Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2/20
Executive summary
Nokia Siemens Networks and Juniper Networks have joined together to develop
and implement carrier-grade end-to-end Next Generation Network (NGN) solutions
with best-in-class QoS, reliability, management, and security.
The Resilient IP (ResIP) Certified solutions are the product of more than three
years of joint solution development work focused on validating, optimizing, and
certifying IP solutions for voice, video, and data applications end-to-end.
Contents
2
Executive summary
Introduction
Network aspects
12
16
Conclusion
17
19
Abbreviations
3/20
Service providers can tailor the ResIP Certified solutions and engineering work
to their specific network environment. Nokia Siemens Networks and Juniper
Networks offer professional network planning and implementation services to help
carriers customize their IPTV solution.
4/20
1. Introduction
Telecom operators around the world are facing the challenge of declining voice
revenues due to increased competition and the mass proliferation of mobile
communications. In addition, cable TV operators are adding voice services to
their traditional cable offering, and are thus entering into the domain of telecommunication carriers.
Studies have shown that end customers will pay for an attractive service bundle
comprising voice, video, and data, and prefer to have a single bill from a trusted
operator for all their service needs. Under these conditions, it has become mandatory for the incumbent fixed line carriers to reposition themselves in the changed
competitive landscape. There is a strong need to migrate from simple infrastructure provider to a one-stop service provider.
The new business model for the carriers will be driven by the expectations of end
users for multimedia services. The operators network must be able to support the
multimedia services requirements, i.e. the need to have voice, data, video on demand (VoD), and TV broadcast services. The success of service bundling is
dependent on satisfying the expectations of the end user.
Early movers on the IPTV market have faced the risk of suffering from technical
barriers and challenges. In several cases, technical issues have led to stalled
projects, incomplete service offerings, and unexpected quality degradation of the
services. This in turn has affected the acceptance of the triple-play services and
resulted in negative impact on margins and increased customer churn.
Innovative online
entertainment and
communication via TV.
5/20
In addition to the end users expectation, service providers need to reduce costs
(from both the equipment point of view and the operational point of view) and
increase revenues. Network operators must:
optimize the utilization of network resources in both unicast and multicast
environments
minimize operational efforts through advanced management tools and zerotouch provisioning recommendations
be quicker to market with new services
be flexible and maintain investment protection to address a broad range of
access types, network architectures, aggregation technologies, and existing
protocol environments
6/20
3. Network aspects
The introduction of IPTV services, including both broadcast TV and on-demand
services, onto todays broadband IP networks changes several aspects of these
networks.
The total number of IPTV channels streamed online determines the total bandwidth requirements. The total transmission rate of the IPTV content measured in
Mbit/s equals the sum of all concurrent streams. Each IPTV channel is sent only
once from the video headend to the network, independent of the number of potential TV broadcast receivers. The distribution to all subscribers is achieved by
multicast implementations in the core and the access networks. For example, if
30 IPTV channels are broadcast and each channel is encoded by H.264 codec
providing a gross bit rate of 2 Mbit/s (incl. Ethernet overhead), 60 Mbit/s bandwidth
is required for the IPTV service. The calculated 60 Mbit/s IPTV traffic will be transmitted via the network operators IP core network to the DSLAMs independent of
the number of end customers. This amount of traffic does not affect the throughput
of the IP core network dramatically.
In the core network, typically all offered IPTV channels are distributed without
considering the current usage of every channel. However, in the access network,
bandwidth can be reduced by supporting IGMP (Internet Group Multicast Protocol)
snooping in the aggregation switches and edge routers. IGMP snooping can passively snoop on IGMP Query, Report and Leave (IGMP version 2) packets transferred between IP multicast routers/switches and IP multicast hosts to learn the
IP multicast group membership. It checks IGMP packets passing through it, picks
out the group registration information, and configures multicasting accordingly.
Without IGMP snooping, multicast traffic is treated in the same manner as broadcast traffic, that is, it is forwarded to all ports. With IGMP snooping, multicast traffic
of a group is only forwarded to ports that have members of that group. IGMP
snooping with proxy reporting can help reduce the IGMP Membership Report
messages.
Statistics in existing IPTV installations have shown that about 50% of all offered
channels are requested by at least one user per DSLAM. This number depends
on the ratio of free TV and pay TV channels or the quality of the electronic
program guide (EPG).
7/20
3.2. Reliability
Reliability is one of the key requirements for networks delivering IPTV services.
Avoidance of any single point of failure and subsecond restoration times is a key
fundamental of all ResIP design concepts. This includes both the IP core network
and the access/aggregation network. The IP core network can be based on either
the Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) like IS-IS or OSPF or on an MPLS backbone.
The access and aggregation network is Ethernet-based with redundant interconnection of the video headend equipment to the IP core network. An example for a
resilient multicast network design is shown in Figure 1.
This network design assumes that the multicast replication is achieved in the
DSLAM, and that that and the multicast traffic is distributed from the redundant
IP edge via a multicast VLAN to the DSLAMs. Usually there is only one IPTV edge
location in the network. In some situations, geographic redundancy is required and
there are two IPTV edge locations. However, there are usually multiple IP edges,
one for each regional access and aggregation network. For the access and aggregation network, two options are generally possible. First, the topology can be
built as a tree structure, using Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP) or Multiple
STP (MSTP) to resolve redundant paths. Secondly, ring topologies are emerging
to improve reliability. The innovative Nokia Siemens Networks Ethernet Ring
Protection (ERP) provides very fast switch-over times in case of ring failures.
IPTV edge
IP edge
G1
G1
G2
G1+G2
Resilient
aggregation
IP core
G1
G2
G2
G1+G2
8/20
The latency of IGMP processing in the network (e.g. the residential gateway,
DSLAM and BSR) also directly adds to the overall zapping delay.
The required size of the jitter buffer depends on the jitter of the media stream received by the STB. The jitter generated by a well-engineered high bandwidth IP
network is less than 50 ms. The video source itself should also produce low jitter
streams.
MPEG decoder delay usually makes up the largest part of the overall delay
budget, because the decoder must usually wait for an I-frame to resynch. Also,
additional decoding delay results due to the use of B-frames which are encoded
using past and future I- and P-frames. This delay depends on the compression
rate, the encoding algorithm and the number of B- and P-frames between two
I-frames (GOP). This results in a tradeoff between channel change delay and
compression rate. High compression rates imply a large GOP with extensive use
of B-frames, and therefore result in a large encoding/decoding delay.
To improve the responsiveness from a users perspective, the STB immediately
shows a dialogue box with the program name, time, channel, etc. upon receiving a
zapping request for another channel via the remote control. This ensures that end
users will never view a black screen while waiting.
The DSL Forum has recently finished the specification (TR-101) for the fundamental architecture for Ethernet-based DSL aggregation networks, which also includes
definitions for the delivery of multicast services.
9/20
4. Access network
architecture
TR-101 differentiates between two different approaches for connecting broadband
DSL users to the aggregation network, first the so-called 1:1 (also known as VLAN
per subscriber) and secondly the N:1 (also known as VLAN per service) mode.
xDSL
IP DSLAM
1
2
3
4
K
Port 3
VLAN
1
3
TV
xDSL
IP DSLAM
1
2
3
4
L
Ethernet
switch
DSLAM-x
VLAN
K
1
Port 3
VLAN
Ethernet
switch
DSLAM-x
VLAN
BSR
1
DSLAM-y
VLAN
DSLAM-y
VLAN
TV
1
Port 3
VLAN
xDSL
IP DSLAM
TV
DSLAM-z
VLAN
DSLAM-z
VLAN
TV
TV
1
2
3
4
M
Porttag
IPTV headend
10/20
IP DSLAM
HSI
VoD/TV
VoIP
1
2
3
4
K
HSI-X
VoD-X
TV
VoIP-X
IP edge
TV
Ethernet
switch
IP DSLAM
HSI
VoD/TV
VoIP
1
2
3
4
L
HSI-Y
VoD-Y
TV
VoIP-Y
Ethernet
switch
GE/10GE
BRAS
HSIX,Y,Z
IP edge
VoDX,Y,Z
IP DSLAM
HSI
VoD/TV
VoIP
1
2
3
4
M
HSI-Z
VoD-Z
TV
VoIP-Z
IP edge
VoIPX,Y,Z
TV
headend
11/20
xDSL
Multicast
replication
IP DSLAM
1
2
3
4
K
Multicast and
shaping/subscr.
