Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Department of Neurology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Research Institute for Medical Science, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Received 22 January 2015
Accepted 29 June 2015
Available online xxx
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of olfactory dysfunction and evaluate
the relationship between olfactory function and nutritional status, comorbidity, and the results of a
neurocognitive test in geriatric patients who do not suffer from neurodegenerative disease.
Materials and methods: A total of 45 patients who visited the Geriatric Health Center of Chungnam
National University Hospital were enrolled in this study. Olfactory function was assessed using a Korean
Version of Snifn Stick Test II. Cognitive status of all participants was assessed with the MMSE-K (Korean
version of the Mini-Mental State Examination). Nutritional status was assessed with body mass index,
Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA), and serum total protein and albumin.
Results: A total of 45 participants were enrolled in this study. Of these subjects, 28 were men and
17 were women, with a mean age of 71.7 5.16 years. Nine (20%) were normosmia, 13 (28.9%) were
hyposmia, and 23 (51.1%) were anosmia. Thirty-six patients (80%) suffered from olfactory dysfunction
(anosmia or hyposmia). MMSE score showed signicant correlation with MNA score. There were signicant
negative correlations between age and total TDI (threshold, discrimination, and identication) score,
discrimination score, identication score, and MMSE score. MMSE score showed signicant correlation with
discrimination score and identication score. However, MNA score did not show any signicant correlation
with olfactory function test results.
Conclusion: Although olfactory function was not inuenced by nutritional status, abilities of
discrimination and identication of odors were associated with cognitive function in geriatric patients.
2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Olfaction
Odor identication
Nutrition
Aging
Cognitive impairment
Malnutrition
Smell disorder
1. Introduction
Olfactory dysfunction may be associated with failure to
recognize danger and may accompany social, psychological, and
nutritional problems, as well as decrease quality of life [1]. It has
been known that the overall prevalence of olfactory dysfunction is
estimated around 5% and that the prevalence increases exponentially with age [1,2].
Age-related olfactory loss (presbyosmia) affects critical functions, such as nutrition, immunity, mood, behavior, and sexuality
[3,4], and has been known to be related to high risk of mortality
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2015.06.009
0385-8146/ 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: Jin S-Y, et al. Effects of nutritional status and cognitive ability on olfactory function in geriatric
patients. Auris Nasus Larynx (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2015.06.009
G Model
Table 1
Patients characteristics.
Age
Male (No.)
Female (No.)
BMI
Total protein
Albumin
KVSSII score
MNA
MMSE
No. of comorbid disease
Barthel Index
Normosmia (n = 9)
Hyposmia (n = 13)
Anosmia (n = 23)
p-value
71.7 5.16
28
17
24.0 3.2
6.84 0.62
4.07 0.39
20.0 5.7
23.6 2.9
26.4 2.5
3.2 1.4
100
69.3 4.2
5
4
23.3 2.5
7.1 0.75
4.09 0.54
28.3 3.2
22.6 3.1
27.7 2.0
3.1 1.4
100
70.2 4.9
10
3
24.4 3.1
6.78 0.54
4.02 0.32
22.0 1.1
24.9 2.7
26.6 2.7
3.6 1.7
100
73.4 5.0
13
10
24.0 3.5
6.77 0.61
4.08 0.37
15.7 3.3
23.3 2.9
25.9 2.4
2.9 1.1
100
.643
.431
.464
.149
.485
.000
.473
.738
.439
BMI, body mass index; KVSSII, Korean version of Snifn Stick Test II; MNA, Mini-Nutritional Assessment; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination.
Please cite this article in press as: Jin S-Y, et al. Effects of nutritional status and cognitive ability on olfactory function in geriatric
patients. Auris Nasus Larynx (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2015.06.009
G Model
Fig. 1. Correlations among the olfactory function test and between Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. There were
signicant correlations between TDI (total) score and threshold (A), discrimination (B), or identication (C) score in this study. In addition, MMSE score showed signicant
correlation with MNA score (D). *a, p < .0001 and b-Coefcient = 0.722 (A), 0.675 (B), 0.798 (C); *b, p = .016 and b-Coefcient = 0.356 (D).
Thirty-six patients (80%) suffered from olfactory dysfunction (anosmia or hyposmia). Barthel Index of all subjects was 100 points, and
mean BMI, KVSS II, MNA, and MMSE scores were 24.0 3.2,
20.0 5.7, 23.6 2.9, and 26.4 2.5, respectively (Table 1).
Comorbid diseases were also analyzed, and the most common
comorbid disease was hypertension (n = 27), followed by hyperlipidemia (n = 14), diabetes mellitus (DM, n = 8), urology disease
(n = 8), peripheral vascular disease (n = 6), cardiovascular disease
(n = 5), skeletal disease (n = 4), and gastrointestinal disease (n = 2).
