Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

Specialty Practices Ambulatory Surgery Centers

12
G
etting the right person in the
right position is essential to
organizational success. Every
position has key prerequisites
and critical responsibilities
that contribute to the operation. The
Steps
to Recruitment
and Selection
Regina Boore, RN, BSN, MS, and Elethia Charoo, RN, BSN, MBA

One of the most successful strate-


gies used by many organizations today
involves a 12-step program designed
by Steve Brinkman (1987). You can in-
crease your likelihood of success when
you employ his 12 simple hiring
Screening
Once you have identified some viable
candidates, the challenge of the
screening process begins. All candi-
dates, internal and external, must be
assessed. Assessment begins with
challenge of finding the right people guidelines. The strategies outlined thoughtful review of the résumés and
can be daunting and mistakes can be here are fundamental and can be ap- applications submitted. This seems
costly. Recruitment failures can result plied to any organization. fairly obvious; however, negative ram-
in expenses associated with advertis- ifications can ensue if important items
ing, orientation and training, compro- Searching are missed. For example, the length of
mised client satisfaction, and The first step is to set high standards previous employment may be indica-
suffering staff morale. Effective re- and communicate them—to employ- tive of whether the applicant is a “job
cruitment and selection strategies are ees assisting in the recruitment hopper” or has a tendency to remain
therefore key to organizational suc- process and to the applicants. It in one position over time (Brannick,
cess and profitability. should be clear that only strong candi- 2001). Significant gaps in employment
dates will be considered. should also be identified. Job changes
12 Steps for Hiring Establish rapport with all individ- and gaps in employment are not nec-
Productive Employees uals who may play a role in the search essarily negative but warrant investi-
process. A good working relationship gation upon interview.
between these employees and the hir- Candidate testing is frequently
1. Set standards high and communicate
them. ing manager will motivate them to overlooked. Operating under the pre-
2. Establish good rapport with search positively contribute to the process. sumption that the candidate is quali-
personnel. For instance, they will be more likely fied for the position, some managers
3. Consider external as well as internal to seek qualified applicants to pro- feel that it may be demeaning to test
candidates. mote increased productivity and suc- the candidate. This is a mistake. Inter-
4. Carefully review résumés/applications. cess for a manager with whom they views are heavily influenced by our
5. Test candidates. have a good working relationship subjectivity. Having an objective
6. Ask the right questions and listen care-
than they will be with a manager who measurement tool can balance the
fully to answers.
7. Check all references. is unpleasant or unreasonable. Good process. Depending on the position,
8. Include a second interview with at working relationships contribute to tests may include skills tests such as
least two individuals whose judgment better outcomes. typing, spelling, grammar, mathemat-
you trust in the process. Then get feed- Do not restrict the process or bur- ics, data entry, use of diagnostic
back from all the interviewers. den yourself by a sense of obligation to equipment, computer literacy, med-
9. Trust your intuition. an internal candidate. There are times ication administration, etc. Other
10. Be open to salary negotiations, but do when an internal candidate is the best testing methods include personality
not make promises you cannot keep.
candidate for a position. However, lim- testing, intelligence testing, psycho-
11. Never rush a search.
12. Use a probation period to evaluate iting the search in this way may place logical testing, etc. These test results
your hiring decision. arbitrary limits on the organization; can provide useful insights and can be
therefore all open positions should be a beneficial part of the employment
Source: Brinkman, 1987 viewed as just that: open. process; however, they must be con-
sidered in light of the totality of the

60 AE Spring 2009
Specialty Practices Ambulatory Surgery Centers

screening process. Factors that affect


the applicant’s test results should also
A disciplined approach to recruitment and
be considered, including cultural in-
fluences, disabilities, etc. No single in-
selection, utilizing the strategies outlined, will
dicator guarantees successful reap long-term benefits for your organization.
selection. However, a comprehensive
assessment will increase the likeli-
hood of placing the right person in checks. It would be a mistake to short- promise the outcome and ultimately
the appropriate position. change the process this way. The hir- your organization. Even when you be-
ing manager should check all lieve you have landed a superstar, take
references. This includes, but is not advantage of the probationary period
Interviewing limited to, calling previous employers, to assess the employee “fit” with the
It seems that more attention is focused managers, and supervisors to solicit organization’s culture, and reinforce
on the interview than on other aspects their impressions of the applicant’s performance expectations. A disci-
of the recruitment and selection work ethic and performance. It is im- plined approach to recruitment and
process. Surprisingly, however, inter- portant to note here that employment selection, utilizing the strategies out-
viewing is too often approached in a verification with the human resources lined, will reap long-term benefits for
cavalier manner without appropriate department does not rise to the stan- your organization. AE
preparation. dard of a reference check. Speaking
It is imperative that the right with individuals who are familiar Cited
questions are asked during the inter- with the candidate’s professional ca- • Brannick, J. (2001). “Seven strategies for retain-
view and that the interviewer listens pabilities to validate past performance ing top talent.” The Journal of Business
carefully to the answers. These an- is essential. Strategy, 22(4), 28–31.
swers can sometimes give more infor- Once you have narrowed the field • Brinkman, S. (1987). “Productivity begins with
mation about a specific candidate hiring.” Management Accounting 69(1), 50.
to the two or three candidates under • Wang, J., & Kleiner, B. (2000). “Effective
than the information found on the ré- serious consideration, it is important
sumé or application. For example, you employment screening practices.”
to validate your impressions through a Management Research News 23, 73–82.
may not want to consider an appli- second interview by another manager.
cant who is unfairly critical and ver- The more information gleaned about a Additional References
bally slanders a previous employer due candidate, the greater the likelihood • Brown, A. S. (2009). “Think of workers as as-
to the negativity this individual may of a successful hiring decision. Having sets.” Mechanical Engineering 131(1), 20.
bring to the organization (Wang, multiple interviewers in the second in- • Capella University (Ed.). (2005). OM8004: Man-
2000). (There are times, however, terview provides perspective and in- aging and Organizing People. Boston, MA: Pear-
when these criticisms are justified.) son Custom Publishing.
sights into how candidates respond • Cawood, Scott (2007). “How destination plan-
As the saying goes, the best pre- under pressure. Once the interview is
dictor of future behavior is past behav- ning can be used to achieve company goals.”
completed, take the time to debrief Employment Relations Today 34(1), 1–6.
ior. So when interviewing, ask thoroughly with the interviewers. • Kelman, M. “Concepts of discrimination in ‘gen-
behavior-based questions rather than Share insights and impressions all eral ability’ job testing.” Harvard Law Review
hypotheticals. Behavioral interviewing around and trust your intuition. 104, 1158–1248.
techniques reveal candidate behavior • Menkes, J. (2005). “Hiring for executive intelli-
or responses to specific situations. For gence.” Harvard Business Review 83, 11.
example, you might try statements
Negotiating an Offer • Patterson, M. (2000). “Overcoming the hiring
like the following: “Describe an in- Do not dismiss a candidate over salary crunch: Tests deliver informed choices.”
stance when you had to think on your requirements or condition of hire de- Employment Relations Today 27, 77–89.
feet to extricate yourself from a diffi- mands without investigating the op-
cult situation” or “Tell me about a portunity for negotiation. A great deal
time when you had to go above and is invested in this process and you ex- Regina Boore, RN, BSN, MS
beyond the call of duty in order to get pect a long-term relationship. In the (rboore@progressivesurgical
a job done.” Responses to these kinds larger scheme of things, the salary dif- solutions.com), is president of
of questions tend to provide a more ferential or time off within the first six Progressive Surgical Solutions,
specific and substantive basis for eval- months may be a small price to pay to LLC, an ASC development and
uation of competing candidates, par- get a superstar. Approach negotiations consulting firm based in San
ticularly when the same questions are truthfully and avoid making promises Diego, Calif. Elethia Charoo,
asked of all candidates. Further, they or commitments you cannot keep. RN, BSN, MBA, (echaroo@
insert discipline into the interview progressivesurgical
process to keep it on track and within Evaluating solutions.com), is an associate
an appropriate timeframe. Patience can be in short supply when consultant with Progressive
you are working short and operational Surgical Solutions, LLC, and is
demands are taking their toll; how- based in Dayton, Ohio.
Vetting
When the interviewer and the candi- ever, it behooves you not to rush the
date really “click” during an interview, recruitment and selection process.
it is tempting to bypass reference Shortchanging the process can com-

62 AE Spring 2009

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen