content (%) of a 20,000 square foot green roof in
Washington, DC (VWC n = 10 and rainfall n = 1).
A2
Conclusions
Test Assumptions
Samples Tested
A3
Test Protocols
A4
Test Results
Testing demonstrated no measurable loss in In Figures B.1, B.2 and B.3, the vertical axis is in pounds,
rewettability of mineral wool over 20 saturation/ and the horizontal axis is cycles (cycle 1 through cycle
desiccation cycles. Mineral wool bound with phenolic 20).
resin retained slightly more water than unbound
mineral wool.
Figure B.1. This graph illustrates the dry weight of each of the 16 samples, per Step 1 as noted above. The dry weight is very
consistently measured to be between 0.80 lbs and 0.90 lbs for each 1 square foot sample. (Sample 1D was a slightly heavier outlier at
approximately 1.0 lbs. Notice that some samples weighed more at the beginning Cycle 5, indicating that Cycle 5 did not uniformly dry
all samples; however most other cycles uniformly dried all samples to from the factory condition, or slightly drier.)
Figure B.2. This graph illustrates the wet weight of each of the sixteen samples, per Step 4 as noted above. The wet weight is very
consistently measured to be 4 lbs and 6 lbs, with an average of 5 lbs for each 1 square foot sample. (Sample 1D was a slightly heavier
outlier at approximately 1.0 lb dry weight and proportionately higher saturated weight. Notice that the trend line for all samples is
relatively horizontal, i.e. there is no measurable decrease in rewettability.)
A5
Figure B.3 illustrates the average wet and dry weights of each group of sample. Notice that the dry weight for bound samples (T)
and unbound samples (K) is uniformly approximately 1 lb/sf. The distance between wet weights and dry weights represents water
retention capacity and material efficiency. Generally, bound mineral wool retained slightly more water than unbound mineral wool,
and uncompressed mineral wool retained slightly more water than mineral wool compressed by 30 psf.
A6
Test Protocols
Conclusions
Process:
1. Each sample was encased in a clear, rigid plastic
casing, open at two sides (top and bottom sides).
The rigid plastic was reinforced with wooden ribs
to prevent bowing of the plastic. Each sample was
inspected to ensure uniform contact between the
plastic casing and the mineral wool so that water
could only pass through the mineral wool and
not through voids between the mineral wool and
casing.
2. Weigh Dry: Weigh samples dry (from the factory)
to establish a baseline dry weight for that sample.
3. Wet: Release five (5) gallons of water through the
samples. Gauge water release so that no water
flows outside the plastic casing.
4. Drain: Allow samples to freely drain along a -inch
per foot slope until water flows not faster than
one drop per second.
5. Weigh Wet: Weigh the drained sample.
Repeat steps 2-5 twenty times.
Test Assumptions
Samples tested
A7
Test Results
Figure C.1. illustrates the wet weight of samples taken per Step 3, above, The wet weight is very consistently measured to be between
6 and 7 lbs, with an average of 6.2 lbs for each 1 square foot sample. Notice that the trend line for all samples is relatively horizontal,
i.e. no measurable decrease in rewettability,
Figure C.2 illustrates the same wet weight results as the chart above, but the vertical axis represents volumetric water capacity (VWC)
expressed as percentage of water of the total volume. Note that the two Bound samples (Samples 1 and 2) average approximately
85% VWC, which is consistent with actual field data illustrated in Appendix A.
A8
A9
Conclusions
Samples:
A10
A
B
C
D
5000
240
21
76
E
F
11.55
0.55
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
4.8
5
2.772
31
11
4
45
124
9424
816
Imperical
Imperical
A/B
Imperical
O/E
E/C
D / 16
Imperical
FxH
J/I
KxL
JxL
DxN
Table D.1. Typical maintenance impact calculations . Statistical measurement: typical low-weed-pressure 5,000 SF green roof is
maintained by 2 people for 2 hours per visit (4 manhours or 240 minutes), with 5 visits annually.
A1
B1
5000
780
C1
D1
E1
F1
H1
I1
J1
K1
L1
M1
N1
6
0.156
11.55
1.8
3
5.41
60
11
4
44
240
Imperical
Imperical
A1 / B1
B1 / A1
E1 / C1
Imperical
F1 x H1
J1 / I1
K1 x L1
J1 x L1
Table D.2. Intensive weeding impact calculations. Statistical measurement: typical high-weed-pressure 5,000 SF green roof requires
2 people for approximately 390 minutes (13 manhours or 780 minutes) 3 times annually.
A11
Figure D.1. Average of all samples: Mineral wool at a 12 pcf density retained approximately 95% of its volume after approximately 22
years of simulated compression, and approximately 91% of its volume after 45 years of simulated compression. Mineral wool at a 14
pcf density retained approximately 99% of its volume after approximately 45 years of simulated compression.
Figure D. 2. Sample C12: 12pcf mineral wool covered with filter fabric and EcoCline Media B2. Most samples exhibited approximately
5% compression after 20 years of simulated impact, and approximately 25% compression after 45 years of simulated impact.
A12
Figure D. 3. Sample C14: 14pcf mineral wool covered with filter fabric and EcoCline Media B2. No samples exhibited any measureable
compression after 45 years of simulated impact.
Figure D. 4. Sample G12: 12pcf mineral wool covered with shovel guard and EcoCline Media R (angular #4 aggregate). No samples
exhibited any measureable compression after 45 years of simulated impact.
A13
Figure D. 5. Sample G14: 14pcf mineral wool covered with shovel guard and EcoCline Media R (angular #4 aggregate). Samples
exhibited temporary compression of up to 10%; however all samples fully rebounded within one week of testing, exhibiting no
measureable compression after 45 years of simulated impact.
Figure D. 6. Sample H12: 12pcf mineral wool covered with shovel guard and rounded #4 aggregate). Most samples exhibited no no
measureable compression after 45 years of simulated impact. One sample exhibited 10% compression after 35 years of simulated
impact. One sample exhibited 25% compression, but rebounded to 100% of original volume within 1 week of testing.
A14
Figure D. 7. Sample H14: 14pcf mineral wool covered with shovel guard and rounded #4 aggregate. One probe of one sample exhibited
temporary compression of up to 25%; however all samples fully rebounded within one week of testing, exhibiting no measureable
compression after 45 years of simulated impact.
A15
12pcf A, dry
12pcf B, dry
12pcf C, dry
12pcf D, dry
12pcf E, dry
12pcf F, dry
12pcf G, dry
12pcf H, dry
12pcf I, dry
Samples
12pcf A, wet
14pcf A, dry
12pcf B, wet
14pcf B, dry
12pcf C, wet
14pcf C, dry
12pcf D, wet
14pcf D, dry
12pcf E, wet
14pcf E, dry
12pcf F, wet
14pcf F, dry
12pcf G, wet
14pcf G, dry
12pcf H, wet
14pcf H, dry
12pcf I, wet
14pcf I, dry
14pcf A, wet
14pcf B, wet
14pcf C, wet
14pcf D, wet
14pcf E, wet
14pcf F, wet
14pcf G, wet
14pcf H, wet
14pcf I, wet
A16
Test Assumptions
Test Protocols
4.8
1000
100
900
188
5
37.5
Appendix D
Imperical
Q- R
S/G
Imperical
T/U
A17
A
B
11.5
3
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
34.5
144
0.24
200
835
3.5
3.5
12.25
144
0.09
71
N
O
P
Q
11
781
22
36
Imperical
Imperical
AxB
C/D
Imperical
F/E
J/K
GxL
MxN
Imperical
O/P
Test Results
A18
A19
A20
A21
Figure E.7. Samples of mineral wool covered only by 1 layer of filter fabric
Figure E.8. Samples of configuration using 1 layer of filter fabric and 2 inches of EcoCline Media B2
A22
Figure E.10. Samples of mineral wool covered by shovel guard and 2 inches of EcoCline Media B2
A23
Figure E.11. Samples of mineral wool covered only by shovel guard and angular #4 stone
Figure E.12. Samples of mineral wool covered by shovel guard and rounded #2 stone
A24
Figure E.13. Samples of mineral wool covered only by filter fabric and angular #4 stone
Figure E.14. Samples of mineral wool covered by filter fabric and rounded #4 stone
A25
A26
A27
A28
A29
A30
A31
A32
A33
A34
Figure G.6. 8 pcf bound mineral wool, exposed to elements for three (3) years, view from top at edge
Figure G.7. Mineral wool fibers under microscope. Magnification level: 100x. Reproduced with permission of Forensic Science
Services. Note the binder, observed as spherical shapes.
A35
Projects
Allee Center
Allee Center
Oldenburg
Oldenburg
Bremerhaven
Bremerhaven
Nordstrae
Daniel-von-Bueren
Daniel-von-Bueren
Flughafendamm
Potomac Plaza
Potomac Plaza
Potomac Plaza
Embassy Suites
Emory Knoll Farm
Original
Density
7.9 pcf*
7.9 pcf*
7.9 pcf*
7.9 pcf*
7.9 pcf
7.9 pcf
7.9 pcf*
7.9 pcf*
7.9 pcf*
7.9 pcf*
8 pcf
8 pcf
8 pcf
8 pcf
8 pcf
Observed
Comression
(Expansion)
25%
(25%)
10%
(60%)
0%
40%
25%
25%
35%
25%
13%
0%
(13%)
0%
0%
Effective
Stable
Density
10.5 pcf
6.3 pcf
8.8 pcf
4.9 pcf
7.9 pcf
13.2 pcf
10.5 pcf
10.5 pcf
12.2 pcf
10.5 pcf
9.1 pcf
8 pcf
7.1 pcf
8 pcf
8 pcf
Age (Years)
20
20
19
19
1
1
25*
25*
25*
25*
2
2
2
2
3
Binder
Phenolic Resin*
Phenolic Resin*
Phenolic Resin*
Phenolic Resin*
None
None
Phenolic Resin*
Phenolic Resin*
Phenolic Resin*
Phenolic Resin*
Phenolic Resin
Phenolic Resin
Phenolic Resin
Phenolic Resin
Phenolic Resin
Table H.1. Summary of original and current effective densities of mineral wool in case studies presented. An initial density of 8 pcf
is adequate in light-duty applications, but 12 pcf is more stable in high-traffic applications. More than one measurement per project
indicates minimums and maximums observed. *Denotes unconfirmed but best available information.
A36
A37
A38
A39
A40
A41
A42
A43
A44
A45
Roots of Carex flacca, Phlox subulata, Eupatorium hyssopifolium, Tradescantia ohioensis after 2 years of growth in an EcoCline mineral
wool green roof.
www.mineralwoolingreenroofs.com
May 2015
Furbish :: 3430 2nd Street, Suite 100 :: Baltimore, MD 21225 :: 443.874.7465 :: www.furbishco.com
Furbish 2015. All Rights Reserved