Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Directorate General
Environment, Soil and Coast Defence
This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the South East Europe Programme Managing Authority cannot be held responsible for
any use which may be made of the information contained therein.
Index
INTRODUCTION
GENERAL CRITERIA
6
7
7
7
7
8
8
9
10
10
10
10
11
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
15
16
18
19
19
CONCLUSIONS
22
22
GLOSSARY
22
OBJECTIVES
INTRODUCTION
Mining plays a very important role in the construction, infrastructure and industrial fields; yet it is characterized as a high-impact business due to the extensive modifications it causes to the environment
and the landscape and due to the consumption of non-renewable
resources that it requires. Therefore, accounting for environmental
considerations related to the correct identification and handling of
mining operations is a compulsory choice, especially in the case of
operations aimed at the natural and vegetation recovery of the quarries. This also implies the necessity to clarify early in the planning
phases the type of final layout of the quarry, in compliance with the
urban and territorial of the area: in this sense, in this manual, under
the term recovery from mining operations we refer to both a final
layout aiming at the creation of new biological habitats (normally defined as natural recovery) and to the morphological restoration of
the mining area for productive ends (referred to as restoration in
the following).
OBJECTIVES
This document aims to address the problem of the strong landscape
and environmental impact of mining operations. It provides guidelines for the planning of quarry recovery during the main operational
phases and it defines criteria necessary for the evaluation, project
control and testing of the mining operations. The document recommendations are based on the summary of the following experiences/
outcomes:
4
This document is addressed to civil servants and to industry professionals. It represents a training tool that provides useful indicators
for quarry planning operations that can be applied to address various
environmental issues.
GENERAL CRITERIA
In the past, the traditional approach to mining operations focused
on the exploitation plan, while the recovery plan came into consideration only at the end of the quarrys lifetime. This practice often led
to insurmountable difficulties in the recovery operations. In the prevailing approach: first we mine and then we restore, the rules were
only dictated by production requirements, which often overlooked
the issues of minimizing the environmental impact and permitting
sustainable recovery of the affected area.
To date, an integrated approach is applied: first we study the recovery and then we mine. This approach is based on the following conditions (figure 1):
1. a sustainable mining operation must be founded on the continuous interaction between the economical productivity component and the environmental component;
2. the planning and design team of the quarry must include professionals specializing in environmental matters;
3. the exploitation plan must be defined in a simultaneous and integrated way with the recovery plan. The goal is to making coexist the part of the quarry that is exploited with the recovered
one. In fact, the recovery should not be considered as the final
layout and closing phase of the productive operation, but it must
be kept in focus from the early planning and design phases. This
General operation
description
Operation
localization
Analysis of
anthropic factors
Analysis of
envronmental factors
GENERAL REFERENCE
OUTLINE
5
Definition of the
objective
Definition of the
desired complexity level
Definiton of the
restoriation characteristic
Definition of the
work intensity
THE PROJECT
Operations on
morphology
Operations on
bedrock
Bedrock improvement
operations
Operations on
water network
Operations on
vegetation
Maintenance
and management
Restoring times
Recovery
costs
Stabilizing
operations
Operations
for wildlife
approach will view the quarry recovery operation as an opportunity to consider in a unified framework various synergetic actions, such as the tracing of raw materials and their subsequent
re-usage for the reduction of hydraulic risks (overflow) or for the
reduction of water emergencies (reservoir for irrigation and/or
drinking);
4. opportunities for the removal of portions of land from farming
and productive use and its return to semi-natural conditions
should be investigated;
5. opportunities for realizing economic profit, e.g., by construction
of a recreational, cultural and educational centre that would attract tourists.