TV
xDSL
IP DSLAM
Ethernet
switch
Ethernet
switch
1
2
3
4
L
BSR
xDSL
IP DSLAM
1
2
3
4
M
IPTV headend
12/20
5. Core network
design concepts
Optimized for scale.
This paper addresses three different mechanisms for distributing multicast traffic
throughout the IP backbone. Two of them, PIM SSM and PIM SM, are based on
IGP only, and the third, P2MP LSPs, are based on the MPLS multicast distribution
concept.
Active
Multicast
traffic for Group G
Receiver DR
Receiver DR
Standby
IGMP v1/2
Multicast
Receiver 2
Receiver DR
Multicast
Receiver 1
Figure 5: PIM SSM scenario with static SSM mapping at the edge
13/20
Multicast
traffic for Group G
Active
Register messages
Multicast
Receiver 3
SPTs for (S,G)
Receiver DR
Receiver DR
Standby
Multicast
Receiver 2
Receiver DR
5.2. PIM SM
In this PIM mode, shown in Figure 6, the edge router does not need to know which
multicast source can provide the multicast data for a certain group address G. The
routers do need to know whom to ask to get the information about the multicast
source for G: the instance to ask is another router called Rendezvous Point (RP).
This kind of multicast distribution is used in the IP backbone when the range of potential multicast group addresses is quite large, the multicast source IP addresses
are not really known from the beginning, or the multicast source IP addresses are
subject to change quite often during the time. There are a couple of options for how
to choose an RP. The preferred option is the so-called Anycast RP.
In this option, each potential RP router is equipped with two loopback addresses,
a primary and a secondary one. The secondary loopback address does not need
to be unique throughout the network. The Anycast RP concept is to define the RP
via the secondary IP address and assure that each such secondary IP address
occurs at least twice in the network. Any time an edge router has to contact the RP,
it will automatically be led to the nearest router (in terms of IGP metrics) with a certain secondary loopback address. This assures that the time in which a new multicast group cannot be joined when an RP fails is the time the IGP needs to converge.
Moreover, RP load balancing is achieved automatically.
14/20
Active
Multicast
Receiver 3
Receiver DR
Receiver DR
Standby
Multicast
Receiver 2
Receiver DR
Multicast traffic
for Group G
P2MP LSP
Multicast
Receiver 1
15/17
15/20
High Quality and Resilient IPTV Multicast Architecture Technical White Paper
6. Conclusion
5.4. Summary
PIM SM is recommended in the IP backbone when the range of potential multicast
group addresses is quite large, the multicast source IP addresses are not really
known from the beginning, or the multicast source IP addresses are subject to
change quite often during the time. Therefore the typical multicast applications to
use PIM SM are voice, video conferencing (if realized by multicast at all), or gaming. The ResIP recommendation is to use PIM SSM or P2MP LSPs for IPTV
services.
Combining the multicast features with an intelligent implementation in the equipment (i.e. routers and switches), a subsecond failover time can be achieved for
physical and also Layer 3 failures. A number of failure types need to be looked at.
This includes e.g. a link failure in the core, a failure of a router, or a failure of the
multicast source itself. A concept has been developed to assure a subsecond failover time for all these failure cases (this includes the failure detection as well as
the failure recovery).
