Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Nor the Eye Filled with Seeing: The Sound of Vision in Film
Author(s): Stan Link
Source: American Music, Vol. 22, No. 1 (Spring, 2004), pp. 76-90
Published by: University of Illinois Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3592968
Accessed: 21-10-2015 01:44 UTC
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
University of Illinois Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Music.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 169.229.11.216 on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:44:56 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
STAN LINK
the
Nor
The
Eye
Sound
with
Filled
of
Vision
Seeing:
in
Film
The increasingly sophisticated use of sound and music in film has not
yet dispelled the notion that cinema is an essentially visual medium.
But whether or not film's primary address is to the eye, its visuality
has two faces. On the one hand, there is the sense in which film presents images to be seen: it captures objects for display. But on the other, we may also encounter cinema's visuality in its presentation of seeing for display: there are clearly ways in which cinema's techniques,
signs, and images become place-holders for vision itself. In other
words, along with objects, film presents modes of visual attention for
display. The point-of-view shot is perhaps the most obvious. Regardless of the object observed, the character's vision itself becomes visible. The visuality of film resides in its own looking, as well as in its
being looked at.
This active visuality typically functions as a narrative vehicle. Seeing becomes a nearly transparent part of how filmic characters take
in their world and, ironically, vision usually disappears into characters and plots. But what of a film in which a character stares through
a peephole, or stands and looks at paintings? In such instances vision becomes a narrative event: seeing has made the leap from style
to story. If only for a moment, vision may trump image. Promoted
from medium to content, seeing becomes action. As such, seeing becomes a candidate for the most evocative elaboration undergone by
any other type of film action-namely, it can become the topic of the
Stan Linkis the assistantprofessorof the Composition,Philosophy,and Analysis of Music at VanderbiltUniversity's BlairSchool of Music. He is currently completing the "Horrorand Science Fiction" chapter for the Cambridge
Companionto FilmMusic.His acoustic and electro-acousticmusical works are
performed in the United States, Europe, and Australia.
American Music
Spring 2004
? 2004 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
This content downloaded from 169.229.11.216 on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:44:56 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
77
soundtrack's characterization of screen activity. Cinema asks a question worthy of Alice to the Caterpillar: What does seeing sound like?
Theories of how soundtracks comment on particular images will
not provide an answer. Vision is not a concrete thing, nor is it an emotional act in and of itself. Typical metaphoric referents such as tempo, rhythm and affect can be made to refer to objects and motion on
the one hand, and subjective reactions on the other. But to what can
sound and music meaningfully refer when vision itself becomes the
salient action? Numerous instances may suggest that vision is, literally, not unheard of. And yet, what is there to encode? What are the
referents and how are they invoked? By way of relevant examples and
conceptualization in terms of the body and culture, this essay addresses cinema's aural encounters with vision as action.
This content downloaded from 169.229.11.216 on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:44:56 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
78
Link
tions for our identifications. But the filmic body leaves impressions
deeper than the symbolic or representational. The filmic subject is
experienced as though it is embodied. The film body's contact with its
world leaves traces that translate as contact with our own world. As
Vivian Sobchack so eloquently describes it,
more than any other medium of human communication, the moving picture makes itself sensuously and sensibly manifest as the
expression of experience by experience. A film is an act of seeing that makes itself seen, an act of hearing that makes itself
heard, an act of physical and reflective movement that makes itself reflexively felt and understood. Objectively projected, visibly and audibly expressed before us, the film's activity of seeing, hearing, and moving signifies in a pervasive, primary, and
embodied language that precedes and provides the grounds for
the secondary significations of a more discrete, systematic, less
"wild" communication.'
Thus we can expect filmic subjectivity to evoke not only cognition,
but perception. The intensity of the landing scene in Steven Spielberg's Saving Private Ryan (1998), for example, derives in no small part
from the fact that its acts of seeing and hearing don't belong simply
to an omniscient and disembodied camera and microphone. Instead,
this scene references physical embodiment and all its limitations of
perspective and scope-eyes and ears rather than lenses and tape recorders. The sequence overflows with corporeal moments: the splash
of a body submerging in the ocean muffles its ear until it resurfaces;
the explosion of a mortar shell causes temporary deafness; the metallic rain of metal shell casings ejecting onto the concrete floor of the
German bunker places the machinegun within reach. The soundtrack
is on a human scale. The distance is personal. Sound becomes haptic, touching at arm's length.
We "experience" these sequences via their circumscription to the
most immediate physiological dimension. "Wild" communication is
sensed paradoxically through its utter austerity of scope. The sound
and image in Saving Private Ryan crystallize Sobchack's idea that "cinema thus transposes, without completely transforming, those modes
of being alive and consciously embodied in the world that count for
each of us as direct experience: as experience 'centered' in that particular, situated, and solely occupied existence sensed first as 'Here,
where the world touches' and then as 'Here, where the world is sensible; here, where I am."'2
This content downloaded from 169.229.11.216 on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:44:56 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
79
This content downloaded from 169.229.11.216 on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:44:56 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
80
Link
a sense not in keeping with the present advanced industrial age
and its cultural anthropology.5
This content downloaded from 169.229.11.216 on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:44:56 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
81
Music as VisualSelectivity
One of the most familiar examples of this connection can be found
in the so-called shock chord, a term Roy Prendergast attributes to Scott
Bradley, who scored many of the best Tom and Jerry cartoons.7 Typically a short dissonant burst, the shock chord became a staple effect
during such moments as in Kitty Foiled (1947), when Jerry's new ally,
a canary, suddenly shoves a pistol in Tom's face. Tom's reaction is one
of instant mortification and, as its name suggests, the "shock" chord
would seem unproblematically emotional in its reference and effect.
Beyond emotion, however, closer consideration suggests that this
This content downloaded from 169.229.11.216 on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:44:56 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
82
Link
Music as VisualSpace
Herrmann's score for the Mount Rushmore chase in Hitchcock's North
by Northwest (1959) offers another sounding of vision. As in Vertigo,
the musical effect goes beyond the simulation of a purely emotional
response. From the point when Eve grabs the figurine to when she and
Thornhill reach the back of the monument, their escape has been musically tracked by an essentially rhythmic accompaniment that encodes
such elements as might be expected in cinematic pursuits: the flight,
pacing, pounding heartbeats, and so on. Just before Thornhill's line,
"This is no good. We're on top of the monument," however, Herrmann's score abandons its insistent rhythmic ostinato for a harmonic
interjection that breaks rhythmic continuity and inevitability. Both the
image and the soundtrack at this point imply visual astonishment in
This content downloaded from 169.229.11.216 on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:44:56 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
83
the edit from the characters to an image of the back of Rushmore revealing its intimidating grandeur. As in Vertigo,we confront a moment
in which vision is the narrative action. Thornhill and Eve have seemingly reached a dead end. And yet it seems even more difficult to hear
the soundtrack as a purely emotional response in this instance than
in Vertigo'sbell tower. Herrmann's musical commentary resonates seeing the monument more deeply than subjective anxiety.
This is confirmed a few moments later in the film. As Eve says,
"What do we do?," there is another such harmonic interjection, this
time accompanying an objective shot of the iconic faces of Rushmore.
The musical emphasis here is on geometric rather than emotional perspective. Elements like size, scope, and distance are briefly foregrounded, concepts that composer and music theorist Robert Morgan
succinctly identifies as among the metaphoric possibilities of music:
Anyone familiar with the philosophical and theoretical literature
dealing with music must be struck by the persistence with which
spatial terminology and categories appear. Indeed, it would seem
to be impossible to talk about music at all without invoking spatial notions of one kind or another. Thus in discussing even the
most elementary aspects of pitch organization-and
among the
musical elements, only pitch, we should remember, is uniquely
musical-one finds it necessary to rely upon such spatially oriented oppositions as "up and down," "high and low," "small and
large" (in regard to intervallic "distances"), and so on. Space,
then, pace Schopenhauer, apparently forms an inseparable part
of the musical experience.8
Morgan's point bears not only on how we "talk about music," but
on how we hear it. Musical listening refers to space in ways that transcend purely acoustic perceptions of distance, location, and orientation. We listen with reference to many of the same categories in which
we see. Spatial constructs are, however, more intimately identifiable
with visual data than with aural. While an object can really be, say,
small or distant in a visual sense, a "small" or "distant" object in a
musical sense may be at a lesser amplitude, "higher" frequency, etc.
In other words, while we can speak quite sincerely of space in terms
of vision, such categories in music are often metaphors.
The selectivity of visual syntax during these moments on Mount
Rushmore arises and becomes emphasized in the tectonic rift between
the musically "horizontal," that is, rhythmic, and the musically "vertical," that is, harmonic. This "spatially oriented opposition" evokes
geometric visual space while, as with the shock chord in Vertigo, sudden interjection encodes and reinforces the eye's penchant for dividing and actively selecting within that space. The musical motivic shift
This content downloaded from 169.229.11.216 on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:44:56 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
84
Link
This content downloaded from 169.229.11.216 on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:44:56 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
85
But even apart from other elements of the scene such as the closeups of Lester's rapt eyes, the focused lighting, and the sequence's
narrative structure, the musical style of the nondiegetic interjection
is crucial to creating and sustaining Lester's mesmerized view of
Angela. During his phantasm, the ensuing narrative stasis and visual focus are closely encoded by the static quality of Newman's percussive score. Although thoroughly energetic and engaging, the composer's music for this scene goes nowhere. Such a description for this
point in the film should be far from denigrating. On the contrary, the
effect of Lester's hypnosis would be ruined by the imposition of anything else-of music that imparted an awareness of time's inevitable
forward movement. Newman's score is effective not by virtue of its
melodic or harmonic writing, but rather in its very lack of traditionally conceived notions of melody, harmonic progression, tension and
release, anticipation, climax, and anticlimax. All are elements that
have traditionally imbued music with a sense of motion, of development, and all are elements eschewed by the composer's treatment
here. Newman's music for the scene is appropriately nonteleological.
In his work on musical temporality, Jonathan D. Kramer describes
music that presents "a single present stretched out into an enormous
duration, a potentially infinite 'now' that nonetheless feels like an instant." Kramer refers to this musical temporality as "vertical time."
In his view, vertical time appears as part of the expansion of musictemporal possibilities during the twentieth century. These alternative
temporalities arose in competition with the dominant teleology of
western music. Kramer describes the characteristics of vertical music
as follows:
A vertical piece does not exhibit cumulative closure: it does not
begin but merely starts, does not build to a climax, does not purposefully set up internal expectations, does not seek to fulfill any
expectations that might arise accidentally, does not build or release tension, and does not end but simply ceases. It defines its
bounded sound world early in its performance, and it stays within the limits it chooses. Respecting the self-imposed boundaries
is essential because any move outside these limits would be perceived as a temporal articulation of considerable structural import and would therefore destroy the verticality of time.9
Such qualities correspond closely to Newman's score for Lester's
fantasy: sudden onset, lack of formal/dramatic articulation, hasty
exit, and immediate circumscription of timbral and rhythmic resources. Newman's music does not drive the scene onward, but instead keeps it running in place. It does not track a forward motion
that is not there. Instead, it parallels the expansion and suspension
This content downloaded from 169.229.11.216 on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:44:56 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
86
Link
of time in Lester's gaze. Appropriately, Kramer's metaphor for vertical time derives from vision:
Listening to vertical musical time, then, can be like looking at a
piece of sculpture. When we view sculpture, we determine for
ourselves the pacing of our experience: we are free to walk
around the piece, view it from many angles, concentrate on some
details, see other details in relationship to each other, step back
and view the whole, see the relationship between the piece and
the space in which we see it, leave the room when we wish close
our eyes and remember, and return for further viewings. No one
could claim that we have seen less than all of the sculpture
(though we may have missed some of its subtleties), despite individual selectivity in the viewing process.10
In the vertical time of Newman's score, hearing becomes attentive and
hypnotically fixated in a manner characteristic of visual perception.
The musical stasis of the fantasy gaze is the stasis of visual selection
and concentration, especially when contrasted with the traditional
teleology and closure of the framing diegetic tune. "On Broadway"
returns as suddenly as it was banished, and the sense of having been
in a focused state of suspense is augmented by a return to teleological time and to typical visual and auditory space. But where the
soundtracks to Vertigoand North by Northwest may offer glances, Alan
Ball's screenplay and Newman's score stare. The static musical effect
is of extreme and prolonged concentration, and the film ear is attentive and fixated in a manner more characteristic of visual cognition
than of aural.
This content downloaded from 169.229.11.216 on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:44:56 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
87
the further into the past we see. In Contact, recent history is represented by a sequence of radio broadcasts that began emanating from
Earth in the twentieth century. As we journey farther and farther outward from present-day Earth into the deepest reaches of space, the
backwards passage of time is signified by popular songs and news
sound bites that stand as emblems of their times. Beginning in the
late 1990s, we travel back on a carpet of sonic snippets such as The
Trammps' "Disco Inferno," Armstrong's "small step" during the moon
landing, big band music, FDR's "all we have to fear .. ." and Hitler's speeches. All the while we are treated to a visually stunning panoramic tour of the universe beginning with our own planet and solar system, moving out to distant nebulae and galaxies and, tellingly,
concluding with the full-screen image of a child's eye. The temporally receding sequence of sounds becomes, appropriately, a "synoptic"
condensation of time and space-an "overview" of history and cosmography moving from present to past-from here to out there.
Contact's sound design borrows from visual space an ability to observe from outside or above and to conceive in terms of discrete objects. In Contact's synopsis of history, sound becomes ordered and
"uniformed" in a way imitating the ordered visual journey. Rather
than an "all at once," the soundscape is a "one after the other." Contact's prelude spatializes sounds, making separate entities that become
points on its "organized continuum." Here again, the formal aspects
of the sound design are part of its effectiveness. As in Vertigo, North
by Northwest, and American Beauty, sudden juxtaposition plays a pivotal role in establishing the soundtrack's visual reference. Hard edges are articulated, and the extreme fragmentation and disjunction of
the sounds involved are crucial to their objectification and ordering.
Literally and figuratively "spaced out," the auditory panorama of
Contact is hearing by way of a visual purification and rearrangement
of its subject matter.
This content downloaded from 169.229.11.216 on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:44:56 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
88
Link
This content downloaded from 169.229.11.216 on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:44:56 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
89
tanz or Berlioz in his Symphonie Fantastique. We can also find the decadent, grotesque waltz associated with the pathological in Richard
Strauss's Salome and Elektra. Shared in these are not only dance type
and style, but an underlying aesthetic of distortion. The nineteenthcentury fascination for the misshapen image complemented its appreciation of the grotesque: the image of the misshapen. Geared toward the production of imagery, as so much of romantic music was,
these concepts are, like Morgan's spatial metaphors, natively visual
categories. The very nature of the grotesque compels us to look even
against our will and seemingly punishes us for doing so. Underlining the cruelty of the situation along with the crude sensibilities of
his abusers, the misshapen waltz aggressively reinforces the elephant
man's position in the scene as a distortion. Precisely because it is repulsive, the grotesque incites desire for closer inspection. Significantly,
the score backs off long enough for the elephant man to be forced to
look at his image in a mirror. After his horror at seeing his own face
the mocking waltz resumes with conviction. Seeing the elephant man
see himself is the pinnacle of his humiliation, a debasement augmented in the score's repulsive fascination.