Based on these principles, we hereby suggest various actions to develop a sustainable, self-supporting and multifunctional recovery approach for mining sites. In this context the recovery and environmental requalification of the quarries must meet the following objectives:
1. suggest organizational measures that will enable carry out the
timely, economically affordable and successful environmental
recovery of the areas involved in the mining operations;
2. guide the designer in the preliminary evaluation process of the
reference scenario and in the definition of the project objectives
in order to guarantee realistic, lasting and sustainable environmental and landscape recovery;
3. provide reference examples and indicate potential mistakes that
should be avoided;
4. propose accurate technical indications for all the operative phases;
5. introduce methodological tests for the assessment of the recovery project quality and completion.
Physical factors
Climate Classification
Macro- and mesoclimate
Studying the climate requires collecting data over long periods of
time, concerning parameters such as temperature, precipitation levels, wind intensity, snowfall etc. In addition to global, average, yearly or monthly averages data on climate, it is also important to have
data concerning the maximum and minimum, both, average and total, that characterize the frequency of extreme events. In fact, the
extreme values highlight the limiting factors (excess of or shortage
in water, extreme temperatures, etc.), that will need to be considered during the planning phase of the recovery. The study of extreme
precipitation values is very important, especially for the definition of
the critical conditions that the hydraulic system will have to support.
At high altitudes, it may also be important to collect information on
both the extent and duration of snowfall. From an ecological point of
view, the data concerning humidity and the number of days with fog
are also very important, although generally difficult to obtain. If such
data are not available, it is possible to classify the site according to
general climate.
Microclimate
Regarding the general climatic conditions that are typical of a reference area, there is always a degree of local variability, tied to the
particular characteristics of the site or the measurement station.
Factors such as orography, morphology, hydrology and other can influence the climatic conditions at the station. It is difficult to have detailed data for these local conditions even for limited periods, as it is
difficult to install a specific meteorological station, even a simplified
one, for reasons of costs and management. Generally only important
and prolonged quarry operations (big mining poles) can enable an
on-site collection of meteorological data.
Usually the following approach is used:
1. informal direct information: through the in situ collection of useful indicators for identifying particular climatic conditions (e.g.
duration of snowfall, periods of fog);
2. indirect information: deducing the influence that the different
climate factors can have locally, taking into account:
the orography (presence of valleys, mass altimetry, particular
land configurations that influence the wind statistics and impact
certainly better to assess the problems in general terms. To organize all the information, geographical information systems (GIS) tools
could be useful.
Morphological Classification
It is necessary to have detailed maps at different scales, to find information on the morphology of the site and the surrounding area.
Generally we work with different scales :
during the designing phase: scale 1:10.000-1:5.000, or higher for
sections and project details;
during the planning phase: scale 1:25.000, 1:10.000;
Geomorphological maps are also particularly useful since depending
on the reduction scale, they represent all the geomorphological shapes present at the study site, thus defining different aspects, such as
the morphographic and morphometric characteristics (sizes, shape,
inclination etc.), the natural processes that are or were involved, and
the mutual relations and space distribution of these processes.
Geological and geomorphological classification
It is necessary to have at ones disposal a thorough description of all
the litho-geological features that characterize the site and the surrounding area, both on the surface and in the subsurface, and in particular:
1. static surface elements: these are represented by a Surface geological map integrated with a land survey. From this map we
can define the local detrital covers, the faults, the position of the
layers etc;
2. dynamic superficial elements: these defined by the geomorphological map, which enables the identification of all geological phenomena, with particular attention to landslides and to the
changes in the surface hydrography;
3. deep static elements (stratigraphy): these are established by
means of the Stratigraphic lithologic map, which identifies
the existing stratigraphy and its position. This enables defining
different types of materials involved in the remodelling; the lithological and mechanical characteristics of these materials
are necessary for planning both the mining operations and the
safe removal of land and raw materials. All of this information
is generally available, as the required steps are essential for the
accomplishment of the mining exploitation project of the site.
Pedological classification
10
The combination of operations that involve the substratum requires knowledge of the sites pedological parameters. First of all, it is
necessary to start with an overall analysis of the area through general pedological analysis of the site in order to determine the type
or types of soil found and characterize them by the most important
chemical-physical descriptive parameters. In addition, a careful pedological analysis of the site should enable the correct definition of
homogeneous sub-areas, characterized by sub-layers and uniform
ecological conditions.
For every identified sub-area, an in-depth analysis has to be carried
out (Pedological analysis of the homogeneous areas) to define more
precisely the environmental conditions and parameters that characterize the various highlighted layers. These two analysis levels should
be realised during the process of drafting a map at the scale 1:5.00010.000.
Flora and vegetation classification
It will be necessary to proceed with a preliminary field study in order
to define the flora and vegetation characteristics, both of the area
to be recovered and of the surrounding land. It is obvious, yet often
overlooked, that these studies can only be carried out during the vegetative period (spring-summer) and not during other seasons. However, when possible, its better to do a bibliographic research.
Flora census
In an ideal situation, this study should be carried out at least for two
years, with collections of samples on the field, repeated passages
along the same paths, etc. In the end, a flora list is compiled that systematically lists names and orders, based on the most recent floristic knowledge. If carried out correctly, the flora census allows to
photograph the environmental quality aspects of the site; in fact,
many species can be considered (based on the knowledge acquired
during many years of studies) as good ecological indicators. Therefore, besides characterizing the current condition of the site, the list
suggests suitable species for the subsequent recovery operations. In
fact, we will try to use, as much as possible, species that grow locally
and in particular those with special bio-technical qualities, such as
resistance to mechanical stress, high speed of propagation, colonizing ability also by vegetation, ability to improve the soil (e.g. leguminous plant), market availability, etc.
Study of the vegetation
The vegetation of the area, if present, and that of the surrounding
Landscape classification
The study of the landscape is mainly based on subjective and
objective approaches. The subjective approach for studying the
landscape is based on visual patterns; it is above all aimed at identifying the scenic qualities and uses the visual-perceptive analysis.
This method is mainly used for areas of undisputed value (parks, reserve, anthropic landscapes of high quality) or for areas under study
with no quantifiable parameters or bio-indicators. In contrast, the
objective analysis examines the biotic and abiotic characteristics that
make up the structure of the landscape; each analysis plan refers to
distinct scientific fields, such as geology, pedology, botany, silviculture and so on. Both approaches, however, consider humans as an
integral part of the natural system.
The landscape study aimed at assessing environmental impacts does
not focus entirely on landscape ecology, but it also introduces concepts connected to the anthropic system, such as environmental safety, salubrity and protection of historical, cultural, ritual values etc.
11
When studying the landscape, the selection of the optimal map scale
is important for both the analysis and the constructive-project phases, as well as for setting the hierarchy that allows identifying the
scale at which individual characteristics interfere. The most effective
tool to this end is the identification of the landscape units within the
studied area. The landscape units (UDP unit di paesaggio) are
landscape sub-systems, characterized by a certain uniformity, within
which the ecosystems distribute themselves in characteristic and
recognizable modalities. The process leading to the identification of
the UDP involves the following phases:
1. basic map-making, at the optimal scale, and (if available) aerial
photography;
2. mapping of the data for the biotic and abiotic components involved;
3. collection of theme maps and elaboration of specific themes;
4. superposition of theme maps;
5. identification of UDP.
12
If the study area has land level surface, networks and matrices can
be used. Networks consist of grids which (superimposed on the basic
map) subdivide the land into small blocks, i.e., elementary areas
whose size typically is a few hectares; these blocks are given quanti-
In addition to the physical characteristics, a reference outline concerning all the anthropic variables is also necessary.
Real use of the soil
It is important to know the normal usage of the site area and its surroundings. From this information we can obtain very strong indications or restrictions for the restoration process, in particular for reintegrating the site to the surrounding land during the recovery phase.
As for the vegetation, lithology and soil, in this case it is also necessary to support the analysis with appropriate thematic maps, using
the existing information (territorial and urban, vegetation plans etc.)
obtained from specific in situ surveys.
Territorial planning
Mining operations are normally defined following an administrative procedure (at the municipal, provincial and regional level), which
identifies sites that are potentially available: this represents an exclusive restriction for the startup of the entire mining operation. Upon
conclusion of the mining activity, knowledge of the legal framework
is important for the planning future uses of the area. Restrictions, or
potential requirements, arise in the first place by the targets set by
the planning norms specific for that area, or by the land use targets
of the neighbouring areas. They could also arise from a specific norm
(for example the presence of a park or a reserve in the area).
Further restrictions may also derive from the need to protect and safeguard the landscape (landscape plan, norms on the use of vegetal
species etc.), as well as from the need for health control (the use of
organic fertilizers, restrictions for the spreading of particular plants
that carry diseases such as fire blight, blights, etc. it is therefore necessary to possess all the norm information and if possible a specific
map at the suitable working scale.
Restrictions and constraints
In addition to territorial constraints, there are specific constraints
that could affect the post-mining organization; such restrictions are
not linked to the programming, but to the presence of particular and
precise requirements, e.g., the passing of long-distance power lines,
pipelines, roads, railways and airports, i.e.. It is important to identify
such constraints in order to adapt the subsequent reuse and layout
to their presence.
13
Economical aspects
14
In addition to external constraints (customs, planning etc.) it is important to also define the constraints that arise from the investment
plan and the actions foreseen for the mining operations and the subsequent expectations. This information defines the requirements of
the mining operations that will restrict the entire subsequent recovery operation. Only on the basis of the cultivation plan and the final
layout, can one define the recovery times and modes, thus promptly
quantifying all the actions to be implemented, including the subsequent maintenance and management of the area. In addition, having
from the very beginning an economic outline is very important for
planning the final layout of the quarry areas in the best possible way.
In the past we have always tried to keep this expense as minimal as
possible: the final layouts, especially those not aimed at productive
goals, have always been considered as unjustified or unnecessary expense, a gift to the local governments. This facilitated the reuse of
the abandoned sites as agricultural destinations also in unsuitable
areas that lack management structures (farms), and thus favour lowefficiency solutions, from both the economical and environmental
standpoints.
Methods of exploitation
The recovery plan comes into action at the end of a mining operation.
Therefore, the design of the deposit exploitation represents essential
information. It enables us to define the surfaces (mining lots) and the
final substratum upon which to operate and thus defines precisely
the final morphological and geotechnical conditions of the site.
Furthermore, from knowledge of the mining methods we can define
ways and times of possible recovery phases.
Expectations on site use after mine closure
Often, decisions concerning final recovery of the site are not based
on planning or ecological or landscape restrictions nor but on economical or legal expectations tied to the ownership and management
of the area. Therefore all the juridical relations between the owner
and the quarry operator as well as the restrictions caused thereby
should be carefully defined. In order to precisely verify the feasibility
of the proposed choices, it is necessary to specify who will carry out
the restoration operations as well as who will use the site and for how
long.
It is necessary to precisely define the ownership regulations of the
soils involved in the mining operations and of all the neighbouring
areas. Everything has to be defined by means of cadastral maps,
usually on a scale of 1:2000. This enables identifying the owners and
defining the present and future expectations that will determine the
15
These and other spatial relations among the various entities are called topological relations. They are essential for carrying out a series
of spatial and statistical analysis operations that constitute one of
16
as the design of the work and exploitation plan of the deposit. Usually, the recovery requirements are considered as secondary, both in
terms of importance and of time spent on it, compared to the exploitation project and the economical investments. This leads to the
drawing up of unsuitable, if not impossible to carry out, layout plans,
as they are prepared according to a morphological system devised
only in mining terms that avoids any in-depth analysis or interaction
among the various planning stages.
The recovery requirements should be treated on an equal footing
when all the relevant decisions are made. In the past this procedure
caused serious environmental and landscape damage and a general
distrust of both local governments and citizens of mining operations,
with a consequent significant increase in the expectations of the recovery and the payouts that the operating companies must pay in
order to work. A closer relation between the requirements of immediate use and future reuse would enable us to optimize the decisions
and the projects, with a consequent price control of the recovery
costs, while at the same time increasing the effectiveness of the operations. The possible objectives should be considered in different
ways: in ecological terms, they can be classified depending on their
relation with the natural processes as:
Cosmetic objectives: these comprise disguising and cleaning
of the area; they are considered as pure and simple engineering
operations, also with strong initial morphological and ecological
layout investments (superficial fill of top soil), yet with a specified time, considered as a temporary stage of final recovery destination that its not yet been defined.
Sustainable-objectives: these refer to containment and control
related to the destruction of natural systems through purely
technical operations that are self-referential, focus on the engineering aspects and do not involve -except perhaps at a minimal
level- natural processes (re-naturation). This kind of recovery can
be effective and have a medium to long duration, but they are
always require a periodic reworking operation.
Self-sustainable objectives: these refer to measures that are
mainly ecological, and aim to activate the natural processes necessary for stabilizing and enriching the restored area. In addition to the containment and control of the limiting factors, these
measures aims to restore the natural dynamics, to go beyond to
the impacts determined by the restoring works. This definitely represents an optimal option in the long term, which allows
with the same number of resources used, achieving a highly stable and balanced condition. The possible final use destinations
are as different as the conditions and constraints that have to
be considered. The possible destinations are further elaborated
below.
17
18
The quality and the result of the recovery process depend on varying
conditions, at least in the short and medium term. Natural recovery
is an ambitious objective, which is difficult to accomplish, requires a
good knowledge of the area and the ecological relations present, as
well as long implementation times. A good working organization is
required both during the phases of topsoil removal and of the site
recovery, as well as careful handling of the pedological and biologi-
Agricultural destination
In this case, we assume that an agricultural type of productive development (both extensive and intensive) is favourable. This must
establish itself stably both in biological and economical terms and
the area, in order to be returned to its original use, must not have
particular limits for agricultural production, such as the following:
a) Natural constraints: they represent an ensemble of microenvironmental factors that impede the agricultural production and include:
chemical restrictions: presence of microelements that are toxic
for both plants and animals;
high presence of salts;
presence of extreme pH, both low and high;
physical constraints;
high inclinations;
abnormal stoniness and texture;
limited layer thickness;
limited ability for water supply accumulation.
b) Economicalsocial constraints: these include the group of economical and social factors that limit the vitality of farms, such as:
ownership: a stable agricultural business is favoured by the possession of the land;
management: the agricultural business can be established only
in the presence of a farm that guarantees good management
qualities;
productive infrastructures: the agricultural business can be established only in the presence of a network of services and infrastructures for the company, that will help to make it competitive
from an economical point of view;
social infrastructures: presence of services, roads, etc. at the service of the company and owners.
cal material present. For soil management it is very important, besides having good quality material at ones disposal, to reconstruct a
succession of layers that do not slow down or impede the evolution
processes foreseen for the specific type of landscape unit.
These quarry layouts are suitable for all the locations where natural
areas are disappearing due to the economical development.
19
20
not always available within the technical offices of the various government institutions.
Therefore, the necessity arises to facilitate the analysis and control
over both the initial planning of the operations and their implementation (work tests). For this reason, two check-list has been developed to assist in these activities.
The check-list takes into account the different types of operations
that follow sequentially on the decision path that leads to the design and implementation of the project (starting from the choice of
objectives and attending with the choice of vegetation and its management). The check-list also include a list of points in which more
important quality-quantity information is required for a correct assessment of the work.
The check-list is organized into two distinct analysis plans:
A concise plan: this underlines the overall aspects necessary for
the analysis of every project phase. This plan must always be
completed;
An analytical plan: in this plan detailed information is requested
on the technical aspects of the current assessment phase: this
represents all the additional information.
Furthermore, the check-list for the individual types of intervention
can be used as general summary documents of the site and can also
be associated to the various landscape units that are present.
