Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
BY
Jednipat
Puechpanpaisan
Nuttawut
Meekla
Muhammad Hamza Sarwar
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Wanchai Asvapoositkul
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
KING MONGKUTS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY THONBURI
Outline
Introduction
Literature Review
Objectives
Scope of research
Time schedule
P. 2
Introduction
Fig.1
Ref: https://whatiswatertreatment.files.wordpress.com
Fig. 2
P. 3
Introduction
Cooling tower
Types?
Wet cooling
tower
Dry cooling
tower
Hybrid (wet/dry)
cooling tower
P. 4
Disadvantages
Water loss
Advantages
High performance
Low power consumption
P. 5
Advantages
No water loss
Easy to clean because it is a close system
No water basin
Disadvantages
Low performance
Large size
High power consumption
P. 6
Advantages
Low water consumption
High performance than Dry cooling
tower
Disadvantages
Difficult to operating
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
P. 7
Fig. 11
- Mechanical draft
- Counter flow
induced draft
P. 8
Literature Review
(2011)
(2008-2009)
Treeutok, S. [6]
Performance capability mechanical
draft counter flow cooling tower
Predict characteristic curve with CTI
standard
Analyze Thermal performance with
CTI standard and TDA then compared
(2012)
-
P. 9
Literature Review
Kuansathan, T. [7], [8]
Result
Experimental conditions
ratio ( )
P. 10
Literature Review
Our conditions
Experimental conditions
Range
of dry
section
Range
of wet
section
Tdb,in = 50
Tdb,out = 47
Twb = 23 30
Tdb = 28 35
Resource: Thai Meteorological Department at Don Mueang airport station
P. 11
Parameters
P. 12
Parameters
P. 13
Parameters
P. 14
Parameters
P. 15
Parameters
Effectiveness
[7]
[7]
P. 16
Parameters
P. 17
Objectives
1. To study how Hybrid (dry/wet) cooling tower works
2. To study performance of a Hybrid (dry/wet) cooling tower
3. To study the proper functioning of dry and wet cooling tower from performance curve
P. 18
Scope of work
1. To study principle operating of the experimental equipment of Hybrid (dry/wet)
cooling tower that consist of Casing & Louver, Water Distribution System, Fans, Fill,
Collection Basin, Drift Elimination, Radiator and Pump
2. To study performance of Hybrid (dry/wet) cooling tower
3. Use COP as the benchmark to comparison heat exchanger performance of the
three kinds of cooling tower
P. 19
Time schedule
Procedure
2015
Jul. Aug.
Sep.
Oct. Nov.
2016
Dec. Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr. May.
P. 20
Reference
1. ASHRAE Handbook HVAC Systems and Equipment, 2012, Chapter 40 Cooling tower, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.,
4. Asvapoosikul, W. and Kuansathan, T., 2014, Comparative evaluation of hybrid (dry/wet) cooling tower performance, Journal of Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol.
71, pp. 83-93.
5. Ebrahim Rezaei, Sirous Shafiei, Aydin Abdollahnezhad, 2008 2009, Reducing water consumption of an industrial plant cooling unit using hybrid cooling tower,
7. Mantheerapol Kuansathan, 2012, Performance Evaluation of Hybrid (Wet/Dry) Cooling Tower in Thailand, Journal of Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 51,
pp. 311 319.
8. Mantheerapol Kuansathan, 2012, Computational Model and Analysis of Hybrid (Wet/Dry) Cooling Tower Concept for Thailand, Cooling Technology Institute, Vol.
31, pp. 2 23.
P. 21
End
P. 22
Make up
Introduction
Cooling Tower Types ?
(By flow type)
Mechanical draft
Counter flow
induced draft
Counter flow
forced draft
Natural draft
Cross flow
induced draft
Cross flow
forced draft
P. 1
Fig. 2
Ref: http://spxcooling.com/
P. 2
P. 3
P. 4
Picture
P. 5
Method
P. 6