Further on, however, the cruel voyeurism of the porter's sideshow
and the significance of its waltz macabre pave the way for a wholly
different sort of amusement and waltz. The penultimate scene in
which Dr. Treves invites the elephant man to watch a theater production marks the climactic shift in his status: the film emphasizes the
elephant man's own gaze. As the stage production begins, the shot
of him being handed an opera glass and invited to look forms the crucial moment. Lynch unleashes a collage of reaction and point-of-view
shots now developing the elephant man's act of seeing. For him to
watch so publicly instead of being watched so publicly is quite a new
experience. Indeed, the theater scene also culminates the musical
transformation enacted over the entire film. The waltz genre now reappears significantly as one of grandness and brilliance. This new
topic shines luminously against the dimly lit diversion of carnival tent
music and the misshapen imagery of the waltz macabre. The cultural coding of the score modulates from a low style of mechanical instruments to a high style in which strings and harp predominate.
Musically and socially we have gone from amusement to occasion.
The theater scene displaces the sound of the opening "freak show"
and its one-way gaze with music of more social entertainments, such
as a ball, reception, or other large public gathering. There the gaze is
mutual and invited rather than unilateral. The musical change is in
the status of spectatorship itself and accompanies the elephant man's
transformation from passive, curious object to active and attentively
gazing subject who is himself now "curious." The grandness of the
This content downloaded from 169.229.11.216 on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:44:56 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
90
Link
waltz sanctions and magnifies his seeing just as the circus waltz sanctioned his being stared at. The visual significance of the waltzes on
the soundtrack are an integral part of the character's social transformation from the elephant man into John Merrick, from spectacle to
spectator.
Thus, even without invoking the notion of synesthesia, the idea that
the soundtrack can transduce seeing suggests that to use the ear is
not necessarily only to hear. Synesthesia may be another means of
exploring that possibility but does not acknowledge the ways in
which body and culture play on each other. Some aspects of perception are learned and provide cinematic style and signs, while cultural artifacts like cinema often refer to perception and may ultimately
reconfigure it. As such, it would be fairer to suggest that the most effective underscoring of seeing as action takes place when sound and
music form an aural theory or description of vision, rather than an
alternate means of sensing it. Or perhaps it is a way of experiencing it,
as we do with thought itself, without sensing it per se. In any case, if
film can thus extend, encode, and simulate vision by way of the ear,
then there may be far more seeing going on in cinema than actually
meets the eye, so to speak. Even the clear dominance of visuality in
film may not be enough for it. Or, in terms of what we might consider an early theory of film's sensory complex, found in Ecclesiastes:
"The eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear filled with hearing."
This truth is there to be seen, while that seeing itself may ask to be
heard.
NOTES
1. Vivian Sobchack, "Phenomenology and the Film Experience" in Viewing Positions,
ed. Linda Williams (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1995), 37.
2. Ibid., 37.
3. Marshall McLuhan and Quentin Fiore, The Medium Is the Massage (1967; San Francisco: Jerome Agel and HardWired, 1996), 111.
4. Rudolf Arnheim, Visual Thinking (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969),
19.
5. Theodor Adorno and Hanns Eisler, Composingfor the Films (1947; London: Athlone Press, 1994), 20.
6. Michel Chion, Audio Vision, ed. and trans. Claudia Gorbman (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), 33.
7. Roy Prendergast, Film Music: A Neglected Art (New York: Norton, 1977, 1992), 187.
8. Robert Morgan, "Musical Time/Musical Space," Critical Inquiry (Spring 1980): 527.
9. Jonathan D. Kramer, "New Temporalities in Music," Critical Inquiry (Spring 1981):
549.
10. Ibid., 551.
11. Michel Chion, David Lynch (London, British Film Institute, 1995), 60.
This content downloaded from 169.229.11.216 on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:44:56 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions