Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Submitted to
Submitted by
07
01
2015
Page |1
INDEX
Serial
Page
01
02
02
03
03
04
04
05
05
06
07
07
08-13
06
13
09
13
10
Problem
14
Tables
Table 1
Table 2
10
Table 3
12
14
Table 4
Table 5
13
Page |2
Page |3
Figure 1: A Plot of Lattice Energy versus the Identity of the Halide for the Lithium, Sodium, and Potassium Halides
F1036
923
821
785
740
Cl853
787
715
689
659
Br807
747
682
660
631
I757
704
649
630
604
Page |4
Because lattice energy is inversely related to the inter-nuclear distance, it is also inversely
proportional to the size of the ions. This effect is illustrated in figure, which shows that lattice
energy decreases for the series LiX, NaX, and KX as the radius of X increases. Because r0 in
is the sum of the ionic radii of the cation and the anion (r0 = r+ + r), r0 increases as the cation
becomes larger in the series, so the magnitude of U decreases. A similar effect is seen when
the anion becomes larger in a series of compounds with the same cation.
Page |5
The result of the attractive and repulsive forces is to lead to an equilibrium position of
minimum potential energy, i.e., of greatest stability, as depicted in the figure below:
The r0, corresponds to the minimum, represents the equilibrium value of the ionic separation
in the stable crystal lattice. At all temperatures there will, however, be some thermal oscillation
about the equilibrium positions; in some cases rotation also occurs.
Page |6
Figure 3: A Plot of Melting Point versus the Identity of the Halide for the Sodium Halides. The melting points follow the same trend as
the magnitude of the lattice energies in Figure 1
The hardness of ionic materialsthat is, their resistance to scratching or abrasionis also
related to their lattice energies. Hardness is directly related to how tightly the ions are held
together electrostatically, which, as we saw, is also reflected in the lattice energy. As an
example, MgO is harder than NaF, which is consistent with its higher lattice energy.
In addition to determining melting point and hardness, lattice energies affect the solubilities of
ionic substances in water. In general, the higher the lattice energy, the less soluble a compound
is in water. For example, the solubility of NaF in water at 25C is 4.13 g/100 mL, but under
the same conditions, the solubility of MgO is only 0.65 mg/100 mL, meaning that it is
essentially insoluble.
High lattice energies lead to hard, insoluble compounds with high melting points.
Page |7
Page |8
NaCl (s) + H f0
Page |9
Process II
The second route consists of five steps:
1. Sublimation of Sodium
Metallic sodium is vaporized to a gas of sodium atoms. (Sublimation is the
transformation of a solid to a gas.) The enthalpy change for this process, measured
108 per mole of sodium.
experimentally, is
Enthalpy of sublimation is always positive because energy is required to sublime a solid.
Table 1: Selected Enthalpies of Sublimation at 298 K
Substance Hsub (kJ/mol)
159.3
Li
107.5
Na
89.0
K
80.9
Rb
76.5
Cs
324.0
Be
147.1
Mg
Ca
177.8
164.4
Sr
180.0
Ba
2. Dissociation of chlorine
Dissociation of mole of Cl2 (g) into 1 mole of separate gaseous chlorine, Cl(g) atoms.
It is the enthalpy of atomization of chlorine. The enthalpy change for this equals the
Cl Cl bond dissociation energy, which is 240 kJ per mole of bonds, or 120 kJ per mole
120 /
of Cl atoms. Therefore,
The H for this reaction, too, is always positive because energy is required to dissociate
any stable diatomic molecule into the component atoms.
P a g e | 10
Electron affinities can be positive, negative, or zero. In this case, H is negative because
of the highly negative electron affinity of chlorine.
5. Formation of NaCl(s) from ions
The ions Na+ and Cl- formed in Steps 3 and 4 combine to give solid sodium chloride.
Because this process is just the reverse of the one corresponding to the lattice energy
(breaking the solid into ions), the enthalpy change is the negative of the lattice energy.
.
If U be the lattice energy, the enthalpy change for Step 5 is
Because it is the reverse of the equation used to define lattice energy and U is defined
to be a positive number, H5 is always negative, as it should be in a step that forms
bonds.
According to Hesss law:
P a g e | 11
In summing the equations, we have canceled terms that appear on both the left and right sides
of the arrows. The final equation is simply the formation reaction for NaCl(s). Adding the
enthalpy changes, we find that the enthalpy change for this formation reaction is 375
.
But the enthalpy of formation has been determined calorimetrically and equals 411 .
Equating these two values, we get:
,
,
,
Therefore, the lattice enthalpy of the formation of NaCl is 786kJ/mol.
Born-Haber Cycle for Cesium Fluoride
Lets use the BornHaber cycle to determine the lattice energy of CsF(s). CsF is a nearly ideal
ionic compound because Cs is the least electronegative element that is not radioactive and F is
the most electronegative element. To construct a thermochemical cycle for the formation of
CsF, we need to know its enthalpy of formation, Hf, which is defined by the following
chemical reaction:
Figure 5: The BornHaber Cycle Illustrating the Enthalpy Changes Involved in the Formation of Solid Cesium Fluoride from Its
Elements
P a g e | 12
The following steps are involved in the formation CsF from its constituents:
1. Sublimation of Cs
Cs s Cs g
Enthalpy of sublimation, H
76.5 kJ/mol
2. Ionization of Cs
Cs g Cs g
H
375.7 kJ/mol
Enthalpy of Ionization, H
3. Dissociation of F
1
F g F g
2
H
79.4 kJ/mol
Enthalpy of dissociation, H
4. Formation of Fluoride
F g F g
H
328.2 kJ/mol
Electron affinity of fluorine, H
5. Formation of CsF(s)
F g CsF s
Cs g
H
553.5 kJ/mol
Enthalpy of formation, H
According to Hesss law:
Hf = H1 + H2 + H3 + H4 + H5
Or, H5 = H1 + H2 + H3 + H4 Hf
Or, U = 76.5 kJ + 375.7 kJ/ + 79.4 kJ + (328.2 kJ) (553.5 kJ)
= 756.9 kJ/mol
Table 3: Summary of Reactions in the BornHaber Cycle for the Formation of CsF(s)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Reaction
Cs(s) Cs(g)
Cs(g) Cs + (g) + e
F2(g) F(g)
F(g) + e F(g)
Cs + (g) + F(g) CsF(s)
Cs(s) + F2(g) CsF(s)
P a g e | 13
P a g e | 14
The discrepancy between the experimental lattice energy and that calculated on the assumption
of purely ionic linkages increases as the valence partakes increasingly of covalent character.
Problem
Draw a Born-Haber cycle for the formation of RbCl to determine the lattice enthalpy of the compound
using the following data:
H
431 kJ
H
H
86 kJ
122 kJ
Solution:
Born-Haber Cycle for the formation of RbCl:
408 kJ
349 kJ
P a g e | 15
Given,
H
431 kJ
H
H
86 kJ
122 kJ
H
H
408 kJ
349 kJ