Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PHYSICALEDUCATION
Unit 1 Model Answer
Sports lessons have almost always been compulsory in schools in the West.
Recently, however, parents of children who are overweight or who have
difficulty doing sports have requested that the sports lessons be optional,
allowing children to decide whether or not to participate. Some educators and
health experts think this would be a serious mistake. In your opinion, should
sports lessons be compulsory? Why or why not? Discuss, giving reasons to
support your point of view.
Physical education has long been obligatory in schools in the West. In my opinion,
exercise is beneficial to all students, including those who are overweight. If sports
lessons were to become optional in schools, many young people might end up being
deprived of the exercise they need. However, making sports compulsory may not be the
best way to make exercise enjoyable.
No one can deny the physical and mental health benefits associated with sports. Many
young people have a sedentary lifestyle and spend long hours watching TV or playing
computer games and if physical education were no longer compulsory, those who opt
out might be giving up their sole opportunity to exercise. In addition, exercise has been
shown to increase concentration. Therefore, schools must ensure that young people are
provided with adequate physical activity. Otherwise students academic performance
could suffer along with their fitness levels.
Despite this, some people feel students should be able to choose whether they
participate in school sports. One reason for this is that overweight children are less able
when it comes to sports. For example, they may not be able to run as fast as their peers.
As a result, they could suffer embarrassment when participating in sports and may even
be laughed at by their more athletic classmates. Another reason against making sports
compulsory is that young people sometimes react negatively to being told what to do
and may dislike sports because they feel they are forced to take part.
To sum up, I believe physical education should be an essential part of any school
curriculum because its benefits far outweigh any drawbacks. However, while children
should be encouraged to take part in sports, I feel they should not be required to do so.
PRIVATESCHOOLS
Unit 2 Model Answer
Some parents believe private schools can provide a better education than state
schools. Do you agree? Is it fair that some people can afford to send their
children to schools which are not open to everyone? Discuss, giving examples to
support your views.
In most countries parents can choose to send their child to a private school rather than
to a state school. This choice is often made in the belief that private schools provide a
higher standard of education. In an ideal world, all children should have the same
educational opportunities, so many people feel that private schools offer an unfair
advantage to those who can afford the fees. I do not feel that this is such a bad thing,
however.
There are many reasons why a private education could be regarded as preferable. One
of the main advantages is the teacher-pupil ratio; smaller classes translate into more
individual attention. This means children get the help they require whenever they have
trouble understanding something. In state schools, where classes are usually bigger,
teachers cannot devote a great deal of time to each student. Furthermore, private
schools have more funds available for equipment such as computers, good sports
facilities and well-equipped science laboratories. A student who has the opportunity to
carry out a scientific experiment in an up-to-date laboratory is likely to learn more from
the experience than one who hasnt got these advantages.
Although it may seem unfair, inequality is an integral part of most societies and is
something to which we are accustomed. Some children attending state schools may not
do as well as they could academically because of insufficient teaching resources, but
many children leave state schools with impressive qualifications and go on to a
university education and professional success. At the same time, private education is
not always a passport to success. With support and guidance from parents and teachers,
any student can do well, whatever school they attend.
In conclusion, while private education can be advantageous, it does not always mean that
students at public schools are at a disadvantage. Governments should strive to improve
free public education without restricting a parents right to choose to pay for private
schooling for their children.
CHILD OBESITY
Unit 4 Model Answer
In some countries, health experts who are concerned about increasing child
obesity have called for a ban on the advertising of unhealthy food products on
television at peak viewing hours for children. How far is such advertising
responsible for childrens eating habits? How useful do you think such a ban could
be? Discuss your opinion, giving specific examples.
Childrens eating habits have led to a rise in the incidence of child obesity in many
parts of the world. Given the persuasive nature of TV commercials, it follows that child
obesity can be linked to junk-food advertising. But how effective would reducing
exposure to TV advertisements be in solving the problem of child obesity?
Commercials for candy and crisps often feature animated characters that children learn
to associate with a particular snack. This has proven to be an effective way to
encourage children to request that their parents buy these snacks. In addition,
manufacturers often make misleading claims in these commercials. An adult may
realise a chocolate bar is not healthy just because it contains milk. However, a young
child is not so critical. Although advertising plays a role in encouraging unhealthy
eating habits, other factors, such as parents attitude to food, are also important. If
nutritious meals are not served at home, how can a young child be expected to eat a
balanced diet and maintain a normal weight?
Restricting the type of commercials allowed when childrens shows are broadcast is a
worthwhile policy. Children would be less likely to want to eat certain products if they
did not associate them with their favourite cartoon character. However, children do not
only see programmes designed for their age group so they could still be exposed to
inappropriate advertising. Furthermore, children do not only find out about food
products from TV. A trip to the supermarket, for example, exposes them to shelves full
of packets of sugary breakfast cereals with free gifts inside.
To sum up, although development on this scale would change the face of the area, a
theme park would benefit the town where I live. Increased traffic and noise would be a
small price to pay for all the advantages it would bring.
TELEVISION
Unit 6 Model Answer
Television is sometimes said to be a reflection of society. To what extent do you
think this is true and to what extent do you think that we are influenced by
television? Discuss, giving examples to support your opinion.
Television is part of our everyday lives. Two, or even three, television sets can be found
in most households, and there are few people who do not watch television each day. In
many ways, what we see on the screen reflects current society. However, television can
also be said to exert an influence on viewers.
When we turn on the television, we learn about all aspects of the world in which we
live from the clothes worn by characters in soap operas to the social issues discussed
on current affairs programmes. In addition, the kinds of shows which are popular tell us
much about society. In many countries, for example, programmes which help people
become younger-looking or more fashionably dressed are popular. These reflect
societys obsession with appearance and the importance placed on youth.
It is also true that television exerts a powerful influence on us. The way the days news
is presented affects the way we feel about the events being described. While the news is
supposed to be unbiased, this is rarely the case. If we are not given all the details about
an event, for example, how can we form an educated opinion? Television does not only
have the power to shape public opinion about current affairs; in the arts, for example,
music programmes influence our preferences by giving more exposure to certain artists
than others. Viewers are also influenced by the opinions and behaviour of presenters,
celebrities and even characters in popular television series.
To sum up, a two-way relationship exists between television and viewer. Elements of
modern society are reflected in soap operas, comedies and dramas, and a look at a
television guide reveals much about our likes and dislikes. On the other hand, we are
influenced by what we see, often more than we might realise.
use of technology actually makes them busier with added tasks, rather than saving them
time. There is also a danger of over-reliance on machines. Should there be a power cut,
even the simplest task at work could not be carried out.
For these reasons, some people suggest limiting the use of computer technology.
However, I do not think this is either desirable or feasible. The advantages of computers
in terms of speed and convenience far outweigh the disadvantages, and such technology
is here to stay. However, we do need to guard against overuse of machines. While we are
unable to manage without machines, human intelligence and judgement are essential as
well.
TRADITION & CULTURE
Unit 10 Model Answer
Partly due to globalisation, the languages and traditions of some minority cultures
are endangered. How important is it to preserve them? Do you think people care
enough about this issue? If so, what can be done? Discuss, giving examples to
support your opinions.
In many parts of the world, certain groups of people are finding that their traditional
way of life, including the language spoken by their ancestors, is in danger of extinction.
As languages and traditions are wiped out, cultural diversity is lost. In my opinion, we
should fight to curb the effects of globalisation on minority cultures.
There are many reasons why endangered languages and traditions should be preserved.
Firstly, language and culture are closely linked; once a language disappears, a vast
amount of cultural information vanishes too. Traditionally, societies use language to
pass down their cultural heritage from generation to generation. This could be in the
form of stories told orally or instructions given verbally concerning crafts or hunting
skills. If language and traditions cannot be kept alive, young people will no longer feel
such a strong connection to their roots. In consequence, they will be deprived of a
strong sense of identity and pride in their origins. In many countries, unfortunately,
those belonging to minority groups have no choice but to adopt the language and habits
of the more dominant group if they hope to succeed professionally.
Sadly, it is true that this issue does not attract much attention. Most people would
probably argue that change is inevitable. Fortunately, efforts are being made in many
places to reverse the fate of endangered cultures. These include policies to ensure the
minority language is taught in schools. Schemes that enable local craftspeople to earn a
living by selling their handmade baskets, carpets and pottery have also proven
effective. These projects not only help protect the threatened cultures, but also raise
awareness of the issue.
To sum up, I believe that minority languages and cultures are definitely worth preserving.
Without the diversity they represent, the world would be a much less colourful place and
the national heritage of many people would be lost forever. Hopefully, efforts to protect
time-honoured traditions and ancient languages will continue to bear fruit.