Sie sind auf Seite 1von 1

38780 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2005 / Rules and Regulations

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION holidays. The telephone number for the Sheets (MSDS), then the option is very
AGENCY Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, limited.
and the telephone number for the Air Accordingly, we are withdrawing the
40 CFR Part 63 Docket is (202) 566–1742. amendment, 40 CFR 63.8055(b)(4). The
[AD–FRL–7933–2] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. amendment is withdrawn as of July 6,
Randy McDonald, Organic Chemicals 2005. We will take final action on the
RIN 2060–AM72 Group, Emission Standards Division proposed rule after considering the
(Mail Code C504–04), U.S. EPA, comment received. We also received a
National Emission Standards for comment regarding chemical processes
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
Hazardous Air Pollutants: involving reactions that produce
27711, telephone number (919) 541–
Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing materials that may have a coating-
5402, electronic mail address
AGENCY: Environmental Protection mcdonald.randy@epa.gov. application end use. However, the
Agency (EPA). commenter referred to preamble
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May
ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule. language merely clarifying existing rule
13, 2005, we published a direct final
language in overlapping standards, and
rule (70 FR 25676) and a parallel
SUMMARY: On May 13, 2005, the EPA not new language provided by the direct
proposal (70 FR 25684) amending the
issued direct final amendments to the final rule. We have not changed any of
NESHAP for Miscellaneous Coating
national emission standards for the rule language discussed in the
Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart
hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for clarification of overlapping standards
HHHHH). The direct final rule amended
Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing. section of the preamble. Thus, this
the NESHAP by providing additional
The amendments were issued as a direct comment is not an adverse comment on
compliance options and clarifications.
final rule, along with a parallel proposal the amendments themselves, but rather
Specifically, the direct final rule
to be used as the basis for final action an adverse comment on the definition of
amendments specified that compliance
in the event EPA received any adverse coating manufacturing in the original
with a percent reduction emission limit
comments on the direct final rule.
may be demonstrated by measuring total
amendments. Because an adverse We will not institute a second
organic compounds (TOC), compliance
comment was received on one comment period on this action. The
with the weight percent hazardous air
provision, EPA is withdrawing the provisions for which we did not receive
pollutant (HAP) limit in coatings
corresponding parts of the direct final adverse comment will become effective
products may be demonstrated based on
rule. We stated in that direct final rule on July 12, 2005, as provided in the
formulation data, and the cover or lid on
that if we received adverse comment by preamble to the direct final rule.
a process vessel may be opened for
June 13, 2005, we would publish a material additions and sampling. The List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
timely withdrawal in the Federal direct final rule amendments also
Register. We will address the adverse Environmental protection,
clarified the requirements for cleaning Administrative practice and procedure,
comment in a subsequent final action operations, the compliance date for
based on the parallel proposal Air pollution control, Hazardous
equipment that is added to an existing substances, Intergovernmental relations,
published on May 13, 2005 (70 FR source, the conditions under which you
25684). As stated in the parallel Reporting and recordkeeping
must determine whether an emission requirements.
proposal, we will not institute a second stream is a halogenated vent stream, and
comment period on this action. the terminology used to describe the Dated: June 29, 2005.
DATES: As of July 6, 2005, EPA emission limits for process vessels. The Jeffrey R. Holmstead,
withdraws the direct final rule revision direct final rule amendments also Assistant Administrator, Air and Radiation.
for 40 CFR 63.8055(b)(4), published on revised the definition of Group 2 [FR Doc. 05–13275 Filed 7–5–05; 8:45 am]
May 13, 2005 (70 FR 25676). The transfer operations to clarify that all BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
remaining provisions published on May product loading operations are part of
13, 2005, will be effective on July 12, the miscellaneous coating
2005. manufacturing. We stated in the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a preamble to the direct final rule and AGENCY
docket for this action under Docket ID parallel proposal that if we received
40 CFR Part 180
No. OAR–2003–0178. All documents in adverse comments by June 13, 2005, (or
the docket are listed in the index at if a public hearing was requested by [OPP–2002–0294; FRL–7720–9]
http://www.epa.gov/edocket. Although May 23, 2005) on one or more distinct
listed in the index, some information is provisions of the direct final rule, we Alpha-cyclodextrin, Beta-cyclodextrin,
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other would publish a timely notice in the and Gamma-cyclodextrin; Exemption
information whose disclosure is Federal Register specifying which from the Requirement of a Tolerance
restricted by statute. Certain other provisions will become effective and AGENCY: Environmental Protection
material, such as copyrighted material, which provisions will be withdrawn Agency (EPA).
is not placed on the Internet and will be due to adverse comment. We ACTION: Final rule.
publicly available only in hard copy subsequently received adverse comment
form. Publicly available docket from one commenter on the amendment SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an
materials are available either to allow compliance with the weight exemption from the requirement of a
electronically in EDOCKET or in hard percent HAP limit in coating products tolerance under 40 CFR 180.950 for
copy at: Air and Radiation Docket, EPA/ may be demonstrated based on residues of alpha-cyclodextrin, beta-
DC, EPA West, Room B102, 1301 formulation data. The commenter’s cyclodextrin, and gamma-cyclodextrin
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, claim is that if EPA does not allow the when used in or on various food
DC. The Public Reading Room is open mass cutoffs of 0.1 percent for OSHA- commodities. Wacker Specialties
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday defined carcinogens or 1 percent for submitted a petition to EPA under the
through Friday, excluding legal other HAP used in Material Safety Data Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

VerDate jul<14>2003 16:43 Jul 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\06JYR1.SGM 06JYR1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen