Design of PCC Abutment

DESIGN OF PCC ABUTMENT - OPEN FOUNDATION
For "T beam cum slab " super structure with four beams& with footpath on both sides
Name of Work: Reconstruction of Bridge
ALL CELLS IN RED COLOUR ARE MEANT FOR DATA INPUT
Expansion
40 mm Thickness of Wearing Coat
75 mm
Approach slab
Road level
RL 102.450
395 mm
Depth of Super Structure @ Centre =
= 22.5 0
2166 mm
2166
= 90 0
Depth of Super Structure @ Edges =
2030 mm
96 mm
200 mm
300 mm
BOB
RL 99.619
300 320 380 50
Start of Batter
RL 99.619
1000
= 22.5 0
=
99.68
ka2 =
0.320
105.5
3519
MFL
1211
RL 99.000
0
1000
a
276
1552
Ground level
RL 98.000
1900
Toe side
Heel side
b
500
600
1000
2800
1200
500
top of fdn
RL 96.100
500
700
2100 1400
500
600
700
700
1000
600
2200
5400
RL
1600
94.000
Pressure Developed in kN/m2

Minimum
no tension
58.29
Maximum
Normal Case
184.01
< 233
Seismic Case
231.64
< 292
for soil, tension is not permitted,cl.706.3.3.1

In case of rock, refer cl 706.3.3.2
no tension
21.85
DESIGN OF PCC ABUTMENT

General Data:
Roadway of the bridge
Overall Length of span
13
Width of abutment in roadway direction
Width of bearing
250
320 360 400
Length of bearing
400
500 560 630
Thickness of bearing
48
64 80 96 112
Thickness of steel plate
No. of steel plate layers
No of bearings in Abutment
Intensity of footway loading ( Vide Cl 209.1 IRC:6-2000 )
Width of footpath
0 1.5
Longitudinal Gradient (only in case of ROB)
camber in carriage way
Skew Angle
Corrected N value at bottom of foundation for soil
SEISMIC DATA
Zone as per Fig. 11- IS 1893 (Part I) 2002
BACKFILL SOIL PROPERTIES
Unit wt of soil
Angle of internal friction
Angle of surcharge
Slope of earth fill
Coeff of friction between Concrete and Founding Soil/rock
Equivalent height of surcharge
MATERIAL DATA
Grade of concrete
20 25
30 35
Dead load (total dead load of 1 span)
Unit weight of RCC, 2
Unit weight of PCC, 1
Maximum Live load reaction+ footpath live load
Maximum Live load coming over the span
Derived / Known Data
Carriageway of the bridge
No of lanes
Intensity of live load on footpath for effective span of m
Effective span of super structure
Thickness of wearing coat (ave)
Depth of Superstructure at centre
Thickness of Superstructure at edges
Thickness of expansion gap
Effective thickness of bearing
Pedestal height
Road level at centre
Bottom of Deck Slab
level at top of fdn
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
12.00
21.56
12.00
400
500
96
4
4
4
400
1.5
0
0.025
0.0
28
=
=
=
=
=
=
18
35
0
0
0.5
1.20
=
=
M30 kN/m3
4950 kN
25 kN/m3
=
=
=
22 kN/m2
837.2 kN
1000.0 kN
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
7.50 m
2
3.4 kN/m2
21.00 m
75 mm
2.166 m
2.030 m
40 mm
72 mm
200 mm
RL102.450
RL100.209
RL96.100
m
m
m
mm
mm
mm
mm
kg/m2
kN/m2
0
0
0
Cl.706.3.4 of IRC 78-2000
m
Bottom of Foundation Level

Length of abutment at top of foundation level
Length of abutment at foundation level
Front Batter
Rear Batter
Backwall portion
Bearing portion
Bed block height
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
RL94.000
12.000 m
16.060 m
1.20 m
0.60 m
0.30 m
0.70 m
0.30 m
=
=
-0.67 N/mm2
-0.603 N/mm2
PERMISSIBLE STRESSES
Permissible tensile stress in concrete
If surface reinforcement is not provided, permissible stress
Calculation of Live load Reaction
Class 70R wheeled loading - One lane
4.42
170
170
170
1.37
3.05
1.37
5.79
170
cbc
7.92
120
9.44
120
2.13
1.52
13.40
3.96 80
3.0
7.9
0.280
0.280
21.00
A
RA
kN
727.29
kN
Total Load on Span
RB
=
1000.00
272.7
kN
Class 70R tracked loading - One lane

4.570
700
kN
0.280
0.280
21.00
kN
RA
633.17
kN
Total Load on Span
RB
=
700.00
66.83
kN
Class A wheeled loading - one lane

4.3
5.5
27
27
114
114
1.1
3.2
1.2
4.3
3
9.8 12.8
68
68
3.0
3
3.0
15.8
68
18.8
68
3.0
2.5
0.280
0.280
RA
21.00
321.55
kN
Total Load on Span
for one lane

=
Class A wheeled loading - Two lane
RB =
1108.00
=
kN
643.107
kN
232.4
kN
Summary of Live load
Vehicle type
Class 70R Wheeled
Class 70R Tracked
Class A wheeled - 2 lane
Reaction
without
impact
727.29
633.17
643.11
Impt.
factor
Impact
factor at
bottom of
fdn
Rn with
impact at
bottom of
foundation
%
16.67
10.00
16.67
%
0.000
0.000
0.000
kN
727.3
633.2
643.1
Imp.
factor Rn with impact
at top
at top of
of fdn
foundation
kN
0.000
0.000
0.000
kN
727.3
633.2
643.1
Rn with
impact at
top of
bedblock
kN
848.52
696.48
750.31
Combination of Live load considered
Combination
1
1
Vehicles considerd
Class 70RW - 1 Lane
Footpath
No of
lanes
1
Reaction
727.29
3.4x21.56x1x1.5
Class 70RT-1 Lane

Footpath
633.17
3.4x21.56x1x1.5
Class A wheeled
Footpath
321.55
3.4x21.56x1x1.5
Total
load
727.29
109.96
837.24
633.17
109.96
743.12
643.11
109.96
753.06
load on
span
1000.00
700.00
1108.00
Max vertical reaction + footpath liveload

Load on span for the above max reaction
=
=
837.24
1000
kN
kN
Max load on span

Vertical reaction for max load on span
=
=
1108
643.1
kN
kN
Combination 1 is considered
290261999.xls
ABUTMENT PRESSURE CALCULATIONS AT SILL LEVEL

Straight length of Abutment at top
=
12.00 m
Effective length of Abutment at sill level
=
12.00 + 2
x(
1.20
sec(0)
)x
=
14.40 m
Dead Load reaction
=
2475.000
kN
Live load reaction at sill
=
727.286
kN
foot path liveload
=
109.96
kN
Pressure Calculation at Sill level
Stress due to Active Earth pressure
Coefficient of earth pressure Ka
=
sin2( x 1
sin2()x sin()x(1+K2)
K
sin() x sin()
sin() x sin()
35
90 +
tan-1(batter width/batter height)
where,
tan-1(
0.60 )
3.519
9.7
99.68
22.5
0.0
sin(35+22.5) x sin(35-0)
sin(99.68+22.5) x sin(99.68-0)
0.48
0.83
=
Ka
0.76
sin2(99.68-35) x1
sin2(99.68)xsin(99.68+22.5)x(1+0.76)^2)
0.817
2.552
0.32
Active earth pressure

Earth pressure
Ka
1/2 x g x h2 x Ka
0.5x18x6.35x6.35x0.32
=
Kah
Lever arm for pressure P2
116.13 KN
0.32 x cos(9.68+22.5)
0.42 x 6.35
2.67
0.271
m from sill
SILL-check
Page 7
290261999.xls
a)Horizontal component of earth pressure PH
=
=
SILL-check
116.13 x cos(9.68+22.5)
98.29 kN
Page 8
290261999.xls
Modulus of section Z=
b x d2 where d =
1.2+0.6+0.3+0.7 =
2.80
1.00 x (2.8)
6
=
Moment
1.31
98.293x0.42x6.35
=
Stress =
+ M/Z
m3
262.15 KN-M
= +
262.1
1.31
= +
201 kN/m2
Stress due to Horizontal Earth Pressure at Heel
-200.6 kN/m2
Stress due to Horizontal Earth Pressure at Toe
200.6 kN/m2
Stress due to Live Load surcharge

Earth pressure due to a fill of 1.2m
0.32x18x1.2
=
Horizontal force due to live load surcharge
5.85
Modulus of section Z =
KN/M
5.85x6.35
=
Moment due to this force
x cos(9.68+22.5)
2
37.15
KN/M
37.15x0.5x6.35
117.95 KN-M
1 x 2.8
6
=
Stress =
+ M/Z
1.3067 m3
= +
117.952
1.307
= + 90.2693
kN/m2
Stress due to Earth Pressure at Heel
-90.27
kN/m2
Stress due to Earth Pressure at Toe
90.27
kN/m2
Stress due to Dead Load reaction

Total Dead load reaction from abutment
2475.000
Intensity of the Dead load
2475.000
kN
14.40
=
Eccentricity
171.88 kN/m
2.80
-(0.6+0.3+0.04+0.28)
2
=
0.180
Stress due to Dead load reaction

P x 1 + 6e
A
=
d
171.88
x(
1+6x(
2.80
))
2.80
Stress due to Dead load reaction at Heel
85.06
kN/m
Stress due to Dead load reaction at Toe
37.71
kN/m2
SILL-check
0.18
Page 9
290261999.xls
Stress due to Live load reaction

Maximum Live load reaction from abutment
837.2 kN
837.2
14.40
=
Eccentricity
58.142 kN/m
0.180
P x 1 + 6e=
A
58.142
d
m
x(
1+6x(
2.80
0.18
))
2.80
Stress due to Live load reaction at Heel
28.77
kN/m
Stress due to Live load reaction at Toe
12.76
kN/m2
Stress due to Self weight

No.
L x B x unit weight
Wt/m
Lever
Moment About Heel
arm
0.30
2.537
25
19.03
0.75
14.271
1.025
0.30
25
7.69
1.1125
8.552
0.5
0.60
22
23.2
0.4
9.290
0.30
3.519
22
23.2
0.75
17.419
0.70
3.519
22
54.2
1.25
67.741
0.5
1.20
22
46.45
2.00
92.902
Total
173.8
3.519
3.519
C.G. from Heel
210.175
210.2
1.2092 m
173.8
Eccentricity
2.80
1.2092
2
=
P x 1 + 6e
A
=
d
0.191
173.8
m
x(
1+6x(
2.80
0.19
))
2.800
Stress due to Self weight at Heel
87.45
kN/m
Stress due to Self weight at Toe
36.70
kN/m2
Maximum Load coming over the span
1000.000
kN
Braking force (20 % of the load on span)
200.000
kN
200x( 1.2+2.241)
Stress due to Longitudinal Force due to Braking effect
This force acts at 1.20m above road level

Vertical reaction due to Braking
=
Eccentricity
Stress due to Braking effect
=
P x 1 + 6e
A
=
d
21.0
2.29
kN
0.180
2.29
14.40
m
x(
1+6x(
2.80
))
2.800
Stress due to Braking effect at Heel
1.13
kN/m
Stress due to Braking effect at Toe
0.50
kN/m2
SILL-check
0.18
Page 10
290261999.xls
Stress due to Longitudinal force
(Cl.214.5.1.4 - IRC :6 - 2000)

Fh/2
=
+
Longitudinal force
Where Fh
Vr Itc
Applied horizontal force.
Vr
Shear rating of elastic bearing
Itc
Movement of deck above bearing other

than that due to applied force
Es
Strain due to shrinkage
Temperature variation
2.00E-04
Coefficient of expansion
Strain due to Temperature variation Et
Total strain Es + Et
Horizontal deformation due to above strain
17.0
(Cl.220.3 -IRC:6 -2000)
deg
1.17E-05
1.99E-04
(1 x a x t)
2.00E-04
3.99E-04
(Cl.218.4 -IRC:6 -2000)

1.99E-04
0.0003989x21.56x10^3/2
4.30E+00
mm
Total thickness of bearing
96
mm
96
Shear strain
(4x4) =
4.3/80 =
80
5.38E-02
Considering 10% variation in the efficiency of the bearing force developed

1.1
x 0.9 x
5E-02
x400x500x4x0.001
=
Total longitudinal force
42.570
200/2+42.57
=
Intensity of the force per metre run
142.57

bxd
9.9007
KN
9.9007
40.682 KN-M
1 x 2.8
at bearing level
4.109
2
6
=
-M/Z
KN
142.57/14.4
6
Stress due to long. force at Heel
KN
1.3067
40.682
m3
31.13
kN/m2
31.13
kN/m2
1.3067
Stress due to long force at Toe
+M/Z =
40.682
1.3067
b)Without liveload
42.57/14.4
2.9563
1 x 2.8
b x d2
6
42.570 KN
acts at bearing level

=
x
4.109 =
2
2.9563
KN
12.147 kN-m
1.3067 m3
Stress due to longitudinal force at Heel
-M/Z
12.147
1.3067
Stress due to longitudinal force at Toe
9.2964
+M/Z =
12.1472
SILL-check
kN/m2
Page 11
290261999.xls
1.3067
=
SILL-check
9.2964
kN/m2
Page 12
290261999.xls
ABSTRACT OF STRESSES AT SILL LEVEL AT RL
98.000
Without seismic (with live load condition)

No.
Stress due to
Dry condition Mpa

At Heel
At Toe
1 Active Earth pressure
-0.20062
0.20062
2 Live load surcharge
0.00000
0.00000
3 Dead load
0.08506
0.03771
4 Live load
0.02877
0.01276
5 Self weight
0.08745
0.03670
6 Braking effect
0.00113
0.00050
7 Longitudinal force
-0.03113
0.03113
-0.02934
0.31942
Net Stress with Earth

Pressure
Permissible Tensile stress for
M30 grade of concrete is -0.603 Mpa
The stresses are within the permissible limits.Hence the section is safe
Without seismic (without live load condition)
No.
Stress due to
Dry condition Mpa

At Heel
At Toe
-0.20062
0.20062
-0.09027
0.09027
3 Dead load
0.08506
0.03771
4 Live load
0.00000
0.00000
5 Self weight
0.08745
0.03670
6 Braking effect
0.00000
0.00000
-0.00930
0.00930
-0.12768
0.37459

Pressure
With seismic (with live load condition)
No.
Stress due to
Dry condition Mpa

At Heel
At Toe
-0.20062
0.20062
0.00000
0.00000
3 Dead load
0.08506
0.03771
4 Live load
0.01439
0.00638
5 Self weight
0.08745
0.03670
6 Braking effect
0.00057
0.00025
-0.02022
0.02022
8 Seismic force
-0.15817
0.15817
-0.19154
0.46004

Pressure
SILL-check
Page 13
290261999.xls
With seismic (without live load condition)
No.
Stress due to
Dry condition Mpa

At Heel
At Toe
-0.20062
0.20062
-0.04513
0.04513
3 Dead load
0.08506
0.03771
4 Live load
0.00000
0.00000
5 Self weight
0.08745
0.03670
6 Braking effect
0.00000
0.00000
-0.00930
0.00930
8 Seismic force
-0.14998
0.14998
-0.23252
0.47944

Pressure
SILL-check
Page 14
290261999.xls
ABUTMENT PRESSURE CALCULATIONS AT THE

Corrected N value
=
28
Overburden pressure
=
64.00
Footing No.1
Front offset
=
0.600
Rear offset
=
0.500
Height
=
0.700
Footing No.2
Front offset
=
0.500
Rear offset
=
0.000
Height
=
0.700
Footing No.3
Front offset
=
0.500
Rear offset
=
0.500
Height
Bottom of Foundation level

Width of foundation
=
=
SBC of actual width of foundation
=
=
0.700
BOTTOM OF FOUNDATION
kN/m2
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
RL94.000
2.8 + 0.6 + 0.5 + 0.5 + 0
+ 0.5 + 0.5
5.400
m
3.5x(N-3)x(B+0.3)2xRwxFd+overburdenpr
2xB
Rw
water reduction factor
Fd
Depth factor
(1+D/B)
=
1+(2.1 / 5.4)
=
1.4
3.5x(28-3)x(5.4+0.3)2x0.5x1.389x10 +64
2x5.4
=
233.257
kN/m2
=
12+(2x(1.2+0.6+0.5+
0.5)
x sec
=
17.60 m
Length of abutment at foundation level

Stress due to Dead load
Dead load reaction
Eccentricity from Heel =
Stress
=
=
5.40
2
P x 1 + 6e
A
d
Stress due to DL reaction at Heel
Stress due to DL reaction at Toe
Maximum Live load reaction from abutment
Intensity of the Live load
Eccentricity
0.50
-(
=
0.6
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
P x 1+ 6e =
A
d
Fdn-check
2475.000
2475.000
17.60
140.625 kN/m
+
0.3
+
0.28
0.000
+
0.480
140.625
x(
5.400
39.9306
12.1528
kN
837.242
837.242
17.60
47.5706 kN/m
0.480
47.5706
x(
5.40
kN
+
+
0.50
m
1+6x(
0.04
0.5
)
+
+
0.480
5.400
kN/m2
kN/m2
m
1+6x(
0.480
5.40
Page 15
290261999.xls
Stress due to LL reaction at Heel

Stress due to LL reaction at Toe
Stress due to Earth pressure
Live load surcharge height
=
=
Kah
=
=
13.5077
4.1110
kN/m2
kN/m2
1.20 m
0.271

=
=
=
=
1/2 x Ka x g x h2
=
=
=
=
Stress =
=
= +
= +
P x 0.42h
174.151x0.42x8.45
618.06 KN-M
1 x 5.4
2
6
4.860 m3
618.062
4.860
127.17
kN/m2
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
0.271x18x1.2
5.85
KN/M2
5.854x8.45
49.47
49.47 KN
49.47x0.5x8.45
209.00 KN-M
This force acts at 0.42H from sill level

M/Z
Live load surcharge

Earth pressure due to a fill of 1.2m
Horizontal force due to live load surcharge
Stress =
=
= +
M/Z
Stress due to Earth Pressure at Heel

Stress due to Earth Pressure at Toe
= +
=
=
Stress due to Longitudinal Force due to Braking effect

Maximum Load coming over the span
=
Braking force (20 % of the load on span)
=
This force acts at 1.20m above road level
Vertical reaction due to Braking
=
Eccentricity
Stress due to Braking effect
Stress due to Braking effect at Heel
=
=
P x 1+ 6e =
A
d
=
Fdn-check
0.5x0.271x18x8.45x8.45
174.15
174.15
KN
1 x 5.4
6
4.860 m3
208.995
4.860
43.0031
-43.00
43.00
1000.000
200.000
kN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2
kN
kN
200x( 1.2+2.241 )
21.00
x
17.6
1.872
kN
0.480
m
1.87
x(
1+6x(
5.40
-0.5316
kN/m2
0.480 ) )
5.40
Page 16
290261999.xls
Stress due to Braking effect at Toe
Fdn-check
-0.1618
kN/m2
Page 17
290261999.xls
Stress due to Longitudinal force

Longitudinal force
(Cl.214.5.1.4 - IRC :6 - 2000)

Fh/2
=
+
Vr Itc
Where Fh
Applied horizontal force.
Vr
Shear rating of elastic bearing
Itc
Strain due to shrinkage

(Cl.220.3 - IRC:6 - 2000)
Temperature variation
Coefficient of expansion
(Cl.218.4 - IRC:6 - 2000)
Strain due to Temperature variation Et
Es
=
=
Movement of deck above bearing other

than that due to applied force
2.00E-04
25.0
deg
1.1700E-05
=
2.93E-04
(1 x a x t)
=
2.00E-04
+
2.93E-04
=
4.93E-04
Horizontal deformation due to above strain
=
4.93E-04
x
21.6 x10^3/2
=
5.31E+00
mm
Total thickness of bearing
=
96
mm
=
96
(4x3)
=
80
mm
Shear strain
=
5.30915/80
=
6.64E-02
Considering 10% variation in the efficiency of the bearing,
force developed =
=
1.1
x 0.9 x
0.07 x400x500x4x0.001
=
52.561
KN
=
200/2+52.561
=
152.561
KN
=
152.561/12
=
12.7
KN
=
12.7
x
6.209
=
78.9 KN-M
b x d2
=
1 x 5.4
2
6
6
=
4.8600
m3
+M/Z =
78.938
4.860
=
16.2423
kN/m2
-M/Z=
-16.2423
kN/m2
Without live load
=
52.561 KN
at bearing level
=
52.561/12
=
4.38
KN
=
4.38
x
6.209
=
27.2 KN-M
b x d2
=
1 x 5.4
2
6
6
=
4.860
m3
+M/Z =
27.196
4.860
=
5.5959
kN/m2
Total strain Es + Et
Fdn-check
Page 18
290261999.xls
-M/Z=
Fdn-check
-5.5959
kN/m3
Page 19
290261999.xls
Stress due to Bouyancy

Width of abutment at MFL level
Bouyant force due to submerged vol of stem
=
=
=
1.32
m
(1.317+2.8)/2 x
21
kN
x 10
Bouyant force due to submerged volumeof footing1

=
=
3.90
27.3
x
kN
0.70
x1x
10
4.40
0.70
x1x
10
30.8
kN
=
=
=
5.40
x
37.8
kN
21
+
+
37.80
116.483
0.70
x1x
10
27.3
30.800
Total Bouyant force
=
Bouyant effect (as per IRC:6-2000 is 15 % of full bouyancy)
=
=
Stress
P =
A
Stress due to Bouyancy at Heel
=
Stress due to Bouyancy at Toe
=
0.15
x
17.472
17.472
5.40
-3.2356
-3.2356
Lever
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
L x B x unit weight
0.30
1.03
0.50
0.30
0.70
0.50
3.90
4.40
5.40
0.50
0.60
0.50
0.00
0.50
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
2.54
0.30
0.60
3.52
3.52
1.20
0.70
0.70
0.70
0.60
2.83
6.35
7.05
7.75
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
C.G. from Heel
Wt/m
3.519
3.519
3.519
25
25
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
18
18
18
18
18
Total
=
Eccentricity
=
=
Stress due to Self weight at Heel
P x 1 + 6e
A
d
Fdn-check
arm
19.0 1.75
7.7 2.11
23.2 1.40
23.2 1.75
54.2 2.25
46.5 3.00
60.1 2.45
67.8 2.70
83.2 2.70
19.0 1.20
30.6 1.30
57.2 0.75
0.0 0.50
69.8 0.25
561.3
1061.465
561.267
5.40
2
0.809
561
x(
5.4
197.3672
kN
116.483
kN
kN/m2
kN/m2
Moment About
Heel
33.3
16.2
32.5
40.6
121.9
139.4
147.1
183.0
224.5
22.8
39.7
42.9
0.0
17.4
1061.5
1.891 m
1.891
m
1+6x(
0.809))
5.400
kN/m2
Page 20
290261999.xls
Stress due to Self weight at Toe
Fdn-check
10.5093
kN/m2
Page 21
290261999.xls
ABSTRACT OF STRESSES AT FOUNDATION LEVEL AT RL 94

CASE-1
Without seismic (with live load condition)
Dry condition Mpa
No.
Stress due to
At Heel
At Toe
-0.1272
0.1272
1
0.0000
0.0000
3 Dead load
0.0399
0.0122
4 Live load
0.0135
0.0041
5 Self weight
0.1974
0.0105
6 Braking effect
-0.0005
-0.0002
7 Seismic force
0.0000
0.0000
-0.0162
0.0162 Safe Bearing Capacity
0.233 Mpa
Stresses
within
permissible
limits.
9 Buoyancy
-0.0032
-0.0032
Net Stress
0.10362
0.16679
CASE-2
Without seismic (without live load condition)
Dry condition Mpa
No.
Stress due to
At Heel
At Toe
-0.1272
0.1272
1
-0.0430
0.0430
3 Dead load
0.0399
0.0122
4 Live load
0.0000
0.0000
5 Self weight
0.1974
0.0105
6 Braking effect
0.0000
0.0000
7 Seismic force
0.0000
0.0000
-0.0056
-0.0056
9 Buoyancy
-0.0032
-0.0032 Safe Bearing Capacity
0.233 Mpa
Stresses
within
permissible
limits
Net Stress
0.05829
0.18401
CASE-3
With seismic (with live load condition)
Dry condition Mpa
No.
Stress due to
At Heel
At Toe
-0.1272
0.1272
1
0.0000
0.0000
3 Dead load
0.0399
0.0122
4 Live load
0.0068
0.0021
5 Self weight
0.1974
0.0105
6 Braking effect
-0.0003
-0.0001
7 Seismic force
-0.0610
0.0610
-0.0109
0.0053 Safe Bearing Capacity
0.292 Mpa
Stresses
within
permissible
limits.
9 Buoyancy
-0.0032
-0.0032
Net Stress
0.0414
0.21494
CASE-4
With seismic (without live load condition)
Dry condition Mpa
No.
Stress due to
At Heel
At Toe
-0.1272
0.1272
1
-0.0215
0.0215
3 Dead load
0.0399
0.0122
4 Live load
0.0000
0.0000
5 Self weight
0.1974
0.0105
6 Braking effect
0.0000
0.0000
7 Seismic force
-0.0579
0.0579
-0.0056
0.0056
Fdn-check
Page 22
290261999.xls
Buoyancy
-0.0032
0.0218
-0.0032
0.23164
0.292 Mpa
Safe Bearing Capacity
Stresses are within permissible limits.
Fdn-check
Page 23
290261999.xls
Check for stability in loaded condition

Check for overturning
Resisting moment
Dead load moment
=
140.63
x(
Live load moment
=
=
447.188
47.57
x(
Vertical Reaction due braking
=
=
151.274
1.87
x(
Self weight moment
=
=
6
561
1969
Over turning moment

=
Live load surcharge
=
Longitudinal moment
=
Seismic moment (with live load) =
(without live load)=
x(
618.06
208.995
78.938
301
282
Factor of saftty against overturning without seismic

(I) Without seismic (with live load)
=
447
5.400
2
kNm
5.400
2
kNm
5.400
2
kNm
5.400
2
kNm
0.480
0.480
0.480
0.809
kNm
kNm
kNm
kNm
kNm
618
+
3.69 >
151.27 +
5.9539 +
1969.48
0.000 +
78.94
2
Hence safe.
(II) Without seismic (without live load)

=
447.19
618.1
+
2.92 >
Factor of safety against overturning with seismic

(I) With seismic (with live load)
=
447.2
618.1
+
2.5 >
447.2
618.1
+
2.41 >
0.000
1969.48
209.00
2
+
+
0
+
0.00
Hence safe.
75.637
1969.48
0.000
1.5
+
2.9769 +
+
0
+
78.94 +
Hence safe.
0.000
1969.48
104.498
1.5
+
0 +
+
0
+
0.00 +
Hence safe.
301.383
(II) With seismic (without live load)

+
Fdn-check
281.62
Page 24
290261999.xls
Check for Sliding without seismic

Total horizontal force
Total resisting force
=
=
=
=
Factor of safety against sliding
=
=
=
Check for Sliding with seismic

Total resisting force

The section is safe against sliding
(without liveload)
Act.ear.pressure+Llsurcharge+Long.force
174.15
+
49.47
+
4.380
228.0 kN
0.5 x (
DL + Self weight )
=0.5x(
140.625
+
561
)
350.946
kN
350.946
227.997
1.54
>
1.5
Hence safe.
(without liveload)
=
Act.ear.pressure+Llsurcharge+Long.force+
Seismic force
=
174.15
+
24.733
+
4.380
+
50.0
=
253.2 kN
=
0.5 x (
DL + LL + Self weight )
=0.5x(
140.625
+
0
+
561
=
350.946
kN
=
350.946
253.221
Hence safe.
=
1.39
>
1.25
1
Check for Stability in Span Dislodged Condition

Check for Overturning
Resisting Moment
Dead load moment
=
0.00
kNm
Live load moment
=
0.00
kNm
Vertical moment
=
0.00
kNm
Selfweight moment
=
1969.484
kNm
Passive earth pressure moment
=
0.00
kNm
Total restraining moment
=
1969.484
kNm
Overturning moment
=
618.062
kNm
Live load surcharge
=
0.000
kNm
Longitudinal moment
=
0.00
kNm
Seismic moment
=
0.00
kNm
Total overturning moment
=
618.062
kNm
Factor of safety against overturning
=
1969.484
kNm
618.062
The section is safe against overturning
=
3.19
>
1.5
Check for Sliding
=
Act.ear.pressure+Llsurcharge+Long.force
Seismic force
=
174.15
+
0
+
0.00
+
0.00
=
174.2 kN
Total horizontal resisting force
=
0.50 x (
DL + LL + Self weight )
=0.5x( 0.00
+
0.00
+
561
=
280.633
kN
=
280.633
Fdn-check
Page 25
290261999.xls
The section is safe against sliding
Fdn-check
174.151
1.61
>
1.25
Page 26
290261999.xls
CALCULATION OF SEISMIC FORCES

ah
z
I
R
Sa/g
=
=
Horizontal seismic coefficient

(z/2) (Sa/g)
=
=
=
=
(R/I)
Zone factor for zone
2
=
Importance factor
=
Response reduction factor
=
Average response acceleration coeffici =
=
av
(0.1/2)
x
2.5 =
(1/1.2)
Vertical seismic coefficien =
0.1
1.2
1
2.5
0.15
0 for zone
2&3
AT SILL LEVEL
1. Self weight
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
L x B x unit weight
0.3
1.03
0.5
0.3
0.7
0.5
0.50
0.28
0.82
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
2.537
0.30
0.28
1.62
1.62
0.55
0.28
2.83
4.45
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
25
25
1.619
22
22
1.619
1.619
Horizontal force
Horizontal moment
Stress at Toe
Stress at Heel
2.Deadload
Total Dead load from Superstructure
Seismic coefficient
Seismic force F'
=
=
=
=
=
=
Wt/m
19.0
7.7
x
22
4.9
10.7
24.9
x
22
9.8
18
4.0
18 14.1
18 66.0
Total 161
161.2x0.15
24.18 Kn
588.4x0.15
88.26 Knm
+
67.546
kN/m2
67.546
kN/m2
ah
F1
Seismic force perRM
Lever
Moment About Heel
arm
5.09
96.802
3.67
28.205
2.44
11.994
2.71
28.952
2.71
67.555
2.44
23.983
2.98
11.984
3.32
46.638
4.13
272.245
588.400
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
SEISMIC
4950.000
0.150
4950x0.15
742.5
742.5/2
371.25
371.25/14.4
25.781
kN
KN
kN
KN/m
Page 27
290261999.xls
Eccentricity of the above force e
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
Moment due to seismic force F'

Change in vertical reaction
Change in reaction per RM
Moment at sill level
Stress at Toe
Stress at Heel
=
=
+
-
b) Change in vertical reaction of Deadload

e
M
Stress
Stress at heel
Stress at toe
2.166+0.075
2
1.121 m
from top of bearing.
832 KN-m at bearing level
831.97125/21
39.62 kN at one support
39.62/14.4
2.75 KN/M
25.781x4.109
106 KN-m
81.073
kN/m2
81.073
kN/m2
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
2.751 kN
0.18
0.495 KN-m
P/A + or - M/Z
2.751 +
0.495
2.80
1.307
1.362 kN/m2
0.604 kN/m2
3.Stress due to live load

Seismic force F' per span
lever arm for seismic force from bearing level
=
=
=
=
=
=
Moment due to seismic force( at bearing level)

Seismic force at bearing level
Moment due to seismic force( at sill level)
Moment due to seismic at sill level/RM
=
=
=
=
129.038
KN-m
75.000
kN
308.175
KN-m
308.175000000001/1
Stress at Toe
Stress at Heel
With live load on span
Total stress
+
-
16.38 kN/m2
16.38 kN/m2
Seismic force
F' per support
Without live load on span

Total stress
=
=
1000.000
1000x0.15
150.0
150/2
75.000
KN
kN
KN
2.166+0.075+1.2
2
=
=
67.546+81.073+1.362+0.5x16.378
=
=
67.546+81.073+1.362
1.721 m
21.401
KN-m
158 kN/m2
150 kN/m2
SEISMIC
Page 28
290261999.xls
SEISMIC
Page 29
290261999.xls
AT FOUNDATION LEVEL
1. Self weight
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
L x B x unit weight
0.3
1.03
0.5
0.3
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.82
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
2.537
0.30
0.28
1.619
1.62
0.55
0.28
2.83
4.45
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
25
25
1.619
22
22
1.619
1.619
Horizontal force
Horizontal moment
Stress at Toe
Stress at Heel
Wt/m
=
=
=
=
=
=
2.Deadload
Total Dead load from Superstructure
Seismic coefficient
Seismic force F'
161.167x0.15
24.18 Kn
810.29x0.15
122 Knm
+ 121.544/4.86
-
ah
F1
Seismic force perRM
Eccentricity of the above force e
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=

Moment at foundation level
=
=
25 kN/m2
25 kN/m2
4950.000
0.150
4950x0.15
742.5
kN
742.5/2
371.25
kN
per support
371.25/14.4
25.781
kN/m
2.166+0.075
2
1.121 m
from top of bearing.
832
kN-m
831.97125/21
39.62
kN
39.62/14.4
2.751
kN/m
25.78x (6.209 )
160.08
kN-m
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
Moment due to seismic force F'

Change in reaction
Stress at Toe
19.0
7.7
22
4.9
10.7
24.9
22
9.8
18
4.0
18 14.1
18 66.0
Total 161
Lever
Mom. About B.O.F
arm
7.19
136.760
5.769
44.349
4.81
23.662
4.81
51.391
4.81
119.913
4.54
44.628
5.08
20.430
4.94
69.541
4.54
299.613
810.290
32.94
SEISMIC
kN/m2
Page 30
290261999.xls
Stress at Heel
=
b) Change in vertical reaction of Deadload
32.94
kN/m2
=
=
=
2.751
kN
1.30666667 m
3.595
kN-m
Stress
=
=
Stress at heel
Stress at toe
=
=
P/A + or - M/Z
2.751 +
3.595
5.40
4.86
2
1.249 kN/m
-0.23 kN/m2
e
M
3.Stress due to live load

Seismic force per span
Seismic force F'
Moment due to seismic at foundation level
Stress at Toe
Stress at Heel
With live load condition
Total seismic moment
Without live load condition

Total seismic moment
With live load

Total stress
Without live load
Total stress
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
1000.000 kN
150.000
kN
1000x0.15/ 2 x 14.4
5.2
kN/m per support
5.208x(4.109+2.09999999999999)
32.336
KN-m
+
-
6.654 kN/m2
6.654 kN/m2
=
=
121.544+160.076+3.595+0.5x32.336
301 KN-M
=
=
24.175+25.781++0.5x5.208
52.56 KN
=
=
121.544+160.076+3.595
281.62
kN-m
=
=
24.175+25.781
49.956
kN-m
=
=
25.009+32.937+0.5x6.654
61.04
kN/m2
=
=
25.009+32.937
57.95 kN/m2
SEISMIC
Page 31

Design of PCC Abutment - Open Foundation

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Design of PCC Abutment - Open Foundation

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

DESIGN OF PCC ABUTMENT - OPEN FOUNDATION

Pressure Developed in kN/m2

for soil, tension is not permitted,cl.706.3.3.1

Bottom of Foundation Level

Total Load on Span

Class 70R tracked loading - One lane

Total Load on Span

Class A wheeled loading - one lane

Total Load on Span

for one lane

Class A wheeled loading - Two lane

Summary of Live load

Combination of Live load considered

Class 70RT-1 Lane

Max vertical reaction + footpath liveload

Max load on span

ABUTMENT PRESSURE CALCULATIONS AT SILL LEVEL

tan-1(batter width/batter height)

Active earth pressure

a)Horizontal component of earth pressure PH

Stress due to Horizontal Earth Pressure at Heel

Stress due to Horizontal Earth Pressure at Toe

Stress due to Live Load surcharge

Stress due to Earth Pressure at Heel

Stress due to Earth Pressure at Toe

Stress due to Dead Load reaction

Intensity of the Dead load

Stress due to Dead load reaction

Stress due to Dead load reaction at Heel

Stress due to Dead load reaction at Toe

Stress due to Live load reaction

Intensity of the Dead load

Stress due to Live load reaction

Stress due to Live load reaction at Heel

Stress due to Live load reaction at Toe

Stress due to Self weight

Moment About Heel

C.G. from Heel

Stress due to Self weight at Heel

Stress due to Self weight at Toe

Maximum Load coming over the span

Braking force (20 % of the load on span)

Stress due to Longitudinal Force due to Braking effect

This force acts at 1.20m above road level

Stress due to Braking effect at Heel

Stress due to Braking effect at Toe

Stress due to Longitudinal force

(Cl.214.5.1.4 - IRC :6 - 2000)

Applied horizontal force.

Shear rating of elastic bearing

Movement of deck above bearing other

Strain due to shrinkage

(Cl.220.3 -IRC:6 -2000)

(Cl.218.4 -IRC:6 -2000)

Total thickness of bearing

Effective thickness of bearing

Considering 10% variation in the efficiency of the bearing force developed

Total longitudinal force

Moment due to this force

Intensity of the force per metre run

Moment due to this force

acts at bearing level