There was no signicant correlation between olfactory function
test and number of comorbid diseases. However, number of
comorbid disease showed signicant correlation with BMI
(p = .0373).
correlations between age and TDI (Fig. 2A, p = .0380), discrimination (Fig. 2C, p = .0054), identication (Fig. 2D, p = .0438), and
MMSE scores (Fig. 2E, p = .0009). Threshold and MNA scores did not
show any signicant correlation with age (Fig. 2B and 2F).
Table 2
Linear regression analysis of factors inuencing cognitive function.
Mini-Mental State Examination
b-Coefcient
Age
Gender
No. of disease
MNA
KVSSII score
Threshold
Discrimination
Identication
0.234
0.197
0.122
0.356
0.226
0.095
0.340
0.280
SE
p-value
0.066
0.757
0.275
0.121
0.064
0.139
0.157
0.130
.001
.194
.426
.016
.135
.535
.022
.037
OR (95% CI)
0.234
0.998
0.221
0.301
0.098
0.087
0.371
0.249
[ 0.367 to 0.102]
[ 2.524 to 0.529]
[ 0.776 to 0.334]
[0.058 to 0.545]
[ 0.032 to 0.228]
[ 0.366 to 0.193]
[0.055 to 0.687]
[ 0.014 to 0.511]
MNA, Mini-Nutritional Assessment; KVSSII, Korean version of Snifn Stick Test II.
Please cite this article in press as: Jin S-Y, et al. Effects of nutritional status and cognitive ability on olfactory function in geriatric
patients. Auris Nasus Larynx (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2015.06.009
G Model
Fig. 2. Correlations between age and olfactory function test, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scores. There were signicant
negative correlations between age and TDI (A), discrimination (C), identication (D), and MMSE scores (E). *a, p = .0380 and b-Coefcient = 0.312; *b, p = .0054 and bCoefcient = 0.408; *c, p = .0438 and b-Coefcient = 0.302; *d, p = .0009 and b-Coefcient = 0.479.
Table 3
Linear regression analysis of factors inuencing nutritional status.
Mini-Nutritional Assessment
b-Coefcient
Age
Gender
No. of disease
MMSE
KVSSII score
Threshold
Discrimination
Identication
0.282
0.430
0.018
0.356
0.029
0.298
0.186
0.080
SE
p-value
0.085
0.823
0.328
0.168
0.078
0.157
0.193
0.159
.061
.003
.906
.016
.852
.046
.221
.600
OR (95% CI)
0.163
2.571
0.039
0.420
0.015
0.322
0.240
0.084
[ 0.334 to 0.008]
[ 4.232 to 0.911]
[ 0.700 to 0.622]
[0.081 to 0.760]
[ 0.172 to 0.143]
[ 0.638 to 0.005]
[ 0.150 to 0.630]
[ 0.237 to 0.406]
MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; KVSSII, Korean version of Snifn Stick Test II.
Please cite this article in press as: Jin S-Y, et al. Effects of nutritional status and cognitive ability on olfactory function in geriatric
patients. Auris Nasus Larynx (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2015.06.009
G Model
Table 4
Linear regression analysis of factors inuencing body mass index.
Body Mass Index
b-Coefcient
Age
Gender
No. of disease
MMSE
MNA
KVSSII score
Threshold
Discrimination
Identication
0.457
0.095
0.311
0.327
0.330
0.113
0.359
0.116
0.024
SE
p-value
0.085
0.986
0.338
0.185
0.156
0.084
0.167
0.212
0.174
.002
.535
.037
.028
.027
.460
.015
.449
.875
OR (95% CI)
0.287
0.617
0.727
0.420
0.358
0.063
0.421
0.162
0.027
[ 0.459 to 0.115]
[ 1.371 to 2.605]
[0.045 to 1.409]
[0.047 to 0.792]
[0.043 to 0.673]
[ 0.233 to 0.107]
[ 0.757 to 0.085]
[ 0.266 to 0.590]
[ 0.323 to 0.378]
MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MNA, Mini-Nutritional Assessment; KVSSII, Korean version of Snifn Stick Test II.
Fig. 3. Correlations between and serum total protein or albumin levels and body mass index (BMI, A and B), Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scores (C and D), and TDI
(total) score of olfactory function test and b-Coefcient = 0.170 (A), 0.192 (B), 0.147 (C), 0.100 (D), 0.094 (E), and 0.017 (F).
Please cite this article in press as: Jin S-Y, et al. Effects of nutritional status and cognitive ability on olfactory function in geriatric
patients. Auris Nasus Larynx (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2015.06.009
G Model
Financial disclosure
This work (research) was supported by Chungnam National
University Hospital Research Fund 2013.
References
[1] Hoffman HJ, Ishii EK, MacTurk RH. Age-related changes in the prevalence of
smell/taste problems among the United States adult population. Results of the
1994 disability supplement to the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).
Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998;855:71622.
[2] Bramerson A, Johansson L, Ek L, Nordin S, Bende M. Prevalence of olfactory
dysfunction: the skovde population-based study. Laryngoscope 2004;114:7337.
[3] Schiffman SS, Graham BG. Taste and smell perception affect appetite and
immunity in the elderly. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000;54(Suppl. 3):S5463.
[4] Pinto JM, Schumm LP, Wroblewski KE, Kern DW, McClintock MK. Racial
disparities in olfactory loss among older adults in the United States. J Gerontol
A Biol Sci Med Sci 2014;69:3239.
[5] Gopinath B, Sue CM, Kiey A, Mitchell P. The association between olfactory
impairment and total mortality in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
2012;67:2049.
[6] Ahmed T, Haboubi N. Assessment and management of nutrition in older
people and its importance to health. Clin Interv Aging 2010;5:20716.
[7] Mathey MF, Siebelink E, de Graaf C, Van Staveren WA. Flavor enhancement of
food improves dietary intake and nutritional status of elderly nursing home
residents. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001;56:M2005.
[8] Morley JE. Anorexia of aging: physiologic and pathologic. Am J Clin Nutr
1997;66:76073.
[9] Cho JH, Jeong YS, Lee YJ, Hong SC, Yoon JH, Kim JK. The Korean version of the
Snifn stick (KVSS) test and its validity in comparison with the cross-cultural
smell identication test (CC-SIT). Auris Nasus Larynx 2009;36:2806.
[10] Kobal G, Hummel T, Sekinger B, Barz S, Roscher S, Wolf S. Snifn sticks:
screening of olfactory performance. Rhinology 1996;34:2226.
[11] Kim TH, Jhoo JH, Park JH, Kim JL, Ryu SH, Moon SW, et al. Korean version of mini
mental status examination for dementia screening and its short form. Psychiatry Investig 2010;7:1028.
[12] Smoliner C, Fischedick A, Sieber CC, Wirth R. Olfactory function and malnutrition in geriatric patients. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2013;68:15828.
[13] Vellas B, Guigoz Y, Garry PJ, Nourhashemi F, Bennahum D, Lauque S, et al. The
Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and its use in grading the nutritional state
of elderly patients. Nutrition 1999;15:11622.
[14] Vennemann MM, Hummel T, Berger K. The association between smoking and
smell and taste impairment in the general population. J Neurol 2008;255:
11216.
[15] Schubert CR, Cruickshanks KJ, Fischer ME, Huang GH, Klein BE, Klein R, et al.
Olfactory impairment in an adult population: the Beaver Dam Offspring Study.
Chem Senses 2012;37:32534.
[16] Huttenbrink KB, Hummel T, Berg D, Gasser T, Hahner A. Olfactory dysfunction:
common in later life and early warning of neurodegenerative disease. Dtsch
Arztebl Int 2013;110:17. e1.
[17] Hedner M, Larsson M, Arnold N, Zucco GM, Hummel T. Cognitive factors in
odor detection, odor discrimination, and odor identication tasks. J Clin Exp
Neuropsychol 2010;32:10627.
[18] Schubert CR, Carmichael LL, Murphy C, Klein BE, Klein R, Cruickshanks KJ.
Olfaction and the 5-year incidence of cognitive impairment in an epidemiological study of older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:151721.
[19] Conti MZ, Vicini-Chilovi B, Riva M, Zanetti M, Liberini P, Padovani A, et al. Odor
identication decit predicts clinical conversion from mild cognitive impairment to dementia due to Alzheimers disease. Arch Clin Neuropsychol
2013;28:3919.
[20] Olofsson JK, Ronnlund M, Nordin S, Nyberg L, Nilsson LG, Larsson M. Odor
identication decit as a predictor of ve-year global cognitive change: interactive effects with age and ApoE-epsilon4. Behav Genet 2009;39:496503.
[21] Hummel T, Nordin S. Olfactory disorders and their consequences for quality of
life. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;125:11621.
[22] Toller SV. Assessing the impact of anosmia: review of a questionnaires
ndings. Chem Senses 1999;24:70512.
[23] Mattes RD. The chemical senses and nutrition in aging: challenging old
assumptions. J Am Diet Assoc 2002;102:1926.
[24] Henkin RI. Effects of smell loss (hyposmia) on salt usage. Nutrition 2014;30:
6905.
[25] Hickson M, Frost G. A comparison of three methods for estimating height in
the acutely ill elderly population. J Hum Nutr Diet 2003;16:1320.
Please cite this article in press as: Jin S-Y, et al. Effects of nutritional status and cognitive ability on olfactory function in geriatric
patients. Auris Nasus Larynx (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2015.06.009