30440 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.
101 / Thursday, May 26, 2005 / Notices
(subpart E) mills under 40 CFR part 430
as part of the effluent limitations
guidelines and standards promulgated
on April 15, 1998. As a result, the
permitting and pretreatment control
authority requires applicable facilities
subject to subparts B or E to monitor
their effluent for adsorbable organic
halides (AOX), 2,3,7,8-
tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD),
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (TCDF),
chloroform, and 12 chlorinated
phenolics at specified frequencies. See
40 CFR 430.02. Under 40 CFR
122.41(e)(4), the discharger must then
report these monitoring results to the
permitting or pretreatment control
authority using either Discharge
Monitoring Reports (DMRs) or Periodic
Compliance Reports (PCRs). These
minimum monitoring requirements and
corresponding reporting requirements
are necessary to demonstrate
compliance with the effluent limitations
guidelines and standards promulgated
at 40 CFR part 430, subparts B and E.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for EPA’s regulations in 40
CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and are
identified on the form and/or
instrument, if applicable.
Burden Statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average 361 hours per
response. Burden means the total time,
effort, or financial resources expended
by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency. This includes the
time needed to review instructions;
develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes
of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements; train personnel to be able
to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information.
Respondents/Affected Entities:
Operations that chemically pulp wood
fiber using kraft or soda methods to
produce bleached papergrade pulp,
paperboard, coarse paper, tissue paper,
fine paper, and/or paperboard; and
those operations that chemically pump
wood fiber using papergrade sulfite
methods to produce pulp and/or paper.
VerDate jul<14>2003 19:11 May 25, 2005 Jkt 205001
Estimated Number of Respondents:
138.
Frequency of Response: No less than
annually for direct dischargers and no
less than twice annually for indirect
dischargers.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:
37,544.
Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$15,086,000, which includes $0 annual
capital/startup costs, $13,819,000
annual O&M costs and $1,267,000
annual labor costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is
slight increase in the burden hours
currently identified in the OMB
Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens
which is due to an adjustment in the
number of respondents. There is a
decrease in the annual cost due to the
fact that the one-time capital costs
incurred under the original ICR are not
included in this renewal ICR.
Dated: May 18, 2005.
Oscar Morales,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 05–10495 Filed 5–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[R08–OAR–2005–UT–0005; FRL–7916–9]
Adequacy Determination for the Ogden
City Area Carbon Monoxide
Maintenance State Implementation
Plan for Transportation Conformity
Purposes; State of Utah
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of adequacy.
SUMMARY: In this document, EPA is
notifying the public that we have found
that the motor vehicle emissions budget
for 2021 in the Ogden, Utah Carbon
Monoxide Maintenance Plan, that was
submitted by Utah Governor Olene S.
Walker on November 29, 2004, is
adequate for transportation conformity
purposes. 40 CFR 93.118(e)(2) requires
that EPA declare an implementation
plan submission’s motor vehicle
emissions budget adequate for
conformity purposes prior to the budget
being used to satisfy the conformity
requirements of 40 CFR part 93. As a
result of our finding, the Wasatch Front
Regional Council of Governments, the
Utah Department of Transportation and
the U.S. Department of Transportation
are required to use the motor vehicle
emissions budget from this submitted
maintenance plan for future
transportation conformity
determinations.
PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
DATES: This finding is effective June 10,
2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Kimes, Air & Radiation Program
(8P–AR), United States Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 8, 999 18th
Street, Suite 300, Denver, Colorado
80202–2466, (303) 312–6445,
kimes.jeffrey@epa.gov.
The letter documenting our finding is
available at EPA’s conformity Web site:
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/transp/
conform/adequacy.htm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’,
or ‘‘our’’ are used to mean EPA.
This action is simply an
announcement of a finding that we have
already made. We sent a letter to the
Utah Division of Air Quality on May 2,
2005, stating that the motor vehicle
emission budget in the submitted
Ogden, Utah Carbon Monoxide
Maintenance Plan is adequate. This
finding has also been announced on our
conformity Web site at http://
www.epa.gov/otaq/transp/conform/
adequacy.htm.
Transportation conformity is required
by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act.
Our conformity rule requires that
transportation plans, programs, and
projects conform to SIPs and establishes
the criteria and procedures for
determining whether or not they
demonstrate conformity. Conformity to
a SIP means that transportation
activities will not produce new air
quality violations, worsen existing
violations, or delay timely attainment of
the national ambient air quality
standards.
The criteria by which we determine
whether a SIP’s motor vehicle emission
budgets are adequate for conformity
purposes are outlined in 40 CFR
93.118(e)(4). Please note that an
adequacy review is separate from our
completeness review, and it also should
not be used to prejudge our ultimate
approval of the SIP. Even if we find a
budget adequate, the SIP could later be
disapproved, and vice versa.
The process for determining the
adequacy of a transportation conformity
budget is described at 40 CFR 93.118(f).
For the reader’s ease, we have
excerpted the motor vehicle emission
budget from the Ogden, Utah Carbon
Monoxide Maintenance Plan and it is as
follows: Motor vehicle emissions budget
for the year 2021 is 73.02 tons per day
of CO. 40 CFR 93.118(e)(1) requires that
previously approved budgets for years
other than 2021 must still be used in
any conformity determination until the
maintenance plan is fully approved by
EPA.
26MYN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 101 / Thursday, May 26, 2005 / Notices
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 10, 2005.
Robert E. Roberts,
Regional Administrator, Region VIII.
[FR Doc. 05–10496 Filed 5–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[OPP–2004–0369; FRL–7711–5]
Chloroneb Risk Assessment; Related
Document, and Input on Risk
Management; Notice of Availability
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
availability of EPA’s risk assessments,
and related documents for the fungicide,
chloroneb and opens a public comment
period on these documents. The public
is also encouraged to suggest risk
management ideas or proposals to
address the risks identified. EPA is
developing a Reregistration Eligibility
Decision (RED) for Chloroneb through a
modified, 4-Phase public participation
process that the Agency uses to involve
the public in developing pesticide
reregistration and tolerance
reassessment decisions. Through these
programs, EPA is ensuring that all
pesticides meet current health and
safety standards.
DATES: Comments, identified by docket
identification (ID) number OPP–2004–
0369, must be received on or before July
25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted electronically, by mail, or
through hand delivery/courier. Follow
the detailed instructions as provided in
Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wilhelmena Livingston, Special Review
and Reregistration Division (7508C),
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 308–8025; fax number: (703) 308–
8041; e-mail
address:livingston.wilhelmena@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
This action is directed to the public
in general, and may be of interest to a
wide range of stakeholders including
environmental, human health, and
agricultural advocates; the chemical
VerDate jul<14>2003 19:11 May 25, 2005 Jkt 205001
industry; pesticide users; and members
of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since
others may also be interested, the
Agency has not attempted to describe all
the specific entities that may be affected
by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How Can I Get Copies of this
Document and Other Related
Information?
1. Docket. EPA has established an
official public docket for this action
under docket ID number OPP–2004–
0369. The official public docket consists
of the documents specifically referenced
in this action, any public comments
received, and other information related
to this action. Although, a part of the
official docket, the public docket does
not include Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
The official public docket is the
collection of materials that is available
for public viewing at the Public
Information and Records Integrity
Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall
#2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA. This
docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The docket
telephone number is (703) 305–5805.
2. Electronic access. You may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
An electronic version of the public
docket is available through EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA
Dockets at http://www.epa.gov/edocket/
to submit or view public comments,
access the index listing of the contents
of the official public docket, and to
access those documents in the public
docket that are available electronically.
Once in the system, select ‘‘search,’’
then key in the appropriate docket ID
number.
Certain types of information will not
be placed in the EPA Dockets.
Information claimed as CBI and other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute, which is not
included in the official public docket,
will not be available for public viewing
in EPA’s electronic public docket. EPA’s
policy is that copyrighted material will
not be placed in EPA’s electronic public
docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public
docket. To the extent feasible, publicly
available docket materials will be made
PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
30441
available in EPA’s electronic public
docket. When a document is selected
from the index list in EPA Dockets, the
system will identify whether the
document is available for viewing in
EPA’s electronic public docket.
Although, not all docket materials may
be available electronically, you may still
access any of the publicly available
docket materials through the docket
facility identified in Unit I.B.1. EPA
intends to work towards providing
electronic access to all of the publicly
available docket materials through
EPA’s electronic public docket.
For public commenters, it is
important to note that EPA’s policy is
that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or on paper,
will be made available for public
viewing in EPA’s electronic public
docket as EPA receives them and
without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. When EPA
identifies a comment containing
copyrighted material, EPA will provide
a reference to that material in the
version of the comment that is placed in
EPA’s electronic public docket. The
entire printed comment, including the
copyrighted material, will be available
in the public docket.
Public comments submitted on
computer disks that are mailed or
delivered to the docket will be
transferred to EPA’s electronic public
docket. Public comments that are
mailed or delivered to the docket will be
scanned and placed in EPA’s electronic
public docket. Where practical, physical
objects will be photographed, and the
photograph will be placed in EPA’s
electronic public docket along with a
brief description written by the docket
staff.
C. How and to Whom Do I Submit
Comments?
You may submit comments
electronically, by mail, or through hand
delivery/courier. To ensure proper
receipt by EPA, identify the appropriate
docket ID number in the subject line on
the first page of your comment. Please
ensure that your comments are
submitted within the specified comment
period. Comments received after the
close of the comment period will be
marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to
consider these late comments. If you
wish to submit CBI or information that
is otherwise protected by statute, please
follow the instructions in Unit I.D. Do
not use EPA Dockets or e-mail to submit
CBI or information protected by statute.
1. Electronically. If you submit an
electronic comment as prescribed in this
26MYN1