Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
IS RIGHT = TITLE?
YES: Holland, Lord Blackburn
NO: Salmond,
Austin
5th element of a Right.
Fact or event by reason
of which the right is
vested in the owner
LEGAL RIGHTS
Title is the de facto antecedent, legal right is its de jure
consequent.
Title:
(a) Lawful mode of acquisition
(b) Jural claim to have and hold
Justice Holmes
Every right is a consequence attached by
the law to one or more facts which the law
defines.
Wherever law gives anyone special right
on the ground of certain special facts true
to him.
Special facts = title.
Salmond
Title is the de facto antecedent of which
the right is the de jure consequent.
Right upon one man due to certain facts
true to him (title).
Right may be by birth or personal efforts,
but title is essential.
Holland
Fact giving rise to right is title.
Fact of transfer or extinguishment of right?
Bentham
dispositive facts instead of title.
CLASSIFICATION OF TITLES
Salmond
Bentham
Question of human will
Salmonds Classification
Vestitive
facts
Investitive
facts
Derivative
Title
Alienative
Facts
Original
Title
Salmonds Classification
Vestitive
facts
Relation to Right
(creation, transfer, extinction)
Investitive
Facts
Derivative
Title
Alienative
Facts
Original
Title
Extinctive
Facts
Salmonds Classification
Vestitive
facts
Divestitive Facts
Destroy rights
Alienative
Facts
Extinctive
Facts
Create rights
Investitive
Facts
Derivative
Title
Original
Title
Salmonds Classification
Vestitive
facts
Investitive
facts
Alienative
Facts
Created by transfer of
an existing right
Derivative
Title
Original
Title
De novo
(No previous existence)
Identification
Case:
A caught fish from the river.
He sold the fish to B.
Benthams Classification
Dispositive
facts
Investitive
facts
Collative
facts
Impositive
facts
Divestitive
facts
Destructive
facts
Translative
facts
Exonerative
facts
Benthams Classification
Transferring of
rights and duties
Dispositive
facts
Investitive
facts
Collative
facts
Impositive
facts
Divestitive
facts
Destructive
facts
Translative
facts
Exonerative
facts
Benthams Classification
Dispositive
facts
Investitive
facts
Collative
facts
Confer rights
Impositive
facts
Impose duties
Divestitive
facts
Destructive
facts
Translative
facts
Exonerative
facts
Benthams Classification
Dispositive
facts
Investitive
facts
Collative
facts
Impositive
facts
End rights
Divestitive
facts
Destructive
facts
Release persons
from duties
Translative
facts
Exonerative
facts
Acts of the
Law
Acts in the
Law
Unilateral
Subject to
dissent
Bilateral
Independent
of dissent
Creative
Contracts
Releases
Extinctive
Assignments
Creative
Grants
Extinctive
Acts in
the Law
Unilateral
Will of only one party
is effective or operative
Valid even without
consent of other party
Bilateral
Consenting will of
two or more parties
Identification
Case
A entrusts property to B in trust for C
Unilateral or Bilateral?
Importance of Agreements
1. Evidence of justice
2. Private declaration of rights and duties
. Mutual consent
. Enforced by courts
Kinds of Agreements
1. Create Rights Contracts & Grants
2. Transfer Rights - Assignments
3. Extinguish Rights - Releases
Agreement
Valid
Invalid
Void
Voidable
Validity of Agreements
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Capacity of Parties
Legal Formalities
Morality and Public Policy
Error or Mistake
Consent
Consideration
1. Capacity of Parties
Certain persons are not competent to
enter into Contracts
Contracts by them are Invalid
Eg. Minors, Lunatics
2. Legal Formalities
Imposed by law to
(a) prove consent of parties
(b) distinguish actual agreement from
negotiations leading to it
Eg. Non registration, omission of
signatures of parties
4. Error or Mistake
Mistake :
(a) Essential no consensus ad idem
(b) Inessential external circumstance, induced
consent
5. Consent
Invalid if obtained by means of
compulsion, undue influence or coercion
6. Consideration
Law requires valuable consideration, even
if inadequate.
Sec 25 (ICA) : Agreement without
consideration is Void.
Exceptions exist.
1. Principle of Occupatio
Thing concerned did not belong to
anybody res nullius.
Taking possession is sufficient.
2. Prescription
Long possession
Positive lapse of time confers title
Negative
Limitation of action right exists
Perfect Negative Prescription - Lapse of time
may extinguish right itself
Case : Adverse possession for 20+ years.
Is it fair?
Public Policy certainty
Negative prescription is limited to fixed
period repairs injuries caused by time
Theory of Laches assertion of claim with
promptitude.
THE END