Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

8572 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

34 / Tuesday, February 22, 2005 / Notices

Affected Public: Businesses or other comment on the provisions thereof. on patient safety issues such as
for-profit; Not-for-profit institutions; Comments are invited on: (a) Whether teamwork, communications, medical
State, local, or tribal governments. the proposed collection of information error occurrence and response, error
Annual Burden Hours: 759 hours. is necessary for the proper performance reporting, and overall perceptions of
Number of Respondents: 1938. of the functions of the agency, including patient safety. The purpose of the
Responses Per Respondent: 1. whether the information shall have survey is to assess the current status of
Average Burden Per Response: 23 practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the patient safety in MHS facilities as well
minutes. agency’s estimate of the burden of the as to provide baseline input for
Frequency: One time. proposed information collection; (c) assessment of patient safety
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ways to enhance the quality, utility, and improvement over time. Survey results
Summary of Information Collection clarity of the information to be will be prepared at the facility and
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the Service levels and MHS overall.
The national survey of employers burden of the information collection on Affected Public: Federal government;
with Guard or Reserve members who are respondents, including through the use individuals or households.
absent from work for more than 30 days of automated collection techniques or Annual Burden Hours: 2,384.
to serve in the military will use a self- other forms of information technology. Number of Respondents: 14,022.
administered survey instrument Responses Per Respondent: 1.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
delivered by mail. The survey will focus Average Burden Per Response: 10
comments received by April 25, 2005. minutes.
on the varying economic costs and
ADDRESSES: Written comments should Frequency: On occasion.
impacts to employers’ operations when
be submitted to: Office of the Assistant SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Guard or Reserve members are absent to
Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs,
serve in the military. Survey questions Summary of Collection
TRICARE Management Activity, Skyline
are organized into two sections:
Five, Suite 810, 5111 Leesburg Pike, The survey to be implemented is the
Operations and Human Resources.
Falls Church, VA 22041–3206. pilot-tested Agency for Healthcare
Section One will collect information on
the impact on operations and Section FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To Research and Quality (AHRQ) Survey
Two on the economic impact on human request more information on this on Patient Safety Culture that was
resources. Eligible employers will have proposed information collection or to publicly released in November 2004.
employed Guard or Reserve members obtain a copy of the proposed and The development and testing of this
who were absent form work for more associated collection instruments, survey was funded by the AHRQ and
than 30 days to serve in the military at please write to the above address or call sponsored by the Department of Defense
any time since 2002. Respondents will Capt. Deborah McKay, Office of the as an agency member of the Quality
be the most knowledgeable person(s) Assistant Secretary of Defense for Interagency Coordination Task Force
about operations and human resources Health Affairs, TRICARE Management (QuIC), along with ten other Federal
at each sampled employer. Therefore, it Activity at (703) 681–0064. agencies. The pilot of the AHRQ Survey
is anticipated that employers with Title and OMB Number: DoD Patient on Patient Safety Culture was
greater than 30 employees may require Safety Survey; OMB Number 0720–TBD. previously approved by OMB (No.:
Needs and Uses: The 2001 National 0935–0115, Exp. Date: 01/31/2004). This
two people from different departments,
Defense Authorization Act contains survey was chosen because it measures
while smaller employers may require
specific sections addressing patient a number of different dimensions
only one person to accurately respond
safety in military and veteran’s health pertaining to patient safety culture, has
to both sections.
care systems. This legislation states that demonstrated reliability and validity,
Dated: February 10, 2005. the Secretary or Defense shall establish and the specificity of the items will
Patricia L. Toppings, a patient care error reporting and provide the DoD with actionable
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison management system to study information about MHS patient safety.
Officer, Department of Defense. occurrences of errors in patient care and
[FR Doc. 05–3230 Filed 2–18–05; 8:45 am] that one of the purposes of the system Data Collection Method
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M should be ‘‘To identify systemic factors The proposed project will administer
that are associated with such the patient safety culture survey as a
occurrences’’ and ‘‘To provide for action web-based instrument to a census of all
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE to be taken to correct the identified staff, both clinical and non-clinical,
systemic factors’’ (Sec. 754, items b2 working in all U.S. and international
Office of the Secretary and b3). In addition, the legislation MHS facilities. Due to the large number
states that the Secretary shall ‘‘Continue of staff to be surveyed across the
Proposed Collection; Comment Services, data collection will be phased
research and development investments
Request beginning with the Army, followed by
to improve communication,
AGENCY: DoD, Office of the Assistant coordination, and team work in the the Navy and Air Force. Standard
Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, provision of health care’’ (Sec. 754, item survey procedures will be implemented.
TRICARE Management Activity. d4). Potential respondents will receive a
ACTION: Notice. In its ongoing response to this prenotification letter followed by an
legislation, DoD plans to implement a email survey notification containing an
SUMMARY: In compliance with section Web-based patient safety culture survey embedded hyperlink to the internet
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork to a census of all staff working in Army, location where the survey can be
Reduction Act of 1995, the Department Navy, and Air Force Military Health completed. Two additional e-mail
of Defense, Office of the Assistant System (MHS) facilities in the U.S. and survey notifications will be sent, a week
Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, internationally, including Military apart, so that the data collection field
TRICARE Management Activity Treatment Facility (MTF) hospitals as period will be four weeks for each
announces a proposed public well as ambulatory and dental services. Service. The survey takes about 10
information collection and seeks public The survey obtains MHS staff opinions minutes to complete. All survey

VerDate jul<14>2003 19:10 Feb 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 22, 2005 / Notices 8573

responses are voluntary and will be Project Period: Up to 36 months. • Each participating LEA is firmly
individually anonymous; only group- committed to hiring successful program
Full Text of Announcement
level results will be tabulated to protect completers.
individual anonymity. I. Funding Opportunity Description Invitational Priority 2—Innovative
There are a total of approximately Purpose of Program: The School approaches to recruiting and preparing
125,663 MHS staff in the United States Leadership program is designed to assist school leaders through alternative
and internationally (estimate on 12/16/ high-need LEAs in the development, routes. Over the next five years the
04). Of these staff, approximately 18,696 enhancement, or expansion of number of vacancies among principals
staff (about 15%) are contractors, local innovative programs to recruit, train, and other school leaders is expected to
nationals, volunteers or other MHS staff and mentor principals (including grow by 20 percent; filling these
who are not direct employees of the assistant principals) to serve in high- positions will be particularly
DoD. Because OMB approval is required need schools through such activities as: challenging for rural and urban districts,
only for the non-DoD staff component, which tend to receive fewer
• Providing financial incentives to
we provide estimates of the respondent applications for open positions.
aspiring new principals;
burden for only these non-DoD MHS Studies show that there is no overall
staff. Anticipating a 75% response rate, • Providing stipends to principals
shortage of candidates with the
we anticipate responses from who mentor new principals;
credentials that States require for school
approximately 14,022 non-DoD MHS • Carrying out professional
principals. However, those same studies
staff. development programs in instructional
indicate that most of these candidates
leadership and management; and
Dated: February 7, 2005. typically acquired their credentials in
• Providing incentives that are order to obtain salary increases or attain
Patricia L. Toppings, appropriate for teachers or individuals
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison an advanced degree, and not necessarily
from other fields who want to become because of a strong personal
Officer, Department of Defense. principals and that are effective in
[FR Doc. 05–3231 Filed 2–18–05; 8:45 am] commitment to becoming leaders of
retaining new principals. their schools and school communities.
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M Priorities: Under this competition we The Department recognizes that some
are particularly interested in States have addressed the need to
applications that address the following increase the pool of candidates who are
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION priorities. committed to becoming school leaders
Invitational Priorities: For FY 2005 in high-need LEAs and schools, in
Office of Innovation and Improvement these priorities are invitational particular by making available
Overview Information; School priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(1) we alternative routes to meeting
Leadership Program; Notice Inviting do not give an application that meets requirements for certification or
Applications for New Awards for Fiscal these invitational priorities a licensure as a school principal or
Year (FY) 2005 competitive or absolute preference over assistant principal. The Secretary
other applications. strongly encourages eligible entities in
Catalog of Federal Domestic These priorities are: States with these approved alternative
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.363A. Invitational Priority 1—Commitment routes to submit applications that
Dates from the LEA. To successfully meet the propose to recruit individuals of diverse
purpose of this program and to develop professional backgrounds who can take
Applications Available: February 22, institutional capacity and sustainability, advantage of the alternative routes, and
2005. projects need the full support of each then create incentives for these
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: participating high-need LEA. Therefore, individuals to participate in the
March 24, 2005. the Secretary strongly encourages
Deadline for Transmittal of program and to take leadership
applicants to develop strategies for positions in high-need schools that face
Applications: April 15, 2005. maximizing the involvement of each
Deadline for Intergovernmental the greatest challenges.
participating LEA in the project’s Applicants may choose to address one
Review: June 14, 2005.
design, development and or more of these invitational priorities
Eligible Applicants: High-need local
implementation. These strategies, for within their responses to the selection
educational agencies (LEAs), consortia
example, might focus on ensuring that— criteria.
of high-need LEAs, or partnerships that
consist of at least one high-need LEA • The proposed project is part of an Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6651(b).
and at least one nonprofit organization already well-defined and articulated Applicable Regulations: The
(which may be a community- or faith- district-wide strategy for improving Education Department General
based organization) or institution of student achievement in each Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in
higher education. (See section III. participating high-need LEA; 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82,
Eligibility Information, 3. Other: • Each participating LEA’s 84, 85, 86, 97, 98 and 99.
Definition of ‘‘High-Need LEA’’ and superintendent and his or her staff play Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79
other Eligibility Information) in this key roles in identifying the apply to all applicants except federally
notice. competencies that program participants recognized Indian tribes.
Estimated Available Funds: $12 need to know and demonstrate, and use
million. those competencies to implement and Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86
build the training program; apply to institutions of higher education
Estimated Range of Awards:
• Each participating LEA has only.
$250,000–$750,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: established procedures for placing
II. Award Information
$500,000. participants in part-time or full-time
Estimated Number of Awards: 24. leadership positions or residencies in Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Note: The Department is not bound by high-need schools as part of their Estimated Available Funds: $12
any estimates in this notice. training and preparation; and million.

VerDate jul<14>2003 19:10 Feb 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen