Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Tipos,
estructura y elementos constituyentes
1.- INTRODUCTION
1
A complex sentence contains one independent clause and at least one dependent
clause. Unlike a compound sentence, however, a complex sentence contains clauses
which are not equal. Consider the following examples:
Simple: My friend invited me to a party. I do not want to go.
Compound My friend invited me to a party, but I do not want to go.
Complex Although my friend invited me to a party, I do not want to go.
In the first example, there are two separate simple sentences: "My friend invited me to a
party" and "I do not want to go." The second example joins them together into a single
sentence with the co-ordinating conjunction "but," but both parts could still stand as
independent sentences -- they are entirely equal, and the reader cannot tell which is
most important. In the third example, however, the sentence has changed quite a bit: the
first clause, "Although my friend invited me to a party," has become incomplete, or a
dependent clause.
A complex sentence is very different from a simple sentence or a compound
sentence because it makes clear which ideas are most important. When you write
My friend invited me to a party. I do not want to go.
or even
My friend invited me to a party, but I do not want to go.
The reader will have trouble knowing which piece of information is most
important to you. When you write the subordinating conjunction "although" at the
beginning of the first clause, however, you make it clear that the fact that your friend
invited you is less important than, or subordinate, to the fact that you do not want to go.
There are different subcategories of complex sentences. I am going to
concentrate on adverbial clauses.
2. ADVERBIAL CLAUSES
Adverbial clauses do the work of adverbs. Therefore, adverbial clauses, like
adverbial adjuncts, usually qualify the main clause as a whole. In accordance with the
meaning expressed they can be divided into various semantic categories, which may be
related to those for adverbials in general and for prepositional phrases. Thus, we have
adverbial clauses of time, place, cause, or reason, purpose, result, condition, concession
or contrast, comparison, manner, restriction, and perhaps one or two more. The meaning
intended is usually indicated by the introductory conjunction, though it sometimes has
to be inferred from the sentence as a whole.
Adverbial clauses, like adverbials in general, are capable of occurring in a final,
initial or medial position within the main clause (generally in that order of frequency).
2
b) Local clauses or clauses of place: They indicate where an action is done. Adverbial
clauses of place are introduced by where, wherever, whence. The construction in
place clauses is similar to that in time clauses:
1- Local clauses which speak of a matter of fact in present and past time take the
indicative mood (the same tenses as time clauses):
Remain where you are / Go back where you came from.
2- If the action of the local clause refers to the future, the usual construction is the
simple present. But we may sometimes have another construction with shall or
should.
Where the tree falls, there it shall lie / I will go where you tell me.
Where the tree shall fall, there it shall lie.
3- When the local clause referring to future time is introduced by wherever, we often
have may or might (future in the past) as a subjunctive equivalent:
I will find her wherever she may be.
He did his duty wherever he might be.
c) Causal clauses or clauses of reason: These clauses indicate why an action is done.
They may be introduced by subordinators because, as, since, seeing that, now that.
The difference between a clause introduced by as and one beginning with because
is that in the former (which usually comes first) the emphasis in on the main clause, in
the latter (which usually comes second) on the sub-clause. Since agrees with as in
this respect, but implies at the same time that the cause or reason in an indisputed fact:
As you are not ready, we must go on.
He sold the car because it was too small.
Since there is no help, let us try to bear it as best we may.
Additional emphasis is given to the adverb clause od reason when it is preceded
by it is.., it was etc. and followed by that. In this construction because must
always be used:
It was because the car was so small that he sold it.
The conjunction that may also introduce adverbial clauses of cause. Such
clauses usually follow a main clause that is either a negative exclamation or a rhetorical
question. The clause gives the reason for what is expressed in the exclamation or
question:
I am not a cow that you should expect me to eat grass.
4
He was speaking very quietly, so (that) it was difficult to hear his words.
I took no notice of him, so he flew into a rage.
As we can observe, this construction differs from the similar construction
introducing a clause of purpose, in that it may contain an ordinary verb form without a
modal auxiliary.
A clause of result associated with degree is introduced by so.that, or
suchthat; in this case, that can be left out:
I was so tired (that) I could hardly stand.
It was such a warm day that I took off my jacket.
This type of clause may also be introduced by soas to + infinitive:
Would you be so kind as to carry this?
f) If-clauses or clauses of condition: These clauses state the dependence of one
circumstance or set of circumstances on another. They may be introduced by if,
supposing, so long as. Emphatic condition is expressed by provided (that), on
condition that. Clauses of negative condition may be introduced by ifnot or
unless.
These sentences fall into two main classes, which are distinguished by the form
and meaning of the main clause:
1- Clauses expressing a condition that is not, or is not likely to be, realized are called
clauses of rejected condition; they contain a modal preterit or pluperfect:
If the sky were to fall, we should catch larks.
If I had taken your advice, all this misery might have been avoided.
2- When the condition may or may not be fulfilled, they are called clauses of open
condition:
I shall go if he asks me.
I shant go unless he asks me.
There is another way of introducing a conditional clause: it is sometimes
expressed by a simple inversion of subject and verb without a conjunction; the
construction is mainly literary:
Should he call, tell him I am not at home.
Had I taken your advice, all this misery might have been avoided
3- Special types of conditional clauses
6
Apart from the types of conditional clauses outlined above, there are some less
usual types involving special verb forms and syntactic orderings.
To express an open condition, the present subjunctive is sometimes used in the
conditional clause, instead of the normal present tense:
If any person be found guilty, he shall have the right of appeal.
This usage is mainly confined to very formal, legal or quasi-legal contexts. There are
also alternative ways of expressing hypothetical conditions. They are:
a) was/were to followed by the infinitive:
If it was/were to rain, we should get wet.
b) should followed by the infinitive:
If a serious crisis should arise, the public would have to be informed of it.
A device which may replace the subordinator if in signaling a conditional clause
is the inversion of subject and operator, particularly with the operator had in
hypothetical clauses:
Had I known, I would have written before.
g) Concessive clauses or clauses of concession (or contrast): Concessive clauses
imply a contrast between two circumstances, i.e. that in the light of the circumstance in
the dependent clause, that in the main clause is surprising. These clauses are introduced
chiefly by although or its more colloquial variant though, while and whereas
are sometimes used to point a contrast between comparable things. Even if and even
though are also concessive in meaning:
Though (although) he tried hard, he was not successful.
The USA has immense mineral wealth, while (whereas) Britain has comparatively
little (contrast clause).
He borrowed my mower, even though I told him not to.
Concessive clauses take the verb forms as follows:
1- In concessive clauses which imply a fact the verb is in the indicative mood:
Though he talks a great deal, there is not much in what he says.
2- In concessive clauses which refer to future time (whether from a present or a past
point of view), it is common to use the subjunctive mood or a subjunctive equivalent
with should. The indicative, however, is often employed without any appreciable
difference of meaning:
The latter you arrive (ASV), the better the food is (..CSV).
k) Clauses of restriction: Jespersen and Zandvoort include this type of clause among
adverbial clauses. Some examples of them are:
As far as I can see, he cannot be more than thirty.
That is all right, as far as I am concerned.
The man may be dead, for all I know.
In any case, the initial proportional clause is regarded as an adverbial within the main
clause. Since both clauses in a proportional sentence are of the same general pattern,
however, it is not obvious why the first part of the sentence, and not the second, should
be treated as the subordinate clause. Apart from the parallel with as(so) sentences, the
reason for this analysis lies in the general principle that subordination by means of
correlative conjunctions (except for comparative correlatives and the whether or
construction) entails placing the subordinate clause first.
l) Clauses of preference: The conjunctions of preference rather than and sooner than
deserve mention as the only subordinators introducing a bare infinitive clause:
Rather/Sooner than travel by air, Id prefer a week on a big liner.
3. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, it will have been observed that several conjunctions may
introduce more than one kind of adverbial clause. Thus as long as may introduce a
clause expressing either time or condition; since, time or reason; so that, purpose,
result or condition; if condition or concession, as, time, reason, comparison,
manner, proportion or concession.
The meanings of adverbial clauses often shade off into one another; thus time
and condition in clauses introduced by as long as; purpose and result in clauses
introduced by so that; condition and concession in clauses introduced by if, etc.
10
Bibliography
Adger, D. (2003) Core Syntax. OUP.
Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. The MIT Press.
Dik, S.C. ( 1989) The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part I: The Structure of the
Clause (Functional Grammar Series 9), Dordrecht.
Jespersen, O. (1049). A modern English Grammar on historical principles, London,
Allen and Unwin, 1949.
McArthur, T. (1998). "ADJECTIVE CLAUSE." Concise Oxford Companion to the
English Language. Encyclopedia.com.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar
of the English Language. Longman
Radford, A. (1997) Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English. CUP.
Thompson, S.A. and R.E.Longacre. (1985).Adjectival clauses. In T.Shopen
(ed.),Language typology and syntactic description.Cambridge.
Zandvoort, R.W. (1957). A Handbook of English Grammar. London
11