Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

117 / Monday, June 20, 2005 / Notices 35475

communications relating to the proposed rule change, as amended, on I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s


proposed rule change between the an accelerated basis. Statement of the Terms of Substance of
Commission and any person, other than the Proposed Rule Change
V. Conclusion
those that may be withheld from the The Exchange proposes to amend its
public in accordance with the It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Fee Schedule to adopt a fee cap on
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,15 that the merger spread transactions. The text of
available for inspection and copying in proposed rule change, as amended (File the proposed rule change is available on
the Commission’s Public Reference No. SR–CBOE–2005–26), be approved the Exchange’s Web site (http://
Section. Copies of such filing also will on an accelerated basis. www.cboe.com), at the Office of the
be available for inspection and copying For the Commission, by the Division of Secretary, CBOE, and at the
at the principal office of the CBOE. All Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated Commission.
comments received will be posted authority.16
without change; the Commission does II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Margaret H. McFarland, Statement of the Purpose of, and
not edit personal identifying Deputy Secretary.
information from submissions. You Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
[FR Doc. E5–3150 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am] Change
should submit only information that
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
you wish to make available publicly. All In its filing with the Commission,
submissions should refer to File CBOE included statements concerning
Number SR–CBOE–2005–26 and should the purpose of and basis for the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
be submitted on or before July 11, 2005. proposed rule change and discussed any
COMMISSION
comments it received on the proposed
IV. Commission Findings and Order
rule change. The text of these statements
Granting Accelerated Approval of [Release No. 34–51828; File No. SR–CBOE– may be examined at the places specified
Proposed Rule Change 2005–42] in Item IV below. CBOE has prepared
The Commission finds that the summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
proposed rule change, as amended, is and C below, of the most significant
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
consistent with the requirements of the aspects of such statements.
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Act and the rules and regulations
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
thereunder applicable to a national
Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Statement of the Purpose of, and
securities exchange.12 In particular, the
Thereto Relating to a Fee Cap for Statutory Basis for, Proposed Rule
Commission finds that the proposed
Options Merger Spread Transactions Change
rule change, as amended, is consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,13 which June 13, 2005. 1. Purpose
requires, in part, that the rules of an Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the The Exchange currently caps market-
exchange be designed to remove Securities Exchange Act of 1934 maker, firm, and broker-dealer
impediments to and perfect the (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 transaction fees associated with
mechanism of a free and open market notice is hereby given that on May 23, ‘‘dividend spread’’ transactions at
and a national market system, and in 2005, the Chicago Board Options $2,000 for all dividend spread
general, to protect investors and the Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’ or transactions executed on the same
public interest. The Commission ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities trading day in the same options class.6
believes that the proposed rule change and Exchange Commission According to the Exchange, a dividend
reflects the change in methodology for (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule spread is defined as any trade done to
calculating the index settlement value of change as described in Items I, II, and achieve a dividend arbitrage between
the Nasdaq 100 Index and clarifies that III below, which Items have been any two deep-in-the-money options.
the settlement values of A.M. settled prepared by CBOE. On May 31, 2005, The Exchange proposes to amend its
index options may be determined using the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to Fee Schedule to adopt a similar fee cap
an opening price other than the first the proposed rule change.3 The for ‘‘merger spread’’ transactions.7
reported sale. Exchange designated the proposed rule Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
The Commission finds good cause for change, as amended, as establishing or cap market-maker, firm, and broker-
accelerating approval of the proposed changing a due, fee, or other charge dealer transaction fees at $2,000 for all
rule change, as amended, prior to the imposed by the Exchange under Section merger spread transactions executed on
thirtieth day after publication in the 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,4 and Rule the same trading day in the same
Federal Register. The Commission notes 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,5 which renders options class. Because the Exchange
that accelerating approval of the the proposal effective upon filing with believes that merger spread transactions
proposed rule change will allow the the Commission. The Commission is have similar economic risks and are
Exchange to timely reflect in its rules publishing this notice to solicit
the manner in which Nasdaq proposes comments on the proposed rule change,
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51468

to calculate the current index value at (April 1, 2005), 70 FR 17742 (April 7, 2005) (SR–
as amended, from interested parties. CBOE–2005–18). The dividend spread fee cap
expiration for the Nasdaq 100 Index program is in effect as a pilot program that will
starting with the June 2005 expiration. 15 Id. expire on September 1, 2005.
Accordingly, the Commission finds 16 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
7 According to the Exchange, a merger spread

good cause, consistent with Section 1 15


U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
transaction is defined as a transaction executed
19(b)(2) of the Act,14 to approve the 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
pursuant to a strategy involving the simultaneous
purchase and sale of options of the same class and
3 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange replaced the
expiration date, but with different strike prices,
12 In approving this proposal, the Commission has first paragraph under Item 3 of the Form 19b–4 to followed by the exercise of the resulting long
considered its impact on efficiency, competition, correct a formatting error that appeared in the options position, each executed prior to the date on
and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). original filing. which shareholders of record are required to elect
13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
their respective form of consideration, i.e., cash or
14 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 5 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). stock.

