Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
-Company was lagging its competitors in both financial & market performance
-Consumers were becoming more price and health conscious
-Campbell was competing with giants such as Kraft and Nestle.
Rejuvenation Strategy
Shift Campbells portfolio of brands and products to emphasize growth, and driving a quality
agenda. Distinguish core business activities from non-core, then manage non-core for low cost
while managing core (sales, marketing, and R&D, trade management, & product lifecycle
management-for differentiation and growth).
Project Harmony
Four year effort to create more standardized and integrated business processes Campbell did not
want to experience the performance dip common in companies implementing major new
systems. SAP (Systems Applications and Products) selected with New Governance Design that
includes
1.
2.
3.
4.
Original Plan
Reduce Operating Costs
Improvements
Supply Chain
Accounting
Customer Service
Sustained Benefits
Impacts on Leadership
Depended more on empowering workforce across functional lines to improve business
performance. Campbell was significantly outperforming industry averages evidence is
Shareholders returns of 16.2% vs. industries 7.7% in 2007, by incorporating First corporate CIO
Campbell software
Overtime Campbell had developed multiple software applications to meet specific needs that
created nonstandard business processes. Campbell was like a many different stores ; each one
doing business differently . Confusing for customer
Infrastructure
Clean up its systems and transform it business processes
Not just process improvement; create more competitive and agile company
The Big Change
These were horizontal business streams. Standardizing and integrating these made them more
efficient and improved customer service
One Standard Solution
Not deviating from the process but offering on standard solution, even if its not perfect; the
standardization benefits will outweigh the loss.-David White SVP GSC
Total Delivered Cost (TDC)
New key performance metric to focus managements attention
End to end cost of producing a product and getting it to the customer
Created functional roles, which described the different sets of responsibilities that somebody
would need to perform in each process
Not necessarily cheaper to out source infrastructure operations and other technical
responsibilities; but
Campbell Soup Company has outsourced its day-to-day European treasury and cash
management activities to an external provider for a number of years. Prompted by a
change in our European cash management bank, we took the decision to review our
outsourcing arrangements, resulting in a change of provider.
Having conducted an initial review of the available options, we decided to send an RFP
to our existing provider and Bank of America. Based on the responses and follow up
discussions with both banks, we decided to transfer our treasury outsourcing to Bank of
America. There were a variety of reasons for this:
i) The business processes were more consistent with best practices and more
automated than our existing outsourcing partner.
ii) Our existing outsourcing partner had an arrangement where one relationship
manager was responsible for our business. This meant that if that person was on
vacation, sick or left the company, there was a knowledge gap which took time to
resolve and created some risk to our business. Bank of America had three-person teams
as opposed to a single individual working on each account, so there was less risk of this
knowledge gap occurring. So far, we have found this approach very helpful.