Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

75 / Wednesday, April 20, 2005 / Notices 20523

input session will be provided and The original sponsors include the provide water based recreation and
individuals who made written requests three county governments, three county water supply. Six preliminary
by May 4 will have the opportunity to soil and water conservation districts, the alternatives for multiple-purpose
address the Committee at the session. city of Tarkio, Missouri, as well as the reservoirs were developed, two
Dated: Aril 14, 2005. cities of Clarinda and Shenandoah, alternatives at each study site. The
Iowa. The sponsors have formed the permanent pool sizes of the six
Dan Rife,
West Tarkio Watershed Steering preliminary alternatives ranged from
Acting Designated Federal Official.
Committee to serve as an advisory body 1100 acres to 1800 acres.
[FR Doc. 05–7885 Filed 4–19–05; 8:45 am] for the project. The Steering Committee Groundwater was investigated as a
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M is made up of representatives from the water supply source as a result of public
sponsoring groups plus four local comment. NRCS consulted with
watershed residents. groundwater experts from the Iowa
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE The sponsors’ original objectives are Geological Survey Bureau of the Iowa
regional water supply including the Department of Natural Resources and
Natural Resources Conservation
Cities of Clarinda and Shenandoah, the U.S. Geological Survey Bureau.
Service flood damage reduction for the City of Generalized sources of groundwater
West Tarkio Watershed, Page and Tarkio and agricultural land, water were identified in the area. There was
Montgomery Counties, IA and based recreation, grade stabilization of no sponsor support for an alternative
Atchison County, MO West Tarkio Creek and its tributaries, plan featuring groundwater because it
upland gully and erosion control, and could not meet the water-based
AGENCY: Natural Resources water quality protection. recreation project purpose. In addition,
Conservation Service, Agriculture. The NRCS planning assistance is one sponsor had been previously
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an being provided under the authority of advised that long term, they should seek
Environmental Impact Statement. the Watershed Protection and Flood a surface water supply source to replace
Prevention Act, Public Law 83–566. The their current well fields.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) NRCS has completed studies to
Preliminary alternatives that do not
of the National Environmental Policy determine the extent of natural resource
meet the sponsors’ objectives will be
Act (NEPA) of 1969; the Council on problems and needs in accordance with
removed from further study and
Environmental Quality Guidelines (40 the sponsors’ objectives.
Study results indicate that the consideration. Each alterative plan that
CFR part 1500); and the Natural
sponsor objective of flood damage is carried through detailed planning will
Resources Conservation Service
reduction for the City of Tarkio and be compared against a no action plan as
Guidelines (7 CFR part 650); the Natural
agricultural land is not economically a basis to determine effects. The
Resources Conservation Service, U.S.
feasible. Land voiding and depreciation sponsors will select an alternative plan
Department of Agriculture gives notice
rates are not high enough to justify based on the effects, economic
that an environmental impact statement
grade stabilization dams to control evaluation, and the extent that it meets
(EIS) is being prepared for West Tarkio
gullies and stream channel erosion. their objectives. The project will include
Watershed, Page and Montgomery
Other federal and state programs can be one multi-purpose reservoir with the
Counties, Iowa and Atchison County,
used to satisfy landowner requests for purposes of water supply and water-
Missouri.
upland gully and erosion control. based recreation. Best management
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: practices may be included in the
The NRCS studies indicate that the
Richard Van Klaveren, State sponsors’ objectives of water supply, planned project in order to further
Conservationist, or David Beck, water based recreation, and water protect the new surface water supply.
Planning Leader, 210 Walnut Street, 693 quality protection are likely to be Two open house informational
Federal Building, Des Moines, IA economically feasible. Additional study meetings were held in Shenandoah,
50309–2180. for these project purposes will be Iowa on August 19, 2003, to initiate the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The completed. planning process and obtain public
environmental assessment of this The original sponsors reconsidered input. State and federal agencies,
federally assisted action indicates that their interest in the project considering private organizations, and local
the project may cause significant local, the change in project purposes. individuals were invited to a scoping
regional, or national impacts on the Remaining sponsors are the Cities of meeting on February 17, 2004. The
environment. As a result of these Clarinda and Shenandoah, Iowa, the public input received from these
findings, Richard Van Klaveren, NRCS Page County Soil and Water meetings and at meetings of the West
State Conservationist, has determined Conservation District, and the Atchison Tarkio Steering Committee will be
that the preparation and review of an County Soil and Water Conservation considered as a draft Environmental
environmental impact statement (EIS) is District. Impact Statement is developed. The
needed for this project. Four study sites on the main channel periodic Steering Committee meetings
This project involves the development of West Tarkio Creek, all located in Page as well as individual member sponsor
of a plan to manage, protect, and County Iowa, were initially identified meetings are open to the public and
enhance water and land resources in the for possible multiple-purpose reservoir provide opportunity for citizen input.
West Tarkio Watershed. The watershed sites. One study site was dropped from Preliminary issues: Among the issues
project area is 106,000 acres; 71,000 further consideration after it was that the NRCS plans to consider in the
acres in Page and Montgomery Counties determined not to meet the water scope of the EIS analysis are:
in southwest Iowa and 35,000 acres in supply objective and that it would have —Environmental, economic, and social
Atchison County, Missouri. The upper more effect on public roads than other impacts of the alternatives. Major
end of the watershed is four miles alternatives. categories are listed below.
northeast of Red Oak, Iowa. The City of Studies indicated each remaining Soil erosion Prime farmland
Tarkio, Missouri, is at the downstream study site could be developed as a Flooding Agricultural/other
boundary of the project area. multi-purpose water impoundment to rural land

VerDate jul<14>2003 16:34 Apr 19, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM 20APN1
20524 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 20, 2005 / Notices

Recreation Threatened and en- Windbreak-Shelterbelt Establishment DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


dangered species (Code 380), Riparian Forest Buffer (Code
Water quantity/ Wetlands 391), Tree-Shrub Site Preparation (Code Bureau of Industry and Security
supply 490), Tree-Shrub Establishment (Code
Water quality Wildlife habitat 612), Windbreak-Shelterbelt Renovation Miscellaneous Activities
Cultural resources Air quality
(Code 650), Forest Trails and Landings ACTION: Proposed collection: Comment
—Costs and benefits of the alternatives. (Code 655), Tree-Shrub Pruning (Code
The West Tarkio draft EIS will be request.
660), and Forest Stand Improvement
developed and published in the Federal (Code 666). NRCS State Conservationists SUMMARY: The Department of
Register with a target date of October who choose to adopt these practices for Commerce, as part of its continuing
20, 2005. A 45-day comment period will use within their States will incorporate effort to reduce paperwork and
be available for the public to provide them into Section IV of their respective respondent burden, invites the general
comments. A 30 day comment period electronic Field Office Technical public and other Federal agencies to
will be available following publication Guides. These practices may be used in take this opportunity to comment on
of the final EIS. A meeting will be held conservation systems that treat highly proposed and/or continuing information
in the Shenandoah area near the date of erodible land or on land determined to collections, as required by the
the draft EIS publication to inform the be wetland. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub.
public about the draft watershed plan- DATES: Effective Dates: Comments will L. 104–13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
EIS and to obtain comments. be received for a 30-day period DATES: Written comments must be
The draft watershed plan-EIS will be commencing with this date of submitted on or before June 20, 2005.
prepared and circulated for review by publication. This series of new or ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
agencies and the public. This review revised conservation practice standards to Diana Hynek, Departmental
will be conducted concurrently with the will be adopted after the close of the 30- Paperwork Clearance Officer, (202) 482–
publication of the draft EIS in the day period. Send comments 0266, Department of Commerce, Room
Federal Register. The Natural Resources electronically to 6611, 14th and Constitution Avenue,
Conservation Service invites Daniel.Meyer@usda.gov, or in writing to NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via
participation and consultation of public Daniel Meyer, National Agricultural Internet at dhynek@doc.gov).
agencies, any affected Indian tribe, and Engineer, Natural Resources FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
individuals that have special expertise, Conservation Service, Post Office Box Requests for additional information or
legal jurisdiction, or interest in 2890, Room 6139–S, Washington, DC copies of the information collection
providing data for consideration in 20013–2890. instrument(s) and instructions should
preparing the draft EIS. Comments and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: be directed to Patrick Heinig, BIS ICB
other inputs received will be considered Copies of these standards can be Liaison, (202) 482–4848, Department of
in plan development. Further downloaded or printed from the Commerce, Room 6716, 14th and
information on the proposed action may following Web site: ftp://ftp- Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
be obtained from David Beck, Planning fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/NHQ/practice- DC, 20230.
Leader, at the above address. standards/federal-register/. Single
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: April 12, 2005. copies of these standards also are
Richard Van Klaveren, available from NRCS in Washington, I. Abstract
State Conservationist. DC. Submit individual inquiries to On September 30, 1993, the Secretary
Daniel.Meyer@usda.gov, or in writing to of Commerce submitted to the Congress
[FR Doc. 05–7921 Filed 4–19–05; 8:45 am]
Daniel Meyer, National Agricultural a report of the Trade Promotion
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
Engineer, Natural Resources Coordinating Committee, entitled
Conservation Service, Post Office Box Toward a National Export Strategy. The
2890, Room 6139–S, Washington, DC report included the goal to ‘‘Undertake
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
20013–2890. a comprehensive review of the Export
Natural Resources Conservation SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section Administration Regulations to simplify,
Service 343 of the Federal Agriculture clarify, and make the regulations more
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 user-friendly’’. To carry out this
Notice of Proposed Changes to the requires NRCS to make available, for recommendation, BIS has rewritten the
Natural Resources Conservation public review and comment, proposed entire EAR. To the extent activities have
Service’s National Handbook of revisions to conservation practice been added or changed but not deleted,
Conservation Practices standards used to carry out the highly this collection represents the authority
erodible land and wetland provisions of to collect, on rare occasions, certain
AGENCY: Natural Resources the law. For the next 30 days, NRCS will
Conservation Service (NRCS), USDA. information from the public. This
receive comments relative to the assembly of information collection
ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes. Following that
proposed changes in the NRCS National activities is comprised of two activities.
period, a determination will be made by ‘‘Registration Of U.S. Agricultural
Handbook of Conservation Practices for NRCS regarding disposition of those
public review and comment. Commodities For Exemption From
comments, and a final determination of Short Supply Limitations On Export’’,
changes will be made. and ‘‘Petitions For The Imposition Of
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the
intention of NRCS to issue 11 new or Signed in Washington, DC, on April 7, Monitoring Or Controls On Recyclable
revised conservation practice standards 2005. Metallic materials; Public Hearings’’ are
in its National Handbook of Bruce I. Knight, statutory in nature and—though they
Conservation Practices. These standards Chief, Natural Resources Conservation never have been applied—must remain
include: Alley Cropping (Code 311), Service. a part of BIS’s information collection
Prescribed Burning (Code 338), [FR Doc. 05–7580 Filed 4–19–05; 8:45 am] budget authorization. The third—The
Multistory Cropping (Code 379), BILLING CODE 3410–16–P Commerce Control List—became

VerDate jul<14>2003 16:34 Apr 19, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM 20APN1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen