Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
OF LAKE TEXCOCO,
EVIDENCE
FROM DIATOMS
MEXICO.
John P. Bradbury
Limnological
Research
Center,
University
of Minrlesota,
Minneapolis
55455
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
This paleolimnologic study of Lake Texcoca, Mexico, began in 1968 when I was
a postdoctoral fellow at Yale University
under the advisement of E. S. Decvey and
G. E. IIutchinson.
It was partly supported
by a grant from the American Philosophical Society. The project was continued at
the Limnological
Research Center of the
University
of Minnesota where I was a
National Science Foundation postdoctoral
fellow under II. E. Wright. The cnthusiasm and support of thcsc individuals have
greatly facilitated this work. In addition,
I wish to acknowlcdgc the kind help of
P. 13. Scars, of L. Zccvaert, who provided
1 Contribution
tcr, University
LIMNOLOGY
AND
92, Limnological
of Minnesota.
OCEANOGRAPIIY
Research
Cen-
SETTING
180
MARC11
1971,
V.
16(2)
PALEOLIMNOLOGY
throughout the Tertiary, progressively covering the Crctaccous basement; par ticularly massive extrusions of acidic lava and
probable sinking of the graben floor occurred in the Miocene and Plioccnc, defining a valley whose integrated
river
system drained to the south (Figucroa et
al. 1968). The northern limits of the valley arc defined by lower mountains produced by faulting and volcanism in the
region of Pachuca. The valley was closed
in the late Pliocene when basaltic volcanic
activity from centers located in the southern part of the basin (the massive Chichinautzin lavas and Sierra Ajusco) dammed
the valley. The basin thus formed was
rapidly scdimented with elastic and pyroelastic material to a thickness of 800 m
(Figueroa et al. 1968), and the regional
drainage converged to the lowest part,
where a lake has persisted until modern
times.
LIMNOLOGIC
SETTING
+6 m;
+3 m;
4-3 m;
0 m;
+0.85 in;
f3.5
m;
d-3.5 m.
OF
LAKE
TEXCOCO
181
182
JOIIN
I.
BRADBURY
99OlOO
ChaDultevec
0
I
5
I
km
<-
40
I
3%
-w-m
FIG.
1. Index map showing
(in Mooser et al. 1956).
Adapted
in part
from
J. L.
Lorenzo
183
Clisby ( 1955) and me ( Bradbury
with samples.
LACUSTRINE
1970b)
STRATIGRAPIIY
The Plcistoccne stratigraphy in the Basin of Mexico was first studied in detail
by Bryan (1948). Hc worked with the
exposures of soils, tuffs, and alluvium on
the margins of the basin and divided them
into units of the following names, characters, and ages:
Nochc Buena-soils
and alluvium, with
pottery shards; Pre-Classic, Classic, and
Pus t-Classic.
Toltolzingodark brown soils, alluvium,
some eolian material.
Barrilaco -calichc-pedocal;
Altithermal
4,500-7,500 BP.
Beccrra-alluvium-pedalfcr,
Elephns,
Equus, Bison etc.; Cochranc-Mankato.
Morales-caliche-pcdocal;
Wisconsin intcrstadial.
Tacubaya-yellow-brown
alluvium-pcdalfer; Tazcwell-Gary.
Tarango-acidic
volcanic tuff, watcr-deposited; Plio/Pleistocenc?
Bryan (1948) assumed that these formations or their cquivalcnts exist in the
lacustrine deposits in the center of the
basin, and Zeevaert (1952, 1953) correlated Bryans strata with the alternating
layers of lacustrine clays, silts, and sands
undcrncath Mexico City. Lithology is used
as the basis for correlation of the coarser
units, whereas lake clays are thought to
bc contcmporanoous
with soil formation
and roduccd alluviation.
Deposits high in
calcium carbonate are considered cquivalcnts of the calichcs on the basin margins,
Foreman (1955) more carefully analyzed
the sediments bcncath Mexico City, and,
although he did not USC: the formational
names of Bryan and Zecvaert, he showed
their correlation to his findings. IIis stratigraphy is generalized into scvcn zones,
but despite the complete lithologic
dcscription,
they do not have diagnostic
characteristics.
This seems to bc a result
oE high variability
,of the sediments and
the prodominancc of ash and wcathercd
ash in them.
Bryans names applied to the stratigraphy beneath Mexico City are useful in
spcaking about the section. Considering
the effects of erosion and the occurrence
of hiatuses in the marginal alluvium and
soils, as compared to the more oomplctc
dcpositional record in the central part of
this closed basin, temporal equivalents can
only be sporadic. In addition, correlations
based on concepts such as pedalfers =
clays, pedocals = calichcs (which in scvof
cral cases arc high concentrations
ostracod carapaccs ) seem to be simplistic
representations of complicated and distinctive cnvironmcnts.
Mooser ct al. (1956)
pointed out that it is still adventurous to
identify the upper limit of the Tarango
formation bcncath Mexico City. For now,
despite the uscfulncss of Bryans formations, the lacustrine deposits of the Basin
of Mexico should bc characterized in their
own right and not equated with the marginal deposits.
FOSSIL
STUDIES
-lALEOLIMNOLOGY
Ol?
LAKE
185
TEXCOCO
-....
...
..-.f----.<..
:::::.
--e....,
--xi--n--.....
t . . .I... . . i ashy
.- . -..
.-.
-.-.
.-. ,_I
-=- 7-z.
.-.
, .*. .7.
.* a,*.:..
*::::
sand 1
1:
and 8 si
L,--1-T
I._. . fresh
and 1
FIG. 3. Correlation
of core P 366-2 with the
stratigraphic
divisions
of Zecvacrt
(1952)
and
Foreman
(1955).
Difference
in depths results
from the marginal position of P 366-2 relative to
their sections.
Earlier studies of diatoms from the Plcistocenc sediments of Lake Texcoco include
the taxonomic work of Ehrenbcrg (1869)
and Lozano ( 1917) : P. Congcr used din-
DIATOM
STUIHES
186
JOHN
I.
and Zcevaerts work shows that the formations beneath Mexico City dip basinward
and so are found at greater depths to the
northeast. The amount of clip is about 2
m/km.
SEDIMENTOLOGY
AND
CORRELATION
BRADBURY
holes, suggesting
a shallow lake.
emergent
Diatom
vegetation
in
i?cology
4.
STRATIGRAPHY
4 300ti2r
L-1
% H,O
of dry weight
After Zeevaer
oc7
Dentlculo
elegans
Campylodiscus
Cyclotello
qull lensis
Nitzschia
frustulum
DIATOM
ZONES
: J.P. Bradbury,
Cd4 DATES
(years
8 PI
Analyst
43
(2-
sp
k-l
32 -
30-
28 -
22
DEPTH
(m)
1969
i
--
-----I
I
I--L-I-
--I_/_-
l-l-
I _ I -i-I-II I
-I-
I-_-----_
I
-------I l/ i/
II
I
I__----,
- I- - -
I
I-
II
--
II--
I(1
BENTHONIC
I
i--I----I-I------,---l--,
I
FRESHWATER
AND
-----
EPIPHYTIC
SPECIES
-----
-----
9 ,
_---A
[--
-I-I-I-
I
,(I
__I_
I
I
//
//p
-L-l-ILL-l_:-
BRACKISH - WATER
BENTHONIC //---
-L
SPECIES
----
---
March, 1%(
FRESHWATER
/ /PLANKTONlC
AND/
/ SESSILE
SPECIES/
-. _. ..--_..PLANK lONlC -/
Limnology
PALEOLIMNOLOGY
TABLE
1.
List of diatoms
OF
found
LAKE
in the Reforma-Ilavre
Ecological
Achnanthes
exigua Grun.
A. Jzauckiana Crun.
A. hungarica
( Grun. ) Grun,
A. lanceoluta
( Brelx ) Crun.
A. marginatula
Grun.
A. minutissima
Kutz.
PII
7.2-7.5
8
8+
F-B
F
F-B
8.2
8.0-8.2
8.0-8.5
Anomoeoneis
cost&a (Kutz.)
IIust.
A. sphaerophora
( Ehr. ) Pfitx.
A. sphaerophora
sculpta 0. Mull.
B
F-B
S-10
8.5
Caloneis hacillum
( Grun. ) Cl.
P&r.
C. Zewisii influta (Schultzc)
C. Zimosa ( Kutz. ) Patr.
C. oregonica (Ehr. ) Patr.
C. pemqqxz
(J. W. Bail.) Cl.
C. ventricosa subundulata
( Grun. ) Patr.
F
F-B
core
Occurrence
IC
in Mexico?
3
OS
0,
02
alata Kutz.
Amphora acutiuscula
Kutz.
A. coffaeiformis
salina (W.
A. macilenta Greg.
A. ovalis Kutz.
A. ovalis pedictdus Kutz.
A. veneta Kutz.
Sm.)
A. Cl.
B-M
Ehr.
elegans
Kutz.
