Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Name:
Municipality:
Rating Period:
III.
8 VS Very Satisfactory
6 S Satisfactory
4 U Unsatisfactory
2 P Poor
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
I.
Legend: 10 O Outstanding
SELF
RATING
SUPERIOR'S
10
10
8
8
8
10
10
8
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
8
10
10
10
6
8
10
10
10
10
2
10
10
10
8
8
6
8
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
8
10
10
10
10
2
10
230
6.44
2
10
218
6.34
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
100
2
10
10
10
8
10
10
10
8
10
10
96
1.92
10
10
20
1
8
8
16
0.8
9.44
9.06
RATING
GRAND TOTAL
PLUS FACTORS
( .5 for each indicator buT not to exceed 2 points for the total)
1. Chaired technical committee in the division/ regional level
2. Conducted seminars in the division/ regional/ national level
3. Acted as trainer/ facilitator in the division/regional/ national level
4. Acquired resources/assistance for the school from other sources
FINAL
DESCRIPTIVE
RATING
SUMMARY OF RATINGS
I.
II.
III.
SELF
RATING
SUPERIOR'S
6.44
6.34
2
1
1.92
0.8
9.44
9.06
RATING
FINAL
DESCRIPTIVE
RATING
Remarks:
Outstanding
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Poor
RODRIGO B. PUEBLA
RICHARD C. ACASO , L.L.B., MA.ED.
Recommending Approval
ROSELLER N. GELIG
Approved
CRIPTIVE
CRIPTIVE