Upon completion of every type of activity the check-list requires,
after the analysis phase, an assessment of the project phase, which
involves:
1. Qualitative part: this concerns the presence or absence of activities works considered necessary and/or planned and in case
omitted. This assessment provides for three different opinions:
suitability (the phase is in accordance with the technical requirements), modification (when additions or changes that are
not fundamental are necessary), total restructuring (when it is
necessary to rethink that intervention phase). To this end, the
check-list directs the assessment providing technical choices (R
for reworking, I for integration) to be adopted when there are
lacks or omissions. Based on the total of these individual concise
assessments, an overall opinion can be formulated. This should
be an assessment directed towards the tools used in the implementation of the project;
2. Quantitative part: expressed on a scale between 0 100, this
concerns the chosen intervention objective relation. As a matter of fact, a project phase may appear to be technically correct,
yet at the same time unsuitable for the proposed aims. This is an
opinion that is mainly directed towards the goals of the project
and the possibility to achieve them.
The assessment phase of the interventions can be divided in two different investigations:
1) During the assessment phase of the project, the assessment may
be based on:
information taken directly from the printouts: in all the project
phases the crucial aspects fundamental for the successful outcome of the operation are defined; the check-list requires this
information (presence, absence, entity) which enables an easier
opinion;
technical considerations: based on the experience the quantityquality suitability of the technical choices must be assessed by
comparing them with the supplied instructions and/or requirements, providing for the Reworking (R) or the Integration (I) in
order to adapt the project choices to the necessities.
2) During the testing phase of the operations the assessment may be
based on:
A direct comparison between the operations carried out and the
approved project: the check-list requires the verification of the
interventions carried out and their compliance with the project
(RAP: rispetto al progetto in respect to the project) providing
for three possible options: overlayed, slightly different (requiring
integration -I), different (requiring reworking -R).
A comparison between the operations carried out and the technical requirements: besides the administrative aspect, it is also
necessary to assess compliance with the quality of the interventions according to the planned purposes. Interventions that
are insufficient for the purpose of the work may jeopardize or
nullify the entire recovery operations. This comparison must be
carried out during inspection by observing the effects of the interventions and subsequently highlighting the pre-set spaces
(appropriate not suitable), and quantified in the RET box: (RET:
rispetto alle esigenze tecniche in respect of the technical requirements), each time providing for either the integration (I) or
the reworking (R) of that aspect.
A comparison between the operations performed and the legal
requirements: from the analysis conducted there may emerge
omissions regarding the legal obligations that remained unresolved during the project and the executive phase. Having omitted certain techniques or certain works may, for example, arise
vulnerability of the area, thus jeopardizing not only the design
but also the stability of the site or the surrounding areas. These
inadequacies must be underlined and solved during this phase
by requesting either integration (I) or reworking (R).
A detailed analysis of the various project phases and individual interventions to be carried out, especially during the testing, definitely
creates a heavier workload for the tester. However, this activity represents a very important step in the decision process: in fact, it enables the constant control and verification of the choices made, the
assessment of their validity and the identification of possible faults.
Thus the check-list requires a series of data that can go beyond the
contingent needs of the test (RET) but which enable this type of con-
21
CONCLUSIONS
22
GLOSSARY
Best practices: methods and techniques that have consistently
shown results superior to those achieved with other means, and
which are used as benchmarks to strive for. Nevertheless, there is no
practice that is best for everyone or in every situation, and no best
practice remains best for very long as better methods and technologies are constantly being discovered.
Biotic: relating, produced or caused by life, or living organisms; it refers to the living components of the biosphere or of an ecosystem;
compare with abiotic.
1. glossary: http://www.businessdictionary.com/
2. glossary:http://www.allbusiness.com/4967379-1.
html?spi=profb&query=management
3. glossary:http://www.goodquarry.com/glossary.
aspx?mode=showaz&az_id=19
23
www.sarmaproject.eu
www.ermesambiente.it/difesasuolo