IIust.
x
N&O::
X
x
X
X
8.6-8.7
B-M
F
F
F
F
F-B
B
B-M
F
8+
8
>87
(3.9-8.6
A
SS
G-9
OS
B
B
A
7-8
Sm.
(P 366-2)
characteristics*
Amphiprora
187
l?EXCOCO
* Ecological
characteristics
provided
for the species
plottecl
in Fig. 4. S = salinity
and F = freshwater,
B = breckish water,
M = marine
wntcr.
pH = recorded
pH and A = alkaline
water,
n = acidic.
IC = indicator
choractertitics
and SS = stable
salinity,
AC = aerophil,
W = warm
water,
E = cutrophic,
hct = heterotroph,
0 = oligotrophic.
This
information
is largely
from
Cholnoky
(1968),
Patrick
and Reimer
(1966>,
Hustedt
(1930),
and Bright
(in
prep.).
t 1 = Texcoco
(10,000);
2 = Tlaxcal~
(3,500);
3 = Chalco
(2,140);
4 = Tlaxcda
(1,130);
5 = Xochimilco
(690);
6 = Zumpnngo
(200).
Numbers
in pnrcnthescs
represent
conductivity
in pmho/cm.
188
JOIIN
I?.
BRADBURY
1.
TABLE
Continued
~Ecological
s
Dintoma
heimaZe
(Roth)
Epithemia
hyndmanni
Wm.
E. intermedia
Fricke
E. sorex Kutz.
E. turgida (Ehr.)
Kutz.
E. zebra (Ehr. ) Kutz.
F-B
Sm.
F
F-B
Gomphonema
Wm. Sm.
G.
G.
G.
G.
G.
G.
G.
G.
G.
amphipleuroides
accuminatum
angustatum
(Kutz. )
dubruvi-scense Pant.
gracile Ehr.
lunceolatum
insignis
longiceps subclavata
pawulum
Kutz.
sphaerophorum
Ehr.
tergestinum
( Grun. )
ventricosum
Greg.
Gyrosigma
G. spenceri
obtusatum
(Quek.)
amphioxys
Mastoglwia
smithii
coronata
IC
in Mexico?
3
X
x
(Grun.)
s+
7.5-8
8.2
8.2-8.5
-7.0
7.5-7.8
02
7.7-7.8
On
7.6-7.7
02
7.5-7.7
F
F
7.2-7.4
8
7-9
01 lack
F-B
7.8-8.0
AC
F
F
7.9-8.2
8
W-E
Cl.
( Ehr. )
Rabh.
(Greg. ) Cl.
Grun.
\/
(;
X
x
Fricke
(Sulliv.
Criff.
Ilantxschia
PI-1
Heib.
Diploneis
e2Ziptica ( Kutz. ) Cl.
D. obZonge2la (Naeg. ex Kutz.) Ross
D. palma Cl.
D. pseudovalis IIust.
D. pueL?a ( Schum. ) Cl.
D. smithii (Breb. ex Wm. Sm.) Cl.
Frustulia
Occurrence
characteristics*
& Wormley)
& Henfr.
( Ehr. ) Grun.
lacustris
Boyer
Crun.
Melosira granuluta
(Ehr. ) Ralfs.
M. italica (Ehr.)
Kutz.
M. variant Ag.
NavicuZa accomoda Host.
N. acceptata Hust.
N. agrestis IIust.
N. anglica subs&a
(Gl-un.) Cl.
N. capitata hungarica
( Grun. ) Ross
PALEOLIMNOLOGY
OF
TABLE
1.
LAKE
Continued
Ecological
s
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
2
N:
N.
N.
N.
N,
N<
N,
N,
s*
N:
N.
N.
N.
N.
5
N:
N.
N.
N,
N.
2
N.
N.
N.
cwi Ehr.
cinctu (Ehr.)
Ralfs
circumtexta
Meist. ex IIust.
cocconeiformzk
Greg. ex Grcv.
consentanea Hust.
cryptocephala
Kutz.
cuspid&a
( Kutz. ) Kutz.
cuspid&z
ambigua (Ehr.)
Cl.
cuspidata heribaudi
Pcrgallo
exigua Greg. ex Grun.
festiva Krasske
fragilarioides
Krnsske
graciloides
A. Mayer
gregariu Donk.
grimmei Krasske
hn2ophiZa ( Grun. ) Cl.
huef2eri Grun.
huef2eri Zeptocephalu (Breb. ex Crml.)
