August 1, 2006

BIR RULING [DA-469-06]

Sections 32 and 33; DA-081-2003
SGV & Co.
6760 Ayala Avenue
1226 Makati
Attention: Atty. Rafael C. Vinzon
Partner, Tax Division
Gentlemen :
This refers to your letter dated February 16, 2005 requesting on behalf of
your client, NEC Tokin Electronics (Philippines), Inc. ("NEC Tokin" for brevity)
for confirmation of your opinion that premiums for the group hospitalization
benefits it provides to its non-rank and file employees under a Health Maintenance
Organization (HMO) are not subject to fringe benefits tax (FBT) under Sec. 2.33
(B)(10) of Revenue Regulations No. 3-98.
CHDAEc

The facts, as represented, are as follows:

1.

NEC Tokin is a corporation duly organized and existing under

and by virtue of the laws of the Philippines. Its principal office
address is at 1 Ring Road, Light Industry & Science Park
(LISP) II, Barangay La Mesa, Calamba, Laguna. It is registered
with the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA) as an
Ecozone Export Enterprise pursuant to its Certification of
Registration No. 02-043. Under the Registration Agreement,
the company's registered activity "shall be limited to the
manufacture of electro mechanical device as relay and others,
and the importation of raw materials, machinery, equipment,
tools, goods, wares, articles or merchandise directly used in its
registered operations."

2.

NEC Tokin provides group hospitalization benefits to its

non-rank and file employees under a HMO plan provided by
Health Maintenance, Inc. The company shoulders the entire

Copyright 1994-2015

CD Technologies Asia, Inc.

Taxation 2014

amount of HMO premiums covering its non-rank and file

employees pursuant to this group health insurance. The plan is
compulsory, meaning that the employee has no option not to be
covered by the group health insurance plan. However, the
HMO plan has no paid-up value to the employee.
3.

Furthermore, under the arrangement with Health Maintenance,

Inc., a maximum of three (3) dependents of the non-rank and
file employees are enrolled under the HMO plan. In the case of
assistant managers, NEC Tokin shoulders the entire amount of
the HMO premiums covering their dependents. In the case of
supervisors, NEC Tokin advances the HMO premiums
covering their dependents and collects the same through salary
deductions over a period of one year.

In connection therewith, you now request for a confirmation that:

1.

Premium payments made by NEC Tokin to Health

Maintenance, Inc. pursuant to its group health insurance plan
for its employees are not subject to FBT.

2.

Premium payments made by NEC Tokin to Health

Maintenance, Inc. pursuant to its group health insurance plan
for the dependents of its assistant managers to the extent of P
1,500 per employee per year are not subject to FBT.

3.

Premium payments made by NEC Tokin to Health

Maintenance, Inc. pursuant to its group health insurance plan
for the dependents of its supervisors, which payments are later
paid by said employees, are not subject to FBT.

In reply thereto, please be informed as follows:

1.

On the first issue

Section 33(C) of the 1997 Tax Code provides that:

"(C) Fringe Benefits Not Taxable. The following fringe benefits
are not taxable under this Section:
(1) Fringe benefits which are authorized and exempted
from tax under special laws;
(2) Contributions of the employer for the benefit of the
employee to retirement, insurance and hospitalization benefit plans;
Copyright 1994-2015

CD Technologies Asia, Inc.

Taxation 2014

(3) Benefits given to rank and file employees, whether

granted under a collective bargaining agreement or not; and
(4) De minimis benefits as defined in the rules and
regulations to be promulgated by the Secretary of Finance, upon
recommendation of the Commissioner." (emphasis supplied)

Revenue Regulations No. 3-98, which implements the above provision of

the Tax Code, provides that the cost of group life insurance premiums borne by
the employer for his employee shall be considered as a non-taxable fringe benefit.
Section 2.33(B)(10) of the said regulation states that:
"(10) Life or health insurance and other non-life insurance premiums
or similar amounts in excess of what the law allows. The cost of life or
health insurance and other non-life insurance premiums borne by the
employer for his employee shall be treated as taxable fringe benefit, except
the following:
HEacAS

(a) contributions of the employer for the benefit of the

employee, pursuant to the provisions of existing law, such as under
the Social Security System (SSS), (R.A. No. 8282, as amended) or
under the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS) (R.A. No.
8291), or similar contributions arising from the provisions of any
other existing law; and
(b) the cost of premiums borne by the employer for the
group insurance of his employees." (emphasis supplied)
Although technically a health maintenance organization
(HMO) is not an insurance company subject to registration and
regulation by the insurance Commission, the service rendered by
such HMOs are akin to the service provided by insurance companies.
Thus, in Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 04-03, dated December
31, 2002, in defining insurance and pension funding companies, this
is clarified, to wit:
"(ii) Insurance and pension funding companies refer to those
engaged in life and non-life insurance business as defined under the
Insurance Code AND pre-need companies, including health
maintenance organizations. Their gross receipts shall mean actual or
constructive receipts representing: net retained premiums (gross
premiums net of returns, cancellations, and premiums ceded)/gross
premium or collection from planholders; membership fees (in the
case of HMOs);
xxx
Copyright 1994-2015

CD Technologies Asia, Inc.

xxx
Taxation 2014

xxx" (emphasis supplied)

3

Being considered as a pre-need company, premium payments to HMOs by

a corporation under a group insurance plan are not subject to fringe benefit tax.
2.

On the second issue

Section 33(C)(4) of the 1997 Tax Code states that de minimis benefits are
not subject to fringe benefit tax. This is further implemented by Section 2.33(C) of
Revenue Regulations No. 3-98 (supra), which states that:
"(C) Fringe Benefits Not Subject to Fringe Benefits Tax In
general, the fringe benefits tax shall not be imposed on the following fringe
benefits:
(1) Fringe benefits which are authorized and exempted
from income tax under the Code or under any special law;
(2) Contributions of the employer for the benefit of the
employee to retirement, insurance and hospitalization benefit plans;
(3) Benefits given to the rank and file, whether granted
under a collective bargaining agreement or not:
(4)

De minimis benefits as defined in these Regulations;

(5) If the grant of the fringe benefits to the employee is

required by the nature of, or necessary to the trade, business or
profession of the employer; or
(6) If the grant of the fringe benefit is for the convenience
of the employer." (emphasis supplied)

As defined in the regulations, de minimis benefits are clarified to be:

"The term "DE MINIMIS" benefits which are exempt from the fringe
benefit tax shall, in general, be limited to facilities or privileges furnished or
offered by an employer to his employees that are of relatively small value
and are offered or furnished by the employer merely as a means of
promoting the health, goodwill, contentment, or efficiency of his employees
such as the following:
xxx

xxx

xxx

(2) Medical cash allowance to dependents of employees not

exceeding P750 per semester or P125 per month;
xxx

Copyright 1994-2015

CD Technologies Asia, Inc.

xxx

Taxation 2014

xxx" (emphasis supplied)

On the basis of the foregoing, BIR Ruling No. DA-364-03, dated October
13, 2003, states that:
"The following shall be considered as de minimis benefits not subject
to income tax as well as withholding tax on compensation income of both
managerial and rank and file employees:
xxx

xxx

xxx

2. Medical cash allowance to dependents of employees not

exceeding P750.00 per employee per semester or P125 per month:
AICDSa

xxx

xxx

xxx (emphasis supplied)

"In view of the foregoing, the medical cash allowance to dependents

of employees not exceeding P 750.00 per employee per semester or P 125.00
per month and actual yearly medical benefits not exceeding P 10,000 per
annum if given to the rank and file and managerial employees are considered
de minimis benefits and therefor not considered as compensation
income/wages and which are not subject to either fringe benefits tax, income
tax, or withholding tax on compensation. (Revenue Regulations No. 2-98, as
amended)." (emphasis supplied)

In your supplemental letter to this Office, it is stated that the annual

premium paid for dependents of assistant managers is P9,890.00 and for
dependents of supervisors, P7,831.00, depending on the age of the dependent, and
that the premium payment is not shouldered by NEC Tokin, but is paid by
employee-supervisor through salary deduction. Applying the rate of P 125.00 per
month to an annual basis, the annual ceiling for de minimis benefits given as cash
allowance to dependents of employees is P 1,500.00 per employee per year. To
this extent, therefore, the premiums paid to HMOs by NEC Tokin are not subject
to fringe benefits tax, income tax, nor to withholding tax on compensation.
However, any amount in excess of the ceiling may further be considered as part of
other benefits, provided that the total benefits shall not exceed P30,000.00. Further
still, that the amount in excess of the P30,000.00 threshold of the total of "other
benefits" shall be included as part of the taxable compensation of the
employer-taxpayer.
3.

On the third issue

The premiums initially paid by NEC Tokin to Health Maintenance, Inc. on

behalf of the dependents of its supervisors pursuant to the group insurance plan do
not constitute fringe benefits or income to said supervisors. The amount of the
premiums is paid by the supervisors as salary deductions. NEC Tokin merely
Copyright 1994-2015

CD Technologies Asia, Inc.

Taxation 2014

includes their dependents in the group insurance package as an accommodation. In

any case, any benefit that the supervisors derive from this accommodation does
not exceed the amount of P 1,500.00 per employee per year. As discussed in the
preceding section, such benefit, if any, is neither subject to fringe benefit tax nor to
income and withholding tax.
This ruling is being issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as
represented. However, if upon investigation, it will be disclosed that the facts are
different, then this ruling shall considered null and void.

Very truly yours,

Commissioner of Internal Revenue
By:

(SGD.) JAMES H. ROLDAN

Assistant Commissioner
Legal Service

Copyright 1994-2015

CD Technologies Asia, Inc.

Taxation 2014