16/20
6. Conclusion
The Nokia Siemens Networks and Juniper Networks ResIP Certified IPTV solution
has been certified in the ResIP Lab. It is based on mechanisms drawn from the
Nokia Siemens Networks SURPASS Home Entertainment solution, the Nokia
Siemens Networks SURPASS Carrier Ethernet, the Juniper Networks M- and
T-series routing platform, and the Juniper Networks E-series Broadband Services
Routers. The solution reduces operational costs through a well-designed subscriber management using Zero Touch Provisioning.
SURPASS Integration Solutions offers tailor-made support for the effective and
fast integration of new products and applications in todays complex and heterogeneous multi-vendor networks, and allows network operators to participate in the
ResIP outcomes.
Our approach is based on an in-depth understanding of your needs, priorities, and
requirements, thus enabling us to develop an optimized solution. We analyze your
business requirements and customize products and applications to your specific
needs. Prior to implementing the solution, we perform comprehensive tests such
as performance and conformance testing, interoperability checks, and technical
verification in a reference system to ensure proven end-to-end functionality.
Integration projects carried out by Nokia Siemens Networks result in faster
revenue generation, while keeping expenditure to a minimum by delivering the
right quality, at the right cost, and at the right time, and should you wish to see
how our standard solution would meet your demands, we can carry out a trial on
site or at one of our Nokia Siemens Networks Integration Laboratories.
Learn more!
17/20
Nokia Siemens Networks works together with preferred partner companies, all at
the leading edge in their segment, including Juniper Networks, with its leading IP
product portfolio for BSR solutions, edge and core networks, and security
technologies.
Juniper Networks has been helping its customers build the largest, most reliable,
and most profitable IP networks in the world for nearly ten years. This blend of
world-class offerings and partnerships and our global presence and expertise offer
the best possible guarantee that Nokia Siemens Networks Next Generation
Network solutions are truly carrier-grade.
Nokia Siemens Networks and Juniper Networks have collaborated to develop an
end-to-end IP architecture for next generation networks that supports voice, video,
and data solutions as SURPASS Home Entertainment and SURPASS
VoIP@Home.
This architecture enables service providers to offer an assured experience
based on customer and application requirements. ResIP Certified Solutions
that have already undergone stringent testing are available to service providers for immediate deployment.
18/20
Nokia Siemens Networks and Juniper Networks are working together to solve the
toughest challenges service providers are currently facing. ResIP is designed to
help service providers through these tough times of decreasing voice revenue and
declining customer base. It includes a well-defined program to develop, test, and
certify all technology for the next generation architecture and solutions. The resulting benefits to service providers is a fully tested and complete network architecture
that allow multiple certified solutions to be deployed for new revenue opportunities.
Nokia Siemens Networks is one of the largest players in the global telecommunications industry. Nokia Siemens Networks is the only provider in the market
that offers its customers a full-range portfolio, from devices for end users to complex network infrastructures for enterprises and carriers, as well as related services. Nokia Siemens Networks Communications is the worlds innovation leader
in convergent technologies, products, and services for wireless, fixed, and enterprise networks.
Juniper Networks is the leader in enabling secure and assured communications
over a single IP network. The companys purpose-built, high-performance IP
platforms enable customers to support many different services and applications
at scale. Service providers, enterprises, governments, and research and education institutions worldwide rely on Juniper Networks to deliver products for building networks that are tailored to the specific needs of their users, services, and
applications. Juniper Networks portfolio of proven networking and security solutions supports the complex scale, security, and performance requirements of
the worlds most demanding networks.
19/20
8. Abbreviations
ATM
BSR
C-VLAN
CPE
DHCP
DR
DSL
DSLAM
EPG
ERP
FEC
FTTH
GOP
HDTV
HSI
IEEE
IGMP
IGP
IP
IPoE
IPTV
IS-IS
L2C
LSP
Mbit/s
MPEG
MPLS
MPLS-TE
OAM
OAM&P
PIM-SM
PIM-SSM
PoC
PPP
PPPoE
P2MP
PVC
QoS
RAM
ResIP
RP
RSTP
RSVP
S-VLAN
SDTV
SPT
STB
STP
VLAN
www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com