Patr.
laevissima Kutz.
lagerheimi
Cl.
lanceoluta
( Ag. ) Kutz.
minima Grun.
minuscula Grun.
muralis Grun.
oblonga Kutz.
peregrinu
( Ehr. ) Kutz.
protracta Grun.
pseudoscutiformis
IIust.
pupula rectangularis
( Ck?ff. ) Crun.
p ygmaea Kutz.
radiosa Kutz.
rhynchocephaZn
Kutz.
rhynchocephala
germ&G
( Wallace)
Pntr.
sa2inarum Grun.
semen Ehr. emend. Donk.
seminuloides
Hust.
subhamulata
Grun.
submuralis
texuna Patr.
tripunctata
(0. F. Mull.)
Bory
Neidium
N. iridis
189
TEXCOCO
Occurrence
chnracteristics*
PI-1
IC
F
F-B
8
8.3-8.6
F-B
F
8.3-8.6
758.0
in Mexico?
3
X
X
13
1
17
7.8
758.0
0, lack
X
F-B
F
B
8
A
7.3-7.6
I-lust.
affine ( Ehr.)
(Ehr. ) Cl.
F
F-B
Pfitz,
6
8.5
O:! lack
Ns het
Hust.
8.2-8.5
9-10
7-10
02 lack
xxxxxx
190
JOHN
P.
TABLE
BRADBURY
1.
Continued
Ecological
s
N. ganderscheimiensis
Krasske
N. gracilis Hantz.
N. hantxschiunu
Rabh.
N. hungaricu Grun.
N. kutxingiuna
Hilse
N. linearis Wm. Sm.
N. microcephala
Grun.
N. obtusa Wm. Sm.
N. palea (Kutz. ) Wm. Sm.
N. palea tenuirostris
Crun.
N. puleaceu Grun.
Nitzschia sp. aff. N. punctatu
N. stugnorum Rabh.
N. sub&
Kutz.
N. turds IIust.
N. tryblionella
Hantz.
N. tryblionella
victor&
Grun.
N. vi&u
Norman
N. vivax Wm. Sm.
Rhoicosphenia
Rhopalodia
R. gibber&
R. gibber&
Scoliopleura
delicatulum
curvnta
Wm.
7-9
7.5-7.8
7.8
8.3-8.5
0, lack
G-9
O2 lack
Sm.)
7.8-8.2
in Mexico+
Na hct
N2 het
Cl-
F-B
Ae
F
F
6
G-8
0, lack
IIust.
X
Sm.
( Kutz. ) Grim.
F
F
F
F-B
A
7.8
A
A
5.5-8
B
F-B
A
6.8
H
B-M
F
A
A
7.6
02
Hust.
X
x
co,, sot
w-o
Grun.
Stephunodisws
niugurne Ehr.
SurireZla angustatu Kutz.
S. ovalis Brcb.
S. ovata pinnata Wm. Sm.
S. peisonis Pant.
S. strintulu Turpin
S. tenera Greg.
Synedra ecus Kutz.
S. rumpens familiaris
(Kutz.)
S. rumpens Scotia Grun.
S. socia Wallace
S. dzn (Nitz.)
Ehr.
Grun.
F-B
IC
Pinnularia
acrosnhoeria
Wm. Sm.
P. uppendiculata
( Ag. ) Cl.
P. bogotensis ( Grun. ) Cl.
P. borealis Ehr.
P. bruunii ( Grun. ) Cl.
(A. Mayer)
P. braunii amphicephalu
( Grun. ) Cl.
P. divergentissimn
P. globiceps Greg.
P. maior ( Kutz. ) Rabh.
( Ehr. ) Cl.
P. microstauron
Pleurosigma
PEI
F-B
F
F
F
(Wm.
Occurrence
chnracteristics*
Na&O:,
PALEOLIMNOLOGY
OE
LAKE
TEXCOCO
191
192
JOHN
TABLE
2.
Z~;taha
1.
2-3
2.
3-4
4.
11-14
5.
14--16
111
111
6.
16.-19
7.
19-20
2::
25.10
10.
25.1027 m
4)
Ecology
Frngilaria
NITZSCHIA
FRUSTULUM
(70)
Cnmpylodiscus
clypeus (73)
Anomoeonds
costata ( 72 )
Rhopalodia gibber&z protracta ( 71)
Navicula hdophiln
( 65 )
Chaetocerns sp. ( 77 )
Cyclotello striata ( 79 )
IX
X
X
All
CYCLOTELLA
STRZATA
(79)
Chaetoceras sp. (77)
Nitzschia frustulum
( 70 )
Nitzschia communis ( 63 )
Anomoeoneis costata ( 72 )
Cnmpylodiscus
clypeus ( 73 )
Rhopnloclia gibber&
protmctcl (71)
XI
XI
IX
VIII
X
X
X
Flora
similar
a dominance
AMPHORA
OVALZS (56)
Epithemin zebra ( 59 )
Fragikrin
construens venter ( 17)
Nitzschia frustulum
( 70 )
Campylodiscus
clypeus ( 73 )
Anomoeoneis
costata ( 72 )
Rhopnlodin gibber&
protracta ( 7 I)
Surirella peisonis ( 74 )
Cocconeis diminuta
( 75 )
Chaetoceras sp. (77)
Cyclotelln strinta (79 )
VI
VI
III
IX
X
X
X
X
X
XJ
XI
Flora
is similar
to the last two zones,
but presencc
of A. utdis,
F. construens venter, and
E. zebra suggests
fresher
water
than
the preceding
floras.
CYCLOTELLA
STRIATA
(79)
Chactocerns sp. ( 77 )
Anomoeoneis
cost&a ( 72 )
Cnmpylodiscus
clypeus ( 73 )
Nitzschia frustulum
( 70 )
Navicula halophila ( 65 )
2
X
X
XI
VIII
NAVICULA
Cyclotelln
( 24 )
sp.
( 77 )
ZIALOPHILA
striata ( 79 )
frustulum
(70)
benthonic
of high
diatoms
pH;
most
spp.
are commonly
found
standing
water
and
arc tolerant
range
of salinity;
the
remaining
found
in brackish-water
benthonic
tonic
cnvironmcnts.
forms
are characteristic
C. strinta and Chaetoceras
the others
bcnthonic.
characteristic
tolerate
low
in shallow
of a wide
species
arc
and plank-
of brackish
water;
sp. are planktonic,
~111
XI
XI
(65)
to the preceding
of planktonic
and Chnetocclns
~1).
Dominance
of brackish
and
Chaetoceras
sp.),
brackish
bcnthonic.
planktouic
(C.
the
remainder
strinta
being
VT11
XI
IX
Brackish-benthonic
CYCLOTELLA
QUZLLENSZS
(80)
Cyclotella striintn ( 79 )
Cyclotella sp. cf. C. stylorum (81)
Anomoeoneis
costata (72 )
Cocconeis diminuta
( 75 )
Fragilnria
construens venter ( 17)
XI
XI
XI
X
X
TTI
Brackish
presence
presence
of
of F.
fresh-
FRAGILARIA
IT1
III
TII
II
IV
IV
XI
Many
diatoms
from
the freshwater
groups
the
Fmgilarin
spp.
indicate
shallow,
alkaline
water.
plus
fresh,
VIII
IX
X
XI
XI
XI
Bl;lckisll-l)cntllonic
FTagilaria
m
also Fig.
III
111
X
X
X
1X
VIII
XI
Nitzschia
8.
20-23
(set
Epiphytic
and
of freshwater
salinity.
FAAGZLARZA
BREVZSTRZATA
(19)
Fragilnria construens venter ( 17)
Anomoeoneis costata ( 72 )
Campylodiscus
clypeus (73)
Szcrirelln
peisonis ( 74 )
Nitzschia frustulum
( 70 )
Anomoeoneis sphnerophorn ( 60)
diatoms
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
III
II
VI
Chaetocerns
3.
4-11
dominant
Group
DENTZCULA
ELEGANS
(22)
Cocconeis placentuln ( 21)
Nitzschia amphibiu ( 23 )
Rhopalodia gibberula mnrgnritifern
Navicula
cryptocephuln
(20)
Fragilaria
brevistrinta
( 19 )
Amphora veneta ( 8)
Amphora ovalis ( 56)
in
BRADBURY
Diatoms
I?.
Fragilnriu
Rhopnlodia
Nitzschia
Cocconeis
Cyclotella
BREVISTRZATA
(19)
construens venter ( 17)
pinnatn ( 18)
gibbn ( 15)
amphibia ( 23 )
placsntulu
( 21)
striata (79)
NAVICULA
HALOPHZLA
( 65 )
Nitzschia frustulum
(70)
Anomoeoneis cost&n ( 72 )
Cyclotelln striata (79)
Cyclotella meneghiniana
laevissima
Chaetoceras sp. ( 77 )
( 78 )
planktonic
construens
water
diatoms
venter
dominate;
suggests
dominate.
ncarby.
diatoms
dominate.
PALEOLIMNOLOGY
OF
TABLE
Zone and
depth
11.
2727.75
12.
27.7529.50 m
13.
2x5033.50
111
(81)
CYCLOTELLA
SP. CF. C. STYLORUM
Campylodisczhs clypew ( 73 )
Anomoeoneis
costata ( 72 )
Rhopaloclia
gibberula protracta (7 1)
CAMPYLODISCUS
CLYPEUS
Anomoeoneis costata ( 72 )
Rhopalodia gibberala protracta
Cocconeis diminuta
( 75 )
Surirella peisonis ( 74 )
Cymbella mozicana
(76)
Cyclotella striata (79)
Continued
Ecology
Cyclotella
from
zone
X
X
(73)
15.
STEPIIANODISCUS
(24)
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
IX
l?reshwater,
atoms;
XII
XI
III
Planktonic
alkaline,
NIAGARAE
in
In addition
80 core.
dominated
from
( 1955).
the
core Bellas
Only
scattcrcd
DENTICULA
ELEGANS
(22)
Cocconeis placentzila (21)
Nitzschia
amphibia
( 23 )
R. gibberula
margnritifera
( 24 )
IIantzschia
amphiorys
( 25 )
Rhopalodia gibba ( 15)
(The
limits
ments
that
of this zone
may cont<ain
diatoms
the remaining
flora
is
habitats;
possibly
this
following
one.
the
dominate.
diatom,
lakes.
Artes
80,
samples
which
was originally
of this
core exist,
studied
and the
IV
IV
IV
IV
V
11
assemblage
the depth
Diatom Zonation
Distinctive assemblages of diatoms were
used to delineate 15 zones in the core
(Table 2). They have been numbered in
Fig. 4 and labeled with the name of the
diatom considered most charac tcris tic of
each zone.
A discussion of the paleolimnology
of
Lake Texcoco must be prcccdcd by a consideration of the mechanics of lacustrine
change in this shallow lake and how the
marginal diatom floras arc affected. As
those of many lakes in semiarid regions
with periodic rainfall, its level and salinity
fluctuate widely from season to season,
sometimes in rcsponsc to single storms.
In 1629 the waters of Lake Texcoco rose
8 m and submcrgcd a town for 5 consccu-
and shallow,
freshwater
warm,
cutrophic
lakes.
planktonic
freshwater
deep,
north-tcmperatc
alkaline
benthonic
and epiphytic
many
other
spp. from
groups
I-V.
Cool
of
35 m-?
44-46
and
of
x
XI
MELOSIRA
GRANULATA
( 83 )
Cyclotella sp. (81)
FragiZaria brcvistriata
( 19 )
determined
Foreman
dominates,
brackish-bcnthonic
is a subzone
Brackish-benthonic
X
X
X
X
(71)
DENTICULA
ELEGANS
(22)
Cocconeis placentula
( 21)
Rhopalodia gibberula margaritifera
Nitzschia amphibia
(23 )
Navicula cryptocephala
( 20 )
Nitzschia frustulum
( 70 )
[This
zone has been
Clisby
( 1955)
and
zone is unknown.]
193
TEXCOCO
GrOUp
Diatoms
33.5035 m
14.
2.
LAKE
Freshwater,
phioxys
is
diatoms
zones by several
it is not number&)
was noted
in a sample
from
~70
m in
reached
by P 366-2.
This zone,
like the
from
characteristic
by Sears
extent
of
alkaline
bcnthonic
diatoms;
an aerophilic
spccics.
from
the other
For this reason
di-
meters
II.
of
the Belhas
one at 35
and
this
am-
scdi-
Artes
m, is
194
JOIIN
I?.
the marginal, marshy, frcshwa ter environments supported by the springs extended
basinward and were rcpcatcdly
invaded
by transitory floods of saline water from
the central basin of Lake Texcoco. Rcduccd spring flow, to be cxpcctcd during
long dry periods, can add another variable
to this picture.
The validity ,of this scheme is supported
by historic documentation
of floods that
plagued the marginal marshland chinnmpa
agriculture of the area. For example, the
King of Texcoco, Netzahuacoyotl,
built a
dike in 1450 to prevent the saline waters
of the main basin from entering the western subbasin of the lake ( Fig. 1).
The diatoms from the Pleistocene sedimcnts of Lake Texcoco lbclong to four
broad ecological groups : brackish bcnthonic,
brackish
planktonic,
freshwater
bcnthonic-cpiphytic,
and freshwater planktonic. These groups and the lacustrine
environments
that produced
them arc
shown in Fig. 5, arranged in an idealized
climatic scqucncc. Actually, the changes
between freshwater marsh, shallow saline
water, and deep saline water can occur
rapidly and can bc revcrscd. The freshwater planktonic diatoms represent more
stable lacustrine environments.
Paleolimnology
The earliest recorded diatom assemblage
comes from a depth of about 70 m in the
Bellas Artes 80 core studied by Foreman
( 1955) and Scars and Clisby ( 1955). It
is not shown in Fig. 4. It is dominated
by Stephanodiscus niagarae, a freshwaterplanktonic diatom, indicating that a large,
possibly deep, cool lake cxistcd at that
time. The salinity of the lake was low and
constant, and the lake probably had an
outlet. More than 20 m of sediment may
separate this zone from the next known
assemblage; it is not known what limnologic conditions they represent.
The lowest diatom assemblage from core
P 366-2 (4445 m, Fig. 4) is unnumbered
because it is separated from the overlying
sediments by 9 m. It consists of marsh
Denticula
elegans
diatoms, principally
BRADBURY
FIG.
5. Schematic representation
of the four
distinct lacustrine environments
of Lake Texcoco
suggested by diatom analysis of core 1 366-2.
At the highest levels (bottom sketch), when the
lake may have overflowed,
freshwater-planktonic
(fw-p)
diatoms occurred,
Decrease in the water
brackishlevel and increased salinities products
planktonic
diatoms (br-p ). As water levels continue to drop brackish-benthonic
diatoms ( br-b )
flourish in shallow, saline water. During the lowest lake levels, spring-fed
freshwater
marshes cxtencl basinwarcl
from the margins of the lake.
Associated with the marshes ca.re freshwatcr-bcnthonic
( fw-b ) cliatoms, and brackish-benthonic
forms arc present in the remnant saline pools in
the center of the basin. These assemblages can
be tentatively
related to a climatic change from
moist to dry.
PALEOLIMNOLOGY
OF
LAKE
TE,XCOCO
195
196
JOIIN
I?.
BRADBURY
FIG.
6.
-+
PALEOLIMNOLOGY
_---.
---_
-----*
__--.
____
_---.
-___
.---.
____
--:------i4
0
---.---_
____
---------~-~-~: - ,
____
.---.
--_.---_
____.---.
\aaar-lrl-
Ol?
:
:
:
:
:
LAKE
197
TEXCOCO
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
2-
____
____
____
_---_
____
--;-I-;<- ,6 _
-_ __
.__-.
____
.__-.
____
!"""I-48___
____
_---.
____
.___.
__ __
--------20+-III:
._--.
~L~-~-~:-
:
;
____-22____.
____
.__.
__
-_
:~-~-~: - 24 -
---.____
____
.---.
_-_----w-:-26.-_-.
____
.---____
._--_
____
.__-.
>nr>nr-26-
I
:
POLLEN
DIAGRAM
MADERO
CORE
MEXICO
CITY,
MEXICO
Percentages
(Clisby
&
r'Kl\'r\'/ --_-----yAYAY-- 36 1
I
--d-m
____ : _---.
---L.-z--:-40_---.
____
._--.
_--.---.
_----42
-I:&
__-_
._--.
__ __
'=---z-r- 4 4 .-_-.
_-__
_---.
_
---.---.
---_
---m---z-46.---.
_--_
_--_.
_
Explanation
Weathered
ash
Fresh
clay
ash
m
Ostracod
Sand
No
Pollen
-- .
'::.::: -64. .
::::::: -66-
and
jzq
.:.: ,'-5+
"Ai.:
_
'. .:'
.. .....
of total pollen
Sears
i955)
marl
and
silt
pollen
+
types
in counts
less than 90
198
JOHN
I?.
BRADBURY
PALEOLIMNOLOGY
the likelihood
that the remarkable chinampa agricultural
system evolved from
the similar but more primitive ridged field
system seems logical. Archaeological cvidencc to test these ideas might be obtained
near Mexico City or in the remaining chinampa areas to the southwest. Possibly
some of it is covcrcd by the Rcccnt basalt flows from Xitle and other volcanic
centers.
Although the diatoms from core P 3662 may be only suggestive with rcspcct to
the questions ,of early man and agriculture
in the Basin of Mexico, they offer much
more positive information on carlicr geologic questions.
Mooscr ct al. (1956)
discussed the difficulties in assigning maximum ages to the lake deposits and to the
formation
of the basin, although thcsc
features are generally considered to be
This problem rests on
Plio-Pleistoccnc.
the identification
of the Tarango formation
bcncath Mexico City. Where the Tarango
formation is developed on the margins of
the basin it predates the basaltic eruptions
that are #thought to have blocked the
south-draining valley to form the Basin of
Mexico.
Previous volcanic
rocks were
nonbasaltic.
Thus the Tarango formation
should bc an alluvial deposit free of basaltic components. The prcscncc of deep
strata within
this formation
containing
abundant remains of S. niagame, a frcshwater-planktonic
diatom characteristic
of
large, cool tempcratc lakes in North Amcrica, clearly suggests that thcsc deposits
are not entirely alluvial.
Also, Foreman
(1955) found basalt fragments at similar
depths in the same formation.
Fish fo,ssils (Fig. 4) from core P 366-2
have been identified by R. R. Miller and
C. D. Barbour (pcrsonal communication)
as Chirostoma humboltltianum,
belonging
chiefly to the Lerma drainage basin, The
present fish fauna of the Basin of Mexico
is entirely of Lcrma affinities
(Arellano
1953; Meek 1904). The carlicst fish fossil
from the core occurs at a depth of 35 m;
it indicates that at least since perhaps
100,000 years B.P. the Basin of Mexico
somctimcs contained a large lake, which
OF
LAKE
TEXCOCO
199
200
JOHN
I?.
REFERENCES
A. R. V. 1953,. Estratigrafia
de la
Cuenca de Mexico.
Mem. Congr.
Cient,
Mex. (Conmem.
400th Anniv.
Univ. ) 3 :
172-186.
ARELLANO,
BRADBURY
1962.
Die Kieselalgen
Deutschlands
Osterreichs
und der Schweiz
mit Beriichsichtigung
der ubrigen Lander Europas sowie der aungrezenden
Meercsgebiet.
Zn L.
Rabenhorst
[ea.], Kryptogammen-Flora
von
Deutschland,
Osterreich und der Schwciz, v.
7, Sect. 1. 920 p.
HUTCIIINSON, G. E., R. PATRICK, AND E. S.
DEEVEY. 1956.
Sediments OF Lake Patzcuaro, Michoacan,
Mexico.
Bull. Geol. Sot.
Amer. 67 : 1491-1504.
LINNE, S. 1948. El Valle y la Ciudad de Mexico en 1550. Stockholm Ethnogr. Mus. 9:
220 p. + 12 maps.
L~ZANO, E. D. 1917. Diatomeas fosilcs mexicanas. Anal. Inst. Geol. Mex., 1, p. l-27.
MEEK,
E. S. 1904. The freshwater
fishes of
Mexico.
Collect. Field Mus. Zool. 5: 252 p.
MOOSER, F.
1963.
La cuenca lacustre
de1
Valle de Mexico.
Ing. Hidro. Mex. 17( 2) :
47-56.
--.
1967. Tefracrondgia
de la Cuenca de
Mexico para 10s ultimos
treinta
mil ahos.
Bol. Inst. Nat. Antropol. Hist., 30, p. 12-15.
--,
S. E. WHITE, AND J. L. LORENZO. 1956.
La Cuenca de Mexico:
consideraciones
gcologicas y arqueologicas.
Inst. Nat. Antropol.
Hist., Dir. Prehist., Mexico, D.F., Publ. 2.
51 p.
PARSONS, J. J., AND W. M. DENEVAN. 1967.
Pre-Columbian
ridged
fields.
Sci. Amer.
2117 : 93-100.
PATRICK, R., J. CAIRNS, AND S. S. ROBA~K. 1967.
An ecosystematic
study of tho fauna and
flora of the Savanah River.
Proc. Acad.
Natur. Sci. Phila. 118(5) : 109-407.
AND C. W. REIIMER. 1966. The diator&
of the United
States, v. 1. Acad.
Natur. Sci. Phila., Monogr. 13. 688 p.
SEARS, P. B. l952.
Palynology
in southern
North
America,
Part 1. Bull. Gcol. Sot.
Amer. 63: 241-2Fj4.
AND K. I~. CLISnY. 1955. Palynology
in southern North America,
Part 4.
Bull.
Gcol. Sot. Amer. 66: 521-530.
WIIITE, S. E. 1954. The firn fielcl on the volcano Po,pocatepctl,
Mexico.
J. Glacial.
2
(16) : 389-392.
1962. Late Pleistocene glacial sequence
--.
for the west side of Iztaccihuatl,
Mexico.
Bull. Geol. Sot. Amer. 73: 935-958.
ZEEVA~T, L. 1952, Estratigrafia
y problemas
cle ingenieria
en 10s depositos de arcilla lacustre cle la ciudad de Mexico.
Rev. Ing.
25( 1): 12-28.
Outline
of the stratigraphical
-*
1953.
and mechanical
characteristics
of the unconsolidated sedimentary
deposits in the basin
of the Valley of Mexico.
Proc. Congr. Int.
Ass. Quaternary
Res. (INQUA),
4th, 30 Aug10 Sep 1953, Rome-Piss, Italy.
-.