VerDate jul<14>2003 17:24 Jun 17, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM 20JNN1
35476 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 117 / Monday, June 20, 2005 / Notices

executed in similar ways as dividend At any time within 60 days of the filing available for inspection and copying at
spread transactions, the Exchange of the proposed rule change, the the principal office of the Exchange. All
believes adopting this fee cap would Commission may summarily abrogate comments received will be posted
attract additional liquidity and should such rule change if it appears to the without change; the Commission does
permit the Exchange to remain Commission that such action is not edit personal identifying
competitive. necessary or appropriate in the public information from submissions. You
Similar to the dividend spread fee cap interest, for the protection of investors, should submit only information that
program, the merger spread fee cap or otherwise in furtherance of the you wish to make available publicly. All
would be in effect as a pilot program purposes of the Act.13 submissions should refer to File
that would expire on September 1, 2005. Number SR–CBOE–2005–42 and should
The Exchange represents that the IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to be submitted on or before July 11, 2005.
proposed fee cap is similar to merger
spread fee caps adopted by other submit written data, views and For the Commission, by the Division of
exchanges.8 arguments concerning the foregoing, Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
As is done under the current dividend including whether the proposed rule authority.14
spread fee cap program, the Exchange change is consistent with the Act. Margaret H. McFarland,
would rebate transaction fees for Comments may be submitted by any of Deputy Secretary.
qualifying merger spread transactions. the following methods: [FR Doc. E5–3158 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am]
To qualify transactions for the cap, a
Electronic Comments BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
rebate request form, along with
supporting documentation (e.g., clearing • Use the Commission’s Internet
firm transaction data), must be comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
submitted to the Exchange within 30
• Send an e-mail to rule- COMMISSION
days of the transactions.
comments@sec.gov. Please include File
2. Statutory Basis Number SR–CBOE–2005–42 on the [Release No. 34–51824; File No. SR–CBOE–
The Exchange believes that the subject line. 2005–45]
proposed rule change is consistent with Paper Comments
Section 6(b) of the Act,9 in general, and Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,10 in • Send paper comments in triplicate Chicago Board Options Exchange,
particular, in that it provides for the to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, Securities and Exchange Commission, Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
fees, and other charges among CBOE 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC Rule Change To Modify the Designated
members and other persons using its 20549–9303. Primary Market-Maker Participation
facilities. All submissions should refer to File Entitlement for Orders Specifying a
Number SR–CBOE–2005–42. This file Preferred DPM
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s number should be included on the
Statement on Burden on Competition subject line if e-mail is used. To help the June 10, 2005.
CBOE does not believe that the Commission process and review your Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
proposed rule change will impose any comments more efficiently, please use Securities Exchange Act of 1934
burden on competition that is not only one method. The Commission will (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
necessary or appropriate in furtherance post all comments on the Commission’s
notice is hereby given that on June 6,
of purposes of the Act. Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
2005, the Chicago Board Options
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’ or
submission, all subsequent
Statement on Comments on the amendments, all written statements ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
Proposed Rule Change Received From with respect to the proposed rule and Exchange Commission
Members, Participants, or Others change that are filed with the (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
No written comments were solicited Commission, and all written change as described in Items I and II
or received with respect to the proposed communications relating to the below, which Items have been prepared
rule change. proposed rule change between the by the CBOE. The CBOE filed the
Commission and any person, other than proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
III. Date of Effectiveness of the of the Act,3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
those that may be withheld from the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for thereunder,4 which renders the proposal
public in accordance with the
Commission Action effective upon filing with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
The foregoing rule change has become available for inspection and copying in Commission.5 The Commission is
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) the Commission’s Public Reference publishing this notice to solicit
of the Act 11 and subparagraph (f)(2) of Room. Copies of such filing also will be comments on the proposed rule change
Rule 19b–4 thereunder12 because it from interested persons.
establishes or changes a due, fee, or 13 The effective date of the original proposed rule

other charge imposed by the Exchange. change is May 23, 2005, the date of the original 14 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
filing, and the effective date of the amendment is 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 51596 May 31, 2005, the date of filing of Amendment No. 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1. For purposes of calculating the 60-day period
(April 21, 2005), 70 FR 22381 (April 29, 2005) (SR– 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
within which the Commission may summarily
PHLX–2005–19) and 51787 (June 6, 2005), 70 FR 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
abrogate the proposed rule change, as amended,
34174 (June 13, 2005) (SR–PCX–2005–65).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
under Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the 5 The Exchange provided the Commission with

Commission considers the period to commence on written notice of its intention to file the proposed
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
May 31, 2005, the date on which the Exchange rule change on June 3, 2005. The Exchange has
11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
submitted Amendment No. 1. See 15 U.S.C. requested that the Commission waive the 30-day
12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 78s(b)(3)(C). operative delay. 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).

VerDate jul<14>2003 17:24 Jun 17, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM 20JNN1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen